{"id":39013,"date":"2010-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-04-24T13:24:32","modified_gmt":"2014-04-24T07:54:32","slug":"rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 28778 of 2010(V)\n\n\n1. RAJESH,S\/O.RAMAN NAIR,AGED 35 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SAJIN SASI,THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n3. AJITH,POLICE CONSTABLE,VADAKKEKAD POLICE\n\n4. SURENDRAN,POLICE CONSTABLE,VADAKKEKAD\n\n5. JOSHY,ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n6. DINESAN,POLICE CONSTABLE,VADAKKEKAD\n\n7. STEPHEN,POLICE CONSTABLE,VADAKKEKAD\n\n8. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.K.NANDINI\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI\n\n Dated :25\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               K.M.JOSEPH &amp; M.C. HARI RANI,JJ\n       ==============================\n\n                   W.P.(C). NO.28778 OF 2010\n          ============================\n\n           Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010\n\n                            JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>K.M. Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The petitioner has approached this court seeking the<\/p>\n<p>following reliefs:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        i)to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st and<\/p>\n<p>        8th respondent to act upon Ext.P1 and act upon the<\/p>\n<p>        respondents 2 to 7 in accordance with law;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        ii)to issue a writ of mandamus directing 8th<\/p>\n<p>        respondent to grant effective and sufficient<\/p>\n<p>        compensation to the petitioner for the physical and<\/p>\n<p>        mental torture of respondents 2 to 7 fully<\/p>\n<p>        recoverable from the respondents 2 to 7 later;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        iii)to issue a writ of mandamus directing 1st<\/p>\n<p>        respondent to engage police officers unconnected<\/p>\n<p>        with respondents 2 to 7, preferably from another<\/p>\n<p>        distant station, for granting adequate and sufficient<\/p>\n<p>        protection to the life of the petitioner&#8221;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wpc 28778\/2010                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      2. The case of the petitioner in brief is as follows. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is a small time business man. It is alleged that on<\/p>\n<p>26.7.2010 when he was standing in Guruvayoor Railway Station,<\/p>\n<p>appellant took him to police station. There is an allegation of<\/p>\n<p>physical torture including third degree method on the person of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner in connection with Crime No.119 of 2009 under<\/p>\n<p>Section 420 IPC. There is also reference to petitioner&#8217;s mother<\/p>\n<p>filing a complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate,<\/p>\n<p>Kunnakulam as C.C.590 of 2010. The accused in the said case<\/p>\n<p>included one Sabu and Kannan. It is stated that accused are<\/p>\n<p>powerful and highly influential. The mother of the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>sent several representations to the Honourable Chief Minister of<\/p>\n<p>the State, Home Minister, etc. In Crime No.119 of 2008 lodged<\/p>\n<p>by uncle of the petitioner, though there are other accused, the<\/p>\n<p>ordeal of torture was meted out only on the petitioner and the<\/p>\n<p>other accused roam scot free. It is stated that the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>taken   on    26.7.2010   from    Guruvayoor      Railway    Station.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner&#8217;s mother is alleged to have filed the petition. There is<\/p>\n<p>again allegation of torture and it is the case of the petitioner that<\/p>\n<p>torture and harassment was caused by four people who are<\/p>\n<p>accused\/respondents in O.S.482 of 2009 before Munsiff&#8217;s Court,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wpc 28778\/2010                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Chavakkad and M.P. Nos.4637 and 7701 of 2009 before JFMC,<\/p>\n<p>Kunnamkulam. Both the cases are regarding bank loan and<\/p>\n<p>cheating the petitioner&#8217;s mother granting fake promises. Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>is the order passed by JFCM. Ext.P5 is the plaint in O.S.482 of<\/p>\n<p>2009 filed by the mother. Ext.P6 is produced as M.P filed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s mother pending before JFCM, Kunnamkulam.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner is undergoing treatment for the torture.<\/p>\n<p>      3. A statement is filed as directed by this court by<\/p>\n<p>Superintendent of Police, Thrissur and on behalf of first<\/p>\n<p>respondent. It is interalia stated as follows. Crime No.119 of<\/p>\n<p>2009 under Section 420 IPC was registered on 21.3.2009. The<\/p>\n<p>case was registered based on a complaint filed by one<\/p>\n<p>Sachidanandan Nair who is the uncle of the petitioner and he<\/p>\n<p>was in possession of 1.44 acres of land which belonged to him<\/p>\n<p>and his sister, mother of the petitioner. It is his case that the<\/p>\n<p>said property belonging to him and his sister was fraudulently<\/p>\n<p>pledged by somebody with Union Bank of India, Alappuzha<\/p>\n<p>Branch and had obtained an amount of Rs.50 lakhs from the<\/p>\n<p>bank. Sachidanandan Nair is around 61 years and totally blind.<\/p>\n<p>He only stated that the property was pledged by one Arjuna<\/p>\n<p>Constructions, Alappuzha. Crime No.119 of 2009 was initially<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wpc 28778\/2010                 4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>investigated   by Sri Abhilash the then S.I of Police. He was<\/p>\n<p>transferred on 10.7.2009. Further investigation was conducted<\/p>\n<p>by Sri Ranjith, who replaced Sri Abhilash. The investigation<\/p>\n<p>conducted by Sri Ranjith, revealed that accused 1) Shyam Raj,<\/p>\n<p>2) Sabu, 3) Rajesh and 4) P.S.Balaswamy Pillai were involved in<\/p>\n<p>the crime and he had filed report before Honourable Judicial<\/p>\n<p>First Class Magistrate Court, Kunnamkulam.         Petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>accused No.3 and the then Manager, Union Bank of India,<\/p>\n<p>Alappuzha Branch is accused No.4. The mother filed a petition<\/p>\n<p>alleging that accused mentioned therein had approached her and<\/p>\n<p>secured title deeds and they will secure a loan with meagre<\/p>\n<p>interest. However, in view of Crime No.119 of 2009 filed by her<\/p>\n<p>own brother for the same cause of action, the action is dropped.<\/p>\n<p>S.I Renjith was replaced by the S.I of Police, Unnikrishnan on<\/p>\n<p>8.2.2010 and he continued the investigation. There is reference<\/p>\n<p>to Sabu and Kannan being involved which was revealed on<\/p>\n<p>questioning of Sabu. Unnikrishnan, S.I of Police was replaced by<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent on 18.5.2010. The allegations of the<\/p>\n<p>accused being unlawfully detained, mentally and physically<\/p>\n<p>tortured etc was denied. The accused was arrested and the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was arrested by second respondent from Guruvayoor<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wpc 28778\/2010                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Railway Station on 28.7.2010 observing all proceedings. Thus<\/p>\n<p>he was questioned and produced before the Court on the same<\/p>\n<p>day and remanded to judicial custody by the learned Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p>Reference to another cheating case is also pending investigation<\/p>\n<p>in Guruvayoor Police Station in Crime No.236 of 2009. Iti s also<\/p>\n<p>stated that Vadakkekad Police Station         has received three<\/p>\n<p>petitions in recent past against the petitioner from Suresh<\/p>\n<p>Kumar, Savin and Subaida respectively alleging that the accused<\/p>\n<p>had deceived the petitioners using various methods. A warrant<\/p>\n<p>from Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Calcutta was received from<\/p>\n<p>Vadakkekad Police Station       against the petitioner.  There is<\/p>\n<p>reference to the investigation in Crime No.119 of 2009 revealing<\/p>\n<p>various aspects. It inter alia states that a caucus is revealed to<\/p>\n<p>be operating in this field, i.e., collecting documents and title<\/p>\n<p>deeds from innocent parties under some pretext and then<\/p>\n<p>forging documents pledging it with banks for huge amount. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that the petitioner herein was a party to the conspiracy<\/p>\n<p>and had supplied the title deed and other documents without the<\/p>\n<p>knowledge and consent of his mother and uncle and collected a<\/p>\n<p>substantial amount from the loan amount.        The allegation of<\/p>\n<p>torture is disputed.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wpc 28778\/2010                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      4. As regards the allegation of torture, etc which is denied<\/p>\n<p>by the party respondents, we feel that it is open to the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>if he is aggrieved to approach the concerned forum. So also we<\/p>\n<p>feel that we leave open prayer No.2 also. We see no reason at all<\/p>\n<p>for a direction to engage police officers unconnected with<\/p>\n<p>respondents 2 to 7, preferably from another distant station in the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings in this case. However, we leave it open to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to approach any superior officer in this regard and<\/p>\n<p>seek such relief.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. We record the<\/p>\n<p>submission of the learned Government Pleader that respondents<\/p>\n<p>will be only investigating the matter in accordance with law and<\/p>\n<p>there will be no harassment or torture to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>                                      K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                    M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE<br \/>\nlgk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 28778 of 2010(V) 1. RAJESH,S\/O.RAMAN NAIR,AGED 35 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. SAJIN SASI,THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 3. AJITH,POLICE CONSTABLE,VADAKKEKAD POLICE 4. SURENDRAN,POLICE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1101,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010"},"wordCount":1101,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010","name":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-24T07:54:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajesh-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-25-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajesh vs The State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}