{"id":3927,"date":"2010-01-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-02-24T16:25:00","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T10:55:00","slug":"j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Swamy<\/div>\n
1 \"V\n\nI? -31.3... Hl\u00e9ir\ufb01 GQURT QF K..A..R..HATAK.A\n\nAT BANGALORE\n\nDated this the 8*-*1 day 1L;\nBetween: ' V ' .\n1. J HEMA.C\u00a3{A:s\u00a7DRgg\u00e9g' 7   PE'T'E'I'IONElR5S\n\n~  5lf:  :j._[Bg ]\u00a7:;;i  P~i\"E\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7)11.\u00bbAdV]\n\n1. s*m_'1*:::%%o1'=*  $5 OTHERS  RESPONDENTS\n\n; 'V _  _[Zv'is'4 Gectila Manon, AGA for R\u00bb-1;\n  M] 2: Ashok'  Associates 65 R Subramanya\n \"Advsfor R-2; Ms Aujana Snndar, Adv for R~3 5:. 4;\n..     U Abdul Khader, Adv for R-5]\n\n ~.  \u20ac*2\u00a7'\u00a7s--..w*:\u00a7'\u00a3% PETITEGN ES FILI3\ufb02 EENIJER AR'E'ECLES 226 ms\n\n213? QFTHE-.v.$GN8'FITUTEGN (BF ENDIA, PRAYENG TC} DIRECT 'THE\nRESPC}iS\u00a7DE'I'\u20aciTS TS TAKE IMMEDIATE STEPS TC? COMPLY WFTH\nTHE {1E\u00a7?;ECTI\u20ac3N ISSUE?) BY THES CGURT AS PER ANNEXURE-A\n\n : AND FURTHER D1REC'I\"E'Ir{E RESPONDENTS TO EVICT, DEMQLESH\n T'HE. S\"E'RUC'E'URES ON THE PARK AND QESTORE THE LANE AS A\n PA.F<'.f{ AN!) f33'f'C,,\n\nTHIS PETITIQN IS COMING ON F03 FUEVFHER HEARENG\n\nV'  "'f'HiS DAY, SHYLENIJJRA KUKAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n\n\n\n2\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Per L Naragarza Swamy, J:\n<\/p>\n
Ms Anjana Sundar, Rearmed counsel <\/p>\n
3 an\u00e9. 4, made submissions thgt  <\/p>\n
heard in part, may be  <\/p>\n
the said submission has \u00a5:)c*.%\u00e9,’11.._VI..}:1z;1(Vi<'-.:..<;';\u00a5::(;<x
\naddressed by her clicfmts —    4 -~ to her
\nan\u00e9 Inarldng cepy V<ii'-fit. ,  J-udgc -Justice: D V
\nShylendra  aI1{.-?;aiI;s::i::   Chief Justice.<\/p>\n
2. wave gi;;:e4.:,$;fe:;gjI%; “Sf1s:V_Eetter dated 11.1 1.2009<\/p>\n
produced    s_ui\u00a7$itted by the Registrar
\n(Vigilance), ‘vi\/’i_161″;?:i11”}s1 remark has been made<\/p>\n
against aformei? jucig\u00e9, t\ufb02lich makes me to recuse frem<\/p>\n
 n;\u00a3i{t\u00e9f’;”L g\ufb02gcordj\ufb01gly, piace the matter before the<\/p>\n
 for appropriate orders.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nPer D V Shyiendra Kumar, J<\/p>\n
3. When the matter was taken u\u00a7 for .4 Ms
\nAr\ufb01ana Sunday, learned counsel for respor:fc:1:”er,1t:s:V  4,’<\/p>\n
made a submission that the m\u00a7:\u00bb1t”t?e:” may  Ecficegsed \u00a7’1:()1:\u00a31f <\/p>\n
part heard. While I was  Ito:\n<\/p>\n
{he request, as my leaI11Ve(}.vL:’L: :'{)Ifothht”:r’~-
\nSwamy had some resfttijyfatiofi’ fflatvjthe learned
\ncaunsei who has  should mention<\/p>\n
the reason as’ R} f1’i7I”1y;=__SU;iZ\u00a71′;S’\u00a3ZIb\ufb011iSSiQI} was made.<\/p>\n
4. :\u00a73i1t:iCiaTf-,  COL1I”}S\u20ac1 for respoladents
\n3 an\u00e9 4 \ufb01lf\ufb01f\ufb01ifitf the mason in the: court, as<\/p>\n
theV1\u00abE:;;arI1\u20ac:’tiw {;_v’;f>mf1%l f._\u00e91ii the counsel and the judge are<\/p>\n
 V’  . gt ghe \ufb01id\ufb01teiits of the letter received from her<\/p>\n
  ‘VV<:,'1_:'1{V=:'2'i*.'.'$',' sha had been instznlcted to make a<\/p>\n
sA1:241;2I:::13;_ss:i ;;%1j;=a Asaekirxg to release the case from hearing<\/p>\n
V n bcihi\ufb01  Bmch.\n<\/p>\n
 H However, on counsel being apprised that she need<\/p>\n
‘ not have any reserva\ufb01on in reveafmg the rmsans and that<\/p>\n
\u00a7\/<\/p>\n
-w Maw” WWW-mm vowm aw\u00bb\u00bbmww~wamwm~m $u!\u00a3K*~\u00a2’I7’5i- my-‘wwwmgi we uswwmaemawwwwazr. <2'e,:s='=.x'wa uwwma<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\nthe court proceedings are open proceedings; tlaatthere is<\/p>\n
no private transaction between a counsel anria’ a<\/p>\n
party and a judge, and it wiil be in the   <\/p>\n
reveal as to the reasons for nixaking j,s’u_(:1″‘i’  s11h_\ufb01*1i\u00a7s\u00a7en’~.._ V<\/p>\n
and in the meanwhiie the counsel”  ail_ ‘jf)1.4e3e’:’;t
\nin the court having been  the letter
\nhad been received ‘  me  Ms \ufb01ekashamma,<\/p>\n
President, Priyadarshi12i:’_i*\u00bb4ai\ufb01Vi1Ls1 ‘Ne 13, 2336’ Cross,<\/p>\n
Okalipuramg    i\ufb01agar, Bangalore-2 1,<\/p>\n
addressed   and had been<\/p>\n
received at-griyi  wtiieh-reads as ‘under:<\/p>\n
‘PR:YAeARSr:i:’v;.”MAH1LA MILAN
\n_(,’l’ Lakshmanjv-.Rc2e Itfagarg # 13, (2nd Cross
\n3  eAOka\u00a3r;i;u,r:arn, Bangaiore — 560 021<\/p>\n
 w    e 4V{Presidenz ; Prakashamma)<\/p>\n
Eate I 1*} }~–2009<\/p>\n
ire:\n<\/p>\n
 ” 53:3; Aiijana Sunder (Advomte)
\nA’  ‘#._1.?’0, MRCR, 18*?! Cross
\n“\u00a7V\u00a7;’ayanagar, Bangelere-40<\/p>\n
V’ H H Respected Madam,<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
Sub: Partiality by Judge Shailendm
\nKmnar hearing WP No
\n16206\/2005<\/p>\n
We, the undersigned, (on behaif (3,? _o
\nhouses) wish to submit this my kind ‘letter’  V.
\nyour kind consideration and favourabke
\nAmma! we comes \ufb01nm poor   ‘
\nbelongs to SC community.  We are; poor  ”
\nand straggling [sic] hard to  :1 xsquare’-:;}edIVV
\nper day.  ‘     <\/p>\n
Amma! we are miaeh thomk\ufb01tl V30 E<3\u00a5e,~\u00bbfor
\nwinning our cases suo\u00e9ier.$;sjix.lly \u00e9md'rii'ade: us to
\nbuilt [s\u00e9c] our 33 houses,  'iaonowirzgiothe loan
\nof 6! sum of R$"'\u00ab.12.'00;0DQ,'.-_ {Rupees tweive
\nlakhs only] for  expenees, it is very
\nappreciat-able [s%'<\u00ab:l.f<=zi yaw? g\u00e9od <\/p>\n
 """  ,?1m:i'i%z3' we""were""\u00a3?Lere at the court hall.<\/p>\n
   .- "re: Kumar has neglected<\/p>\n
ebout V  the order passed by
\njucigeee  was shown,<\/p>\n
"said 'it is not that judge'5<\/p>\n
" _i Vgmnd f:;ther's property to change dimerttion<\/p>\n
     ciimention [sic] was changed
\nV .. _ _Vac.ccx:f\u00e9i'z'ng to wrporatiorz plan only.<\/p>\n
. ‘    One Mr Hanumcm thappa was<\/p>\n
::.et_”z;1A any association during 1999. He has<\/p>\n
 z ier\u00e9tted [sic] the faise ease against as in WP No
\nv1_{:\u00e9910\/1996 that he was a preeident of<\/p>\n
Okzalipuram Resident? Welfare Associetiien, I8’<\/p>\n
 Cross, Bcmgaiere-21. Then \ufb01cs\ufb01ee<\/p>\n
Chandrashekaraialz, found the reality and
\nwarned him not to repeat the same and stop
\neheaiing eouzt. The case is not public interest<\/p>\n
e\/o<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
favour so far judge said he is confused about
\ncase.\n<\/p>\n
Amma! we shail approached them -.\n<\/p>\n
judge for suitab\ufb01e justice    _
\nshailendraicwnar is doing thejudgenz\u00e9nt rI;$.hzLs4 –
\nown without hearing our Aci;n;2cates;’ ‘A:zi’r_mc:if.we  <\/p>\n
shall transfer this case toCsom’e\u00ab ether ;iuS2n_:e <\/p>\n
future. Otherwise, 33 fari2iZie$ \u00bb25Q.’pe’c;r:’rEe
\nwill be on roads, we are poo’r. and  ‘  <\/p>\n
Thanking you,  ‘  T –\n<\/p>\n
%   Ai\u00e9iurfs faamay,<\/p>\n
     {\u00a71’HANDRAM\u00a7\u00bbIA)<\/p>\n
The  ”  ”  (fourt of
\nKamataka, Banggaicref’  .. _ \u00e9<\/p>\n
_   J.u.s\u00a3L’o\u00e9; -.;SVLVqt’9ref\u00a71e Gem’: of India,
\n  I  …..  4.\n<\/p>\n
  High Court of<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01qngaiore<\/p>\n
 V  RE}  *4}: Gundu Rao, 3 E, MLA,
\n‘ ‘ -\u00ab I jv ‘ ~ Gxzndhinagar<\/p>\n
   Meena, Corporation<\/p>\n
‘ ‘ \u00ab  -\u20ac.?ofte3missioner, Bangaiare<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
wrmmu-uum max-wmm\u00a5w1v.\u00a55 Wm xwwummwxmmwrmim  mwammm ‘t…,\ufb01\u00a3E” \ufb01”‘\u00ab’u2’~%$?\u00a7E,\u00a3’%\u00a7,\u00a7-‘K)g%’-:k’\u00bb~.;\u00a7”\u00a7\ufb01% \u00a7””E\u00a7$g:r&”\ufb01 <\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
and 011 my recoliecting that a certain letter of this r1a\u00a5:t1re{<\/p>\n
had tbxtwarded to the Regstrar (Vigilance) for exam\ufb01lati\u00e9ij’: ”<\/p>\n
and to submit a report and that a report  <\/p>\n
submitted by the Regstrar (Vigilance)  a se\u00a7z;u c;::’?<\/p>\n
the report; of the Regstrar Vigi1ance.[‘\u00bbVas S1i\ufb021I}}DI1\u20acd’;i(3.t:}j\u00e9  V<\/p>\n
COIIFL<\/p>\n
6. it was opened irl the   caf
\nccsunsei etc. The re1::;\u00a3>z?:t:V    V{‘:ourt hail
\nby Ms Anjana  counsel for
\nrespondents    the counter
\nfiled on beha}t” nqi”‘ 4 to the main writ
\npetitien.  _ V’ % ‘ A J ‘\u00bb<\/p>\n
  :\u00a731;2_i'<i:<:ti(:I2 on behalf of the respondents 3
\n  v3.I1ci \u00e9  \ufb02iatter before this bench appears to
\n aicf\ufb01ording to mass respondents, the prsesenft
\n Qe\ufb01\ufb01o\ufb01\u00e9rs have I19 bang: fades in presenting the Writ<\/p>\n
  $2" majrztaining the petition and that they have<\/p>\n
'V V  d'eiii\u00a7\u00e9?at\u20aciy suppressed Certain earlier developments and<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
mwwrv-wamm wwm m"M!"0nuE\\M:hct-ras'\\\\x|m',9a was wvcm ww-wwwnvm-m<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\nparticularly {he i\u00e9ct that this court; had enquired about
\nthe facts of the case from one R .HanumantI1appa, who<\/p>\n
had been described as the prosiciont of  <\/p>\n
residents' welfexra association, who was 1;Hr;\u00e9" 'WI'if:_T1E\u00a5(;:tiI.ii3\u00a51(i\u00a7"–..'<\/p>\n
in WP No 16910 of 1996   af.__ <\/p>\n
supporting a\ufb02idavit to
\nwas secured before the ootifii' the   \ufb02lrouggh
\nthe good oi\ufb01ces    counsel
\nappearing for the prostsxii;  as this Court
\nwas very      the said
\n'ocoo:'d\u00a71g to respondents 3 and 4,
\nis the    the present writ; pe\ufb01tion and<\/p>\n
 has be\u00e9:1.._;;\u00a7iayi\u00a7"Lg fraud on this court D.0\u00a7 only While<\/p>\n
o ;p;if:$o3:?1\ufb01i:1gA:V'\u00a7VP No 16910 of 3996 but also :11: date and<\/p>\n
" =t:1&io.re:i'o1'V{.=\u00a3_"&– ._ showiizg S(}I}fl\u20ac importance or gving some<\/p>\n
promii\u00e9otioo to the saiz\u00e9 person in getting facts quite<\/p>\n
 V. \ufb01a;t:;1rf\u00e9;1ly has Created doubts and suspicion \ufb01r; the minds
\nof {hose respondents about they getting a prayer order or<\/p>\n
 "justice from the hancis of this court and that is to be the<\/p>\n
\u00a7"\u00a7N.;%\u00a7"% \u20ac$\u20ac\u00a7?U\ufb01'\u00a7<\/p>\n
wmww vm.ar-wmm van-"tw:I""'twwu"m m&i\ufb01"haVWi$ '9oou"'W"4u\u00a7mni' 'k-M5" W6\u00bb4""\u00a7\u00ab%K\u00a5'\u00a7\u00a7j1'%\u00a7W\u00a7\u00a7*&aW\u00a7:    -\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02  V<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
reason \u00a301′ seeking the matter to be reimsed \ufb01tnn part <\/p>\n
heard.\n<\/p>\n
8. The mm respondent ~ Ms Prakashamma    <\/p>\n
present in the court and 011 enquiring,1’1’thE\u00a7:i:g:h  ” <\/p>\n
indicated that she has no objectiofi -.tE(3:?._%t\u00a51eA.’13c1;3.tte;*i  <\/p>\n
heard by ttis bench, has :a:e;~%%–s;;ateg\u00a7-:;\u00a7;ii;;~eM’%1:1;ne
\nit would be better if the matt;\u00e9f&’_T_is \u00e9\ufb01lvii-‘.’\u00a7’\u00bbent to
\nsome other bench, \u00ab    2  iV\u00a7V\u00a7:;’)ondent–
\ncommissiomr of  Palike is
\nnot carI’ying   in a gmoper<\/p>\n
raiaxmer and as ‘h\u00e9 is  of the oxdexs<\/p>\n
and diractigns iSsa=1u1\u20ac:dVVtj:yAt11iS”‘p%ic:0ur1: and the third and tha<\/p>\n
f\u00e9iiixih 1*\u00a7i\u00a7p\u00a3.:nde.nts  to harassment and in this<\/p>\n
staid \u20ac3\u00a7T_   state that it is desirabie that the<\/p>\n
 . “”-“t\u00a3ratter \ufb01gheard: heibre some ether bench.<\/p>\n
.1  .. S2’;-._S  Baht}, Rearmed counsei for the petitioners<\/p>\n
 ._t_1_a\u00e9;-‘ 1:}i;;t f\u00a7’:Asrtk1 a very streng objectien for the matter being<\/p>\n
.  V  Ar\u00e9:’}:\u00a7\u00e9;S\u00a7:ci, ibr the reason that the matter had been heard by<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
this bench earlier and frivolous and S{3″i}3’I’i.lO1}S 0T’\u00a7$_ieg:tions
\nhaving been raised by the respondents 3
\navoid U13 bench and if the r\u00e9aquest is
\namounts to giving
\naround fer benches to hear’t1}eir4\u00e9CaJ%\u20acs,
\nhealthy development in 3;::*g:)p\u00e9;3i”‘–\u00a7\u00a7L:c2 IV\u00a71iIz1:i}snV;atjon of
\njustice an\u00e9 more ve’::” _._\ufb01;\u00a51t:’  in the
\nnature of a pubiic  a request for
\n   beach on the mere
\napp1’e1;\u00a2;*;:$iQ1\u00a7   of respendents 3
\nand   ~::1:1erit acceptance, on the face
\nof it  gtrozlgly urges for rejecting the<\/p>\n
req\u00e9gt\u00e9st far tfansfer. V<\/p>\n
   – }:fh\u00a2\u00bbv44:\u00a7e \u00a7.;r: of the Registrar {“v’ig’lan<::A”0m4W\ufb02= %r\u00bb’b\u00a2si”‘8:\u00ab\u00a54Ws2’1’<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
16. This writ petition is in the nature of p’t1.E:ii{ij”-ifitgirest<\/p>\n
iitigation and wlaenever this court. entegiain\ufb01  ‘–%p}1}31:Ec<\/p>\n
interest iitigation, the petitioners    <\/p>\n
bI’iI}g a cause before this C{}1]I’f ?35.I”}:{<\u20ac1   i19 t~.p{;rS\u00a7i1$\u00bbV'v2ho<\/p>\n
are neither persens   Vhat\u00e9tg\u00e9i\u00e9\u00e9i'  {in tm\u00e9
\niitigation] I101' are par\u00a7ox1s'.._fg':;r a\ufb01};y"'Apa=:i:sona1 reiief
\nor bene\ufb01t, unlike in  f3:f'i,'tzrc";1':f;t::;:"\ufb01;1V*1t<_\u00e9jf<i%–s-3"'i\u00a7::};i"ij_ga%:ion, where the
\npetitioners   in a suit or a<\/p>\n
petitioner"   \u00bbp'e\u00a7i?,iGz1,':'V.ciair;r1iz1g reiief for himself or<\/p>\n
herseif.\n<\/p>\n
17. Whethefksuch  pursue a petjijon or even
\n1’11; 3.  F%s.eexi\u00a3:g.Vi2\u00a7r s.g\u00a7m1drawa1 of the writ petition,<\/p>\n
that  .i1;sci\u00a7’ ~is–,z\ufb01c2t__ the criterien far dismissing a ‘public<\/p>\n
  i11ter”es1\u00a7f,2ctiii:i1::e with iaw.<\/p>\n
@\/<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
the directions an\u00e9 orders, the Bnmut Baxagalore<\/p>\n
Maha-nagara Paiike may act in a  to<\/p>\n
the detriniem of the fespon\u00e9ents 3 and  <\/p>\n
nothing beytmd putting forth :\u00ab3;”E:1t\u00a7i’:~.*zj1\u00a713t.”‘ <\/p>\n
28. In  33. acihdressed to the learned<\/p>\n
COILIITISEI {qr t31\u00e9’~vr;\u00a7’spQ:1d\u00a3:nf$”‘LV3 and 4, marking capies 01’<\/p>\n
which  amgl t11\u00a2’i\u00a7:1c;x:’b1e Chief Justice, is Concerned,<\/p>\n
it’is_.i11;\u00a71’t:.  and appears to be an attalnpt is get<\/p>\n
“‘~V”*$}1e ma\ufb01a?  0f the mnsideration by mis particular<\/p>\n
” i;ji3:\u00a2:1’1\u00a2:A21, faff\ufb01ize reascms best imown to the respendents 3<\/p>\n
   net on any discemabia iegitimata appreherzsion<\/p>\n
18<\/span>
\nof bias on the part of one of us, constituting thddjvision<\/p>\n
bench.<\/p>\n
\n2 1. Even on our repeated   <\/p>\n
Ms Pmkashamma has only    ”\n<\/p>\n
that the orders and ‘may
\nmisused or abtzsoda   ‘co;111.i1i\u00e9;s’ionc;:\u00a7r, Bruhut
\nBangalore Mananag\u00e9ro :>a1i:<\u00a2   demment and
\ntherefore s1j1..\u20ac'\u00ab   shouid go before<\/p>\n
some othc\u00e9f 'Lf:–n\u00e9:i'1\u00a7'\u00ab.._ 9  <\/p>\n
22.  __ it is the duty of this court to<\/p>\n
ensure that A\ufb02o\ufb02 pubiic acts in a highhanded
\nnprzarmer  oothat iaz\ufb01i is oot taken into their own hands<\/p>\n
 every a(\u00a7I:ion: Is. _:o be in ful} consonance with the law<\/p>\n
  and ii”;  c”:or1oo1iQ(1f:Ct: i\u00e9s7it13 fa:\u00b0ir–p1ay and in compliance with
\n:77 _ tho pz\u00e9noipleoof xi’1a'{}}I’3i justice.<\/p>\n
 rE1aci oariier ijtlciicated in the order dated 4\u00bb1};~<\/p>\n
 that the Commissioner, Bruhut Bangaiore<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
Mahanagara Palike should submit a report indieatfmg the
\npcssibiiities for rehabilitatien cf third and tile fourth
\nrespondents and ether like persons, if :beC:;mes
\ninevitabie that they may have to
\npremises if their \u00e9weiiing  {Be  n
\namenity area. V — 2 V x<\/p>\n
I24. On this aspect, Ms   eouneel
\nfor the respondents 4″,’   appeam
\nto be some   measurement<\/p>\n
of ea*,rm :\u00e9;fi{e\u20ac}~.1br 8  and the subject matter of
\nthe et\ufb01\ufb01er  or\ufb01y the area covered by<\/p>\n
parVi~:,_ it  e’u11g3t7._g;d expanded in the present writ<\/p>\n
    11; is 1’16?2:”materiai for the present purpose, as to<\/p>\n
  ‘What  iihe”_jeivie amenity area bandied over by the then<\/p>\n
c::y% im~pife\u00a7:einen\u00a3 must board in favour of the Bangalore<\/p>\n
 City eefpczra\ufb01en, as it) in what marmer that should have<\/p>\n
”   utiiizevzi er maintained is a mateer on record and does<\/p>\n
V%  V. ._..;\u00a71ot admit any controversy abeut it. The only issue in<\/p>\n
2 1
\nOkalipura, Lakshmanagar Area. Eangalore. it is”–.not an<\/p>\n
aliotment ofa house property or site itseif.<\/p>\n
26. Be that as it may, the question is<\/p>\n
civic amenity area which 3if1ad\u00bb_,,4b_sf”:t”:1_1 “_e’1?1t1*u’s_te(V\u00a55 :’forV.._ V<\/p>\n
maintaining and admhiisteritlg fo1′.’a
\ncivic body – the then city   —- can
\nbe diverted by the  or even
\nby the state governntentes  property owned<\/p>\n
by either  1;g'”ei*”\ufb01’1″e state govemment.<\/p>\n
27. it iS:’-.\u00a71  i11 iaw that a trustee<\/p>\n
Cannot appropriateVe1f”i3;i1:?\u00a7;;1\u00a7i4o;3riate a property held in<\/p>\n
{met \u00a3'(::1*.%l:t’;1’V1ct~ bez1ei:\u00a7t…ot’  beneiiciaxy and the position of<\/p>\n
the  is not any di\ufb01erent from that of a<\/p>\n
 to  the civic amenity area for the bene\ufb01t<\/p>\n
 ofthe re’3id7:\u00a7:;t\u00e9’,4′.oI’tI1e ioeaiity, to maizltain it as a park, to<\/p>\n
  izp — ._g:o\u00a3:\u00a3st111c:tion to have a maternity home, chiid<\/p>\n
   eentre and ward o\ufb01ioe. It is the duty of the<\/p>\n
 Atfiahanagara pahke to maintain. the civic amenity site as<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
W-WWW” we *\u00bb’wWw’wWnWAwwW1s Hmmw Vwmmwwi we”  Wi\u00a7W\u00bb’a\u00a7’\u00a7Ti MK\/”Z.-*’\u00a7\u20acL\u00a7   \u00a7’\ufb01\u00a7WW \u00a3..”\u20ac..3w\ufb01N<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
in a matter such as the present one, which is esse11t\u00a7aH5; at
\npublic interest litigation, private interest \u00e9gyen
\nmuch importance or promizzenee not cane
\nfor such purpose. Apart from
\nhas been specifically directecikte 4}f)(:.\ufb02\u00a7:”i’:-:te<1 <\/p>\n
by a special order by   .;)j11ei:ice and
\ntherefore the    Bench,
\ntheugh it \u20ac3()1}I(i_ have..bee\u00a7J 1eeI1er bench of this<\/p>\n
court.\n<\/p>\n
3:2. H0we\\.?e%\u00a3’,’~.ii1 vim  t.he “\u00a7esire and sentiment
\nexpressed  4. my V .._brother Justice Narayana<\/p>\n
Swamy, Vthat   W:”~i.1it1;sA”\u00a7:d””feeuse himself from further<\/p>\n
 \u00e9hiswzase Hfe1″‘”‘i:%1e reasen that the respondente 3<\/p>\n
W’ mm. VV. W >.~.x’mywA’\u00a3 $<\/p>\n
  a letter to their counsel 1:0 make a<\/p>\n
L”-V”eu\u00a53n1:iS$ie1},~ recf\ufb01esting the ehange ef bench and the<\/p>\n
” i;jiee;1’*n:ed eezx\ufb01sel for respondents 3 and 4 has else filed :3.<\/p>\n
 :1′}e1:1{; fe {hie effect befere this court expressing<\/p>\n
 nea\ufb01ilr\ufb01-filensien foe \u20acO1{11Z\u00a7I1’l_\u00a3i1f}g the matter befere this bench,<\/p>\n
?%<\/p>\n
27<\/span>
\nbinds on the commissioner and the comnzission\u00e9\u00e9’-iTs \u00e9uty<\/p>\n
bound \u00a30 obey that order.\n<\/p>\n
35. However, in the meanwhi}e,._   “wig.
\ndirected H) submit a
\nrehabilitation of the rcsp\u00e9n\u00e9ients   ot\u00a71ers,
\nthey are ultimately 17.9  ‘\ufb01’a<iz'11~  present:
\nposition, if rule ot'1ax;*'  provisions of the
\nKarnataka and the Rules and
\nRegmatioh\ufb01  to be implemenmd.\n<\/p>\n
36.   1\u00e9aI’:1ed counsei appearing for
\nthe s\u00e9ce\ufb01d  Mahanagara Palike<\/p>\n
  like  V’ plaice an afti\u00e9avit sworn to by the<\/p>\n
\u00bb  Bruhui: Bangalore Mahanagara Palike,<\/p>\n
” ‘i\u00a7ici1ic$.i:ii9ig;..  action taken so far and the a\ufb01idavit is<\/p>\n
pL’;{::r\u00a7d’V.bc::””::%;:Vvr\u20ac the court fer such purpose;<\/p>\n
  For want of time, While it may not be passibie to<\/p>\n
 V. ..  the c0r1i.:e:;’1ts of the ai\ufb01davit teday itself, the<\/p>\n
Q\/A<\/p>\n
ww.wwww\u00a5sm\/”‘w\u00a5AmU’V\\ mmwm W-wmww xzwm” mmm,wm\u00a7Mm,m mn;;_zs;:~:i; mwm\ufb01g my   ‘\u00a7-  ygg\ufb01gg \ufb01g\ufb01\ufb01fg”<\/p>\n
28<\/span><\/p>\n
Commissioner is directad #1:} submit 3 {Luther  about<\/p>\n
the comparative position mi’ the propesed  _ Lu1x1its<\/p>\n
located at the housizlg board houses a:..\u00a3{i_ii’ga1;\u00e9:;j’api;ifa,.. :d’:.__<\/p>\n
be given in piace cf the ]’Z)I’\u20acS\u20acI”l’i;_ buildings  0Cc2.1p}it3i{)1.’1 of’ 4]<\/p>\n
respendents 8 and 4 and?\n<\/p>\n
they are to be displaced    to whether
\nthe proposed dweHi1i::\u00a7:”u::;i:t%s  w\u00e9y\ufb02on par with
\nme faciiities that  existing dweiling
\nunits new %    0 <\/p>\n
38. The   in Ai\u00e9fiditgate if respondents 8<\/p>\n
and 4 a<I;(:i -.Q"t:l'".:.<=:V1\u00b0  . will have to incur any<\/p>\n
additiona\u00a7_V{:xp<\u00a721ri_itur\u00e9 f{;15\u00a3\u00a7i_1ch purpose, as it is highly<\/p>\n
I-'\u00a7ii\u00e9sirAab'}\u00e9;' thatths: f\u00e9\u00e9pcindents 3 and 4 and other 31<\/p>\n
pei~:\u00a7(i:3\u20acig_$'V 6i" i).ow 0<:cupam:$ in a stnlcture buiit by<\/p>\n
 fu;':\u00e9.'\u20ac'_\u00a7n a housing caoperative and beiengng<\/p>\n
" i:jt+3_  Vwgakef' 'vfK;3Cti0I1S of society and they shouicl not be<\/p>\n
  with any further cast or expenditure.<\/p>\n
\u00a2\/<\/p>\n
k~:#'nlli'0bm"'"M Mwwwa mwwmn war" mmnwmwmmmm EWEWW mwammz\ufb01 WE'" \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01w\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \u00a7"'\u00a7%?\u00a7;\u00a7\u00bbW @\u00a7.:\u00a73\u00a7.J\u00a7\u00a7N'<\/p>\n
29<\/span><\/p>\n
39. Theugil Ms Prakashamxna [third <\/p>\n
V-my passionately plead that thir\u00e9   <\/p>\n
respondents and other 31    <\/p>\n
to remain in their Present\ufb01lace  wOBl’dA, Ili\u00e9itz ‘t::V
\ndisturbed, that is a  to  “”<:l\u00e9(:icxi'ef:ci on the
\nappiication of the rai\u00e9vant  1;.he:.f'a1ct \ufb01itiiation and is<\/p>\n
not a matter which I   {gr Q?-ders in any othsr<\/p>\n
way other t,]\u00a7']"Ei'.f'l'::::,\u00a731V .'–1.<5.'–:'<)23'(:i;-'aix1c'\u00e9': .wifr1v–\u00e9aW, which is the duty<\/p>\n
of the court.\n<\/p>\n
40. The  ‘s~.~\u00a2p*oj:-to  (Vigilance), submitteci ix:<\/p>\n
the c01″zt\u00a7:xt <:}vf'L\ufb02ie'v3et';tic3rA 11-11-2009 fmm 3"' and 43*<\/p>\n
 addr\u00e9s' to their couase} Ms Anjana<\/p>\n
 _  Vczypj; of which had been sent to my<\/p>\n
%$  %\u00bbA\u00a21~;a\ufb011*:;:5ei~ 3,I';{i 1_:3i;1 which : had ciirectted the Regstrar
\n submit a. report, is hereby directed to make
\n  \u20ac335. Regsuy is directed to keep 1:116 report:<\/p>\n
V  %%~\u00a7:\u00a7i};;::iit:ee1 by the Regstrar (Vigiiance) along with the<\/p>\n
Q\/,<\/p>\n
 ' ~ ..m3cords of this case;\n<\/p>\n
we-s'”‘<& aa!:rA\u00a5*6\u00abm"!I\u00a3aI "*nurW\u00a21I'Mw|W.i\ufb01<\/p>\n
30<\/span><\/p>\n
43. List {hr-2 matter next Week beibre the  ~<\/p>\n
constituted by the Chiefdustice.   ._<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Swamy 1 “V I? -31.3… Hl\u00e9ir\ufb01 GQURT QF K..A..R..HATAK.A AT BANGALORE Dated this the 8*-*1 day 1L; Between: ‘ V ‘ . 1. J HEMA.C\u00a3{A:s\u00a7DRgg\u00e9g’ 7 PE’T’E’I’IONElR5S ~ 5lf: :j._[Bg ]\u00a7:;;i P~i”E\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7)11.\u00bbAdV] 1. s*m_’1*:::%%o1’=* $5 OTHERS RESPONDENTS ; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJ Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2968,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\",\"name\":\"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010"},"wordCount":2968,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010","name":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-24T10:55:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/j-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}