{"id":39301,"date":"2010-05-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-01T14:23:41","modified_gmt":"2018-01-01T08:53:41","slug":"suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 20116 of 2009(H)\n\n\n1. SURESH K.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE MARUTHONKARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE\n\n3. K.P.SINDHU,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.RAVINDRAN (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :20\/05\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                  K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n               ---------------------------\n             W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009\n           -----------------------------------\n         Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010\n\n                       J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
The reliefs prayed for in the writ petition are the following:<\/p>\n
i.   issue a writ of mandamus or any other
\n     appropriate writ, order or direction, directing
\n     the respondents 1 and 2 to implement to the
\n     direction in Exhibit P3 order which has been
\n     confirmed     by   Exhibit   P6    Judgment     and
\n     terminate the service of the 3rd respondent as
\n     Peon in the 2nd respondent;\n<\/p>\n
ii.  issue a writ of mandamus or any other
\n     appropriate writ, order or direction, directing
\n     the 1st respondent to direct 2nd respondent to
\n     appoint the petitioner herein as Peon in the 2nd
\n     respondent forthwith;\n<\/p>\n
iii. issue a writ of mandamus             or any other
\n     appropriate writ, order or direction, directing
\n     the 2nd respondent to appoint the petitioner
\n     herein as Peon in the 2nd respondent forthwith;<\/p>\n
iv.  to declare that the petitioner is legally entitled
\n     to be appointed as Peon the 2nd respondent and
\n     that the 3rd respondent is not entitled to be
\n     appointed as a Peon in the 2nd respondent, that
\n     her continuance services as Peon is highly
\n     illegal, violative of the directions in Exhibit P3
\n     confirmed vide Exhibit P6 and that she is to be
\n     removed from service forthwith;\n<\/p>\n
v.   issue   a   writ   of  certiorari   or  any   other
\n     appropriate order or direction calling for the
\n     records leading to Exhibit P2 and quash the
\n     same;\n<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n
      vi.    issue a writ of mandamus or any other
\n             appropriate writ, order or direction commanding
\n             the 1st respondent to produce the copy of the
\n             review petition filed by the 3rd respondent
\n             pending before him before this Hon’ble court,
\n             declare    that  the   1st  respondent    has   no
\n             jurisdiction to entertain a review petition against
\n             Exhibit P3 as per the Act and Rules and
\n             especially when Exhibit P3 order has been
\n             upheld by this Hon’ble Court vide Exhibit P6 and
\n             issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate
\n             order or direction to quash the same;\n<\/p>\n
      vii.   issue such other writ, order or direction, as this
\n             Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the fact and
\n             circumstance of the case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      2.     The second respondent, the Maruthonkara Panchayath<\/p>\n
Service     Co-operative    Bank    Ltd.   invited  applications for<\/p>\n
appointment to the post of Peon as per the notification issued in<\/p>\n
2005. The petitioner had applied for the post. She was called for<\/p>\n
the written test. According to the petitioner, five persons<\/p>\n
appeared for the written test. Thereafter, on 21\/1\/2006, an<\/p>\n
interview was conducted and four persons appeared for the<\/p>\n
interview. They were (1) Rakhi P.T. (2) Jyothiprasad Jayan K.P.<\/p>\n
(3) Suresh K (4) Sunila K.C.. According to the petitioner, she<\/p>\n
was assigned rank No.3 among four persons who attended<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
interview. Rakhi P.T. was appointed. It is stated that Jyothiprasad<\/p>\n
Jayan went abroad. According to the petitioner, he was entitled<\/p>\n
to be appointed in the vacancy which arose. Instead, Sindhu K.P<\/p>\n
was appointed as per Exhibit P2 dated 10\/7\/2007. The petitioner<\/p>\n
filed W.P.(C)No.813\/2008        challenging the appointment of<\/p>\n
Sindhu. It was contended that Sindhu was appointed overlooking<\/p>\n
the claim of the petitioner. That Writ Petition was disposed of<\/p>\n
directing the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kozhikode<\/p>\n
to dispose of the complaint raised by the petitioner within one<\/p>\n
month from the date of receipt of the copy of the judgment. After<\/p>\n
hearing all the parties, the Joint Registrar passed       Exhibit P3<\/p>\n
order dated 17\/7\/2008 holding that the appointment of Sindhu<\/p>\n
was illegal. The Joint Registrar arrived at the following findings:<\/p>\n
   1. In the document showing the names of the persons to<\/p>\n
      whom the hall ticket was issued under certificate of<\/p>\n
      posting, the name of Haris was scored off and the<\/p>\n
      name of K.P. Sindhu was included.\n<\/p>\n
   2. In the demand draft appended to the application<\/p>\n
      submitted by the candidate, in the demand draft<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
      obtained in the name of Haris, the name of Sindhu<\/p>\n
      was interpolated.\n<\/p>\n
  3. In the minutes dated 21\/1\/2006 of the Sub-<\/p>\n
      committee, interpolations were made and the name<\/p>\n
      of Sindhu was included as rank No.2. Number (2) was<\/p>\n
      Jyothiprasad Jayan and his number was changed as<\/p>\n
      No.3. The rank of the petitioner shown as No.3 was<\/p>\n
      changed as No.4 and the rank of Sunila K.C., who<\/p>\n
      was No. 4 was changed as No. 5.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
  4. There      were    interpolations in the entries and<\/p>\n
      manipulations in the minutes book.\n<\/p>\n
  5. The manipulations of records were made in order to<\/p>\n
      give illegal appointment to Sindhu.\n<\/p>\n
  6. Sindhu was illegally appointed and therefore, she is<\/p>\n
      liable to be removed from the post.\n<\/p>\n
      3.     It would appear that Sindhu filed a review petition<\/p>\n
before the Joint Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed the<\/p>\n
review petition as per Exhibit R3(a) order dated 30\/7\/2009. It is<\/p>\n
submitted that Sindhu has filed Exhibit R3(b) appeal dated<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n
17\/8\/2009 before the Government and that appeal is pending.<\/p>\n
Exhibit R3(c) Stay Petition was also filed by Sindhu in Exhibit R3<\/p>\n
(b) appeal. It is submitted that no stay was granted by the<\/p>\n
Government in Exhibit R3(c) Stay Petition. Before Exhibit R3(b)<\/p>\n
appeal was filed, Sindhu had approached this Court in W.P(C)<\/p>\n
No.23681 of 2008 challenging Exhibit P3 order dated 17\/7\/2008<\/p>\n
passed by the Joint Registrar. The Writ Petition was disposed of<\/p>\n
as per Exhibit P6 judgment. For the sake of convenience, the<\/p>\n
judgment is extracted below:\n<\/p>\n
            “The petitioner was appointed as a peon in the<\/p>\n
     second respondent co-operative bank. The third<\/p>\n
     respondent complained against it. Following an<\/p>\n
     enquiry, it was found by the Joint Registrar that there<\/p>\n
     were interpolations in the minutes book. Severe<\/p>\n
     criticism is levelled against the sub committee<\/p>\n
     members and also even regarding the manner of<\/p>\n
     despatch of notices for the interview. Certain postal<\/p>\n
     articles are also alleged as interpolated. These<\/p>\n
     allegations led to a consideration and decision on<\/p>\n
     17\/7\/2008. That is the impugned Ext.P9.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            2.    To exclude the controversies, I required the<\/p>\n
     second respondent to make available its records. A<\/p>\n
     perusal of that will show that the findings in Ext. P9,<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                  6<\/span><\/p>\n
     on merits, are not those which could be criticized as<\/p>\n
     wholly unavailable on the records.           Under such<\/p>\n
     circumstances, this Court is not to extend its<\/p>\n
     jurisdiction and interfere with the situation on grounds<\/p>\n
     of injustice.\n<\/p>\n
             Hence, this writ petition is dismissed without<\/p>\n
     prejudice to the right, if any, of the petitioner to seek<\/p>\n
     other reliefs in accordance with law before competent<\/p>\n
     statutory authority.”\n<\/p>\n
      4.     Since no stay was granted in the appeal filed by<\/p>\n
Sindhu before the Government, naturally Exhibit P3 order passed<\/p>\n
by the Joint Registrar should have been implemented. But, it was<\/p>\n
not implemented by the second respondent and there is no<\/p>\n
explanation for the same. Had there been no appeal filed by<\/p>\n
Sindhu, naturally most of the reliefs prayed for in the Writ<\/p>\n
Petition would have been allowed. But, since the appeal is<\/p>\n
pending against the decision of the Joint Registrar, I think it is<\/p>\n
proper and just to direct the Government to dispose of the<\/p>\n
appeal, after affording an opportunity of being heard to all the<\/p>\n
affected parties, as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate,<\/p>\n
within a period of two months.\n<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).No. 20116 of 2009
\n                                  7<\/span><\/p>\n
      5.     Since, the State of kerala is not a party in the Writ<\/p>\n
Petition, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the<\/p>\n
State of Kerala represented by the Secretary to Government,<\/p>\n
Department of Co-operation, Thiruvananthapuram is suo moto<\/p>\n
impleaded as additional 4th respondent. The learned Government<\/p>\n
Pleader takes notice for the 4th respondent.<\/p>\n
      In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition<\/p>\n
is disposed of directing the additional 4th respondent to dispose of<\/p>\n
Exhibit R3(b) appeal dated 17\/8\/2009 filed by Sindhu K.P., as<\/p>\n
expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, within two months,<\/p>\n
after affording an opportunity of being heard to all the affected<\/p>\n
parties. The petitioner shall forward a copy of the writ petition<\/p>\n
along with exhibits, counter affidavit and reply affidavit to the<\/p>\n
additional 4th respondent within a period of two weeks from today<\/p>\n
along with a copy of the judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                        K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n
scm<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 20116 of 2009(H) 1. SURESH K., … Petitioner Vs 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE … Respondent 2. THE MARUTHONKARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE 3. K.P.SINDHU, For Petitioner :SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR For Respondent :SRI.P.RAVINDRAN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSuresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1341,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010"},"wordCount":1341,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010","name":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-01T08:53:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-k-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suresh K vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 20 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39301\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}