{"id":39542,"date":"1950-11-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1950-11-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950"},"modified":"2019-01-11T14:48:53","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T09:18:53","slug":"in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","title":{"rendered":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1951 Mad 610, (1951) IMLJ 101<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: G Menon<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: G Menon, B A Sayeed<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Govioda Menon, J.  <\/p>\n<p>1. The petitioner seeks to revise the order of the learned District-Magistrate of North Arcot passed in Cri. M. P. No. 52 of 1950 in C. C. No. 32 of 1950 holding<br \/>\nthat the Court has jurisdiction to take cognizance of the complaint against him and proceed with the enquiry and trial.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioner is a detenu in the Central Jail at Vellore, having been confined there under the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act of 1947. The complaint against him is that in violation of Clauses 6 and 9 of Rule 15, Madras Security Prisoners&#8217; Rules, 1947, he continued to be on hunger strike from 1-11-1949 to 26-11-1949 and thereby committed an offence under Rule17 (2) of the said Rules. Rule 17 (2) contemplates<br \/>\nthat:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;If any security prisoner is guilty of a jail offence, which, by reason of his having frequently committed such offences or otherwise, is in the opinion of the Superintendent not adequately punishable by him under the provisions of Sub-rule 1, he may, with the approval of the Government, forward such prisoner to the Court of a Magistrate of the first class or of a Presidency Magistrate, as the case may be, having jurisdiction, and such Magistrate shall thereupon inquire into and try the charge so brought against the security prisoner, and upon conviction, shall sentence him to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>It is admitted that in this case before the person was forwarded to the Magistrate or before a complaint was filed against him, specific approval of the Government was not obtained for the prosecution, and therefore it is contended that the initiation of the prosecution, without the Government considering the necessity or otherwise of a prosecution and giving their sanction for such a prosecution, is void and inoperative. On the other hand, on behalf of the State, it is contended by the learned Public Prosecutor, that the Memorandum No. 4934 dated 27-6-1949 has given general permission to all the Superintendents of jails for launching such prosecutions against security prisoners who are guilty of such offences and intimate the effect of such prosecutions alone to the Government. The Memorandum referred to is one sent by the Government of Madras to the Inspector General of Prisons, who in his turn, has forwarded it to the Superintendents, The last two sentences of this Memorandum<br \/>\nare as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;If in spite of the warning the detenus go on hunger strikes, they should take action as follows : if the hunger strike is a token one, lasting for a day, the Superintendent should withdraw the privileges of the detenus for a month or 15 days according to their discretion. In other cases of persistent or continuous hanger strikes, they should launch prosecutions against them and should intimate the Government, without delay, as soon as such prosecutions are launched.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>It is contended before us that the instructions issued by  the Government  to the Inspector General of Prisons are directly and diametrically opposed to Rule 17 (2) and as such, such instructions cannot override or outweigh the efficacy of a statutory rule as Rule 17 (2). The statutory rule  lays down  that  before the prisoner is forwarded to   the   Court of the   Presidency Magistrate or First Class Magistrate for enquiry and trial, approval of the Government for that action  should   be  taken. But the instructions issued by the Government state that in general a carte blanche is given to the Superintendents to  launch prosecutions against security prisoners, who are alleged to be guilty of persistent or continuous hunger strikes and after prosecutions are launched the facts of such launching should be intimated to the Government without delay. We have no doubt that the instructions contained in the memorandum go contra to what is contained in the statutory rule and in our opinion, these directions, issued as they are to the Inspector General of Prisons, cannot be said to be formal and general approvals of launching of prosecutions against individual  detenus  as  contemplated in  Rule 17 (2). Rule 17 (2) does not contemplate  that there must be such a mass approval. Each case, as and when it occurs should be reported to the Government and Government should consider the necessity,   expediency   or   otherwise,   of launching prosecutions, separately and thereafter such approval is accorded, can  the prosecutions be  launched. If that be the true and correct  interpretation   of Rule 17 (2), in our opinion, the instructions   issued   are  ultra vires and cannot have any legal efficacy. Further the instructions issued by the Government should be in conformity with statutory rules.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. We are, therefore, of opinion that the prosecution has not been launched properly and as such the Court has no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the complaint. In such circumstances, the proceedings before the District Magistrate are quashed. This order should not be interpreted as preventing a proper application to the Government for approval and any initiation of proceedings after such approval, if the authorities so desire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 Equivalent citations: AIR 1951 Mad 610, (1951) IMLJ 101 Author: G Menon Bench: G Menon, B A Sayeed JUDGMENT Govioda Menon, J. 1. The petitioner seeks to revise the order of the learned District-Magistrate of North Arcot passed in Cri. M. P. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950\",\"datePublished\":\"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\"},\"wordCount\":846,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\",\"name\":\"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950","datePublished":"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950"},"wordCount":846,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950","name":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1950-11-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T09:18:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/in-re-k-t-k-thangamani-vs-unknown-on-6-november-1950#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In Re: K.T.K. Thangamani vs Unknown on 6 November, 1950"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}