{"id":39797,"date":"2009-09-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009"},"modified":"2018-08-10T22:51:22","modified_gmt":"2018-08-10T17:21:22","slug":"smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<pre>1 M.F.A.131 17\/D7{MV}\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 07\"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009\nBEFORE\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANANDA\n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1 31 I 7' \/ 2007 (MB\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSMT. SANDHYA N. RAO.\n\nW\/0. NITHYANANDA RAO.\n\nAGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,\n\nR\/O. \"ANUGRAHA\".\n\nBHAGAVATHI NAGARA,\n\nKODIALBAIL, MANGALORE.\n\n...APPELLANT\n\n(By Sri K. RANJAN KUMAR ADV.)\nAND\n\n1. JAWAHAR NAZRATH,\nS\/0 RAYMOND NAZRATH.\nR\/0. VISHAL PINTO LANE,\nKARANGALAPADY,\nMANGALORE675 003.\n\n2. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,\nII FLOOR, FLORA COMPLEX.\nBENDOOR WELL CIRCLE,\nKANKANADY, MANGALORE~5'75 O02.\nREP. BY ITS MANAGER.\n\n \n\n\n\n2 M.F.A.I3117\/O'7(MV]\n\n3. GIRIJA SHERIGARTHI.\nW\/0. LATE. NARASIMHA SHERIGAR,\nKAVERI PRASADA NILAYA.\nCHURCH ROAD, VODERA HOBLI.\nKUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT.\n\n4. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,\nDIVISIONAL OFFICE.\nBI-IARATI-I BUILDING,\nP. M. ROAD. MANGALORE.\nREP. BY ITS MANAGER.\n\n... RESPONDENTS\n\n{By SR1 C. R. RAVESHANKAR ADVOCATE FOR R-2\nR-- 1 AND R-3 ARE SERVED\nSRI S. SRISHAILA ADVOCATE FOR R4}\n\nTHIS IS AN APPEAL FILED U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 5.5.2007\n\nPASSED IN MVC NO. I94\/98 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.\nCIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.) AND CJM AND MEMBER, MACT,\nMANGALORE, DESMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION F OR\nCOMPENSATION.\n\nThis appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the\ncourt delivered the following:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>This is a claimanfs appeal for enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>compensation. j A E<br \/>\ngxs ..  A. I<\/p>\n<p>3 M.F.A.131l&#8217;7\/0&#8242;?'(MV]<\/p>\n<p>2. I have heard Sri K. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel<br \/>\nfor claimant and Sri. S. Srishaila. learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>insurance company.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The claim relates to compensation for damage<br \/>\ncaused to maxi~cab bearing N0.KA&#8211;l9\/7459, which belonged<br \/>\nto the claimant and insured with National insurance<\/p>\n<p>Company Ltd. [IV-Respondent before the Tribunal}.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The vehicle of claimant had been insured under<br \/>\ncomprehensive policy. Therefore, claimant had submitted<\/p>\n<p>claim to NUS. National Insurance Company. The survey to<\/p>\n<p>assess damage was conducted by a surveyor. The total loss<br \/>\nwas evaluated at Rs.2,08,172\/&#8211; by the surveyor. The<br \/>\ninsurance company paid Rs.1,45,125\/&#8211; to the Canara Bank<br \/>\nwith which the maxi cab was hypothecated by claimant. The<br \/>\nclaimant has sought for the difference amount of<br \/>\nRs.55,000\/&#8211;. Therefore, the point for determination is<\/p>\n<p>whether the claimant is entitled to recover the difference<\/p>\n<p>ru   .\n<\/p>\n<p>4 M.F.A.13117\/O7{MV]<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs.55,(}00\/&#8211; from M\/s. New India Assurance<\/p>\n<p>Company {Insurer of the bus\/ offending Vehicle}.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Sri K. Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel for claimant<br \/>\nwould submit that claimant had not received damages in<br \/>\nterms of survey report. Therefore, the claim petition can be<\/p>\n<p>maintained for recovery of difference amount.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The learned counsel for insurance company would<br \/>\njustify the impugned award. The learned counsel for the<br \/>\ninsurance company has relied on a decision reported in<\/p>\n<p>2005 ACJ 1332 (Harkhu Bai and others V\/s. Jiyaram and<\/p>\n<p>Others}, wherein a Division Bench of this court, has he1d:&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;6. That leaves us with the claim in<br \/>\nlVl.V.C. No.3 of 1990. The Tribunal has<br \/>\nrejected the said claim on two grounds.<br \/>\nFirstly, because no negligence on the part<br \/>\nof the offending vehicle is proved and<br \/>\nsecondly, because the claimant, owner of<br \/>\nthe vehicle, has already received from the<br \/>\ninsurance company with which the<br \/>\nvehicle was insured an amount<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5 M.F.A.13l17\/O7[M.V]<\/p>\n<p>representing the loss suffered by him.<br \/>\nWhile the finding on the first of the said<br \/>\nquestions has been reversed by us, we<br \/>\nsee no reason to interfere with the View<br \/>\ntaken by the Tribunal on the second<br \/>\nquestion. It is not in dispute that the<br \/>\nvehicle owned by the claimant in M.V.C.<br \/>\nNo.3 of l990 had suffered extensive<br \/>\ndamage on account of the collision but it<br \/>\nis also admitted that the Vehicle being<br \/>\ninsured with one of the other insurance<br \/>\ncompanies, the damage was assessed and<br \/>\npaid. The order passed by the Tribunal<br \/>\nfurther shows that the payment was<\/p>\n<p>received by the claimant in full and \ufb01nal<\/p>\n<p>settlement of his claim without any<br \/>\nreservation or demur. In the absence of<br \/>\nany material to show that the claim paid<br \/>\nby the other insurance company<br \/>\nrepresented a part only of the total<br \/>\ndamage, the Tribunal was justified in<br \/>\nrejecting the claim for any further<br \/>\npayment. We, therefore, see no merit in<br \/>\nthe appeal filed by the owner which shall<\/p>\n<p>have to be dismissed.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>6 M.F.A.1311&#8217;7\/07(MV)<\/p>\n<p>7. In the case on hand, on 26.09.2003, IV-<br \/>\nRespondent, M\/ s. National Insurance Company has settied<br \/>\nthe claim for Rs.1,4~5.125\/&#8211; and credited the cheque for<br \/>\nRs.1,45,125\/- to the account of claimant in Canara Bank,<br \/>\nGandhinagar Branch, to which the claimant had<br \/>\nhypothecated his vehicle. On receipt of the letter of<br \/>\nsettlement dated 26.09.2003 from M\/s. National Insurance<br \/>\nCompany, the ciaimant had not made any protest. The<br \/>\nsettlement of claim was accepted without any protest or<\/p>\n<p>demur. Therefore. the claimant can not claim the difference<\/p>\n<p>amount from other insurance company namely M\/ s. New<\/p>\n<p>India Assurance Company Ltd. [IIwResp0ndent).\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The next point for determination is whether<br \/>\nclaimant is entitled to loss of earnings and interest paid by<br \/>\nclaimant to M \/ s. Canara Bank. At the outset, it is necessary<\/p>\n<p>to say that the claimant can not claim both interest and loss<\/p>\n<p>of earnings. %\\3 &#8216; C &#8216;.E,=,M   <\/p>\n<p>7 M.F.A.13117\/OTIMV}<\/p>\n<p>The claimant was running a maxi cab (bearing No.KA&#8211;<br \/>\n19\/7459) and he was earning Rs.15,000\/&#8211; per month. After<br \/>\nthe accident he did not run the maxi cab. The loss of<br \/>\nearnings has to be assessed for number of days of non&#8211;usage<br \/>\nof vehicle. Considering the nature of damages, it would be<br \/>\nappropriate to award ioss of earnings for a period of two<\/p>\n<p>months @ Rs.12,000\/&#8211; pm.<\/p>\n<p>9. In View of the above, I pass the following\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>(i} The appeal is accepted in part.<br \/>\n{ii} The impugned award is set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>{iii} The claimant is entitled to<br \/>\ncompensation of Rs.24,000\/&#8211; with<br \/>\ninterest at 6% p.a. from the date of<br \/>\npetition till the date of realisation<br \/>\nfrom H &#8212; Respondent [M\/s. New<br \/>\nIndia Assurance Compan Lt:d.].\n<\/p>\n<p>(iv)<\/p>\n<p>RKK\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>3 M.F.A.13l 17\/07{MV)<\/p>\n<p>Parties are directed to bear their<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\u00bb<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 Author: N.Ananda 1 M.F.A.131 17\/D7{MV} IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 07&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANANDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1 31 I 7&#8217; \/ 2007 (MB BETWEEN: SMT. SANDHYA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":822,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009"},"wordCount":822,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009","name":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-10T17:21:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-sandhya-n-rao-vs-jawahar-nazrath-on-7-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Sandhya N Rao vs Jawahar Nazrath on 7 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39797\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}