{"id":4022,"date":"2008-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-28T07:28:50","modified_gmt":"2014-06-28T01:58:50","slug":"prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
-1..\n\n13 ran :13 count or xaaum:axa.az nnuA;\u00e9\u00a7a .\n\nDATED THIS THE G3m'\ufb02AY OF JuLy.\u00a7eQ\u00a7  \"f\"'\"\n\n9nns:nx_W,\n\nan aouvama ua.ausr1\u00e93 v;e\u00a7s52\u00a7ma: '?a'\"\"\n\n3R9. . . .\nran EQN'BLE ma.aus:I\u00e9\u00a3f$.x.si\u00e9zajmhaxasa\n\nWRIT APp\u00e9ga.NQ\ufb012332x2\u00a7\u00e95f;LR;\n\nBETWEEN: .-V g\"\"~IjV\n\n'\u00ab Jsy\ufb01u, MANGALORE 575 002, 0.x\n\n1 9RABHA5NA\u00a7AK . a_ , ;. 'W\nW\/O 9AY3sznnHu'N3xgK_, _\nHINDU, A933 ABOUT s5_\u00a5Rs;\n\nRxA\u00bbs:NpHU*\u00a2oTTAG\u00a3.\nEALKAR}7BAJAL,vKANKANADY 'B',\n\nMANGALGRE;fDK;, --, _\nREP BY HUSBAND A\u00a7D\"3PA HOLDER\ns DAEASZNDHU RAYAK,\n5\/0 s'nAMAyyA NAYAK\n_;HInDU. Ara 66 YRS.\n- \"R(O SAME AS EBOVE\n\n'.2\"~ARuNAyBHAN3ARI\n-3 Bio M Agnmna HEGDE\n'. \"HINDU; AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS\n%_R\/Q'KUDUPADI RGAD;\nM.B,CQM?OUND\n\n. . . APPELLANTS\n\n ; }s\u00a7'\u00e9RI SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K, ADV)\n\n \n\n\n\n2 \"' paras 3;\/3\/2005.\n\n.' :z\"*a:His APPEAL COMING on FOR HEARING THIS DAY,\n T  ax, DELIVERED ma: FOLLOHING:\n\n \n\n1 RAMA POOJARY\ns\/0 PUTTA POJARY\nADULT, PUDU VILLGE\n\nBANTWAL TALUK ~\"W-\n\nDK\n\n2 MUNBI POOJRRTHI\nW\/O KOGGU POOJARY\n\nHINDU, ADULT,\nPUDU VILLAGE\nBANTWRL, DK '\n\n3 THE LAND rRIau\ufb01A:g'\"\nBANTRHL, DK _'.Vv\nREP BY cgA:RMAN\"\"~.;\n\n4 STATE OF<K\ufb02RHATEKn_"aw~ \u00a2\nREP BE Ira SECRETARY{_ V;\nREVE\ufb01UEyDEP\ufb01RTMERT, ""\nM s Buizaigs, =_'\nBaN$AL0RE',v_=,'=\n\n*V" '. ~u< ... RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By SR1 p\ufb01asann\ufb01 v%a; ABV FGR R1 & 2
\n. sax SREEDHARWEIREMATH, AGA FOR R3 AND 4;<\/p>\n
T’-‘f*Ta1$%iw3:: APPEAL IS FILED U\/S 4 OF THE
\nKAR\ufb01ATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO 331 ASIDE was
\noamza PASSED IN THE wnzr PETITION N0.9728-29\/2095<\/p>\n
me<\/p>\n
This appeal is filed the  <\/p>\n
WP.NoS.9?28-29\/2005 being aggrieved hy~\u00a7heebrae:<\/p>\n
dated 31.3.2065, wherein’ the \ufb02earxzed <\/p>\n
has declined to interferet’xefit_1; the passed
\nby the Land Tribun.e1.,’ .’T ‘D.3kshine VfKannada,
\ndated 25.11.2004, wh\u00e9r\u00a2;\ufb01}\u00a3h\u00e9,o\u00a7\u00a2\u00a79\u00a7ncy right has
\nbeen conferre-zit’ in  ef.:’,t”;e:-gpcfntient 1603.1 and<\/p>\n
2 on the.   by respondent 140.1<\/p>\n
and the f*e3per:\u00a23u\u00e9I1’t”V:No.2.<\/p>\n
2.  _ epelgtcattions were filed claiming<\/p>\n
oceng\u00e9ency rightv ef the land in Sy.No.129\/3<\/p>\n
Vineeetturilsnicg  acres, wherein the 1″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
 a half acre and the husband of<\/p>\n
the’—..2″”V_’v’ree;:endent claimed two and a half acre.<\/p>\n
 writ: petitioners were arraigned as owners in<\/p>\n
  “t_he_>_epplications seeking conferment of occupancy<\/p>\n
 and they contended that the land comprised<\/p>\n
 Sy.No.129\/3 is a dry land and uncultivable of<\/p>\n
We<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
being cultivated and is in personal posses:sione..V’ef<\/p>\n
the landlords. The Tribunal after  <\/p>\n
the material on record,  facts<\/p>\n
elicited in the cross examinati’on’3ofvtize\u00bb <\/p>\n
regarding the existence’:_o–\u00a3 the-.. easheeirlhAtnut-..t’3:ees’-L’<\/p>\n
and palm trees and also  –.Vrecei;3t’,v.’ held that
\nthe applicants  1\u00a7\u00a7os;sAes’e.ien’~of the land as
\ntenants on  Were.’Qt-“l’entitled to
\nconferment 3-of  accordingly.
\ngranted 15 of Rama Poojar,
\nthe  acres 20 cents in
\nfavour\ufb02of  ‘the hasband of second<\/p>\n
responden”t\u00ab._o_V%%in lE?yl\u00a7i5Zo;31~29\/3. Being aggrieved by<\/p>\n
_ the..\u00ab.isaid order’~vpa_ssed by the Land Tribunal dated<\/p>\n
  landlords preferred WP.Nos.9728-<\/p>\n
  learned Single Judge, after<\/p>\n
cons’\u00abide.rirag:”” the contentions of the learned<\/p>\n
;for the writ petitioners, the learned<\/p>\n
:”cou.ns\u00a7”e1 for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the<\/p>\n
 do\u00e9rernment Pleader for respondent Nos.3 and 4, by<\/p>\n
 detailed order held that the order passed by<\/p>\n
U3<\/p>\n
 4.  1′ <\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
the Tribunal conferring occupancy right<\/p>\n
of the first respondent and husband  <\/p>\n
respondent is justified and\u00bb~~does ‘=:Vcal”1.4.’_fA.f<\u00a7r it<\/p>\n
interference in the writ T ~  <\/p>\n
accordingly, dismissed  __writ ' . peti   ..,Being'V . ll<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said ordelra_of–,V_\u00bbthe."leernevd Single
\nJudge dated  t\u00ab'_nei–".As}r'.=Z..t\u00bb.VlA.pe_titione::s have
\nPreferred this apPe3r1r.:."\\\\V'  'l   it<\/p>\n
3.  Counsel for the
\n &lC’c$u’nsel for respondent
\nNos.12  ASA, who has been<\/p>\n
directed tail-‘re h.o’t’j.L_ee for respondent Nos.3 and<\/p>\n
:’AV’j;’he’v~l:i”earned Counsel for the appellants<\/p>\n
sub\ufb01t\u00abitt.ed-that the land comprised in Sy.No.129\/3<\/p>\n
 _ not?’ agricultural land capable of being<\/p>\n
pxAcul.ti.\u00a3*ated, the mere existence of cashew nut<\/p>\n
 and palm trees would not make it an<\/p>\n
uifegricultural land and the rent receipt does not<\/p>\n
\\SiJ~<\/p>\n
   “Court appeal. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n
tn “‘r\u00a7:d\/-\n<\/p>\n
..1-\n<\/p>\n
Mangalore. It is not shown that the rent’
\nproduced before the Tribunal pertai–ns
\nother land and wherefore, the\u00bb.
\nby the Tribunal that the laisol
\nland and was being cuiatvivatectit
\nto the extent for which  has been
\nconferred, is   Single Judge
\nhaving regard to material on
\nrecord has  itheicirgthatV”‘:\u00abthe…V:order passed by
\nthe “rioes not call for
\n1nterfere;nceEj_;n   powers of this
\nCourt  ufrtit’  t The order passed by
\nthe learneea..\u00a7ingie._audgett-nbttdoes not suffer from any<\/p>\n
‘_VVerror.\u00a7;or t’illegua”i\u00e9.ty____as to call for interference<\/p>\n
app.ea}.__ is <\/p>\n
Sd\/-3′
\nJudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-2’
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & S.N.Satyanarayana -1.. 13 ran :13 count or xaaum:axa.az nnuA;\u00e9\u00a7a . DATED THIS THE G3m’\ufb02AY OF JuLy.\u00a7eQ\u00a7 “f”‘” 9nns:nx_W, an aouvama ua.ausr1\u00e93 v;e\u00a7s52\u00a7ma: ‘?a'”” 3R9. . . . ran EQN’BLE ma.aus:I\u00e9\u00a3f$.x.si\u00e9zajmhaxasa WRIT APp\u00e9ga.NQ\ufb012332×2\u00a7\u00e95f;LR; BETWEEN: .-V g””~IjV ‘\u00ab Jsy\ufb01u, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPrabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\\\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":622,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\\\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\\\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008"},"wordCount":622,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008","name":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-28T01:58:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabha-nayak-vs-rama-poojary-so-putta-poojary-on-3-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prabha Nayak vs Rama Poojary S\/O Putta Poojary on 3 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}