{"id":40824,"date":"2009-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-06T04:19:47","modified_gmt":"2017-03-05T22:49:47","slug":"sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
 1;+->\n\n- MW\n\nIN THE HIGH CQURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANz;}ALQ.;v\u00e9;\u00a7\"'    \n\nDATED THIS THE} am my C1F'p\u00a5iILY.~'_4\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3\u00a799fV   I \nBEFORE A A  '  %  \nTEE HOIWBLE MR.   \nCRIMINAL REVIS_\u00a7QN  cgggoafi\nBETWEEN V  A  \n\nSRETKRISHNA   '\nSIOTHIMMARAYASETTY   '     \nAGEDABOUT48YE\u00a3\u00a7RS'\u00a7,-     \nR\/AT Nr:\").31['?, B(__\".'27<'A'\u00a3\\i_\u00a5*~iA._EIJiL$i_N{3._ " \u00bb\nESYATARAYANAPUTRA :m:RGss' \nBANGALORE--2;t:}_V    , 'V\n\n A.  _  .  FETITIONER\n{By sri-,; I{AI\u00bbiALES'\u00a7+IWA}?2%_PGQJARY\nmm SWARN_AKA.M\u00e91;.ASS?FS-.,,,;\u00a7..\u00a3}V}\n\nAND\n\n1, . , TH E\u00bb <E3RAN\u00a3.1H MANA.{;%f;_RA.\n  -BAN\u00a3}AI;(3RE'%Ci'i'\u00a5 CORPQRATIVE BANK L{i'D,,\n ,VIJAY:1.BEAG&RBI2ANCH\n'  LaaNG;aL@RE..-\u00a3m_ " -- .\n\nTHE BRANCi%.'j_\u00a7a\u20ac$';RAGER\n\n\u20ac3AN:'-4's.RA,.*3AN\u00a7i, B\u00a3XPEL.IIP\u00a7AGARA BUS'ST'0P\nV MYSOREROAB\n\n '-\u00bb13ANGa.L::\u00a7\u00a7<E--25\n\n S29}: 2&5. HARAYANAPPA\n SIQASEPALLAPPA\n" gem; MAJOR'\n\n  we N\u20ac).8'7, 4TH mam\n\n 6TH GROSS, BYRAVESHWARA NAGARA\nNAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD\nBANGALOREEZ-\u00ab'?2\n RESPGNDENTS\n\n(By Sri : E3 E1 SEETHARAMAR RACE FCDR RI}\n\n\n\n3\n\nTHIS GRLRP FILED 9,1339? \u20ac3R,P.C. BY Tm A1:}'s:\u00a7:;~.\u00a2A*:f,\u00a7',\nma THE PETITISNEER PRAYING *m.a:r THIS Han-13L.E_\u00bb.\u00a2e:r mj\n\nMAY BE PLEASE!) TO SET ASEDE THE ORDER;:m.,~;1'.~3j;"2n}::3 \nPASSED BY THE N A\u00a7SL.C.MM., BAN?(3A;,0.1\u00e9:E'_ 1'N__ \n\nC.C.NC}.21298\/ 2005.\n\nmis CR.R.IP comma GN \u00a7\u00ab'0R:"14A\u00a3\u00e9'\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7I:\u00a7s:T(m " .*i\u00a7H1us'v"%1%;'D}s;1i5,._\n\nC3C)UR"I' MADE THE FOLLOWING:  _'  A'\n\nThe petitiancr has   'gtiischarging the\n\nnsspondent Nos. 1   \u00abt}:fe ij:':ha;r\\gs for o\ufb02imces\n\ngtuaishabie    and 420 IPC1 by invoisring\nthe pmvismg of saw  \n2.  11\ufb02'vlii\u20acCt\u00a7$'}S:3}jFV. details the facts; reievani: far the\n\n {if this rcirision $311: as lm\u00e9er:\n\n  The H   issutcd a cheque in favour of the\n\n C' pgt\u00a7\ufb01{}I1\u20ac}: fQfv 1&\u00a7\u00a3J.' V amount at" Rs,3,40,Q0o;- on 92.072004 and\n\n4:  of the said cheque 1:0 tlm second respondent<\/pre>\n
  \u00e9incashmcnt thmugh the: \ufb01rst Iespnndent bank, tlm<\/p>\n
 V  Tc}–3:;\u00a7:i’;:’1\u00e9x::as rctume\ufb01 with an cnderscmcnt crsf insu\ufb01cient funds<\/p>\n
 3130 on the: gmumi that {Em cheque was stalcdg If is<\/p>\n
V fhmtrafter that that pe\ufb01\ufb01aner aiic\ufb01ng that the chaque has been<\/p>\n
34<\/span><\/p>\n
destroyed by the bank authari\ufb01es \ufb01led the eemplei\ufb01t  <\/p>\n
Magstrate requesting to take action agaizzet  reepeigdeiite fer V’<\/p>\n
the aforesaid offences.\n<\/p>\n
3. The learned Magistrate  ‘of:.i1ae”go\ufb01;ence as<\/p>\n
against respondent Noel ax;;\u20aci~{_3 hexve’i:’1″a\u00a7i:gdVV’i’s;a;ja1e:i tiie piwmess and
\ndismissed the complaint as   No.2. After the
\nappearance Of Iespoegient  u\ufb01’1e’f1ea1ned Magistrate
\nheaxtl the co11nsvelV   the respondent N05,}
\nand .3  -undee’\u00a7i:iei:::5impegeec\u00a7  has discharged fhem.
\nAgglieved b\ufb01the  hwfieien has been preferxed.<\/p>\n
4. Ihvave  the Aleaae\ufb01ied eztmnsel far the petitioner anal
\n5:31’V&\u00a7e3.?11e’:T’:e’G.}\\:”‘\u00a2:-\ufb01?’?,’3′;l\u00a2:i.;'”i’Ie1i’.e*,.  ‘ eeeee e e<\/p>\n
   arise for my eonsi\u00e9era\ufb01en am:\n<\/p>\n
‘V i)  ..Whe\ufb02e.er the erder of discharge of respendem; Nos. E
\nV ”   3 herein in respect of the charge far the e\ufb01ences
\n punishable under Sections 204, 409. 418 and 420 IPC<\/p>\n
is illegal or perverse?\n<\/p>\n
ii) What Qrder?\n<\/p>\n
e(<\/p>\n
6. It is the contemition of ‘tin: licazrncd   <\/p>\n
the petiticncr that as a private camp1air.t*was  {ha i<\/p>\n
respgnd\ufb01nts the Trial Ccurt ought <\/p>\n
accused invoicing Section 239 Cif:’P…C., \u00e9is.-V the <\/p>\n
authoxise the Magistrate to    where a
\npolice mpart is submitted tci  ‘afi.fi\u00e9rL’Viiiiicstiga\ufb01on. So also
\nit is his contention that   made by tht
\nKamataka State   Commisssion in its
\njudgment is   the acc11:s,cd as the
\ncnbscxvatien   Civil Court fur the inizligf
\nagainst the i:\u00a7:;4:vzV:\u00a31i3c:*:id.’  “i14:=: submits {hat the mtler cf
\ndimharge is   di\u00e9\u00e9seiiizts to be set aside. Per ma\ufb01a,
\n  122′; th\ufb01iiii\u00e9\u00e9j\u00e9dizdcnts supportcd the order passed by<\/p>\n
theiT:’i.’aT1  i ~ <\/p>\n
3?.  give-.i’iip4i=:rused the decuments pmduccd and fhf’:<\/p>\n
 ma\ufb01a in the complaint. At the first instance, it is<\/p>\n
 ‘$5-Emits that the: pm-visigms of Sec\ufb01an 23$ Cr\u00a7P.(3 cmild be<\/p>\n
 only in a case where a po}ic:\u00a2 report is submitted undsr<\/p>\n
  Ss’:zr:;f:i<311 17.3 Cr.P.C authorising the Magistrate til} axamintz the<\/p>\n
  itpaii submitted and 8130 the documents pmduceti 31161 a\ufb01er<\/p>\n
54<\/span><\/p>\n
$’ving opportunity t0 the parties, if he considers t\ufb01e
\nthe accused as groundless can dischmge; \u00a3133   u
\n\u00a311: masons. Admittsdlya the 343151 pmvis\ufb01n
\nfacts an hand, as then: is no    1′;1nd%c:r”  L’
\nSection 1′?3 C:1:P.C: and the ibcfgm it.jl1e  was
\non the basis of a complaini     under Scc\ufb01cm
\n200 Cr.P.C and after taking  of process to
\nmspendent    at least to the
\nextent of the    under Section 239<\/p>\n
Cr.P,C the ::1Ilcri_S”\u00e9:*;>01;:\u00a7:1us_.’V <\/p>\n
8, It is  Ves;t\ufb01i:Iiis;’;}:\u00a7:c(}.:’::\u00a7z1″i’nciplc that a wmng men\ufb01on of
\nprpvisiarg  ‘law itg\u00e9if’ vvnetla gmzmd ta reject the request, If the
\n ‘jxuisdic\ufb01on to dmp the pmccedings under any<\/p>\n
other” pr\u00e9ivisiisiigsgef and awn if the a\ufb02cgations against thtf:<\/p>\n
 am gmunfllcss, he need not iixlll\ufb01lfltl\ufb01 with the proceedings<\/p>\n
‘ W ”  proceedings against the acrcused if he \ufb01nds that<\/p>\n
  \ufb01e gmtmds to pluzmd against th\ufb01 accused. On this<\/p>\n
 the mattz\u00e9zr, lcarzrmd counsel for fhc r4:-,$po11dent has<\/p>\n
 lpila\u00e9izd mljance {tn the decision of the Apex Court mporttzzd in AIR<\/p>\n
J 1992 sac: 2206, K.ll\u00a7.MAT’HEW V. sum 95* KERALA. Tlm<\/p>\n
>4<\/p>\n
pcmsa} of tlizts facts mvca} that there was a p\ufb01vatr:
\nSec\ufb01ons E394 and 34 IPC, pm:-:55 was   u
\nhale} that there is 31:: bar to dmp
\naccused persons, if the com;::la:i:1t  1\u00a7i-\u00a73’:;:a fa\u00e9i\u00e9
\nQ\ufb01ence agaj\ufb01st the acctzst-.d_,. I1:  \u00a5JrI:\u00a7seI3I4::dE that thc
\nMagistrate may {Imp fshcv V_  is satis\ufb01ed on
\nrccon\ufb01ideraticzn of th::–   no cs\ufb01isnzzc for
\nwhich the accusc\u00e9d.    it ‘ivlz-‘\u00a7”Ii iis judicia} discretian
\nand 3:19     Magistzatc to drop or
\nmscind 1:11: f:Z’\ufb01e*;i E\u00a7i$i0n of the Apex C()1l1″i applies {:3
\nthe  “ivhcre there is no pmvigign. for
\ndischarge   speci\ufb01c pmvisian for discharge of
\n   Thaugh Seiztian 239 applies to 31::\n<\/p>\n
::as’\u00e9:3_ is subm:itt.ed after inves\ufb01ga\ufb01on, the deftzcts<\/p>\n
 ‘*….b\u00a2r:3i31aft\u00a7:f%  ta wtmld ccsmpal \ufb01n”: Court ta apply the<\/p>\n
 1ai\u00a2:3_ c1fa:\u00bbw3:1 by $11: Aperx Couxt zrcfermd to supra to jugtify<\/p>\n
  13f acc\ufb01sadu The perusal Qf $11: impugned \u00a3}I’d.\u20acf2I’ de\ufb01nes<\/p>\n
  .fji1g\u00a7t’.ix:wi\u00a3:a3 the patent defects in the complaint which might tar haw:<\/p>\n
‘V  ‘ –\u00bb.1\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9:1 f\u00e9fentd by th: icamed Magistxate in his ozticr to indicate and<\/p>\n
  the 03:16:: :31’ dischazgct.\n<\/p>\n
{XL<\/p>\n
‘-3<\/p>\n
9. That: is no dispute that the third msponde1yi:”ii\u00e9r\u00a7i;i<\/p>\n
t’<\/p>\n
issued a cheqtze in favour of the petitioner fc\u00a7rH..a3i:tV..  ‘\u00a2::a.,-._ <\/p>\n
R$,3,4~{},()0G\/ -. At the time when the  <\/p>\n
in prapcr condition, it was met tamed “or”~sta}nd_.”g;1ti “rzv\u00e9vn<\/p>\n
submitted by the leaned 001111363  f\u00e9r\ufb01ie  the<\/p>\n
third resgzondent hemin was 331??  50
\nfar a5 \u20ac116 first rzzspcsndam:  is “The Bra;1c.h
\nManager. Ba11ga1om_   ‘\u00a75’\u00a7;3;ya11agar Branch.
\nBangalore 40”,  :\ufb01\u00a7,f)t.V.giv@n the name of the<\/p>\n
Branch Maxz\ufb01geff the cemn\ufb01ssion cf the
\no\ufb01l-3:n:::\u20acu Whcgi  “:L:3V  of the complainant \ufb02mt the
\ne\ufb02\ufb01ciais of thtif  for taming \u00a331′ dcst1″0yi11g thc
\n th\u00e9 fz\ufb01\u00e9t\ufb01\ufb01, an izlvestigaiimz in the matttzr was<\/p>\n
\u20ac:\u00a3’\u00a7S'(i’?I3;’_’11IiE}’,’_ ‘V E? fer the cxzsmplainant \u00a39 prima facit: shew<\/p>\n
‘ V’  to   is rcra\ufb02y zt\ufb01pensible and the cognizazzcc for<\/p>\n
_ _f_–\u00abth\u00a7”r3\ufb01”\u20ac:11<:re  $36: taken ztmfiy againsf: the said iindividal or \u00a3116:<\/p>\n
  was {hm} the Manager and in the: absence of the mam:<\/p>\n
  Manager of the Eangaiorc City C(}-(3Ip\u20acI'atiVl:3 Bank<\/p>\n
'V V  cannet be an accusitd. Nowhtzre in the complaint, the<\/p>\n
 \u00abihame gf the Manager has been mention\ufb01d by the camplaiat. In the<\/p>\n
chcumstancms, the learned Magistrate ought not  \ufb01g.-.vo__z_f1'*'x _<\/p>\n
taken cogaizancc against the first respondent   V. <\/p>\n
thcugh these reasons are not assigned   j3.e\u00e9:r17\u00a3%fd'*–h3Iagi.s_t1:a:t\u20ac\u00a7<\/p>\n
\ufb01le canijnua\ufb01on 01" the pmcecdings _aga:i,1'\u00ab1':-:t '1:hc  '$355.  \\'<\/p>\n
and 3 herein woujid serve no  the Iv\u00e9as@i15. :st\u00a7'a\u00a7cdVVabove.
\nThangh the ltzazned Magish%{t:E..  \ufb01easons for
\nCiischaxging the msgxandcnt  }:z<.;::i'"e \ufb013.3:'b\/__1i:2:sons assigned
\ncan be slibstitlitcd 3.11:3' Dl13i :l:&tC'.'?v\u00a7'd:fiT of dischmgc of<\/p>\n
mspondcmt N051'; -.\u00a5%;i'$11v %1tv'\ufb01*;ie2v'of the mattgr, I do next<\/p>\n
\ufb01nd any j1L3ti\ufb01a\u00a7l\u00e9\u00a7 interfemnxzez. Httnce, I<\/p>\n
answer the point   \u00a30 pass the following:
\n"~oaBER<\/p>\n
 \u00a543;,=:fL_ri:',i<\u00a7::1 is dismissed. If the petiti0n::~:r\u00ab11as any<\/p>\n
— V’ L”A….c-{her   ‘I\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7r’i:o proceed against the. accu\ufb01e\u00e9, ht: is at libfi\ufb01y<\/p>\n
u1:::a_\u00a7.n: rcczoursgt to the said provtisiens,<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb02g
\nIud\u00a7'”\u00a7<\/p>\n
 hvr<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 1;+-> – MW IN THE HIGH CQURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANz;}ALQ.;v\u00e9;\u00a7”‘ DATED THIS THE} am my C1F’p\u00a5iILY.~’_4\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3\u00a799fV I BEFORE A A ‘ % TEE HOIWBLE MR. CRIMINAL REVIS_\u00a7QN cgggoafi BETWEEN V A SRETKRISHNA ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri T Krishna S\\\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1192,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri T Krishna S\\\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri T Krishna S\\\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009"},"wordCount":1192,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009","name":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City ... on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-05T22:49:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-t-krishna-so-thimmarayasetty-vs-the-branch-manager-bangalore-city-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri T Krishna S\/O Thimmarayasetty vs The Branch Manager Bangalore City … on 3 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40824\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}