{"id":40994,"date":"2010-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010"},"modified":"2019-04-11T18:08:06","modified_gmt":"2019-04-11T12:38:06","slug":"sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
.....AND:..\u00ab.{_ 1' \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KAEENATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 10\" DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANA\u00ab?:\u00a7T:OLi\u00a7.'I.\u00a7v4i'\u00a7\" \n\nWRIT PETITION No.38037,v\"2OIO(6\ufb01Q\\--1fN\u00a7\u00ab. %  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nB.M.Hanumanthe Gowcla\nS\/o.Mu|iabagaiaiah\n\nAged 35 years :\nR\/at.No.152\/41, 2\"? Mam\nIttamadu, BSK 3'\" Stage ._  \nBangaEore--8S   _  '\nProprietor of Srinivasa '\n\nEiectricavljs    _  PETITIONER\n\n(By Sri Genapathy*.VVE\u00a7iT.Lat;;  \"for\nKumar &._Bhat, 'Adv.<;.",} _.'T'\n\nV121\u00bb. :T'he ceVmnTi.s'S~i.o_ner\n\n \u00a3sianVga,i"o.r_e"Development Authority\n'T.'Chwod2i'i--ah[;P;oad\nKL'.uFT1aTa~P_3;f:k West\nBangai"0\u00e9re'--2O\n\n  "T'r.e Executive Engineer\n\n*  '{E_ie';:tricai)\n"Bangalore Development Authority\n\n\n\nTU\n\nT.Chowdaiah Road\nKumara Park West 2 \nBangai0re--2O .. RESPONDENTS <\/pre>\n
(By Sri I.G.Gachinmath, Adv.,)<\/p>\n
This writ petition is fiied under
\nof the Constitution of India, praying.to-,_quash;;the tertder
\nnotification dated 14.10.2010__*as_. pert’Annexufe-:$,…,_iss.ued .0 ><\/p>\n
by R2, etc. <\/p>\n
This writ petition ‘icomiragwon0-I’f0ru”ip._re|imi–nary’V hearing
\nin B~Groub, this day the”‘Cso?L.:.rt.m\u00a7aQe”thefcii0wing;–<\/p>\n
Pveti.tVioh._e’i* ljtiaxes >sj0i.i:oAh”t\u00ab’sfotiiquashing the tender
\nnotification vid’e}2.hiie’xvti}’e.–H; dated 14.10.2010 issued<\/p>\n
by the segondxi inviting appiications to<\/p>\n
 _certe”i’n…_w.ovri< on behaif of the respondent-<\/p>\n
  ;\n<\/p>\n
  Ganapathy Bhat, iearned advocate<\/p>\n
V”‘}..app.eati”ng for the petitioner submits that the totai<\/p>\n
 to be carried on is worth about $79 iakhs.<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
However, a condition is imposed as per Clause-2.9.5<\/p>\n
of the Instructions to Bidders to the effect thva.t:’-.the_<\/p>\n
Contractors who had average annual.’-\u00ab<\/p>\n
turnover of \u20ac500 Crores in at least’ two rfinahc–i’Iai  V’<\/p>\n
and positive net worth of atVIeast:?__2:’0_iVC)A’<\/p>\n
have to apply. According   of ‘V<\/p>\n
condition is iiiegai  sarneis made
\nwith a view to heip  has got net
\nworth of   relies upon the
\nNoi:ifica_ti’ori–i..Vgis\u00e9si\ufb02i\u00e9idiiii  Government vide
\n  in support of the said<\/p>\n
contention. * V <\/p>\n
  3–..”>Th’3i Dreavrhiailie of the Notification at Anne><ure–<\/p>\n
 makes it amply ciear that the<\/p>\n
said .___N'o.ti.7fication is issued prescribing certain<\/p>\n
 c.opndit'ions to be used in identified Divisions of PWD<\/p>\n
 WRD and the Corporations under WRD for<\/p>\n
N\u00bb<\/p>\n
.4-\n<\/p>\n
procurement of works from 1.9.2005 for a period___of<\/p>\n
six months initially on an experimental <\/p>\n
Therefore, the same may not be applicaiaie  ”<\/p>\n
BDA. However, the fact remain’sii”ti1\u00abat wi.i| <\/p>\n
have to strictly adhere the provisio”ns1’*oi\u00b0 the’Vi{.a’i~nat’a:i{a.:”‘<\/p>\n
Transparency in Pubiic PI”OCLi!’\u00e9’t:T.r:1:.(‘-2.fit  i\n<\/p>\n
4. Statement of’…,’obj_ectEoven:s’is, \ufb02ied” by the
\nrespondent– BOA. According’   tt,~.et”- .,Eefs_p.ondents, as<\/p>\n
the project inclitidehs bgiigilcimsg,'”own’in.g,:\u00e9operating and<\/p>\n
also travi:i’s’fer,;”of iwtiii’:-e En’erg*,i”\ufb01iffizciency System, the
\npersons who parti~ciep,a’te_”i-nit,i:he bid, must have much<\/p>\n
credibiiity, i4″i’ve;_juta’.tEoAii2_,V”\u00b0iT enabled technical and<\/p>\n
,f’jV’Finaniciiiai:,,,,pa'<:kgrouVn'd"itfor making the project work<\/p>\n
i'e–ffec.tVive:i:y..:a'nciefficiently. Having regard to its past<\/p>\n
  expe–r_ienv\u00a7:e,,,it~hAe BDA has imposed the conditions that<\/p>\n
Vpersoins applying must have net worth of ?200<\/p>\n
 ,.:Cror'\u00bbes5and must had the turnover of ?'S0{) Crores for<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
l5_<\/p>\n
two years. According to the respondents, such<\/p>\n
conditions are imposed keeping in mind the_4vpV_u-biiicp<\/p>\n
interest at large.\n<\/p>\n
5. Sri Gachinmath, learnedT_cou.nsel”.app’ea’ring:onvi’<\/p>\n
behalf of the respondentsi’argVuesV”th’at if <\/p>\n
who are not having much tuno’v.er–.or t’h’ey:_d’:o not have
\nmuch positive net wo,\u00e9in,ag %.pre’4s~cpi”iit\u00a7:ed, the work of
\nBDA may  at large will<\/p>\n
be Put to  ‘V -I   <\/p>\n
  settled that in contracts<\/p>\n
having commercial.:eE..ei’naVe’nt, some more discretion has<\/p>\n
 toconcedediyto the authorities, so that they may<\/p>\n
‘ enter..i_nto\u00ab.contracts with persons, keeping an eye on<\/p>\n
the’ii’augE-nenttvation of the revenue. But even in such<\/p>\n
 matters they have to follow the norms recognised by<\/p>\n
A  AC:o’u_rts while dealing with public property. It is not<\/p>\n
 “possible for Courts to question and adjudicate every<\/p>\n
,5,<\/p>\n
decision taken by an Authority, because many of___the<\/p>\n
Government Undertakings which in due coursejha-yge.u”<\/p>\n
acquired the monopoiist position in matters’ o.f:”s:a’iie:.i_””i ”<\/p>\n
and purchase of products and with” so man_y fve.nt:ures<\/p>\n
in hand, they can come outgwithiaa ipliea  is<\/p>\n
always possible to act like aiviguasi\u00ab:jtsdic’i.a:I’.=
\nwhile awarding  “special
\ncircumstances a discretgioni ‘AcToLn’ceded to the
\nauthorities  giving
\nthem Eibertyi. iiisiwtuation for purpose
\nof taking  whom the contract be<\/p>\n
awarded  a’t’*–w’h’at. If the decisions have<\/p>\n
 been,._ita”\u00a3<en  fide manner aithough not strictiy<\/p>\n
 'A\u00abt%i'–.e*~–n_orms laid down by the Courts, such<\/p>\n
deciisi-onxs  'upheld on the principle that Courts while<\/p>\n
'judging constitutionai validity of executive<\/p>\n
 I {(:i'ecis'ions must grant certain measure of freedom of<\/p>\n
f<\/p>\n
F3<\/p>\n
' V' "Vthe"-peti.ti.ora~er.\n<\/p>\n
‘piay in the joints’ to the executive [see 199-4(6)SCC<\/p>\n
651 and 2004(4)SCC 19].\n<\/p>\n
Though this Court has thesecond'”o’p—-i.n_i0’ri;   <\/p>\n
same will not be imposed on ;’i:ithe”*Tend_er_:”inVit-i.n\u00a71:_:<\/p>\n
Authority.\n<\/p>\n
“7. During the coii._r$e of  it is\ufb02brought
\nto the notice of the _C.9ii_rt. :.gth’ev.’Ee’arned advocate
\nappearing ofithe___..4Vres”po:n’d’ents that three
\npersonVs”h’avte”;stiE)3imitt’e.d’—-.the’i’r”~tenders as on this day,
\nwhich   competition and the BDA<\/p>\n
has not kept Vi’ri.rn–.ind._i’a’i=i:y single person as ailegeci by<\/p>\n
 the same, no reiief can be granted to<\/p>\n
[the pe.ti”ti:oner. Hence, writ petition fails and<\/p>\n
57acco’i<dEng|y same is dismissed.<\/p>\n
-34<\/p>\n
If the petitioner is aggrieved by the outcome of<\/p>\n
the tender notification, it is open for him to queS._t’i’o.n<\/p>\n
the same before the appellate authority, if  _<\/p>\n
him to do so.\n<\/p>\n
*;U3gEtoa;o<\/p>\n
*ck\/–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar …..AND:..\u00ab.{_ 1′ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAEENATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10″ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANA\u00ab?:\u00a7T:OLi\u00a7.’I.\u00a7v4i’\u00a7” WRIT PETITION No.38037,v”2OIO(6\ufb01Q\\–1fN\u00a7\u00ab. % BETWEEN: B.M.Hanumanthe Gowcla S\/o.Mu|iabagaiaiah Aged 35 years : R\/at.No.152\/41, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":927,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010"},"wordCount":927,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010","name":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-11T12:38:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-m-hanumanthe-gowda-vs-the-commissioner-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B M Hanumanthe Gowda vs The Commissioner on 10 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}