{"id":41018,"date":"2009-05-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009"},"modified":"2014-09-13T21:46:19","modified_gmt":"2014-09-13T16:16:19","slug":"smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 5886 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. SMT.PAVIZHAM @ D.INDIRA DEVI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K.M.HARIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. M.C.THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. MONCY DANIEL, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.RAVINDRAN PUZHANKARA\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :21\/05\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n              S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                  -------------------------------\n              W.P.(C).NO.5886 OF 2009 (O)\n                -----------------------------------\n          Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      This writ petition is filed under Article 227 of the<\/p>\n
Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:<\/p>\n
          i. issue a writ of certiorari or such other writ,
\n          direction or order calling for the records
\n          leading   to   the   proceedings\/order     dated
\n          21.2.2009 in O.S.No.476 of 2007 on the file of
\n          the 1st Additional Sub Court, Ernakulam and
\n          quash    the   same     while    permitting  the
\n          petitioners to adduce oral evidence through
\n          their Power of Attorney Holder on the basis of
\n          Ext.P6 proof affidavit submitted in lieu of chief
\n          examination.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          ii. Award the petitioners the costs of these
\n          proceedings; and<\/p>\n
          iii. Grant such other just and proper relief(s)
\n          as this Honourable Court may deem fit and
\n          proper.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Petitioners, two in number, are the defendents 2 and 3 in<\/p>\n
O.S.No.476\/2007 on the file of the 1st Additional Sub Court,<\/p>\n
WPC.5886\/09                   2<\/span><\/p>\n
Ernakulam.    Suit was one for specific performance of an<\/p>\n
agreement of sale, filed by the 1st respondent, the plaintiff.<\/p>\n
The grievance of the petitioners is that the court below had<\/p>\n
unjustifiably denied opportunity to them to lead evidence in<\/p>\n
support of their case.   The court, after examination of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff, ordered for examining the 3rd defendant through<\/p>\n
Commission. The 1st defendant in the suit also wanted to lead<\/p>\n
evidence, but there was no order by the court to record his<\/p>\n
evidence by Commission. So much so, the counsel for both<\/p>\n
sides brought the matter to the notice of the court, the next<\/p>\n
day, and thereupon the court permitted to record the evidence<\/p>\n
of the 1st defendant also.    The examination of the       1st<\/p>\n
defendant by Commission continued till late evening, and<\/p>\n
hence, there was no more time to record the evidence of the<\/p>\n
3rd defendant on that day, is the submission of the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioners. The next day, when the matter<\/p>\n
was reported, the court was not inclined to give any more<\/p>\n
opportunity to the 2nd and 3rd defendants to lead their<\/p>\n
evidence, which was prematurely closed and the case was<\/p>\n
posted for judgment.   The petitioners approached this Court<\/p>\n
WPC.5886\/09                      3<\/span><\/p>\n
with the above writ petition seeking the indulgence of this<\/p>\n
Court granting them an opportunity to lead evidence in the<\/p>\n
case.        The    learned    counsel    appearing     for   the<\/p>\n
1st respondent submitted that the statements made by the<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioners are not fully correct, but, he does<\/p>\n
not stand on technicalities as the plaintiff is only interested in<\/p>\n
getting a decision on merits.           Having regard to the<\/p>\n
submissions made by the counsel of both sides and taking<\/p>\n
note of the facts and circumstances involved, it appears, the<\/p>\n
premature closure of the evidence,        without affording an<\/p>\n
opportunity to the 2nd and 3rd defendants, the petitioners in<\/p>\n
the case, to lead evidence was not justified. So much so, there<\/p>\n
will be a direction to the court below to provide an<\/p>\n
opportunity to the 3rd defendant, to examine his Power of<\/p>\n
Attorney holder by Commission, preferably by the same<\/p>\n
Commissioner, who recorded the evidence of the other<\/p>\n
defendant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        2. Parties are directed to appear before the court below<\/p>\n
on 2.6.2009, on which, the learned Sub Judge shall fix the<\/p>\n
WPC.5886\/09                       4<\/span><\/p>\n
date for examination of the Power of Attorney holder of the<\/p>\n
3rd defendant through Commission. The learned counsel for<\/p>\n
the       petitioners    submitted    the    evidence of  the<\/p>\n
3rd defendant by Commission alone is required to be let in on<\/p>\n
behalf of the 2nd and 3rd defendants.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        Writ petition is disposed as indicated above.<\/p>\n
                              S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                          JUDGE<\/p>\n
prp<\/p>\n
                S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
 ——————————————————–<\/p>\n
                       CRL.R.P.NO. OF 2006 ()<\/p>\n
———————————————————<\/p>\n
                                           O R D E R<\/p>\n
———————————————————<\/p>\n
                                 23rd March, 2009<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 5886 of 2009(O) 1. SMT.PAVIZHAM @ D.INDIRA DEVI, … Petitioner 2. K.M.HARIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, Vs 1. M.C.THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, … Respondent 2. MONCY DANIEL, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, For […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":614,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009"},"wordCount":614,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009","name":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-13T16:16:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-pavizham-d-indira-devi-vs-m-c-thomas-on-21-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Pavizham @ D.Indira Devi vs M.C.Thomas on 21 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41018\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}