{"id":41049,"date":"2010-09-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-06T08:05:25","modified_gmt":"2019-01-06T02:35:25","slug":"smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O … on 29 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O … on 29 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.Govindarajulu<\/div>\n
INTHEPHGH{XNHKFOFKARNATAKAATBANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2.010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K G0V1NDA}\u00a7AJUDLi.fD   \n\nREGULAR SECOND AP'PEAL\u00ab3?T\/2.CiQE\u00ab._  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. SMTKALAMMA A \nW\/O LATE RANGE GOWDA,_____ \nAGED ABOUT 60  \n\n2.  1  I\nD\/O LATE RANGE; 'G_OW'D.A', A\nAGED ABOUT-30 \n\n3. SI~\u00a3RI.NAvEEN'v'- A\nS\/G:,LA'1'E  GQWDA.\n\n D'  ~AGEI3 A1-3Gu'r 26 YEARS.\n\n \n\nS\/O.LA'i'E? GOWDA,\nAGED ABQEUT 24 YEARS.\n\n5. SRLRRAKASH\nA 3 Sm LATE RANGE GOWDA.\n* AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS.\n\nE   ALL ARE RESIDING AT\n\n\n\n(K3\n\nHOLENARASIPURA TALUK\nHALLI MYSORE HOBLI\nDODDAGOPANAHALLI VILLAGE\nHOLENARASIPURA TALUK\n\nHASSAN DISTRICT -- 570006. ...APPELL,\ufb01NTS:VV'    \n\n[BY SR1 R.P.SOMASHEKARAIAI~L ADV.)  O ;  D\nAND: _  I _\n\nSMT K.B.DI~IANALAKSHMI  \n\nW\/O MANJEGOWDA.\n\nAGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, I  \nRESIDING AT KONG2'xLZ\u00a5;BIDU;V'_F.O'R_M,'V _\nKASABAHOBLI, ._   \nHALLI MYSORE_ROAD;--     '\n\nHOLENARASIPURA T;ALUI:; I  VI\n\nHASSAN DI_S=TRlF_CT --.I570.005_, ;,  ...RESPONDENT\n\n(BY SR:1R.VNIAi5ARAJu.  \n\n\"EH18'RSAIISA4FILED\"*EJ1*JDER SECTION I00 OF CPC,\nAGAINST \u00abTHE I'UDG__MENT AND DECREE DATED\n12.11.2009' IvASSED,II=I1\u00a7..A.NO.5\/2008 ON THE FILE OF\nCIVIL JUDG'E,._j--. (S_R.'DN.) & ADDITIONAL CJM,\nHOLENARSIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND\n\n A..1ACO.'Ij\\_Ii'IEnM1NG THE'\"+J\"\"DGMENT AND DEGREE PASSED BY\n CIVIL JUD_GE_ [JR.DN.) & JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA, IN\n L O.S.'NQV;~v1_4'5\/4\"2'005 DATED 01.12.2007.\n\n  COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS\n\n DAY,  COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Defendantairi 08 145\/06 on the file of the-..gCivil<\/p>\n
Judge, Jr.Dvn., Holenarasipura are the ap.p_ella1’iit’s fir;<\/p>\n
this appeal under Section 100 CPC.\n<\/p>\n
2. Parties will be referred according to  <\/p>\n
found in the suit for convenience\u00bb. <\/p>\n
3. Learned advo.cate\u00ab”l.fo_r. submit
\nthat plaintiff is    defendant by
\nname Venkateshpa.   three months,
\nVenkateslial  has left the
\n entered into marriage
\nand thereafter’ said wedlock, plaintiff has<\/p>\n
given, birthlu”to:V’a’chil.d. Also, plaintiff is not entitled for<\/p>\n
_  _paftitld\u00a7’1′; lriview of the second marriage, the approach<\/p>\n
e-oftrial Judge and appellate judges in<\/p>\n
decr.eeirig’  suit for partition is not proper. So, pray<\/p>\n
allowing the second appeal or in the alternative to<\/p>\n
A   the appeal. He also invites the attention of the<\/p>\n
VA   Court to the additional evidence produced in the form<\/p>\n
t ”  ‘documents are<\/p>\n
of a certi\ufb01cate issued by the Medical Officer.<\/p>\n
I-Iolenarasipur, the birth certi\ufb01cate issued <\/p>\n
Municipality, Holenarasipur, the geneologi-said\u00e9treefthe’
\ncerti\ufb01cate of con\ufb01rmation issued  spree’<\/p>\n
Stree Shakti Mahila   <\/p>\n
I-Iolenarasipura as additioiiaixgvidenee.\u00bb _ T’   <\/p>\n
4. The settled’  should
\nmaintain theiivife. is ‘a11.:unfo_rtu1;ate case that the
\nplaintiff  wirthin four months of
\nher   her case that she has
\n\ufb01led atsuit for  ground that the property<\/p>\n
is an.  This suit of the piaintiff is<\/p>\n
..  A\u00e9\u00e9cre\u00e9ii. “Defendant has preferred appeal in RA 5\/08<\/p>\n
   Appeiiate Judge has confirmed the<\/p>\n
iiridings’  the learned trial Judge, has not<\/p>\n
 in.teriered with the decree for partition awarded by the<\/p>\n
it “learned trial Judge. For the first time in this Court<\/p>\n
produced and it is<\/p>\n
contended that after the death of Venkatesha, plaintiff —<\/p>\n
Dhanalakshmi has married another man, thro_ugVh.._:the<\/p>\n
said man Dhanalakshrni has a child. so, it  ‘fit 0.<\/p>\n
to allow the additional evidencehiwthich  H”<\/p>\n
Court to come to a conclusion”. tli’at’i’plaintiff <\/p>\n
entitled for a decree for partition.  narlrated”-suplra, ” it<\/p>\n
the right of a Hindu\ufb01rnarriedlllwoin_an.’i\u00a7w.xIel1Jgettled.
\nSolong as she is   for the stay
\nin the hou5’\u00b0i A .1161’  l1lnother–in–law
\nafter her  took place on
\n14.4.2005. ‘  on 1.9.2005. The
\nalleged lllseeonld  bn 22.12.2006. Atleast for<\/p>\n
the period 5}  if the 1st defendant were to<\/p>\n
. lplacle  Inajterial  having maintained the daughten<\/p>\n
in~lawf,  there was some force in the submission of<\/p>\n
 _ the dleartied-advocate for the defendants to lead additional<\/p>\n
VlL\u00bbevidence;” ll After the death of Venkatesh, plaintiff is<\/p>\n
  into the street is reflected in the facts of the<\/p>\n
it  case. So, the additional evidence now intented to be<\/p>\n
brought on record has to be analysed with the mandate<\/p>\n
under Order 41 Rule 27. Mandate <\/p>\n
order 41 Rule 27 CPC is that a person i’ <\/p>\n
lead additional evidence has to”sh’oW._vthe <\/p>\n
why the said material could placedbefore <\/p>\n
Court when the case was heardon merits’ inspite of due<\/p>\n
diligence. The appeal u_;’ff;;gi”..year  The<\/p>\n
documents now relied  in RA 5\/ 08
\nthe additional\u00e9evidentte.   be produced is
\nnot    on the part of
\ndefendants’   of due diligence they
\ncould   additional evidence. The<\/p>\n
subject of’u”additi’onal evidence is also analysed on<\/p>\n
. l\u00b0’rmeritsfl:*Plea_ put  in the additional evidence is as<\/p>\n
  she is not entitled for partition.\n<\/p>\n
Hear. stre,\u00a7:*V Shakti Mahila Swasayaha Sarnsthe,<\/p>\n
 Vlpt\ufb01olenarasipura is authorised under law to state about<\/p>\n
  birth of child through second marriage remains<\/p>\n
  -unsubstantiated. This probablise the fragile nature of<\/p>\n
intended additional evidence. Suit for partition by a<\/p>\n
widow has taken 4 years. If there is truth in <\/p>\n
additional evidence is permissible. Not in a__-case” .<\/p>\n
in additional evidence takes genesis i–n”‘se!’fp. st-rvingv_ nu<\/p>\n
organizations. So application for arldlitiona’l..evidence:<\/p>\n
under Order 41 Rule 27 isllriej-e_cted;’  was ” it<\/p>\n
not placed before the Court,_.Reasoi1.. is not ‘f\ufb02lln\u00e9l in the
\naf\ufb01davit filed in   ‘application for
\nadditional evidence.  ‘sees no reason to<\/p>\n
admit the dismissed at the<\/p>\n
stage of adrnis*sion’?.itseii’;.. _ —<\/p>\n
sa\/as<\/p>\n
Jndcf\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O … on 29 September, 2010 Author: K.Govindarajulu INTHEPHGH{XNHKFOFKARNATAKAATBANGALORE DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2.010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K G0V1NDA}\u00a7AJUDLi.fD REGULAR SECOND AP’PEAL\u00ab3?T\/2.CiQE\u00ab._ BETWEEN: 1. SMTKALAMMA A W\/O LATE RANGE GOWDA,_____ AGED ABOUT 60 2. 1 I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Kalamma W\\\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\\\/O … on 29 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":664,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Kalamma W\\\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\\\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Kalamma W\\\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\\\/O … on 29 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O … on 29 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010"},"wordCount":664,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010","name":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O ... on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-06T02:35:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kalamma-wo-lt-range-gowda-vs-smt-k-b-dhanalakshmi-wo-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Kalamma W\/O Lt Range Gowda vs Smt K B Dhanalakshmi W\/O … on 29 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41049\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}