{"id":4115,"date":"2008-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-28T19:17:24","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T13:47:24","slug":"mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008<\/div>\n
           Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n                       -1-\n\nIn the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.\n\n                   Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n\n                   Date of decision:25.9.2008.\n\nMamlook Ali.\n\n                                                ...Petitioner.\n\n             Versus\n\nState of Haryana.\n\n                                                ...Respondent.\n\n             ...\n\nCoram:       Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri.\n\n             ...\n\nPresent:     Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.\n\n             Mr. S.S.Goripuria, DAG Haryana.\n\n             ...\n\nK. C. Puri, J.\n<\/pre>\n
Judgment<\/p>\n
     This Criminal Revision petition has been filed against the<\/p>\n
judgment and order dated 5.12.2006 passed by Shri C.L.Mohal,<\/p>\n
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,Jagadhri whereby the<\/p>\n
petitioner was held guilty for offences punishable under Sections<\/p>\n
170, 465, 468,471,convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of
\n          Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n<\/p>\n
                     -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
Rs.500\/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 170 IPC; to<\/p>\n
undergo imprisonment for a period of six months and fine of<\/p>\n
Rs.500\/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of one month under Section 465 IPC; to<\/p>\n
undergo imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of<\/p>\n
Rs.2,000\/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of four months under Section 468 IPC<\/p>\n
and to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of<\/p>\n
Rs.2,000\/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo<\/p>\n
imprisonment for a period of four months under Section 471 IPC.<\/p>\n
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.\n<\/p>\n
           The petitioner has also impugned the judgment dated<\/p>\n
16.7.2008 delivered by Shri Darshan Singh, Additional Sessions<\/p>\n
Judge, Yamuna Nagar whereby his appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n
           As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was booked<\/p>\n
in the present case, at the instance of PW-2 Complainant Parveen<\/p>\n
Kumar Garg, who in his statement Exhibit PB, on the basis of<\/p>\n
which the present case was registered, has stated that on 19.4.1999,<\/p>\n
his daughter Shaveta went to school but did not return and in that<\/p>\n
regard, he got lodged one F.I.R in the police station and even an<\/p>\n
advertisement was published in the newspaper “Punjab Kesri”\n<\/p>\n
          Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n<\/p>\n
                     -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
about her missing.\n<\/p>\n
           The complainant further stated that on 22.5.1999, at<\/p>\n
about 5-00 P.M, he along with his brother-in-law Naresh Kumar<\/p>\n
Mittal was present at his house. In the meantime, a boy came there<\/p>\n
and told his name as Mamlook Ali. The accused apprised the<\/p>\n
complainant that he had come from C.B.I and also showed his<\/p>\n
identity card. Thereafter, he told that the Head Office of C.B.I had<\/p>\n
sent him for investigation of his missing girl. He asked for a room<\/p>\n
for his residence and for arrangement of a two wheeler.            He<\/p>\n
(complainant) got suspicious and when he asked that boy about his<\/p>\n
authenticity, earlier he refused, but , later on, admitted that he was<\/p>\n
not a C.B.I official. He then informed the police.<\/p>\n
           During       the    investigation   of    the   case,   the<\/p>\n
accused\/petitioner was arrested. He was interrogated and fake<\/p>\n
identity card, news-paper cutting about advertisement\/notice<\/p>\n
regarding missing of Shaveta and a rubber stamp were recovered<\/p>\n
from his possession.\n<\/p>\n
           Statements of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C<\/p>\n
were recorded and after completion of investigation, final report<\/p>\n
under Section 173 Cr.P.C was presented before the Court of law.<\/p>\n
           The accused\/petitioner was charge-sheeted accordingly<\/p>\n
to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.\n<\/p>\n
             Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n<\/p>\n
                        -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
              The prosecution, in support of its case, examined PW-1<\/p>\n
Naresh Kumar Mittal, PW-2 complainant Parveen Kumar, PW-3 SI<\/p>\n
Narinder Kumar and PW-4 SI Ajit Kumar, Investigating Officer of<\/p>\n
the case.\n<\/p>\n
              After the conclusion of prosecution evidence, the<\/p>\n
statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
He pleaded himself to be innocent.\n<\/p>\n
              However, the accused did not produce any evidence in<\/p>\n
his defence.\n<\/p>\n
              On an appreciation of the entire evidence on the record,<\/p>\n
the learned trial Court convicted and sentenced the accused as<\/p>\n
detailed above and his appeal was also dismissed, as noticed<\/p>\n
earlier.\n<\/p>\n
              At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has<\/p>\n
taken up a stand that having regard to the concurrent findings<\/p>\n
returned by the Courts below in relation to the conviction of the<\/p>\n
petitioner for the offences in question, he may not be able to<\/p>\n
persuade this Court to take a contrary view and that, too, on re-<\/p>\n
appraisal and re-appreciation of the evidence on record.<\/p>\n
Consequently, instead of pressing this Criminal Revision Petition,<\/p>\n
on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently<\/p>\n
argued that the alleged occurrence had taken place in the year 1999
\n           Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n<\/p>\n
                      -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
and the petitioner faced a protracted trial for about nine years; the<\/p>\n
petitioner had already undergone more three months of actual<\/p>\n
imprisonment out of total sentence of two years and that it will be<\/p>\n
inequitable to send him to jail again at this stage.<\/p>\n
              The learned State counsel,though, does not dispute the<\/p>\n
afore-mentioned mitigating circumstances, yet he contends that in<\/p>\n
view of nature of the offence proved against the petitioner, it might<\/p>\n
not be a fit case for reducing the sentence already awarded to the<\/p>\n
petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
              Apart from considering the fact that the impugned<\/p>\n
judgments are based on cogent and reliable evidence, it is to be<\/p>\n
seen that this Criminal Revision was admitted on the quantum of<\/p>\n
sentence only. Therefore, the conviction of the petitioner is<\/p>\n
confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
              Keeping in view the cardinal principle of law that right<\/p>\n
of speedy and expeditious trial is one of the most valuable and<\/p>\n
cherished right of an accused;            the purpose of punishment in<\/p>\n
criminal cases is that the person found guilty of committing the<\/p>\n
offence is made to realize his fault and is deterred from repeating<\/p>\n
such acts in future; that the reformative aspect is meant to enable<\/p>\n
the person concerned to relent and repent for his action and make<\/p>\n
himself acceptable to the society as a useful social being and the
\n          Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n<\/p>\n
                     -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
fact that within the parameters of the law, an attempt should be<\/p>\n
made to afford an opportunity to the individual to reform himself<\/p>\n
and lead the life of a normal, useful member of society and make<\/p>\n
his contribution in that regard. The accused, by his act, has not<\/p>\n
harmed anyone. So, keeping in view the totality of circumstances,<\/p>\n
the ends of justice would be fully met if the sentence of the<\/p>\n
petitioner is reduced to the period already undergone by him but<\/p>\n
the amount of fine is enhanced suitably.\n<\/p>\n
           Therefore, the sentence of the petitioner is reduced to<\/p>\n
the period already undergone by him but the amount of fine is<\/p>\n
enhanced to Rs.10,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n
           However, in default                of   payment of   fine,   the<\/p>\n
accused\/petitioner shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for a<\/p>\n
period of three months.\n<\/p>\n
           This Criminal Revision is disposed of in the manner<\/p>\n
indicated above.\n<\/p>\n
           A copy of this judgment be sent to the learned trial<\/p>\n
Court for strict compliance.<\/p>\n
\n\nSeptember 25,2008.                     ( K. C. Puri )\nJaggi                                       Judge\n Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008.\n            -7-<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008. -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No.1342 of 2008. Date of decision:25.9.2008. Mamlook Ali. …Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana. …Respondent. … Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri. … Present: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1114,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008"},"wordCount":1114,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008","name":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T13:47:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mamlook-ali-vs-state-of-haryana-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mamlook Ali vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}