{"id":41151,"date":"2007-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007"},"modified":"2018-04-16T00:01:57","modified_gmt":"2018-04-15T18:31:57","slug":"sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","title":{"rendered":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 24533 of 2007()\n\n\n1. SHERLY GEORGE,UPPER DIVISION CLERK,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. F.A.SHYLA,U.D CLERK,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.KKM.SHERIF\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :24\/08\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                   ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n\n            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n              W.P.(C) No. 24533  OF 2007 U\n            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n           Dated this the 24th  August, 2007\n\n                    J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>    This writ petition is filed seeking to quash Ext.<\/p>\n<p>P16 and to declare that the 1st petitioner is entitled<\/p>\n<p>for promotion with effect from 13-2-1986 and the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, on 11-6-1986.     Petitioners also seek a<\/p>\n<p>direction to the respondents to grant all consequential<\/p>\n<p>benefits.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2. The 1st petitioner entered service as a Lower<\/p>\n<p>Division Clerk on 3-9-1984 and on passing departmental<\/p>\n<p>tests in 1986, her probation was declared on 10-2-1987.<\/p>\n<p>The 2nd petitioner also commenced service as a Lower<\/p>\n<p>Division   Clerk   on   28-11-1984   and   on    passing<\/p>\n<p>departmental test in February 1986, her probation was<\/p>\n<p>declared with effect from 25-2-1987.       On 13-2-1986<\/p>\n<p>though the 1st petitioner was promoted as Upper Division<\/p>\n<p>Clerk, she was reverted by Ext. P1 order dated 14-7-<\/p>\n<p>1988 and was later promoted with effect from 27-2-1997.<\/p>\n<p>    3. In so far as the 2nd petitioner is concerned,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No. 24533 OF 2007            2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>she was not included in Ext. P2 seniority list and<\/p>\n<p>hence was not considered for promotion.          However, by<\/p>\n<p>Ext. P4 order dated 3-4-1988 she was promoted as an<\/p>\n<p>Upper Division Clerk with effect from 1-4-1987.          Ext.<\/p>\n<p>P5 is an order cancelling Ext. P4 order of promotion of<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd petitioner based on a complaint made by the 1st<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and another employee called Geetha and by<\/p>\n<p>this order the 2nd petitioner&#8217;s promotion was made<\/p>\n<p>effective from 4-5-1998.        Her request for review of the<\/p>\n<p>order was rejected by Ext. P7 and her pay was also<\/p>\n<p>fixed accordingly.        Thereafter Ext. P10 memo was issued<\/p>\n<p>proposing      to    recover Rs.67,995\/-  drawn  by  the  2nd<\/p>\n<p>petitioner excessively.        She had also filed an appeal<\/p>\n<p>against Ext. P7 order.         That was rejected by Ext. P11<\/p>\n<p>and her representation against Ext. P10 memo proposing<\/p>\n<p>recovery, was also rejected by Ext. P12.             At that<\/p>\n<p>stage, the 2nd petitioner filed O.P. No. 2865 of 2003<\/p>\n<p>challenging Exts. P11 and P12 and the case was disposed<\/p>\n<p>of by Ext. P14 judgment directing reconsideration of<\/p>\n<p>the matter.        She again represented by Ext. P15 and on<\/p>\n<p>its rejection by Ext. P16 which included an order for<\/p>\n<p>recovery of Rs.67,995\/-, this writ petition has been<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No. 24533 OF 2007            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>filed by both the petitioners, seeking the reliefs<\/p>\n<p>mentioned earlier.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4. In so far as the 1st petitioner is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>she seeks a declaration that she is entitled for<\/p>\n<p>promotion with effect from 13-2-1986.        From the facts<\/p>\n<p>narrated earlier, it is evident that the 1st petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was    promoted      initially  to  the  category  of  Upper<\/p>\n<p>Division Clerk with effect from 13-2-1986.        Thereafter<\/p>\n<p>by Ext. P1 order dated 14-7-1988 she was reverted as a<\/p>\n<p>Lower Division Clerk and thereafter her promotion was<\/p>\n<p>made effective from 27-2-1997.         Facts also show that<\/p>\n<p>the cancellation of Ext. P4 order of promotion of the<\/p>\n<p>2nd petitioner as per Ext. P5       was made on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>a complaint made by the 1st petitioner and another<\/p>\n<p>employee.       After Ext. P1 order, she did not make any<\/p>\n<p>complaint or take any action against her reversion or<\/p>\n<p>the order promoting her with effect from 27-2-1997.       It<\/p>\n<p>is only after almost two decades that she is making<\/p>\n<p>this claim for the first time.        If this claim is to be<\/p>\n<p>allowed      now    that  will  be  unsettling  the  settled<\/p>\n<p>position       of    various  employees  and  that  is   not<\/p>\n<p>permissible.         Apart from the delay that is involved,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No. 24533 OF 2007             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the persons who are likely to be affected by such pre-<\/p>\n<p>poning of her promotion, are also not made parties to<\/p>\n<p>this writ petition.         Primarily for the delay and laches<\/p>\n<p>in   challenging        Ext. P1   and  the  order  making  her<\/p>\n<p>promotion effective from 27-2-1997, she is not entitled<\/p>\n<p>to any relief.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5. In so far as the 2nd petitioner is concerned<\/p>\n<p>though by Ext. P4 she was promoted as Upper Division<\/p>\n<p>Clerk with effect from 1-4-1987, based on a complaint<\/p>\n<p>made by the 1st petitioner and another person, Ext. P4<\/p>\n<p>was cancelled by Ext. P5 and the promotion of the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was made effective from 4-5-1998.            It is<\/p>\n<p>this order that ultimately led to Ext. P16 which is<\/p>\n<p>challenged in this writ petition.         She is claiming that<\/p>\n<p>she should be promoted in the vacancy           on 11-6-1986.<\/p>\n<p>While examining her claim for such promotion it is to<\/p>\n<p>be noted that the probation of the 2nd petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>declared only on 25-2-1987.         For the period upto 24-2-<\/p>\n<p>1987 the 2nd petitioner was only a probationer and none<\/p>\n<p>of her juniors superseded her as Upper Division Clerk.<\/p>\n<p>     6. She is also not eligible to get promotion<\/p>\n<p>during June, 1986 to August 1986 in the unfilled<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No. 24533 OF 2007            5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>vacancies since none of her juniors were qualified for<\/p>\n<p>promotion       till     the date  of   declaration  of   her<\/p>\n<p>probation.        Therefore the provisions of Rule 28A(1)<\/p>\n<p>does not come to her assistance.        It is also seen that<\/p>\n<p>between 25-2-1987, when her probation was declared and<\/p>\n<p>4-5-1998 the date from which she was actually promoted<\/p>\n<p>as per Ext. P5, only her seniors were qualified and<\/p>\n<p>were given promotion.         Thus none has superseded her<\/p>\n<p>during this period giving rise to any complaint.           In<\/p>\n<p>this factual background, 2nd       petitioner cannot have any<\/p>\n<p>sustainable claim to insist that she should be given<\/p>\n<p>promotion with effect from 11-6-1986.<\/p>\n<p>     For the aforesaid reasons I do not find anything<\/p>\n<p>illegal      in   Ext.    P16 warranting  interference  under<\/p>\n<p>Article 226 of the Constitution of India.           The writ<\/p>\n<p>petition therefore fails and is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                                ANTONY DOMINIC<br \/>\n                                                         JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>jan\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 24533 of 2007() 1. SHERLY GEORGE,UPPER DIVISION CLERK, &#8230; Petitioner 2. F.A.SHYLA,U.D CLERK, Vs 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL For Petitioner :SRI.KKM.SHERIF For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\"},\"wordCount\":928,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\",\"name\":\"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007","datePublished":"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007"},"wordCount":928,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007","name":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-15T18:31:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sherly-george-vs-the-secretary-to-government-on-24-august-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sherly George vs The Secretary To Government on 24 August, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}