{"id":41268,"date":"2007-08-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-08-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007"},"modified":"2017-02-01T00:27:23","modified_gmt":"2017-01-31T18:57:23","slug":"k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","title":{"rendered":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA No. 489 of 2007()\n\n\n1. K.SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, AGED 48 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. PERUNTHATTA NARAYANI AMMA, AGED 70 YEARS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :02\/08\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n              M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n            ===========================\n             R.S.A. NO. 489    OF 2007\n            ===========================\n\n       Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2007\n\n                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
    Plaintiff  in  O.S.265\/2001  on  the  file   of<\/p>\n
Munsiff  Court,   Kasaragod   is   the   appellant.<\/p>\n
Defendant is the respondent.  Appellant instituted<\/p>\n
the suit seeking a decree for declaration  that he<\/p>\n
is  the  absolute  owner  of  the  plaint  schedule<\/p>\n
property and Ext.B5 sale deed dated 3.6.1995 is<\/p>\n
null and void.    Case of the appellant was that<\/p>\n
plaint schedule property and other properties were<\/p>\n
originally in the possession of Krishna Bhat   and<\/p>\n
Krishna  Bhat  and  his  children  partitioned  the<\/p>\n
property under Ext.A2 partition deed on 17.11.1965<\/p>\n
and   plaint schedule property along with other<\/p>\n
properties was allotted to Sankaranarayana Bhat and<\/p>\n
Sankaranarayana Bhat   transferred the property in<\/p>\n
favour   of   Venkitakrishna   Ganaraja,   Keshava,<\/p>\n
Shivakumara,   Udaneswara    and   Manjunatha    to<\/p>\n
Venkitakrishna and others  in 1976 as per document<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007            2<\/span><\/p>\n
No.649\/1976 and thereafter Venkitakrishna       sold<\/p>\n
plaint A schedule property to the appellant under<\/p>\n
Ext.A8 sale deed dated 11.9.1978 and appellant is<\/p>\n
thus the absolute owner in possession        of the<\/p>\n
plaint A schedule property and respondent has no<\/p>\n
manner of right over the road which is a private<\/p>\n
road which absolutely belong to the appellant and<\/p>\n
respondent     or Venkitakrishna has  no  title   or<\/p>\n
possession of the property. It was alleged that   as<\/p>\n
per Ext.B5 it is seen that    property was purchased<\/p>\n
from B.M.Abdulla and four others as per document<\/p>\n
dated 3.6.1995 and Abdulla got the property from<\/p>\n
Moosa as per sale deed dated 13.7.1987 and Moosa<\/p>\n
had no right over the property and    respondent did<\/p>\n
not derive any right over     the plaint A schedule<\/p>\n
property under the said document and therefore<\/p>\n
appellant is entitled to the declaration that he is<\/p>\n
the    absolute  owner  of  the plaint  A   schedule<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007              3<\/span><\/p>\n
property and Ext.B5 is null and void.      Respondent<\/p>\n
filed a written statement denying the right claimed<\/p>\n
by the appellant.      It was contended that plaint A<\/p>\n
schedule property was never in the      possession of<\/p>\n
Venkitakrishna and appellant did not derive any<\/p>\n
title or possession of the property under Ext.A8<\/p>\n
sale deed and Ext.A8 is not binding on the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property or      respondent and the property<\/p>\n
was purchased by him from Abdulla and others as per<\/p>\n
sale deed dated 3.6.1985 and the vendor Abdulla<\/p>\n
purchased it from Moosa as per document dated<\/p>\n
13.3.1987 and appellant is not entitled to the<\/p>\n
decree sought for.\n<\/p>\n
      2.     Learned Munsiff on the evidence of Pws.1<\/p>\n
and 2, DW1 and Exts.A1 to A8 and B1 to B8 found<\/p>\n
that appellant did not establish his       title.  It<\/p>\n
was found that Ext.A8 under which appellant had<\/p>\n
claimed title to the property, was registered in<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007              4<\/span><\/p>\n
Sub Registrar’s office, Badiadka when        plaint A<\/p>\n
schedule      falls within  the  jurisdiction  of  Sub<\/p>\n
Registrar      Office,  Kasaragod.    Though  it   was<\/p>\n
contended that       jurisdiction over the plaint A<\/p>\n
schedule property was originally with Badiadka Sub<\/p>\n
Registrar’s office,       no evidence was adduced in<\/p>\n
support of the claim. Relying on the decision of<\/p>\n
the High Court of Nagpur (A.I.R. 1946      337) it was<\/p>\n
held that appellant did not derive any title under<\/p>\n
Ext.A1. Learned Munsiff on appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n
found that when examined as PW1, appellant admitted<\/p>\n
that he sold the property in 2002      to one Madhavan<\/p>\n
Nair. On the evidence it was found that appellant<\/p>\n
did not establish the title and       therefore he is<\/p>\n
not entitled      to the decree sought for.  Appellant<\/p>\n
challenged     the  decree  and  judgment  before  Sub<\/p>\n
Court, Kasaragod in A.S.25\/2003.     Learned Sub Judge<\/p>\n
on reappreciation of evidence found that appellant<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007               5<\/span><\/p>\n
did not establish the title and dismissed the<\/p>\n
appeal.      It is challenged in the second appeal.<\/p>\n
      3.      Learned counsel appearing for appellant<\/p>\n
was heard.\n<\/p>\n
      4.     The argument of learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for      appellant    is   that    Ext.A5   encumbrance<\/p>\n
certificate      shows  the  details  of  the  previous<\/p>\n
transfer in respect of the property and       therefore<\/p>\n
it establishes that the property was originally<\/p>\n
within the jurisdiction of Badiadka Sub Registrar’s<\/p>\n
office and therefore finding of the courts below<\/p>\n
that     Ext.A8   is  not  valid  is  not  sustainable.<\/p>\n
Learned counsel also argued that the right obtained<\/p>\n
by respondent is from Moosa who claim that the<\/p>\n
property transferred thereunder is a Government<\/p>\n
land and there is no evidence to prove that it is a<\/p>\n
Government land and even if it is a Government land<\/p>\n
Moosa could not have any right to tranfer the<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007               6<\/span><\/p>\n
property in favour of Abdulla and so respondent is<\/p>\n
not entitled to claim       title to the property.  It<\/p>\n
was further contended that Ext.A2 partition deed<\/p>\n
the     property    divided   thereunder     originally<\/p>\n
belonged      to  Krishna  Bhat  which  devolved     on<\/p>\n
Sankaranarayana      Bhat   and     were  divided   and<\/p>\n
thereafter the        property was purchased    by the<\/p>\n
appellant and      courts below should have upheld the<\/p>\n
title of the appellant      finding that respondent has<\/p>\n
no title under Ext.B5.\n<\/p>\n
      5.    On hearing  learned counsel  for appellant,<\/p>\n
I do not find any substantial question of law<\/p>\n
involved in the appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      6.      Appellant is setting up    title to the<\/p>\n
plaint schedule property under Ext.A8 sale deed.<\/p>\n
Respondent       contended that the property covered<\/p>\n
under Ext.A8 does not fall under          Badiadka Sub<\/p>\n
Registrar’s Office and but      within the jurisdiction<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007              7<\/span><\/p>\n
of Sub Registrar’s Office, Kasaragod and hence<\/p>\n
under Ext.A8 appellant did not derive any right on<\/p>\n
the document is invalid.     It was accepted by courts<\/p>\n
below. The argument of learned counsel is that<\/p>\n
Ext.A5 establish that the      property was originally<\/p>\n
within the jurisdiction of Badiadka Sub Registrar’s<\/p>\n
Office and it was subsequently transferred to      Sub<\/p>\n
Registrar’s office, Kasaragod.     The trial court and<\/p>\n
the first appellate court considered this aspect<\/p>\n
and found that      absolutely no evidence was adduced<\/p>\n
to prove that transfer and if the case of the<\/p>\n
appellant      that  the  property    was  origingally<\/p>\n
included        within    the  jurisdiction of     Sub<\/p>\n
Registrar’s office, Badiadka and was      subsequently<\/p>\n
transferred to Sub Registrar’s Office kasaragod,<\/p>\n
the order transferring the jurisdiction     could have<\/p>\n
been produced. For the         failure to prove that<\/p>\n
aspect       the case of the respondent that Badiadka<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007               8<\/span><\/p>\n
Sub Registrar’s office         has no jurisdiction to<\/p>\n
register      a  document  in  respect  of   properties<\/p>\n
falling under Sub Registrar’s office, Kasaragod<\/p>\n
was upheld.      I do not find any reason to interfere<\/p>\n
with that finding of fact, in the absence of any<\/p>\n
other acceptable       evidence, which could have been<\/p>\n
adduced      by the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
      7. When the appellant is setting up    title and<\/p>\n
seeking a decree for declaration of the title he is<\/p>\n
not entitled to      a decree either on the weakness of<\/p>\n
the respondent’s case or on the failure of the<\/p>\n
respondent to establish her      title.  Appellant has<\/p>\n
to establish the title.          Courts below on the<\/p>\n
evidence found that appellant has no title.        Even<\/p>\n
if    Ext.A8    is  valid,  unless  the title  of   the<\/p>\n
assignor of Ext.A8 is established by producing the<\/p>\n
previous basic title deeds, the title cannot be<\/p>\n
upheld. Learned Munsiff and learned Sub Judge on<\/p>\n
R.S.A.489\/2007           9<\/span><\/p>\n
appreciation of evidence held   that appellant did<\/p>\n
not establish the same. That factual finding cannot<\/p>\n
be interfered .  As  no substantial question of law<\/p>\n
is involved in the appeal, appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                               M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
\n                                        JUDGE
\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
   ———————\n<\/p>\n
    W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n<\/p>\n
   ———————\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
    SEPTEMBER,2006<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA No. 489 of 2007() 1. K.SUBRAHMANYA BHAT, AGED 48 YEARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. PERUNTHATTA NARAYANI AMMA, AGED 70 YEARS … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH For Respondent : No Appearance The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1209,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\",\"name\":\"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007","datePublished":"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007"},"wordCount":1209,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007","name":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-08-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-31T18:57:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-subrahmanya-bhat-vs-perunthatta-narayani-amma-on-2-august-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Subrahmanya Bhat vs Perunthatta Narayani Amma on 2 August, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}