{"id":4131,"date":"2009-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-21T17:08:40","modified_gmt":"2016-04-21T11:38:40","slug":"madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Rajasthan High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>    \n\n \n \n \n\n \t               In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan \n\t\t\t\t              Jaipur Bench \n\t\t\t\t\t     Judgment\n\t\t\t\t\t\t  **\t\t\t\t\t \n<\/pre>\n<p>S.No. \/ Civil Writ Petition No. \/         Cause  title<\/p>\n<p>1. 8359\/2009  Naval Kishore Sharma Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.8690\/2009  Madhu Bala Sharma    Versus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.8140\/2009  Madhu Mathur \t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.8168\/2009  Ram Chandra Silu   \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.8223\/2009 Rajesh K.Gurjar &amp; Ors. Versus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.8351\/2009 Anoop Yadav &amp; Anr.    Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.8353\/2009 Hari Ram Palsania \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.8355\/2009 Asha Palsaniya\t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.8356\/2009 Ms Kamlesh Sharma     Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.8357\/2009 Madhu Raje Goyal\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>11.8363\/2009 Smt. Madhu Sharma     Versus Secy. RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.8365\/2009 Naveen Mathur \t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.8366\/2009 Babita Kumawat\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>14.8396\/2009 Vivek Upadhyaya \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>15.8419\/2009 Lokesh Sharma \t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>16.8526\/2009 Sunita Punia\t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>17.8530\/2009 Rekhi Yadav &amp; Anr \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>18.8533\/2009 Hansa Devi Yadav &amp; Anr Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>19.8535\/2009 Kavita Sharma \t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>20.8536\/2009 Smt. Rashmi Sharma &amp; Anr Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>21.8537\/2009 Jitendra S. Dagur \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>22.8538\/2009 Divya Dixit &amp; Ors.\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>23.8540\/2009 Sunita Sharma\t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>24.8543\/2009 Rewati Raman Jaiman Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>25.8546\/2009 Manju Bala Meena \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>26.8548\/2009 Sunita Jain \t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>27.8550\/2009 Sapna Arya \t \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>28.8553\/2009 Jamku Kumari Chouhan Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>29.8554\/2009 Avdesh Kr. Sharma \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>30.8606\/2009 Jai Singh &amp; Ors. \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>31.8609\/2009 Rakesh Kr. Kumawat &amp; Ors \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>32.8610\/2009 Sunita Kumawat &amp; Anr\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>33.8611\/2009 Babita Kumari &amp; Ors  Versus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>34.8612\/2009 Rajesh Kr. Dhania \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>35.8613\/2009 Vikash Dua &amp; Ors \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>36.8615\/2009 Suresh Kr. Khatik \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>37.8616\/2009 Poonam Ahlawat &amp; Ors \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>38.8628\/2009 Deepika Kaushik \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>39.8633\/2009 Mukesh C. Kumhar\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>40.8635\/2009 Rajendra Kr. Meena \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>41.8636\/2009 Dharmendra Singh\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>42.8641\/2009 Sameer Singh Bag\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>43.8642\/2009 Ramesh C.Saini \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>44.8644\/2009 Rekha Kumari &amp; Anr.   Versus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>45.8656\/2009 Prahlad S.Meena &amp; Ors Versus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>46.8658\/2009 Km Seema Sharma &amp; Anr.\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>47.8663\/2009  Rajesh Kumar &amp; Ors. \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>48.8667\/2009 Vijay Raj Raigar &amp; Ors\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>49.8671\/2009 Prahlad Choudhary \t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>50.8677\/2009 Mithlesh Kumari &amp; Ors.\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>51.8680\/2009 Hemlata Purohit \t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>52.8687\/2009 Sanju &amp; Ors.\t \t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>53.8693\/2009 Jyoti Khandelwal \t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>54.8712\/2009 Vijay Laxmi @ Kavita \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>55.8713\/2009 Renu Kumari \t\t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>56.8721\/2009 Km. Meenakshi Khangar \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>57.8723\/2009 Montu Garg\t\t \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>58.8725\/2009 Keshar \t\t\t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>59.8728\/2009 Hemant Kr. Lawaniya \t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>60.8729\/2009 Jawara Ram \t\t\tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>61.8734\/2009 Chandrawati \t\t\tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>62.8736\/2009 Priyanka &amp; Anr\t\t \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>63.8741\/2009 Anil Kr. Pareek &amp; Anr. \tVersus State &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>64.8742\/2009 Suresh Kr. Saini &amp; Anr \tVersus RPSC &amp; Ors.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t                  Date of Order     :        30\/11\/09<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t        Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi <\/p>\n<p>Advocates for petitioners<br \/>\nSarva Shri Anoop Dhand, Sunil Kr. Singodia, SK Gupta,<br \/>\nRahul Kanwar, Ram Manohar Sharma, Kuldeep Aswal,<br \/>\nManoj Bhardwaj, Prakash Kasuhik, Mukesh Agarwal,<br \/>\nShashi Bhushan Gupta, Vijay Pathak, Arvind Sharma,<br \/>\nAdarsh Sharma, Vikas Kabra, SR Choudhary, Jai Prakash Gupta,<br \/>\nCP Sharma, BBL Sharma, Yogesh Sharma, Praveen Sharma,<br \/>\nSudarshan Laddha, Vinod Goyal, Manish Sharma, Omvir Singh,<br \/>\nAnshuman Saxena, Chiranji Lal Saini, SK Saksena, SN Meena,<br \/>\nAtma Ram Meena, Shivendra S.Rathore, Satya Pal Poshwal,<br \/>\nDD Khandelwal, Kailash C.Charan, Dilip S.Bqagdoliya,<br \/>\nPS Sirohi, Manu Bhargava, Prahlad Sharma, YK Sharma,<br \/>\nBrajesh Sharma, Deepak Ashopa, Mahesh Gautam, Dilip Sinsinwar,<br \/>\nRD Singh Naruka, Miss Sonia Shandilya &amp; Shashi Sharma.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr. SN Kumawat for Mr. SN Kumawat, for respondent-RPSC<br \/>\nMr. Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel for State<br \/>\n\t\tAll these petitions being based on common facts involving identical controversy raised at the bar are being decided together at joint request by present order.<br \/>\n \tBeing eligible for the posts of Teachers (Sanskrit)\/General Teachers Gr.III advertised by Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer (PSC) vide notification No.1\/Exam. Ga\/Adhyapak\/Sanskrit Shiksha\/2008-09\/1125\/dated 20\/06\/2008 (Ann.1\/CWP-8359\/2009) petitioners submitted their applications.<br \/>\n\tIt has not been disputed that all the petitioners are eligible to appear in process of selection initiated by PSC for the post of Teachers (Sanskrit)\/General Teachers Gr.III but their candidature has been rejected only on the premises of either having filled up wrong post Code or failed to fill up post Code in OMR sheet being appended to the application form or having been made available to the applicants through downloading from internet website of respondent-PSC  by virtue whereof, they were not permitted to appear in Teacher (Sanskrit)\/General Teachers Gr.III competitive examination, 2008 which was scheduled to be held on 22\/07\/09 as is evident from press notification dt.02\/07\/09. These petitioners approached this Court by way of instant petitions. Under interim orders, all of them were provisionally permitted to participate in process of selection and appear in aforesaid competitive examination, 2008 subject to production of proof regarding Bar Code and declaration of result of their participation was made subject to permission of this Court. However, pursuant to interim orders, Admit cards were issued to respective petitioners.<br \/>\n\tCounsel for petitioners jointly submit that initially while advertisement was published on 20\/06\/08 separate post Code was to be mentioned by applicant intending to participate pursuant to advertisement, ibid, but upon corrigendum being published by respondent-PSC vide notification No.2\/2008-09\/dt.02\/09\/08 (Ann.3-CWP-8359\/09) calling upon incumbents to mention different post Code for Teacher (Sanskrit)\/General Teacher Gr.III, confusion was created in their mind while mentioning respective Post code in course of filling up OMR sheet.<br \/>\n   It is not the case of respondents that petitioners were not eligible to appear in written competitive examination, 2008 having been held pursuant to advertisement dt. 20\/06\/08 (Ann.1) on the basis of their respective qualifications which they possessed  but their only counter is that on account of wrong mention of post Code or failure to do so, their respective applications have been rejected by respondent-PSC.<br \/>\n    Since the grievance raised at the bar is only confined to wrong mention of post Code or failure to do so by petitioners, that itself in no manner can curtail their right to participate in competitive examination, 2008 (supra) pursuant to advertisement dt.20\/06\/08 and that apart, once the petitioners though eigible have been permitted to appear in the competitive examination, 2008, ibid, even under interim orders, their appears to be a reasonable justification that they may know the final fate of their participation.<br \/>\n    In the light of what has been observed (supra), all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondent-PSC to declare result of participation of the writ  petitioners who have appeared under interim orders of this Court, by wide publication &amp; circulation including through internet website of respondent-PSC within fifteen days and if placed in the merit list, respondents are directed to consider them for appointment as per order of their respective merit prepared by respondent-PSC in pursuance of advertisement dt.20\/06\/08. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t          (Ajay Rastogi), J.\n<\/p>\n<p>K.Khatri\/p6\/<br \/>\n8359CW09-64Nov30TchrSnsk.doc<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench Judgment ** S.No. \/ Civil Writ Petition No. \/ Cause title 1. 8359\/2009 Naval Kishore Sharma Versus State &amp; Ors. 2.8690\/2009 Madhu Bala Sharma Versus RPSC &amp; Ors. 3.8140\/2009 Madhu [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1173,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009"},"wordCount":1173,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009","name":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T11:38:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madhu-mathur-vs-state-of-raj-and-ors-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhu Mathur vs State Of Raj And Ors on 30 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4131\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}