{"id":4147,"date":"2010-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-10T11:13:37","modified_gmt":"2016-07-10T05:43:37","slug":"dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 35218 of 2009(Q)\n\n\n1. DR.J.SEETHARAMAN,SHANMUGHAVILASOM,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,EXCISE RANGE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN\n\n Dated :10\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                        P. BHAVADASAN, J.\n             - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  W.P.(C). No. 35218 of 2009\n            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n          Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010.\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>          This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India seeking to have all further<\/p>\n<p>proceedings in S.C. 780 of 2007                        pending before the<\/p>\n<p>Additional      Sessions                Court            (Abkari       Cases)<\/p>\n<p>Kottarakkara quashed and also to declare that until an<\/p>\n<p>Expert Committee is appointed under Section 56A(b) of<\/p>\n<p>the Kerala Abkari Act and norms are prescribed, no<\/p>\n<p>further proceedings shall be taken.\n<\/p>\n<p>          2. Petitioner is a doctor by profession and he<\/p>\n<p>is an Ayurvedic physician. He manufactures Ayurvedic<\/p>\n<p>medicines also. The manufacture is covered by Drugs<\/p>\n<p>and Cosmetics Act and the Rules. As per Rule 154 of the<\/p>\n<p>Rules, manufacture and sale of Ayurvedic medicines is<\/p>\n<p>permitted on the strength of Form 25-D licence issued by<\/p>\n<p>the Drugs Controller of Kerala. The petitioner holds a<\/p>\n<p>licence to that effect and it is marked as Ext.P1. The<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>licence    prescribed  the     medicines     that   could   be<\/p>\n<p>manufactured by the petitioner.        The licence is being<\/p>\n<p>renewed from year to year and is in force even now. Apart<\/p>\n<p>from Ext.P1 licence, the petitioner is also in possession of L2<\/p>\n<p>licence under the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise<\/p>\n<p>Duties) Act.      He has been manufacturing Ayurvedic<\/p>\n<p>medicines strictly in accordance with law. On 8.12.2001 at<\/p>\n<p>about 12.15 in the noon, the second respondent suddenly<\/p>\n<p>conducted a search in one of the retail outlets of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and 350 ml of Kanakasavam kept for sale in a<\/p>\n<p>sealed bottled was seized and the sample taken was sent<\/p>\n<p>for   chemical   analysis.     The    report   disclosed  that<\/p>\n<p>Kanakasavam contained 12.40% volume of self generating<\/p>\n<p>ethyl alcohol and based on that certificate Crime No.60 of<\/p>\n<p>2002 was registered against the petitioner as the first<\/p>\n<p>accused and the retail outlet employee as the second<\/p>\n<p>accused.     The offence, which is alleged to have been<\/p>\n<p>committed, is one under Section 56A(b) of the Abkari Act.<\/p>\n<p>The occurrence report is produced as Ext.P2.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           3. According to the petitioner, in order to attract<\/p>\n<p>Section 56A of the Abkari Act, the articles seized should be<\/p>\n<p>such preparation      other than a bona fide medicinal<\/p>\n<p>preparation. The said provision defines what is a medicinal<\/p>\n<p>preparation and prescribes certain conditions and norms. In<\/p>\n<p>fact going by the provision, namely 56A(2) Explanation (c)<\/p>\n<p>an Expert Committee to be constituted by the Government<\/p>\n<p>of Kerala has to prescribe the formula in a pharmacopoia<\/p>\n<p>regarding the medicinal preparation.        It is that Expert<\/p>\n<p>Committee which is competent to say whether the medicine<\/p>\n<p>prepared is a bona fide one or not. The Government of<\/p>\n<p>Kerala has not so far constituted any such Committee and<\/p>\n<p>therefore the whole proceedings is illegal.         No other<\/p>\n<p>authority as per the Act has the power and authority to<\/p>\n<p>determine whether the Ayurvedic medicine seized is a bona<\/p>\n<p>fide preparation or not. Petitioner relies on Note to Rule 3 of<\/p>\n<p>the Kerala Spirituous Preparations (Control) Rules, 1969, Act<\/p>\n<p>1 of 1077 also.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           4. The short contention of the petitioner is that in<\/p>\n<p>order to launch a prosecution for the offence punishable<\/p>\n<p>under Section 56A(b) of the Abkari Act, it is necessary to<\/p>\n<p>obtain the opinion of the Expert Committee to be constituted<\/p>\n<p>regarding the medicinal preparation. That having not been<\/p>\n<p>done, the entire proceedings have to be quashed.<\/p>\n<p>           5. Inspite of several opportunities given to the<\/p>\n<p>Government and even inspite of direction to file a<\/p>\n<p>statement, nothing has been done in this matter.<\/p>\n<p>           6. When the matter was taken up for hearing,<\/p>\n<p>learned Government Pleader handed over a copy of the<\/p>\n<p>notification dated 19.11.2009, which reads as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     &#8220;S.R.O. No.963\/2009- In exercise of the powers<\/p>\n<p>     conferred by Section 68A of the Abkari Act; 1 of<\/p>\n<p>     1077 read with rule 3 of the Abkari (Expert<\/p>\n<p>     Committee) Rules, 1968 and in supersession of<\/p>\n<p>     the notification issued under G.O.(P) No.115\/87\/TD<\/p>\n<p>     dated 27th November, 1987 published as S.R.O.<\/p>\n<p>     No.1657\/87 in Part I of section iv of the Kerala<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     Gazette No.49 dated 15th December, 1987, the<\/p>\n<p>     Government of Kerala hereby appoint an Expert<\/p>\n<p>     Committee with following members, namely.-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<pre>          1.The      Drugs      Controller,      Kerala,\n\n            Thiruvananthapurm.\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>          2. The Chief Chemical Examiner, Kerala,<\/p>\n<p>            Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          3. The Director of Health Services, Kerala,<\/p>\n<p>            Thiruvananthapuram     (Official- Allopathic<\/p>\n<p>            System of Medicines)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          4.   The Ayurvedic Drugs Controller, Kerala<\/p>\n<p>            Thiruvananthapuram (Official-Indian System<\/p>\n<p>            of Medicines).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          5.   Dr.V.G. Udayakumar, &#8216;Arabhi&#8217;, Areekkal,<\/p>\n<p>            Edaricode P.O., Malappuram (Non-Official<\/p>\n<p>            Indian System of Medicines).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          6.   The Director of Homoeopathy, Kerala,<\/p>\n<p>            Thiruvananthapuram                 (Official-<\/p>\n<p>            Homoeopathic System of Medicines).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          7. The Joint Commissioner of Excise (Internal<\/p>\n<p>            Audit   Wing),   Excise  Commissionerate,<\/p>\n<p>            Thiruvananthapuram.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.               6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           7. It must be said that there is considerable force<\/p>\n<p>in the contentions raised by the petitioner. Section 56A of<\/p>\n<p>the Abkari Act reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>           &#8220;56A.   For     allowing consumption of<\/p>\n<p>     certain preparations in business premises,<\/p>\n<p>     for the manufacture and stocking of such<\/p>\n<p>     preparations, etc:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>           (1)   Whoever being a chemist, druggist ,<\/p>\n<p>     apothecary    or   keeper     f  a  dispensary   or<\/p>\n<p>     Vaidyasala-\n<\/p>\n<p>           (a) allows any preparation containing liquor<\/p>\n<p>     or intoxicating drug     to be consumed in his<\/p>\n<p>     business premises otherwise than for the bona<\/p>\n<p>     fide treatment, mitigation or prevention of any<\/p>\n<p>     disease; or<\/p>\n<p>           (b) manufactures or stocks or causes to be<\/p>\n<p>     manufactured or stocked any such preparation,<\/p>\n<p>     other than a bona fide medicinal preparation,<\/p>\n<p>     within the premises under his control;<\/p>\n<p>           shall, on conviction before a competent<\/p>\n<p>     court, be punished with imprisonment for a term<\/p>\n<p>     which may extend to five years, and with fine<\/p>\n<p>     which shall not less than fifty thousand rupees.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.              7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           (2)  Whoever consumes any preparation<\/p>\n<p>     containing liquor or intoxicating  drug, which is<\/p>\n<p>     not a bona fide medicinal preparation, in any<\/p>\n<p>     premises referred to in sub-section (1) shall, on<\/p>\n<p>     conviction before a Magistrate be punished with<\/p>\n<p>     fine which may extend to five thousand rupees.<\/p>\n<p>           Explanation:-   For the purposes of this<\/p>\n<p>     section, &#8220;Bona fide medicinal preparation&#8221; shall<\/p>\n<p>     mean any medicinal preparation-\n<\/p>\n<p>           (a) manufactured according to a formula<\/p>\n<p>     prescribed in a pharmacopoeia approved by the<\/p>\n<p>     Government of India or the Government of Kerala,<\/p>\n<p>     or<\/p>\n<p>           (b)  manufactured according to a formula<\/p>\n<p>     approved by the Government of Kerala in respect<\/p>\n<p>     of patent and proprietory medicinal preparations;<\/p>\n<p>     or<\/p>\n<p>           (c) approved as a bona fide medicinal<\/p>\n<p>     preparation by the Expert Committee appointed<\/p>\n<p>     under Section 68A.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Section 68A deals with the constitution of the Exert<\/p>\n<p>Committee.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.                8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>           8. A reading of Section 56A will clearly show that<\/p>\n<p>the authority to determine whether a particular medicinal<\/p>\n<p>preparation is in conformity with the norms is the Expert<\/p>\n<p>Committee to be appointed under Section 68A.              The<\/p>\n<p>Explanation to the said provision defines what is a bona fide<\/p>\n<p>medicinal preparation. It should be confirm to a formula<\/p>\n<p>prescribed in a pharmacopoeia approved by the Government<\/p>\n<p>of India or the Government of Kerala. In the case on hand,<\/p>\n<p>the issue, even as accepted by the learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader, falls within the scope of Explanation (c). The Expert<\/p>\n<p>Committee has been constituted only on 19.11.2009.<\/p>\n<p>           9.  The prosecution in the case on hand was<\/p>\n<p>launched much before that.        It was infact launched on<\/p>\n<p>8.12.2001. Obviously, it is not in accordance with the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of the Act. On that sole ground the petition has to<\/p>\n<p>succeed.\n<\/p>\n<p>           In the result, this petition is allowed, and all<\/p>\n<p>further proceedings in respect of C.R. No.60\/2002 of<\/p>\n<p>Pathanapuram Range Punalur Circle initiated by the Excise<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC.35218\/2009.              9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Range Office shall stand quashed.      So also, all further<\/p>\n<p>proceedings in S.C. 780 of 2007 on the file of the Additional<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Court (Abkari) Cases, Kottarakkara shall stand<\/p>\n<p>quashed and the petitioner shall stand discharged.<\/p>\n<p>                                         P. BHAVADASAN,<br \/>\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 35218 of 2009(Q) 1. DR.J.SEETHARAMAN,SHANMUGHAVILASOM, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,EXCISE RANGE, For Petitioner :SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1218,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010"},"wordCount":1218,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010","name":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-10T05:43:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-j-seetharaman-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.J.Seetharaman vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 10 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}