{"id":41570,"date":"2008-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-26T10:03:23","modified_gmt":"2015-09-26T04:33:23","slug":"remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCAO\/251052006\/2015\t 3\/ 4\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 25105 of 2006\n \n\n \n \n==========================================\n \n\nREMANI\nMENON &amp; 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nK\nG OMNAKUTTAN SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER &amp; 3 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n========================================== \nAppearance\n: \nMS DAXA R\nVYAS for Petitioner(s) : 1 ?  2.                \n                                                 MS MAMTA R VYAS for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nMR MEHUL S SHAH for Respondent(s) : 1, \nMR\nSURESH M SHAH for Respondent(s) : 1, \nDELETED for Respondent(s) :\n2, \nMS E.SHAILAJA for Respondent(s) : 3 -\n4. \n==========================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 23\/10\/2008 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.\tMs<br \/>\nMamta Vyas, learned advocate has appeared on behalf of the<br \/>\npetitioners and Shri Mehul S. Shah, learned advocate has appeared on<br \/>\nbehalf of respondent no. 1.  Petitioner no. 1 as well as respondent<br \/>\nno. 1 are personally present in the Court and they are identified by<br \/>\nthe learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties have<br \/>\nsubmitted that the consent decree has been passed by the learned<br \/>\nFamily Court, Ahmedabad in Family Suit No. 1910\/2000 vide judgement<br \/>\nand order dated 20\/10\/2008.   The xerox of certified copy of the<br \/>\njudgement and decree passed in Family Suit No. 1910\/2000 is placed on<br \/>\nrecord, which is directed to be taken on record.  The learned<br \/>\nadvocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties have<br \/>\nsubmitted that under the aforesaid decree, petitioners would be<br \/>\nentitled to in all Rs. 11 lakhs towards the entire claim of<br \/>\nmaintenance etc. and on payment of Rs. 11 lakhs to the petitioners,<br \/>\nthere shall not be any claim against respondent no. 1.  It is<br \/>\nsubmitted that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, an amount<br \/>\nof Rs. 32,21,615\/- is deposited with the Registry and the same is<br \/>\ninvested in Fixed Deposits and the interest accrued thereon is being<br \/>\nutilised for the purpose of paying monthly maintenance in favour of<br \/>\nthe  daughter of respondent no. 1 and petitioner no. 1.  It is<br \/>\nsubmitted that as per the order passed by this Court, petitioner no.<br \/>\n2 is being paid a sum of Rs. 10,000\/- every month by way of<br \/>\nmaintenance and up to August, 2008, the same is paid.  It is<br \/>\nsubmitted that out of the aforesaid amount of Rs. 32,21,615\/-  with<br \/>\ninterest accrued thereon, after deducting Rs. 10,000\/- per month<br \/>\nalready paid to  petitioner no. 2 and after deducting any further<br \/>\namount due and payable to petitioner no. 2 towards maintenance up to<br \/>\nOctober, 2008, Rs 11 lakhs be directed to be paid to the petitioners<br \/>\nand the balance amount alongwith interest accrued thereon as stated<br \/>\nhereinabove shall be paid to respondent no. 1 by an account payee<br \/>\ncheque.  It is agreed by  petitioner no. 1 that  the amount of Rs. 11<br \/>\nlakhs to be paid to the petitioners be invested in  fixed deposits<br \/>\nwith any nationalised bank initially for a period of 1000 days and<br \/>\nthe monthly periodical interest  be paid to the petitioners.<br \/>\nTherefore, it is requested to dispose of the present Special Civil<br \/>\nApplication with suitable directions.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tIn<br \/>\nview of the consent decree passed by the learned Family Court,<br \/>\nAhmedabad dated 20\/10\/2008  in Family Suit No. 1910\/2000, the present<br \/>\nSpecial Civil Application is disposed of with the following<br \/>\ndirections;\n<\/p>\n<p>(i)\tPetitioner<br \/>\nno. 2 shall be paid a sum of Rs. 10000\/-  per month towards<br \/>\nmaintenance up to October, 2008.  It is reported that petitioner no.<br \/>\n2 has been paid the maintenance as per the earlier order up to<br \/>\nAugust, 2008.  If that be so, Registry is directed to pay first the<br \/>\namount due and payable under the earlier order to petitioner no. 2<br \/>\ni.e. maintenance up to October, 2008 as paid earlier.\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii)\tAfter<br \/>\ndeducting the aforesaid amount as mentioned in Clause (i), out of he<br \/>\nbalance amount, Registry is directed to pay Rs. 11 lakhs by an<br \/>\naccount payee cheque in the name of petitioner no. 2 after obtaining<br \/>\nnecessary receipts signed by both the petitioners in presence of the<br \/>\nadvocate. On receipt of the said amount, petitioners are directed to<br \/>\ninvest the aforesaid amount of Rs. 11 lakhs in the name of petitioner<br \/>\nno. 2 with any nationalised bank for a period  of 1000 days and<br \/>\npetitioner no. 2 shall be entitled to periodical monthly interest of<br \/>\nthe  fixed deposits.  The petitioners shall not be entitled to<br \/>\nwithdraw any amount from the aforesaid fixed deposits either by way<br \/>\nof loan, advance etc.  and the concerned Bank shall make necessary<br \/>\nnoting on the said fixed deposits accordingly.  The petitioners shall<br \/>\nproduce the xerox copy of the fixed deposits on the record of the<br \/>\npresent proceedings.  In case of any urgent need to withdraw any<br \/>\namount from the aforesaid fixed deposits, it will be open for the<br \/>\npetitioners, more particularly, petitioner no. 2 to approach this<br \/>\nCourt by way of an appropriate application and the same shall be<br \/>\nconsidered looking to the need.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii)\tAfter<br \/>\ndeducting the amount of Rs. 11 lakhs and the amount of maintenance as<br \/>\nstated in clause (i), the balance amount be paid to respondent no. 1<br \/>\nby an account payee cheque.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tAs<br \/>\nagreed between the parties, on payment of Rs. 11 lakhs, there shall<br \/>\nnot be any claim by the petitioners against respondent no. 1.  It is<br \/>\nagreed and admitted between the respective parties that all the<br \/>\ndocuments\/certificates have been received by respondent no. 1 from<br \/>\nthe petitioners and no documents\/certificates are to be received by<br \/>\nrespondent no. 1 from the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tWith<br \/>\nthis, the present Special Civil Application is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tThe<br \/>\nRegistry is directed to carry out the aforesaid direction at the<br \/>\nearliest but not later than four weeks from today.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(M.R.\n<\/p>\n<p>SHAH, J.)<\/p>\n<p>siji<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCAO\/251052006\/2015 3\/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 25105 of 2006 ========================================== REMANI MENON &amp; 1 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus K G OMNAKUTTAN SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER &amp; 3 &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":829,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008"},"wordCount":829,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008","name":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-26T04:33:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/remani-vs-k-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Remani vs K on 23 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}