{"id":41585,"date":"2010-11-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-30T01:56:30","modified_gmt":"2017-04-29T20:26:30","slug":"panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<pre>I\n\nIN 'me mesa cause? or KARNATAM AT \ufb01ANGA$..\u20acJRj.EV.,\n\nmass THIS THE 15*' am as mvemaaa 2Qi5  i    --\n\nVRESENT _M_\nTi-:5 z-::r:r4*3:.e MR, JUSTICE Ama t:Z\u00a7:S53\ufb01\u00a3;1_:\ufb01xLf' %'<\/pre>\n<p>A5&#8217;9&#8243;k%    X<br \/>\nms Hoaam MRS.JU8TICE.v:Vj_B &#8216;\u00a7f_I&#8217;%;\u00a7\u00a734\u00a5i3:&#8217;i%B\u00a7JA<br \/>\naesuwz ms? a2.\u00e9_%:5p9mm? % W<br \/>\n3 EN:    1   <\/p>\n<p>wncmvnnse<br \/>\n&#8216;\u00a3&#8217;A:.A43UrmA I-\u00a7i&#8217;.\u00a55LI;      *<\/p>\n<p>SHIK&amp;RI?1\u00a3RT\ufb01i_UK *  , <\/p>\n<p>5HIf\u00a2!\u20ac3G.A 915%\u00bb 5??.433j&#8221;%%A &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>8YI&#8217;T&#8217;8!~1ATADH3&#8217;.KAR1    <\/p>\n<p>SRLCHAN NAVEER&#8217;s=&#8217;&amp;_\u00a3}EESHEE*f\u00a3ti\u20acEF\u00a7\u00bbL\u00a3)RA SWAP-\u00a73GALiJ<\/p>\n<p>Tmmzsz, st-iIKAm:m &#8216;&#8212; &#8216;Tam: &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>SHIMGGA  -. S77 #33<\/p>\n<p>REF&#8217; &#8216;aw !*G_\\\ufb01\u00b0EI1\u00a7..OF.ATTGRPi&#8217;E&#8211;&#8216;f+\u00a5OL\u00a3IER<\/p>\n<p>SRI.VHA&#8217;G\u00bb*;B!-iEJ$i1\ufb01!i arm azmvm, Awxmon<br \/>\n &#8216;  &#8221;     &#8216; &#8230;APPE\u00a3.i.AN&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> % jggv sai:mvA\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5\u20ac:&gt; \u00a2sk%1:\u00e9\u00e9.?:1L, ADV}<\/p>\n<p>_  4:c;\u00e9&#8217;.A:\u00a5\u00bbg;a \u00e9\ufb01wgaakamx<br \/>\n Toam52,.gs\ufb01:xmzPu2 &#8212; TkLiJI(<br \/>\n &#8220;51HI\u00a59&#8217;\u00a7i3C5\ufb01s \u00a7?I5TRICT<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;REP .13&#8217;! I755 SECRETARY<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216; ~T . V M _GRisE\u00a51\u00a3i&#8217;PA\u00a3\u00a7CHAYATHI<br \/>\n ._  S}-IIKARIPUR. &#8212; nwx<\/p>\n<p> }\u00a7;HI!*\u00e9GGA 9:312 57? 433<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;RES POE} $58?\n<\/p>\n<p>(av s-us SHIVAPFA &amp; A3573.)<\/p>\n<p>mm mm 3 $11.59 mmm semen 95 as cm: .a;e2A1:e.s%rFj&#8217;mTE~~-LT<br \/>\nJummerrr ma ca.-sense mama 2u.a2.2an:r PA$SE\u00a7)x_1&#8217;\u00a7: as&#8211;% K<br \/>\n:~4\u00a2.33;199s on THE PM as THE cI\\fIL_3.13.E&#8217;2\u20ac5E (3a.;m\u00a7&#8217;;} ssgmak &#8216;<br \/>\nssxsuzssm; &#8216;me SUE?&#8221; ma BEC\u00a3.ARA&#8217;\u00a5IOPsi &#8216;men -:&#8217;PER.%i.%?\u20ac&#8217;E\ufb02T<br \/>\nzuzunmon.     * &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;mzs RFA cosaxm 0:; ma waqxssiba;&#8221;&#8216;TH:sT&#8221;&#8216;ii.\u00a7*\u00a2_V_V.A3:ir3<br \/>\nGUN3AL, 3., \u20ac35\u00a3.NER\u00a7E? THE FGLLOWIHG2\u00bb V    <\/p>\n<p>The unsuccsasfu! pmintiff $33&#8217;  questioning<br \/>\nthe judgment and   Triai Judge in<br \/>\nas M33\/19% d;ec:ae\u00a7%A&#8217;*%%a\u00a7:%  the graund that na<br \/>\ndacumenla   that he has title ta &#8216;aha<\/p>\n<p> 2.  Vt!9i&#8217;eV.V.. ::::;\u00a3:;__::_._I__:f\u00a7~e cf judgment, parties wauld be<\/p>\n<p>re:&#8221;f\u00e9s1fa&#8217;\u00a7d:VEa Vas &#8216;?f}i\u00e9\u00a5f rank in Ewe Triai Ccsurt.<\/p>\n<p> leading 15:: filing af thim appeai can ha<\/p>\n<p>* *4\u00absijt;\u00bbm:_1&#8217;:ari5e\u00e9 asfnfiawsz<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221; &#8216;fi2\u00a7\u00bb:\u00a7\u00a7:inti\ufb01 filed a suit chiming that they are the awners<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  in 53; $5313.?!) to an extent :31&#8217; 15 scam 14 gamma<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;TjLv.:_\u00ab&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;nz\u00a7\u00a7::iing 2 acras of Kharab Band. Accarding ta we pia\u00a7r:u&#8217;\ufb01&#8217;, the \ufb02<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>entire extent bmongs ta than piaintiff and the<br \/>\ngurstas have been re-grarzbazf in favour af one<br \/>\nwife cf Chan:-sahasava Shastri under  -:<br \/>\nas per at-der datw 1G.&amp;4.1999. 332;: \ufb011v\u00e9e9r2&#8242;,_ \u00a7!&#8217;.ae c\u00a7\ufb01&#8211;\u20ac\u00a7g&#8221;\u00a5;j\u00e9\u00a7<br \/>\nin pusses\ufb01ian :3!&#8217; the suit property 1A}&#8221;\u00a5&#8221;\u00a7a::t.&#8217;_&#8221;a\u00ab.&#8217;.&#8217;ls_V th\u00e9~.\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7ja\u00a7%;ia\u00a7Vfi&#8217;:\u00a7\u00a7VV:-acres<\/p>\n<p>163 guntas inckxding 2 actgmm.\/gf \u00a7ia :&#8217;n&#8211;d ba&#8217;\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;\u00a31ag # to the<br \/>\nplaintiff mutt and that there a:f\u00a7_\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;i\u00a7;\u00a7&#8217;  c\u00aev\u00a7ft&#8217;;;v%:&#8217;garden am, in<br \/>\nthe suit mzhadufe    that dw\u00e9 nama<\/p>\n<p>of piaintiff has  recards and they<br \/>\nhave been  A&#8217;  It \u00a35 their case that<br \/>\ndafendant &#8211;  titlad ta \ufb02ue property. It<\/p>\n<p>is their fur\u00a7iwr_ca\u00a7\u00e9 &#8220;.;%j;\u00a7&#8217;t.&#8221;&#8216;airft::e&#8217;.\u00a3..?:e name of the gtaintiff appears<\/p>\n<p>ir2:&#8217; .;t;VI&#8217;.1\u00a79a  ra\u00e9tzfd fights ag\ufb01\u00e9aii as other dceumants, they hava<\/p>\n<p>:  titie   V <\/p>\n<p>H Vv . 4.  .c\u00a7:a*:fendant ensured appvaaranca and \ufb01\ufb01ed wrmn<\/p>\n<p>in\ufb01\u00e9raiia caniaerr\u00e9irsg that the suit itsaif is not<\/p>\n<p> and the piaintiff has rm authnr\u00e9ty In file the suit.<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;vshuid Fur\ufb01zar cantend that the suit schedule prom:-ty<\/p>\n<p> of 2 acrw of I-Gwarab land and that fang back the I-Gzsarab\ufb02i<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>iand is afiaanamd and r\u00e9ce miii has basin canstrucbead, Hgnca,<\/p>\n<p>contended that there % no Kharab iand availabfe in <\/p>\n<p>scheduh praperty and &#8216;Ft has tn be consMere_\u00a73V. \u00a7&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;~V.&#8217;.i&#8217;;%z\u00a3:-j:._._&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>agricufturat tend. They have fur\ufb01mer \ufb01aniegi th&#8217;z\u00a7!&#8217;.&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;:::;&#8217;V:&#8221;.v_;&#8217;s_.v. &#8216;e&#8221;\u00e9.&#8217;.&#8217;r$&#8217;_ifs;a;t&#8217;r&#8217;v::V &#8220;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>martian ef the Sy.No.7C3 i\ufb01 re~gE&#8221;a&#8217;nta$_\ufb01A ;  &#8220;f+v;V::Sra:\u00a3;i&#8217;\u00a7* &#8216;L_L&#8217;*&#8212;..6;&#8217;.j<\/p>\n<p>Channabasamsrm. They have  \u00a3hat_ ?i5;:}\u00a3a\u00abiz3,t.&#8217;\u00abi&#8217;f is <\/p>\n<p>claiming the Gav Theme {and beic{\u00a7Ej\ufb01\u00a7_  t!f.e&#8221;\u00abiia:fi:;:%iant as<\/p>\n<p>I-(hamb land.\n<\/p>\n<p>5, o\ufb01thghgmf %\u00a7igaaa&#8217;a&#8217;gs,%2ha lmmed Triaf Judge<br \/>\nframed me \ufb01cx\ufb01qwi\ufb01g&#8217;   &#8221;  h<br \/>\n&#8220;1.   pg-ave his em-sership<br \/>\n _ ov&amp;r.ii?:!'{e suit  as a\ufb02wed?\n<\/p>\n<p>   the piaintiff prme his sewed<br \/>\n5p&#8217;ns&#8217;is;a\ufb01Vi\u00e93:\u00e9&#8221;_&#8217;vs::?s\u00a2iigV:&#8221;&#8216;\ufb01&#8217;xe suit property as an tha date 91&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>  _ tiwaamtit gs&#8217; a\ufb02\u00e9gerd?\n<\/p>\n<p> 2 .. &#8221; Does the plaintiff prove the afbgad<br \/>\n  &#8216;infbsrfsrmce by the defendant?\n<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>X&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>as. Whether the suit *3 pmperfy vaiued? \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>S<\/p>\n<p>5. Whether the pzlainti\ufb01f is entittw  <\/p>\n<p>refaefs of declaration and {armament injunct\u00e9\u00e9zih .33:\n<\/p>\n<p>prayad?     4&#8242;\n<\/p>\n<p>6. What Qrdm&#8217; af\u20ac\u00a5oc:*ee?&#8217;5f  A<\/p>\n<p>6. In suppart :3? ma plaintVifF&#8217;s.Vca$e;, vfna.we&#8217;\u00e9f&#8221;\u00e9E_j&#8217;attar\u00a7ney <\/p>\n<p>halder of p\u00e9aintj\ufb01&#8217; is examined as   qai\u00e9camined<br \/>\nthe Court Cammimaner as  E;_csf5,.F.1&#8243; are rnarl-(ad an<br \/>\nbahaif :3f the: plaintiff. % en; behaif as me%demdarg\u00a2, Secramry of<\/p>\n<p>Panchayat is exarpini-a\ufb01      are marked.<\/p>\n<p>7&#8242;. \ufb01rialf;2\u00a7d\u00a7\u00a7&#8221;\u00ab&#8217;.\u00a7g\u00a7v\u00a7n\u00a7VV&#8217;regard ta tha paucity of<br \/>\navidemze was \u00e9&#8217;fV.t\ufb01a% vhf&#8217;  has failed as prove 61:13 to<\/p>\n<p>the prepwartyy <\/p>\n<p>  -VVLeafn\u00ab}s\u00e9 :C\u00ab\u00a7unse! appearing fer the piaintiff submits<\/p>\n<p> thi6.\u00ab.&#8217;f&#8217;a\u00a3:t.vj\ufb02!i.\u00a7\u00e9%:_V..&#8217;\ufb01 \u00a7e name 94&#8242; the plaintiff appmm in the<\/p>\n<p>_ _: _;.e&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;n&#8217;sin\u00a7.:a riawr\u00e9ig \ufb01ffd indax of land, it is \ufb01e be prwumed that the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;?.p&#8217;\u00a5\u00a7\u00a74Ai\ufb01\u20ac:iffAAVV6&#8217;\u00a5i3~ift E in passessiien of the suit pmperty. He fm\ufb01xer<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; &#8216;.\u00a2j:a_:jis\u00a7en:A\u00a7a3 that they are in passassior: at&#8217; we suit mha\u00e9uie<\/p>\n<p>  far a Eatzg periad. Hence, that by itse\ufb02&#8217; is suf\ufb01ciwt tn<\/p>\n<p> Hold that they have ride to than progeny. \/2%<\/p>\n<p>. J &#8211; 2<br \/>\no<br \/>\nu.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>9. L&amp;mw Cazmsai appmring for the defandant<br \/>\nsubmits that in thus absence of any document cf title,__ the<\/p>\n<p>quwtien of gran\ufb01ng the retiaf as saught far in the suit C_3G#:.$&#8211; f!'{\u00a5\u00a7Z<\/p>\n<p>arise and hence supparts the judgmerrt arid dacmgs&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>the iearnad Triai judga<\/p>\n<p>10. The fo\ufb02tawing pant would af\u00a7sfe7 fw_::&#8221;r&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>this appeai: _ % _ __ V<br \/>\n&#8220;Whether in View of R:ac\u00a2r\u00a7VV:\u00a25f.R\u00a7gL_\u00a5jts \u00a7\ufb01ndv.In.di\u00a7ax<\/p>\n<p>csf !ar1v6&#8242;,H \u00a5&#8217;eaVir&#8217;f&#8217;:1_va:\u00ab\u00a7 xii;4&#8217;i&#8217;:&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7{\u00bb..:&#8217;_&#8217;JudA\u00a7i\u00e9&#8221;Q35 justified in<br \/>\nd?sm\u00a3ssi~r:g &#8220;the 5:331?&#8217;  igttf\ufb01?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> 11. Qi\u00e9r\u00e9aed,  ran:-d cxf r\u00e9gh\ufb01 [Form i&#8217;~\u00a3o.V) in<\/p>\n<p> __ This danumerzt weuf\u00e9 show &#8216;that: the suit<\/p>\n<p>schedLh!3&#8243;&#8221;&#8211;preiV\u00e9gm:\u00a7fifg  in the name of Srtchannavaara<br \/>\n  Gut af this entire area an extent 2!)<\/p>\n<p>_  &#8216;i3Ta4_\u00a34\u00a3eh&#8217;\u00e9sbw far tha puraosa of canstruction of rice: miii as<br \/>\n&#8216;\u00e9rdsr cf the Assistant Comrn\u00a3ss\u00a3onez&#8217; an 07.66.1952.<br \/>\n index at&#8217; land (Farm Nc.VI) in raspact of S3: I&#8217;\u00a2a.}&#8217;Q.<\/p>\n<p> has this docunmnt, mite! extent of Sy..No.?\u00a3.3 Ta 15 acres<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>LZ&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;?\n<\/p>\n<p>14 Qantas: Hawever, are sxwnt ef Kharab Ian\u00e9 is ShGWQV&#8217;.%\u00a7.\u00a7B<\/p>\n<p>nii and the entire 3.5 acres 1-6 guntras 52; described  _<\/p>\n<p>Time and again, it is hats that \ufb02ue entries in the   <\/p>\n<p>do not confer ri\ufb02e. Indeed at best,  53:1&#8242;: <\/p>\n<p>respect of entries in the rsvenue r\u00e9cvrdsi  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>12.. It is alsa noticad that dq:&#8221;\u00a7i&#8217;:ug &#8216;L_:cx&#8221;zi:@-5 exa\ufb02\ufb011&#8217;\u00a7nati%-gran, PW:<br \/>\nsates that the suit schedul\ufb01 Vprc\ufb01arik&#8217;  9 aches 10<\/p>\n<p>guntas is Enciusive  vgcre=;\u00a7: &#8221; which is in tha<\/p>\n<p>form ef  is   that tha said property<br \/>\ndoes not bel\u00e9\u00e9sng  much as way back in the<br \/>\nyear 1952, the u&#8217;As55is&#8217;taVV\u00a59:si:v_ Ci..&#8221;s;:*\u00a71&#8242;.*&#8217;A;&#8217;??:fssie:1er has granted pernziasiar:<br \/>\nf&lt;\u00a7v:r~vs9nve_&amp;f\u00a7\u00a7:\u00e9:a:&#039;\u00a7j,iAV&#039;  waam of the View that izha question af<\/p>\n<p>gr\u00e9&#039;r:\ufb01t&#039;e\u00a7 &quot;rslAEae.\u00a7:&quot;ir\u00a7&#039;~.Af\u00a7w9ur 9!&#039; the pkintiff in the absence cf<\/p>\n<p> L..\u00a7fgcunw7nt&#039;&lt;:&#039;f \u00a3:itia&#039;.V\u00abV&#039;afE;:z\ufb01&#039;s not arise.<\/p>\n<p> It \u00a7_s. na dcxubt 5112 that the teamed anunaei<\/p>\n<p> &#039;i.\u00a7:;\u00a7\u00a7;:@ri\u00a7jgL&quot;&lt;&#8211;.._A the plaintiff vehemantiy submits that<\/p>\n<p>ior\u00a7er&#039;s revert woru\ufb01 shew that they are in ;:sssession.\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>\/.-&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>14. Apparently, \ufb01ve said Commis$i.\u00e9&#8217;f&#8217;!v&#8221;1;&#8217;t;:\u00a3:iT:j\u00e9e&#8217;:&#8217;iV\u00a7?i&#8217;g;_&#8217;_itheg  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>question at&#8217; relying an the Comn*:issiz$&#8217;:2ar&#8217;f&#8217;:-gj~:?sgg.geg&#8217;~<\/p>\n<p>arisag     _\n<\/p>\n<p>15. we have pewsegi the  :56  passed<br \/>\nby the learned Trial Judge. \u00a7&#8217;i\ufb01sz &#8216;e:r,a&#8221;&#8211;.&lt;\u00a7f%.f;&#039;%;%&#039;.a}&#039;&quot;%:i\u00a7w\u00a7&#039;%that this question<\/p>\n<p>:33&#039; granting refief as wught f;::r&quot;1&#039;.:ha abeanca of<\/p>\n<p>any docusnenttzf \u00ab:1:&quot;:!\ufb01Vb&#039;a\u00abr \ufb01&#039;a.&#039; &quot;&quot;\u00a5&#039;3&#8211;a&#039;}am constrained to hold<br \/>\nthat the judgkngfst  by the laarna\u00e9 Trial Judge<br \/>\ndoes mt warr\ufb01rdf  Acwrdingiyi the appeal is<\/p>\n<p>dis;*:2!s&#039;.&lt;se{:t&#039;.\u00a7&lt;.    %%%%% <\/p>\n<p>Iudge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-3<br \/>\nfudge<\/p>\n<p> :=\u00a7bgnf&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 Author: Ajit J B.V.Nagarathna I IN &#8216;me mesa cause? or KARNATAM AT \ufb01ANGA$..\u20acJRj.EV., mass THIS THE 15*&#8217; am as mvemaaa 2Qi5 i &#8212; VRESENT _M_ Ti-:5 z-::r:r4*3:.e MR, JUSTICE Ama t:Z\u00a7:S53\ufb01\u00a3;1_:\ufb01xLf&#8217; %&#8217; A5&#8217;9&#8243;k% X ms Hoaam MRS.JU8TICE.v:Vj_B &#8216;\u00a7f_I&#8217;%;\u00a7\u00a734\u00a5i3:&#8217;i%B\u00a7JA aesuwz ms? a2.\u00e9_%:5p9mm? % [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1357,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010"},"wordCount":1357,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010","name":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-29T20:26:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/panchavatige-mutt-togarsi-vs-grama-panchayathi-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Panchavatige Mutt Togarsi vs Grama Panchayathi on 15 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}