{"id":41661,"date":"2010-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010"},"modified":"2015-11-02T22:19:15","modified_gmt":"2015-11-02T16:49:15","slug":"e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 2050 of 2005()\n\n\n1. E.K. KUNJATHAN, AGED 40 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. T. ISMAIL, S\/O. MUHAMMED KUTTY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :29\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n          A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n                  M.A.C.A.No.2050 OF 2005\n            =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=\n           Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant is the claimant in O.P.(MV)No.161\/1995 on<\/p>\n<p>the file of II Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>Kozhikode. In this appeal he challenges the judgment and<\/p>\n<p>award of the Tribunal dated June 2, 2005        awarding a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.38,000\/- for the loss caused to him on<\/p>\n<p>account of the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident.<\/p>\n<p>       2. He sustained the following injuries in the<\/p>\n<p>accident :-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;1)Haematoma and abrasion right side of the<br \/>\n         lower chest near right hypocondyle.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      2) Abrasion right side of abdomen.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      3) Suspected internal injury and questioned liver<br \/>\n         injury.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      4) Rib fracture.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     3.   The accident happened on September 30, 1994<\/p>\n<p>while the claimant was walking along the side of the road<\/p>\n<p>and when he reached at Farook College Post Office, he was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 2050\/2005                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>knocked down by a jeep bearing Reg.No.KL-11\/B 3528<\/p>\n<p>driven by the second respondent in the O.P.       Alleging<\/p>\n<p>negligence against the second respondent in the O.P., the<\/p>\n<p>claimant filed the O.P. before the Tribunal under Section<\/p>\n<p>166 of Motor Vehicles Act claiming a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.   Respondents 1 to 3 in the O.P. are the owner,<\/p>\n<p>driver and insurer of the offending jeep. Respondents 1 and<\/p>\n<p>2 in the O.P. remained absent before the Tribunal. Third<\/p>\n<p>respondent in the O.P. filed a written statement before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal admitting the policy.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.   The claimant was examined as PW1 and Exts.A1<\/p>\n<p>to A8 and Ext.X1 were marked on the side of the claimant<\/p>\n<p>before the Tribunal.    No evidence was adduced by the<\/p>\n<p>respondents before the Tribunal.       The Tribunal on an<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of the evidence found that the accident<\/p>\n<p>occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the<\/p>\n<p>offending jeep by second respondent in the O.P. and<\/p>\n<p>awarded a compensation of Rs.38,000\/- with interest<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 2050\/2005               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>@ 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation<\/p>\n<p>and a cost of Rs. 700\/-. The claimant has now come up in<\/p>\n<p>appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.   Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and<\/p>\n<p>the counsel for the Insurance Company.<\/p>\n<p>     7.   The accident is not disputed. The finding of the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal that the accident occurred due to the negligence<\/p>\n<p>on the part of the second respondent in the O.P. is not<\/p>\n<p>challenged in this appeal.    Therefore, the only question<\/p>\n<p>which arises for consideration is whether the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any enhanced compensation.<\/p>\n<p>     8.     The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 38,000\/-. The break up of the compensation awarded is<\/p>\n<p>as under :-\n<\/p>\n<pre>          Pain and suffering      - Rs. 19,000\/-\n          Loss of amenities       - Rs. 9,000\/-\n          Medical expenses        - Rs. 3,000\/-\n          Economic loss           - Rs. 4,000\/-\n          Other counts            - Rs. 3,000\/-\n                                  -------------------\n               Total              : Rs.38,000\/-\n                                  =========\n\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 2050\/2005                4<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>     9.   Counsel for the claimant sought enhancement of<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the disability caused and on other heads.<\/p>\n<p>      10. The Tribunal did not award any compensation for<\/p>\n<p>the disability caused, as no document was produced by the<\/p>\n<p>claimant to show that the claimant has suffered any<\/p>\n<p>disability due to the injuries sustained. It is seen from<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A4 scan report and Ext.X1 case sheet issued from<\/p>\n<p>Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode that the claimant<\/p>\n<p>suffered injury on the liver and laprotomy was done.<\/p>\n<p>Further he has suffered fracture of 4 ribs. All these facts<\/p>\n<p>would show that the claimant has suffered some disability<\/p>\n<p>due to the injuries. Taking into consideration the nature of<\/p>\n<p>the injuries sustained and the fact that the claimant was a<\/p>\n<p>coolie aged 50, we feel that a compensation of Rs.30,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>would be reasonable for the disability caused.<\/p>\n<p>      11. The Tribunal awarded Rs.19,000\/- for pain and<\/p>\n<p>suffering endured by the claimant. Having regard to the<\/p>\n<p>nature of the injuries sustained and period of treatment the<\/p>\n<p>claimant has undergone, we feel that a compensation of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 2050\/2005               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/- would be reasonable on this count. As regards<\/p>\n<p>the compensation awarded under other heads, we find the<\/p>\n<p>same to be reasonable and therefore we are not disturbing<\/p>\n<p>the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>     12. In the result, the appellant\/claimant is found<\/p>\n<p>entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.36,000\/- with<\/p>\n<p>interest @ 9% per annum from the date of petition till<\/p>\n<p>realization and proportionate cost. The second respondent<\/p>\n<p>(third respondent in the O.P.) being the insurer of the<\/p>\n<p>offending vehicle shall deposit the amount before the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal within two months from the date of receipt of a<\/p>\n<p>copy of this judgment.      The award of the Tribunal is<\/p>\n<p>modified to the above extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The appeal is disposed of as found above.<\/p>\n<p>                              A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                              P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>mn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 2050 of 2005() 1. E.K. KUNJATHAN, AGED 40 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. T. ISMAIL, S\/O. MUHAMMED KUTTY, &#8230; Respondent 2. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., For Petitioner :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM For Respondent :SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":732,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\",\"name\":\"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010"},"wordCount":732,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010","name":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-02T16:49:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-k-kunjathan-vs-t-ismail-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"E.K. Kunjathan vs T. Ismail on 29 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}