{"id":41862,"date":"2009-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-08T07:04:25","modified_gmt":"2015-09-08T01:34:25","slug":"vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>RSA No.816 of 2007                                      (1)\n\n       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                       CHANDIGARH\n\n                                     RSA No.816 of 2007\n                                     Date of Decision: 27.8.2009\n\nVaidik Sadhan Ashram                                    ......Appellant\n\n            Versus\n\nShakil Hassan                                           .......Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM:      HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?\n<\/p>\n<p>2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?<\/p>\n<p>Present:    Shri R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the appellant.<\/p>\n<p>            Shri S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral).\n<\/p>\n<p>            The defendant is in second appeal aggrieved against the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree passed by the first Appellate Court, whereby suit for<\/p>\n<p>possession by way of redemption of the land measuring 12 kanals 12 marlas<\/p>\n<p>was decreed.\n<\/p>\n<p>            It is the case of the plaintiff that the land measuring 12 kanals<\/p>\n<p>12 marlas was mortgaged against a sum of Rs.1500\/-. The factum of<\/p>\n<p>mortgage was incorporated in the revenue record vide mutation No.338<\/p>\n<p>dated 25.12.1951. The mortgage amount was repaid to Swami Atma Nand,<\/p>\n<p>the then President of the defendant, in the year 1962, but the defendant<\/p>\n<p>continued in possession of the same. Thus, the plaintiff sought possession<\/p>\n<p>of the suit land, which was once mortgaged in favour of the defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p> RSA No.816 of 2007                                         (2)<\/p>\n<p>               In the written statement, the stand of the defendant-appellant<\/p>\n<p>was that the plaintiff has lost right of redemption due to lapse of time and<\/p>\n<p>that the defendant has become owner of the suit land. The payment of the<\/p>\n<p>mortgage amount was denied. The defendant-appellant filed a counter claim<\/p>\n<p>claiming declaration in respect of which the ownership and possession for<\/p>\n<p>the suit property for the reason that limitation for redemption of mortgage<\/p>\n<p>has expired.\n<\/p>\n<p>               The learned trial Court dismissed the suit, but the learned first<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Court decreed the suit holding that there is no time limit for<\/p>\n<p>redemption of usufructuary mortgage and consequently, the suit              was<\/p>\n<p>decreed on deposit of Rs.1500\/-. Before the first Appellate Court, an<\/p>\n<p>application was filed by the defendant to produce additional documents,<\/p>\n<p>including certified copy of the mortgage deed No. 459 dated 21.6.1979<\/p>\n<p>and mortgage deed No. 323 of March, 1951. The learned first Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Court found that the defendant-respondent has sought to produce number of<\/p>\n<p>documents in respect of initial mortgage, additional mortgage and sale of<\/p>\n<p>mortgage rights etc., but there is no plea in the written statement or even in<\/p>\n<p>the counter claim filed by the defendant about the initial mortgage by Alias<\/p>\n<p>son of Khuda Baksh in favour of Chhajju son of Ghasitu Mal and\/or about<\/p>\n<p>the additional mortgage in favour of said Chaju Mal and the sale of the<\/p>\n<p>mortgage rights by Mishri Lal etc. Therefore, in the absence of any<\/p>\n<p>pleadings, the additional evidence cannot be allowed to be produced.<\/p>\n<p>               Learned counsel for the appellant in the present appeal has<\/p>\n<p>vehemently argued that on the face of the document dated 3.7.1951, the<\/p>\n<p>possession of the defendant cannot be said to be that of a mortgagee, but is<\/p>\n<p>that as an owner. The said document conveys the title in the land which is<br \/>\n RSA No.816 of 2007                                         (3)<\/p>\n<p>described as old khasra number 31 measuring 7 biswas 10 biswas, new<\/p>\n<p>khasra number 37 measuring 7 bighas 10 biswas. Therefore, the plaintiff is<\/p>\n<p>not entitled to possession of the suit property.<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the appellant could not point out that there<\/p>\n<p>was any plea of ownership rights in the written statement, by purchase<\/p>\n<p>vide the aforesaid document. In the absence of any such plea, the argument<\/p>\n<p>in respect of the purchase, sought to be raised by the appellant cannot be<\/p>\n<p>permitted to be raised for the first time in the second appeal. This is apart<\/p>\n<p>from the objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent that<\/p>\n<p>numbers mentioned in the said document are different than that of which<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff has claimed possession of in the present suit.<\/p>\n<p>             The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question<\/p>\n<p>of law:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   &#8220;Whether the right to seek redemption would arise on<br \/>\n                   the date of mortgage itself in case of usufructuary<br \/>\n                   mortgage when no time limit is fixed to seek<br \/>\n                   redemption?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             The said question has been answered by the Full Bench of this<\/p>\n<p>Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/627172\/\">Ram Kishan and others v. Sheo Ram and others<\/a>, 2008(1) PLR 1 to<\/p>\n<p>the effect that in case of usufructuary mortgage, there is no time limit to<\/p>\n<p>redeem the mortgage. It has been held that the principle `once a mortgage,<\/p>\n<p>always a mortgage&#8217; shall be applicable in the case of usufructuary mortgage.<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>has raised the plea of payment of mortgage amount in the year 1962 and the<\/p>\n<p>said plea being not accepted by the Courts below, the suit for possession is<\/p>\n<p>based upon title and not upon mortgage and thus, the same cannot be<\/p>\n<p>entertained after expiry of 12 years. The said argument is not tenable.\n<\/p>\n<p> RSA No.816 of 2007                                        (4)<\/p>\n<p>Though the defendant has alleged payment of Rs.1500\/- in 1962, but the<\/p>\n<p>said payment is not proved. Therefore, the status of the parties will be<\/p>\n<p>mortgagor and mortgagee alone.        The first Appellate Court has rightly<\/p>\n<p>decreed the suit for possession on payment of mortgage amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1500\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or material<\/p>\n<p>irregularity in the finding recorded or that the finding recorded gives rise to<\/p>\n<p>any substantial question of law in the present second appeal.<\/p>\n<p>             Hence, the present appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                             [ HEMANT GUPTA ]<br \/>\n                                                  JUDGE<br \/>\n27.8.2009<br \/>\n ds\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 RSA No.816 of 2007 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.816 of 2007 Date of Decision: 27.8.2009 Vaidik Sadhan Ashram &#8230;&#8230;Appellant Versus Shakil Hassan &#8230;&#8230;.Respondent CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":880,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009"},"wordCount":880,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009","name":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-08T01:34:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vaidik-sadhan-ashram-vs-shakil-hassan-on-27-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vaidik Sadhan Ashram vs Shakil Hassan on 27 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41862"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41862\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}