{"id":42223,"date":"2007-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007"},"modified":"2018-07-02T12:45:46","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T07:15:46","slug":"mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMFA No. 565 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. MALLIKA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.NELSON J.MANAYIL\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY\nThe Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA\n\n Dated :07\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                         J.B. Koshy &amp; K.Hema, JJ.\n<\/p>\n<p>                    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>                        M.F.A.No. 565 of 2001<\/p>\n<p>                   &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>            Dated this the 7th day of December, 2007<\/p>\n<p>                                  Judgment<\/p>\n<p>Koshy,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>               Appellant\/petitioner   suffered   serious   injuries   in   a   motor<\/p>\n<p>accident on 14.1.1994.  He was riding a scooter bearing registration<\/p>\n<p>No.KL8 &#8211; 4432 from Kunnamkulam to Kochery.  A police jeep bearing<\/p>\n<p>registration   No.   KCV   1288   came   from   behind   and   overtook   the<\/p>\n<p>scooter and, according to the appellant, as a result of the accident,<\/p>\n<p>left side of the bumper of the jeep got hooked on the handle of the<\/p>\n<p>scooter and the scooter  was dragged forward and the appellant was<\/p>\n<p>thrown away and sustained serious injuries.   Both drivers filed claim<\/p>\n<p>petitions O.P.(M.V.) Nos.806  and 807 of 1994  and both cases were<\/p>\n<p>heard   together   and   passed   a   common   award.   The   tribunal   found<\/p>\n<p>that   the   accident   occurred   due   to   negligence   on   the   part   of   the<\/p>\n<p>appellant also which was apportioned as  60% and only  40% of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation calculated was awarded to him.   Appeal filed against<\/p>\n<p>the   above   finding   in   O.P.(M.V.)   No.806   of   1994   was   numbered   as<\/p>\n<p>M.F.A.   No.286   of   2001   and   we   have   held   that   both   drivers   were<\/p>\n<p>equally negligent as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">M.F.A.No.565\/2001                           2<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                     &#8220;2.     In   paragraph   17   of   the   award,   the<\/p>\n<p>              Tribunal   discussed   the   matter   regarding<\/p>\n<p>              contributory   negligence   in   a   detailed   manner.<\/p>\n<p>              The tribunal has not accepted the contention of<\/p>\n<p>              the   petitioner   that   the   accident   occurred   while<\/p>\n<p>              the   scooter   he   was   riding   was   hit   by   the   jeep<\/p>\n<p>              from behind.     A reading of the evidence  would<\/p>\n<p>              show that the accident occurred due to head-on<\/p>\n<p>              collision.     The   police   charge   sheeted   both   the<\/p>\n<p>              drivers.   But the tribunal fixed  more negligence<\/p>\n<p>              on   the   part   of   the   appellant   because   of   the<\/p>\n<p>              position   of   the   vehicle   in   the   scene   mahazar.<\/p>\n<p>              Scene   mahazar   was   taken   after   the   accident.<\/p>\n<p>              The exact spot of accident cannot  be found out<\/p>\n<p>              as  the  scooter  being  a  small   vehicle  is  likely   to<\/p>\n<p>              be moved in view of the impact of the accident.<\/p>\n<p>              The   offending   vehicle   was   the   police   jeep   and<\/p>\n<p>              was   the   bigger   vehicle.     The   contention   of   the<\/p>\n<p>              appellant   is   that   the   police   has   written   the<\/p>\n<p>              mahazar   in   such   a   way   so   as   to   avoid   their<\/p>\n<p>              liability   and   that   is   why   the   police   had   charge<\/p>\n<p>              sheeted him. However, from the scene mahazar,<\/p>\n<p>              it   can   be   seen   that   there   was   head-on   collision<\/p>\n<p>              and,   therefore,   we   are   of   the   opinion   that   the<\/p>\n<p>              negligence   has   to   be   apportioned   equally<\/p>\n<p>              between both the drivers.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since there is 50% negligence on the part of the appellant, only 50%<\/p>\n<p>of the compensation calculated can be paid to him.   Ext.B1  wound<\/p>\n<p>certificate   would   show   that   claimant   had   sustained   a   fracture   to<\/p>\n<p>right humerus with compound fracture to right patella.  Ext.B2 is the<\/p>\n<p>discharge summary which would go to show that he was treated in<\/p>\n<p>the   hospital   till   5.2.1994.   Patellotomy   was   done   under   general<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.F.A.No.565\/2001                            3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>anesthesia.   Open reduction and internal fixation was done for right<\/p>\n<p>humerus.     Bone   grafting   was   also   done.         With   regard   to   the<\/p>\n<p>disability, Ext.B3  certificate shows that he had 10% disability.   The<\/p>\n<p>tribunal   did   not   accept   the   disability   certificate   as   the   doctor   was<\/p>\n<p>not   examined.     We   are   of   the   view   that   there   is   no   reason   for<\/p>\n<p>discarding   the   disability   certificate   especially   due   to   fracture   of<\/p>\n<p>right   femur   and   compound   fracture   of   right   patella.     There   was<\/p>\n<p>difficulty in movement of knee and he will continue to have pain and<\/p>\n<p>difficulties   in   the   knee   movement.     However,   due   to   absence   of<\/p>\n<p>clear   data   regarding   his   age   instead   of   Rs.15,000\/-   at   least<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/-   ought   to   have   fixed   as   compensation   for   disability.<\/p>\n<p>Compensation under other heads granted by the tribunal were just<\/p>\n<p>and   reasonable.       The   tribunal   calculated   compensation   of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.58,500\/- against a claim of Rs.3,40,250\/- and we have held that<\/p>\n<p>claimant   is  entitled   to   Rs.5,000\/-  more   for  disability   compensation.<\/p>\n<p>Thus,   total   amount   of   compensation   is   Rs.63,500\/-.     50%   of   the<\/p>\n<p>amount   payable   is   Rs.31,750\/-.       The   tribunal   has   awarded     only<\/p>\n<p>Rs.23,400\/-   only.     Hence,   appellant   is   entitled   to   an   additional<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs.8,350\/- which should be paid by the fourth respondent<\/p>\n<p>insurance company with 7.5 % from the date of application till the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.F.A.No.565\/2001                             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>date of deposit.   On deposit of the amount, appellant is allowed to<\/p>\n<p>withdraw the same.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            J.B.Koshy<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 Judge<\/p>\n<p>                                                             K. Hema<\/p>\n<p>                                                               Judge<\/p>\n<p>vaa<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">M.F.A.No.565\/2001    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                  J.B. KOSHY AND<\/p>\n<p>                                         K.HEMA,JJ.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                            &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>                              M.F.A. No.  565 of 2001<\/p>\n<p>                            &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>                                          Judgment<\/p>\n<p>                            Dated:7th December, 2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MFA No. 565 of 2001() 1. MALLIKA &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.NELSON J.MANAYIL For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY The Hon&#8217;ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA Dated :07\/12\/2007 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":739,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\",\"name\":\"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007"},"wordCount":739,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007","name":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-02T07:15:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallika-vs-state-on-7-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mallika vs State on 7 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}