{"id":42362,"date":"2009-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-03T03:57:00","modified_gmt":"2017-02-02T22:27:00","slug":"gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n
'Dru' TIK1 {RG11 CQURT <3'? K.AR}$AT2"~3KA AT B3'-..,3'\u20ac\u20ac\u00a7ALOi?E '\u00e9\u00bb'.?.'-Keg 5842 cat' 2969 mid\nW.P.NAg>EFsz;Ea M\" no gm V M ;, .. \nmum EFEJEE R{3h'D, Ko;.2<;,aTp..m am  =\nREGiQ'N:%; QFFECE A'? 3-sass, 'COi'.E$ Roan,\nragga: T\u00a3;}W_N BANGIALGRE see cm 'REP\nHEREEN'--BY"E'E'S_E31Vi53%Qf.\u00e9;';21}r~:as3:CAT\u00a7s)\n\n ;\n\n  I  we uMi<';.xs.Q;_;rv:a:A REF' 8?' {TS SECRETARY\n\n2 'L = D\u00a3\u00a3F*\u00a3kRTMENT GF CONSUME\u00a5--'\u00ab:$ AFFNRS,\nv?~\u00a7'E'a{'\u00a5'{3ELH%\n\n THE .LNE.~'eF'ECTGR OF LEGA%.. !V!ETR{}LOG':'" LEGAL\n%i\u20acETRi'3LOG'( {)EPf%.RTMENT ICJRCLE\n.~ 24, 3 BLOCK DR RAJKUMAR RQAD,\n A RAJAJENAGAR; BANGALORE 568 018\n\n'$9 M \n\n A.  3.  "ma snare <3? KARNATAKA\n\n"REP BY F53 SECRETARY,\nLEGAL i'\u00bbi\u20acETROi.OC$Y DEPARTMENT\nBANGALQRE\n\n RESPEENDENTS\n\u20ac882. HKE', \u00a5'~\u00a7ARE.Ni3RA PRASAE HCGP FOR RESPGNDENTS-2 ARE? 3)\n\n{N 13133 EEEGEE CQLRT GE? KAR}\u00ab'A'I'\u00a74\\}CJ{AGED.FGR{'-R~ 1\"-'sNU=fQR. (ii) \n\nire vsew 0?: THE E.XCi.\u20ac.JStON CONTNNED :m'1>4E RUL '::A (2.? oeszgpreo N\nOF THE ACT. iSSi.\u00e9E A war: {:9 OTHER CRDER 1r;; THEE' NA--TU'Fv.3E 'QR\ns'.3EERTiORARi To OUASH THE r-Tzcmjza 1:4 'mt;-A, DT.1.<.?\ufb012.J.'l9, i$SUED.B'*{\nTH R2.      ~~  '\n\nw.1-mo. 5343 oz? 2oo9\u00a77%"%% \nBETWEEN  A' '   '\n\n1 GMMCO.L\u00a7MtTED_m  _ . 2.  '    "\nH\ufb01\\VtNG,1T\ufb01 REED 0t=Fsa::E Mssga 9:1  N\n:.a:.m'~:E2:"T;:E:~: ROAD, KG-LKATA 70:3: \u00bb\u00a3J\u00a3;.1,.--\nREGiQN:'\u00a7{_ {}:_'?HCE AT .3a:5_,\u00bbe.:rcLEs ROAD,\nFRF&Z\u00a7RT5\\1"'$E}3 BAESALQRE sac cm: REP\nHE\u00a7;Ei\u00a3*4 av :15 $iyF3iONAL'MAP~iAGER\n\n .... ..{VL_EG~AL; :3: 3 E'RA$AN'!'H scam;\n\n PE?tTiONER\n\ngay :;;i.:.s :<:Ne'&v.\u00e9A:\u00e9f:T*a\u00a71:}a_\u00e9','Abvocarss 3\n\n   V' YHE u:~::'C;w~:v.:.1a'~. \u00abzmam REF' 9*\u00bb: :73 SECRETARY\n\n' DEFARTMEPQT OF CONSUMERS AFFNRS,\nnew\n\n" ~ :""'7E\u00a7_%EVAV.%{*\u00e9SPE\u00a3CT<3R 0? LEGAL ME'\u00a7'ROE.Q<3Y mega.\n'ME;ETRGi.\u20ac3GY DEPARTMENT,\n- . QH.%{\u00a73\u00e9<A8ALLAPUR 562 am\n\n'jean \n\n3" V 'I. THE $TATE SF KARNATAKA\n REP BY HS SE$R':ETAR's\ufb01\nLEGAL !'4\u00a5ETROLGG':" DEPARTMENT\nE$\ufb01\u00a7'~iGAL{}RE\n\n RE$PG%~\u00a7DEN'\u00a7"S\n{$R%. HT. NARENEIJRA PRRSAQ HCGP FGR R32 AM?) 3}\n\nEN TEE {HSH $133.'? GE?' X.ARN,{\u00a7TAKA AT ?3:'5sl'\u20ac{3 ALGRE \\\u00a7F.?.N=3. 58432 of \ufb02\ufb01i}? mi\n':3? af 2%?\n\n\n\nIN TEE IIIGII C0311? OF KAREATAKA AT \u00a73?u'*IC ALGRIE. 's'4a'.P.?~i_cs. :5 2?. 0f 2009 Sid\n'1's'.P,?u'=o.5343 sf 2%?\n-3\u00bb\n\nTHIS 'e"u'.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 223 OF THE CONSTITUTION\nOF INDIA, PRA':'ING TO IESSUE A SECLARIKTION THAT THE PROVISIONS\nGI' STAIRIDRRDS OF WRIGHST AND MEASURES ACT, 1976 {CENTRAL ACT\nN{}.6G OF 'I9?8) AND THE STANDARD5 OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES\n{PACAKAGEI3 {.'}C}I\u00bb'II'v'I{)DI'3'IES) RULES 197? :'%RE NOT APPLICABLE TC: THE\nCATERPILLAR HEAVY EARTH IvI{)'~f\u00a7NG EQUIPIVIENT8, GEI'\u00bbI3ETS\u00a5ANI3 ITS\nSPARE PARTS IIMRKETED 8'? THE PETITIONER COMPANY _AI\\ID'REVLATE{}\nQRQDUCTS MARTD AND SOLD BY THE PETITIQNERS 'AS' * I. (I) THEY\nARE NOT 'COIv'IM{}D\u00a7TiES' OR 'COMMODITIES IN PACAKAGEE}. F-C}F'{Iu'II AND\n:'QR (ii) IN VIEW OF THE EXCLUSION {IONTAINED IN 'THE.Ri;iLE C13?\n\nCHAPTER II QF THE ACT. QUASH THE NGTECE IN AISINEX-.&-._{)T. 'I3.9;2i'.'_3\u00abC\u00ab\"-w_\nBEARING NO. 3?';'0\u20ac'a-I39 ISSUED BY THE END RES\u00a55ONE3IE3'\u00a7iT., 'DIRECT THE \nENIII RESPONDNET T0 REHJNCB THE.N'v'I{3I;.3NT'~QF RS. I-'TAIDT\nUNDER PROTEST BY THE PETITIONER TI-IEi{3I4'GI--II DEMANBV E)RA\u00a5?75 N0. \n\n549346 DT. smgeaa {ANNEX-E) WITH 'INTERES-'I'_'L1N?I\u00a2L'v\u00a3iA.TE--.OF\nPA'{MENT.     '   \n\nmasa wps. comma oz-4  PaEL1r4s'\u00e9NAR'~{';%EA\u00a7\u00a7:Ns mes DA\u00bb:\nTHE comm\" mm THE :=,.<.)L\u00a7_o*.*.!;ArT~ze~ _  'I * . \n\n TTTT   in both the pe\ufb01tiens. The\n\n\u00a7)\u20ac'&\ufb01:Tf\u00a7~r3I":1\u20ac\u00a5'T  has prayed to issue 3\n\ndec:I3raI{\u00a7ta!3:V that fI'IeVI}:3rovisicns of Standards of Weights\n\n -  . _ III\u00a75\u00a2;I:Iaeagures; Act 1975, [centras Act No.60 af 1976} and\n\n af wesgm and Measures [Packaged\n\nI"'{3orrI\ufb01*e:"\u00a7;\u20acIiI:\u00a7%} RN83 1977 are not appiicabie is the\n\n A. ;\u00a73t\u00e9'f'f..'.')III3I" heavy earth mcwing equipments, gensets, and\n\n spare parts marketed by the petitianer company and\n\nmated producfs marketed and said by the peti\ufb01oner as (3)\n\n...........,__.,.\n\n \n\n{N Tam U.1{}{I C<}URT <31? mvaaraxa :51' B?xNG.~"~.LORE '$3.1:-=:*\u00bb:c\u00a2 5.342 af 2329 and\naaapirzmgaa gfzma\n\n\n\n11%' 'HIE 31811 C$URT OF KARNATAKA AT BARS ALGRE. W;P(N<3, 582% of 2009 mi!\n"e7v',?3'JG.\u00a78\u00a73 0%' 2009\n-4'\n\nthey are net 'ccmmori\u00e9\u20acies ' or cemmodities i\u00a7)..;\u00a7a\u00a2%:aged\n\nfarm and {or (ii) in View of the exciusicm c;c.~\u00e9Vnf';\u00a7\u00a7'r'=\u00e9Lg:i..TA:$*;._.\u00a7fz.e\n\nRuie 2A 0f chapter as of the Actand;\u00a7Is;t:.3t;2'V\u00e9g\ufb01\u00e9ghifie\n\nnotice we Annexure~A dated:"1\u00ab9_;'\u00e9;G\u00a7, 'i*.as\ufb011\u00a7\u00a2  'L\n\nrespondent (in  . '  Vida'<\/pre>\n
Annejzure\u00bb-A dated 1a:%9.2mak%k5eat%amg Na 37:33-99 issued
\nby the 2nd  Further,
\nin   sought to direct
\nthe 2nd    the amnunt 3′? Rs.\n<\/p>\n
 by the petitioner through<\/p>\n
dem\u00e9rtcgi “draft’Vr\u00a7\u00a7;.’A84\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7fi8”.dated 5.13.2003 (Annexure-E)<\/p>\n
vg.{ifc%1″\u00a7r:ter\u00a7si\u00bb ;.;_V:j*\u00a3i’i d\ufb01te “of payment.<\/p>\n
_ T},  vA\u00a3*\u00a7\u00ab.._is the case of \ufb01ne petitiener that, ;::e’titicmer’s<\/p>\n
 ~.  its pmducts tr: its cugtcamers vvhich are<\/p>\n
i\u00e9fg..ei ;f Etifrzstructure campaniaa ccntractors; and othef<\/p>\n
  ::’:s:ius\u00a7’iai co\ufb01sumar-3. Tim pmducts wing mustiy heavy<\/p>\n
 gm\u00a7\u00a7r,:hinarie$ are packaged for safe transpcrtstio\ufb01 and<\/p>\n
raise far’ protection during *3 rage and handiing and t\ufb01e<\/p>\n
w__w_mM’Wm___,_,,,.,4._..__…-m<\/p>\n
If<\/p>\n
{N TEE {\u00a3283 C\u20acf3L’R’\u00a7’ OF KARE’-EfATAKii AT BANGALQRE ‘\u20ac&’,P’}\u00a5\u20ac3= 5342 Cf 29439 and
\n‘\u00e9f.P,2\u20ace.\u00a78\u00ab$3 ref 2009<\/p>\n
:2: we men mazes: or KAREATAKA AT ewe ALORE. vs.-ip. es. 534: of 2:399 and
\n*::.e:::.:;.,5.s43 of me
\nC
\n“J”‘<\/p>\n
proepee\ufb01ve buyers of me petitienere preducts upon
\nvisiting the show meme ef the petitioner are given 3
\ndemenstretioe of the preducts by the engineers to<\/p>\n
enetxiing the prospective buyers to test <\/p>\n
ef the products to their satisfact\u00e9en. It ie”‘*’tt\u00a7erjeetter’ <\/p>\n
the oeetemere to purchase    <\/p>\n
standard eccmseriw dependirzgjtt’Veper:.’v–‘\u00a7.%i.e’ zcutetemere
\nrequirement. When thin’igR’e._V”:’eteed”  the second
\nrespendent suddei*.A\u00a7\u00a7}1iet;tedVj_~ ti1e_’;:tetit\u00a7e:1er’e premieee ea<\/p>\n
21.7_2aos and 27.3.2393′ W justt\ufb01eation has<\/p>\n
eeizvedtv    premises and theteefter,
\nuniletefe!iy pret;ee%f.P.}5e.5843 6? 23$?\n<\/p>\n
IN TEE} IHGEE COURT {BF KARNATAKA fa’? BANG ALGRE. “Jv’.P.Ne. 5842 af 213$? and
\n‘E\u00a5.?.2\u00b0~\u00a70.fr8-43 sf 2.31}?\n<\/p>\n
-6-<\/span><\/p>\n
preteet and withmzt prejudice to their ..ez’1d<\/p>\n
submitted its reply in both we cases on   4′<\/p>\n
and on 25″‘ September :’28’G8.  j 2<\/p>\n
reependent, as submitted by >3t’i1__e “r;eune\u00e9;}._: ap\u00a7:ee\u00a7f’\u00a3’e\u00a7’ifer<\/p>\n
_ pe\ufb01tiener. it is ‘the spw:i\ufb02e”‘e\u00a7ee cf ti*:e_ pei\ufb01ie’e’e?’Vt\ufb01at, \ufb01fe<\/p>\n
second reependenf_”~V.has_~_” \u00aezv\u00a7*e1ei\u00a7e\u00a7iy ie’rfi’\u00e9t\u00e9e the said
\nproceedings? _ witii\u00e9i\ufb01     and without
\n and contrary to
\nthe   and Rube. Therefore,
\npefi\ufb01enef  -to present \ufb02ame writ pe\ufb01tione,
\ns.eek’i’ri’g:_’_ep1:>’r\u00a35\ufb019’\u00a5’e9\u00a7;ee’ as stated ever:-:4,<\/p>\n
   “hay_e_’A!1eard learned ceuneei appearing for<\/p>\n
‘ ;””\u00e9,:>et\u00a7*\u00a3ies1e2i ;\u00a7’arxd teamed Gevemmerxt Pleacier appearing for<\/p>\n
H ”   and 3.\n<\/p>\n
~.  4 After careful perusal ef the material avaiiabie en<\/p>\n
  fecerd, it emerges that, in pursuance ef the ncrtiees<\/p>\n
 issued by the second rwpendent, petitioner has<\/p>\n
submitted their repiy as r\ufb02jed above. The said repiy<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
{N ‘SEE EBGEI CGLFRT OF K\u00e9’aRNz’~*sTz%KA AT 3\u00a7’&\u20acGALGI{‘\u00a3 ‘$J.\u00a7~’.}L?;, 5842 {if 3%}? mad
\n‘%f.P=1’~Ics.53%\u00a33 ef 2&9<\/p>\n
IE1′ TIE {RG11 CQURT OF’ KARNATRKA AT 13:’-KNG ALORE ‘Jv’,P,N\u00a3\u00a7. $342 6f 20%’)? I518
\nW\\P)N0.5843 05 2909
\nJ}-\n<\/p>\n
\ufb02ied by petiticmer is yet to be ccmsidered by the
\n:’espondents_ it is the specific case of the pet\ufb01ios\u00e9er in the<\/p>\n
instant: writ petitions \ufb01nat, the said Act and net<\/p>\n
applicabie it: the petitioners case and  <\/p>\n
has no jurisdiction to make spot  ‘a:;id’3:eViV;\u00a2?e}the”—-..A <\/p>\n
products. if that i$\ufb021eV’c*_;3$._;e
\nmuch epen for hijr: is   statament
\nbefore me  with nmasary
\n9rdersinct’\u00a7fis;.f;::;n’\u00a3:i_::r1$;:”\u00e9fjdV Court and Agaex
\nCom submitted by him and
\nsegana  \u00e9onsider the same and paess<\/p>\n
aVppropr’i’ate .c;\u00a3ide;%s,”~~\u00ab”\u00a7n accordance with iaw and in<\/p>\n
 V’  . %,’:L\u00a7::\u00a33n1\u00ab;:\u00bb!i3:j\u00a2e <V\ufb01f'i\u00a71\u00e9'principie of naiurai justice.<\/p>\n
 –  }.\u00a7::ej\u00a7;ing regard in the facts and circumstanc\ufb01 01′<\/p>\n
A ‘~-the \u00a7;as \u00e9–‘\u00e9s stated above, witheut expressing any opinicn<\/p>\n
 .. ___3r1z \ufb01e merits and damerits cxf this case, the instant writ<\/p>\n
 “p\u00e9t%tians \ufb01ied by petitioner signed disposed of, with a<\/p>\n
directian ta the second respo en! in cansider ‘the reply
\nx<\/p>\n
haw <\/p>\n
{N TIE IIEGIK CQI\u00a7R’F SF KARNA’\u00a7’z’\u00ab’.KA AT \u00a73;=*\u00ab..”~%G ALQREZ ‘\u00e9f\u00a7’.hk:2. 5342 {if 2136′? and
\n‘\u00e9.i?.E*$::>.\u00a73\u00abf%3 \u00absf 2%}?\n<\/p>\n
EN’ TEE HIGH CQUELT Q17 KARNATQKA RT EANGALORE, \\\u00a7’.\u00a73.NO. 5842 Of 2399 35163
\n‘ ‘-?\u00ab’.P.}~c;G.5343 29%}?\n<\/p>\n
-z_
\n\ufb02ied by petitioner irrckuding the additional remy is be
\nsubmitted by him with\u00a3n two week$ frorq “fEe:”Lj’d\u00e9te af<\/p>\n
receipt 9!’ 3 cepy of this orcfer.\n<\/p>\n
The -secanld responderjfbAAbiV$ ti3:e’r;teIci <\/p>\n
same and pa$s appropriatg nr\u00e9iergin  \ufb01ve
\nrekevant previsi-ans of  and   a\u00e9ispesa ‘of
\nthe same, as   within aight
\nweeks from the data   repiy -cum
\n..3t3\u00abgen\u00ab-:,.e;;\u00a7   pemonaiiy or
\nthifszugh.   \u00e9sfter affording reasoname<\/p>\n
 Tfie _ am\u20acauI”$’: Vd\u00e9ipos\u00e9ted by the petitiomr under<\/p>\n
 V’  _ “‘:L\u00a752i*e’&;=:st ‘with<3'\u00a7jtVi::f\u00e9jud\u00a3ce te h\u00e9g right is subject to the resaft<\/p>\n
   to be taken by the second. Ordered<\/p>\n
A '\u00ab-acsgrdihigiy.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/–\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
ism<\/p>\n
E5? TILE IE\u00a7C\u00a7’a’\u00a7 COURT GI? KARN?sTz%KA AT B.-‘~’u.’~’GAE,\u00a3T}R13 ‘=\u00a7\u20ac.P3’iG. 5842 If w}? and
\n‘Q?-;i?:%=\u00a78<33 eta? 2069<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil ‘Dru’ TIK1 {RG11 CQURT <3'? K.AR}$AT2"~3KA AT B3'-..,3'\u20ac\u20ac\u00a7ALOi?E '\u00e9\u00bb'.?.'-Keg 5842 cat' 2969 mid W.P.NAg>EFsz;Ea M” no gm V M ;, .. mum EFEJEE R{3h’D, Ko;.2<;,aTp..m am = REGiQ'N:%; QFFECE A'? 3-sass, 'COi'.E$ Roan, ragga: T\u00a3;}W_N […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":843,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009"},"wordCount":843,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009","name":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its ... on 17 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-02T22:27:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gmmco-limited-vs-the-union-of-india-rep-by-its-on-17-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gmmco Limited vs The Union Of India Rep By Its … on 17 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}