{"id":4261,"date":"2007-12-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007"},"modified":"2016-12-04T00:37:02","modified_gmt":"2016-12-03T19:07:02","slug":"sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","title":{"rendered":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl No. 7564 of 2007()\n\n\n1. SUNIL (AI),S\/O.LAKSHMANAN ASSARI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. AJMUDEEN (A2),S\/O.SHAMSUDEEN,\n3. SHAFEER (A3),S\/O.SHAHUL HAMEED,\n4. VIJU CHELLAPPAN (A4),S\/O.CHELLAPPAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO.361\/07 OF\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALAN PAPALI\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :13\/12\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                            R. BASANT, J.\n              -------------------------------------------\n                       B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007\n               -------------------------------------------------\n       Dated this the 13th day of December, 2007\n\n                                ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>     Application for regular bail.           The petitioners are accused<\/p>\n<p>1 to 4. Altogether, there are four accused persons. They face<\/p>\n<p>allegations in a crime which was initially registered, inter alia,<\/p>\n<p>under Sec.302 of the IPC.          In the course of investigation, the<\/p>\n<p>Section of offence has been altered to Sec.304 of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p>Investigation is in progress.          Final report has not been filed<\/p>\n<p>yet.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. The crux of the allegations against the petitioners is<\/p>\n<p>that they were proceeding on two motor-cycles on the evening<\/p>\n<p>of 31\/10\/07.   They allegedly picked up a quarrel with some<\/p>\n<p>others at a bus waiting shed near the place of occurrence in<\/p>\n<p>this case.   About that incident, another crime has later been<\/p>\n<p>registered. After the incident in that case, the four petitioners<\/p>\n<p>herein were moving away from the said scene of the crime in<\/p>\n<p>two motor-cycles. Allegedly on receiving information from the<\/p>\n<p>persons, who were involved in that incident at the bus waiting<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007         -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>shed, the deceased in this case and others came on to the road<\/p>\n<p>and allegedly wanted to obstruct the escape of the accused<\/p>\n<p>persons.    There, it is alleged that the deceased was knocked<\/p>\n<p>down and attacked by the petitioners who were proceeding on<\/p>\n<p>two motor-cycles. The deceased and others with him suffered<\/p>\n<p>injuries. The deceased succumbed to his injuries. Accused No.2<\/p>\n<p>was arrested on 1\/11\/07. In fact, the Case Diary shows that he<\/p>\n<p>was intercepted and detained at the scene of the crime itself by<\/p>\n<p>others.    Accused No.3 was arrested on 2\/11\/07 and accused<\/p>\n<p>Nos.1 and 4 were arrested on 12\/11\/07.           They continue in<\/p>\n<p>custody from those dates.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are absolutely innocent.      After the incident in the<\/p>\n<p>earlier scene, they were going away from the scene. They were<\/p>\n<p>victims of aggression even in that first incident. While they were<\/p>\n<p>trying to go away from the scene, the deceased in this case and<\/p>\n<p>some others tried to obstruct them and attack them.      They, who<\/p>\n<p>were passing on the motor-cycles, were intercepted and the<\/p>\n<p>motor-cycles were pushed down leading to the fall of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners. Apprehending danger to them, they took to their<\/p>\n<p>heels.   The deceased who had come to the scene of the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007         -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>occurrence with the intention of attacking them had fallen in the<\/p>\n<p>course of the incident and had suffered injuries. In any view of<\/p>\n<p>the matter, the petitioners cannot be said to be liable for any<\/p>\n<p>offence under Sec.302      or Sec.304 of the IPC, submits the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioners.    The petitioners, who have<\/p>\n<p>remained in custody from the dates referred above, may now be<\/p>\n<p>enlarged on bail, submits the learned counsel for the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>      4. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioners with<\/p>\n<p>the deliberate intention of attacking the victim and knocking him<\/p>\n<p>down had hit him with the motor-cycle and had indulged in the<\/p>\n<p>acts of violence against him.      The petitioners and the victim<\/p>\n<p>belong to two different political parties. A tense law and order<\/p>\n<p>situation prevails in the locality.   In these circumstances, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners may not be released on bail at this stage of the<\/p>\n<p>investigation. If the courts were inclined to grant regular bail to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners, some further time may be granted to the<\/p>\n<p>Investigator to complete the investigation. The presence of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners at the scene of the crime may be excluded by<\/p>\n<p>appropriate directions in the interests of maintenance of law and<\/p>\n<p>order in the locality.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007         -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      5. I have considered all the relevant inputs.       As the<\/p>\n<p>reasons which prompted the Investigating Officer to alter the<\/p>\n<p>Section from Sec.302 to Sec.304 of the IPC was not very clear to<\/p>\n<p>this Court, the learned Public Prosecutor was requested to place<\/p>\n<p>the Case Diary to make detailed submission.      I am yet to find<\/p>\n<p>satisfactory reasons for the Investigating Officer to reduce the<\/p>\n<p>Section of offence from Sec.302 to Sec.304 of the IPC at this<\/p>\n<p>stage of the investigation.        That subtle discretion should<\/p>\n<p>normally not be exercised by the Investigating Officer at this<\/p>\n<p>early stage of the investigation. Be that as it may, I take note of<\/p>\n<p>the totality of the circumstances in this case.  I am of opinion<\/p>\n<p>that subject to appropriate conditions which shall allay the<\/p>\n<p>apprehension aired by the learned Public Prosecutor            and<\/p>\n<p>safeguard the interests of a fair, efficient and expeditious<\/p>\n<p>investigation, the petitioners can be granted regular bail subject<\/p>\n<p>to conditions.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.  In the result:\n<\/p>\n<p>      (a) This application is allowed.   The petitioners shall be<\/p>\n<p>released on bail on the following terms and conditions:<\/p>\n<p>      (i) The petitioners shall not be released from custody on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007          -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the strength of this order prior to 27\/12\/2007.  The Investigator<\/p>\n<p>shall, in the meantime, make every endeavour to complete the<\/p>\n<p>investigation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (ii) The petitioners shall execute bonds for Rs.1,00,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>(Rupees one lakh only) each with two solvent sureties each for<\/p>\n<p>the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p>      (iii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for<\/p>\n<p>interrogation before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and<\/p>\n<p>Fridays between 10 a.m. and 12 noon for a period of three<\/p>\n<p>months from the date of their release from custody and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer in<\/p>\n<p>writing to do so.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (iv) During the said period of three months, the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>shall not enter the jurisdiction of Chadayamangalam Police<\/p>\n<p>Station without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate,<\/p>\n<p>except for the purpose of complying with Condition No.(iii)<\/p>\n<p>above.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that<\/p>\n<p>accused No.4 wants to attend a meeting of the Nilamel Grama<\/p>\n<p>Panchayat for election of its President at 11 a.m. on 17\/12\/2007.<\/p>\n<p>He prays that appropriate directions may be issued to ensure<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> B.A. NO. 7564 of 2007           -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that he is able to participate in the said meeting.<\/p>\n<p>     8.   There shall be a direction that the petitioner No.4\/<\/p>\n<p>accused No.4 shall be permitted to attend that meeting with<\/p>\n<p>necessary police escort.      Arrangement to that effect shall be<\/p>\n<p>made by the Superintendent of the Sub Jail, Kottarakkara.<\/p>\n<p>                                                      Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>\n                                               (R. BASANT, JUDGE)<br \/>\nNan\/<\/p>\n<p>                 \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                                         P.S. to Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl No. 7564 of 2007() 1. SUNIL (AI),S\/O.LAKSHMANAN ASSARI, &#8230; Petitioner 2. AJMUDEEN (A2),S\/O.SHAMSUDEEN, 3. SHAFEER (A3),S\/O.SHAHUL HAMEED, 4. VIJU CHELLAPPAN (A4),S\/O.CHELLAPPAN, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA (CRIME NO.361\/07 OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1045,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\",\"name\":\"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007","datePublished":"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007"},"wordCount":1045,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007","name":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 ... on 13 December, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-03T19:07:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-ai-vs-state-of-kerala-crime-no-36107-on-13-december-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sunil (Ai) vs State Of Kerala (Crime No.361\/07 &#8230; on 13 December, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}