{"id":4274,"date":"2010-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-08-28T14:20:59","modified_gmt":"2017-08-28T08:50:59","slug":"u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nSA.No. 709 of 1997(A)\n\n\n\n1. U.MOHAMMEDKUNHI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN\n\n Dated :07\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                        P.BHAVADASAN, J.\n                        -------------------------\n                       S.A No. 709 of 1997\n                        --------------------------\n                 Dated this the 7th July, 2010\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Plaintiff, who filed this Second Appeal, was awarded<\/p>\n<p>with    the    work     of    improvement         to  Chalikkara<\/p>\n<p>Puliyottumukku-Avarattumukku road as per an agreement<\/p>\n<p>evidenced by Ext.B1 between the parties. According to<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff, he could not complete the work due to the<\/p>\n<p>laches on the part of the defendants. In fact,he claims that<\/p>\n<p>major portion of the work had to be abandoned due to the<\/p>\n<p>conduct of the defendants. He complained that they have<\/p>\n<p>not paid the amount due to him for the work completed by<\/p>\n<p>him and that he claimed for damages along with<\/p>\n<p>settlement of accounts.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   Defendants resisted the suit.            According to<\/p>\n<p>them, it was due to the fault of the plaintiff that work could<\/p>\n<p>not be completed. They had done all they had to do so in<\/p>\n<p>terms of the contract. It is pointed out that the delay in<\/p>\n<p>starting the commencement of the work itself was due to<\/p>\n<p>the fault of the plaintiff and they repeatedly had to sent<\/p>\n<p>notice to him to commence the work. The work was of<\/p>\n<p>urgent nature. Therefore, as the plaintiff did not proceed<\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>with the work. They had to get the work completed early.<\/p>\n<p>Since the plaintiff abandoned     the work and committed<\/p>\n<p>breach of contract the Department had to rearrange the<\/p>\n<p>work.    It is pointed out that the loss sustained to the<\/p>\n<p>Department by rearrangement of the balance work is to be<\/p>\n<p>recovered from the plaintiff. Pointing out that there were<\/p>\n<p>no laches on their part, they prayed for dismissal of the<\/p>\n<p>suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.     The trial court raised necessary issues for<\/p>\n<p>consideration. The evidence consists of the testimony of<\/p>\n<p>PW1 and Exts.A1 and A2 were marked from the side of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff. . Defendants had examined DW1 and Exts. B1 to<\/p>\n<p>B 24 were marked.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     On evaluation of the evidence the trial court<\/p>\n<p>found that none of the allegations made by the plaintiff is<\/p>\n<p>true and breach of contract was on his part. It is also<\/p>\n<p>found that defendants were justified in terminating the<\/p>\n<p>contract. However the trial court observed that since the<\/p>\n<p>final bill has not been prepared it will be done with notice<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner. If he gets any adverse order, he will have<\/p>\n<p>to assail the proceedings before appropriate forum.<\/p>\n<p>Holding so, the suit was dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     5.      Plaintiff carried the matter in appeal as A.S.<\/p>\n<p>No.21 of 1993 the District Court, Kozhikode. The District<\/p>\n<p>Court considered the evidence independently and found<\/p>\n<p>that the plaintiff had no idea about the work undertaken by<\/p>\n<p>him and also about the work done by him. In paragraph 10<\/p>\n<p>of the judgment of the lower appellate court, the case of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff has been discussed in detail.<\/p>\n<p>     6.      The learned counsel for the appellant pointed<\/p>\n<p>out that both the courts erred in holding the suit as one for<\/p>\n<p>money. The plaintiff had sought taking of the account of<\/p>\n<p>the work done by him and balance payment due to him for<\/p>\n<p>the work done. The approach was wrong.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.      It is seen that plaintiff had admitted that he had<\/p>\n<p>received huge amounts from the Government for the work.<\/p>\n<p>But he was unable to complete the work or give details of<\/p>\n<p>the work. Both the courts below found that the department<\/p>\n<p>had carried out their part of the contract and it was only<\/p>\n<p>due to the fault of the plaintiff that work had come to a<\/p>\n<p>stand still.     In fact it is seen that several notices were<\/p>\n<p>issued to the plaintiff to commence the work immediately.<\/p>\n<p>But it is seen that the appellant did not take steps to<\/p>\n<p>complete the work without delay.            It was under those<\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>circumstances,     the Department    was   constrained    to<\/p>\n<p>terminate the contract and re-arrange the work. It is seen<\/p>\n<p>that plaintiff agreed to complete the work provided they<\/p>\n<p>pay 50% enhanced rate. There were no provision for that<\/p>\n<p>in agreement. Therefore, defendants could not agree to<\/p>\n<p>such a proposal. Both the courts below have considered<\/p>\n<p>the    variouas aspects raised by the plaintiff       which<\/p>\n<p>according to them, had delayed in carrying the work. It is<\/p>\n<p>found that none of those allegations are true. Plaintiff had<\/p>\n<p>defaulted in carry out the work. In fact, the discussion of<\/p>\n<p>the lower appellate court shown that he has absolutely no<\/p>\n<p>idea about the work he had undertaken. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>court belows rightly found that the defendants could not be<\/p>\n<p>blamed for the delay in completing the work and also for<\/p>\n<p>the laches committed by the plaintiff. There is nothing to<\/p>\n<p>show that defendants are guilty of breach of contract. Both<\/p>\n<p>the courts below found that termination was justified.<\/p>\n<p>     Finding are essentially on facts     arrived at on an<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of evidence. No interference is called for by<\/p>\n<p>this Court since it is not shown that findings of the lower<\/p>\n<p>appellate court are either perverse or unwarranted by the<\/p>\n<p>evidence on record. No substantial question of law arose<\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>for consideration in this appeal. Appeal is without merits<\/p>\n<p>and it is accordingly dismissed. There will be no order as<\/p>\n<p>to costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                              P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE<br \/>\nma<\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                       6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>S.A No. 709 of 1997<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                       7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM SA.No. 709 of 1997(A) 1. U.MOHAMMEDKUNHI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN Dated :07\/07\/2010 O R D E R [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":874,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\",\"name\":\"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010"},"wordCount":874,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010","name":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-28T08:50:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/u-mohammedkunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"U.Mohammedkunhi vs State Of Kerala on 7 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}