{"id":43090,"date":"2009-06-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-08T10:06:39","modified_gmt":"2019-01-08T04:36:39","slug":"padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE) HIGH CQURT 01? KARNATAKA AT BA:~;{\u00e9:tALQr\u00e9’\u00a7: –  H<\/p>\n
SATED T}\u00a7\u00a7S THE 2561 DAY'(‘3i3’–efUI?\u00a7E    <\/p>\n
BEFORE  Z M<\/p>\n
ma HOIWBLE MR. JL5$1’~3\u00a7:E .?\u00a7L”S__BOf5A.Ni\u00a7i;\u00a7L4’V”‘ <\/p>\n
REGULAR SECQND A?iP\u00a7;AL_ N{)A.2385Oj 2005<\/p>\n
BETWEEN :\n<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
PADMAMMAAW\/O NAl’v\u00a5~JAi”~>PA   ‘
\nAGED ABOUT 45 Y\u00a7\u00a7:ARs _ *   :\n<\/p>\n
occ: H0\u00a7JSEf:I:,?1OE\u00bbD’-W{3\u00a7QK  ”
\nwe N_(};  ;v;A’HA’D_E.$;\u00ab;-WA-RA-~NAVc>ARA
\nHEROHALMCROSS    ‘
\nVISHWANE’EI\u00a7_AM ;>o’sir,* *
\nM\ufb01scyamz .\u00a7::oAD’;iA::3AN'<3A-L012}; -J9:<\/p>\n
YA"$3HDD5.MMAf  _  1.\n<\/p>\n
W\/O fr AsHurA1’Hi\u00a2Ag&A__YANA SWAMY
\nAGEDABAOVUT 52 ‘&’.E;’=.~R;S3<\/p>\n
OCC: aozisa H.eZ)1,.I.*’2 WORK<\/p>\n
R\/e::>,1x:o. 4:3,. _15’m 0- cmss<\/p>\n
 ‘*:2.5’%I\u00a7 MAIN, EEANDIWPA GARDEN
\n A  MUTHYEIANAGARA
\n* \u00bb 1V13A.\u00a3\u00a7rc3A*I_..Q’RE” — 560 054<\/p>\n
 …_\u20ac;UVL{\u00a7i;vHAP.\u00a7\ufb01;1;\u00ab\u00a7MA W\/{} R SWAMIDAS<\/p>\n
AGEE} A-;3oU’r* 56 YEARS<\/p>\n
“”4-004:; 2~\u00a3r::=’Us5: HOLD WORK<\/p>\n
R,\/.0 mi)\/23, am {moss
\nSHMQTI GANAPATH} NAGAR<\/p>\n
x ‘T BASAVESHWARA NAGARA
\nv  BANGALORE -79<\/p>\n
VIJAYAEAKSHMAMMA W’\/Q MUNISWAMAEAH
\nAGED ABOUT 6}. YEARS<\/p>\n
oczc: HOUSE HOLD WORK<\/p>\n
R\/G. 6\/8, 4% MAEN<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
‘1<\/p>\n
AND :\n<\/p>\n
THEMMENAHALLI, MAGADI ROAD
\nBANGALORE — 560 091<\/p>\n
(BY SR1: C H JADHAV, ADV.)<\/p>\n
B L SFEIDHAR MURTHY  ‘
\nS\/*0 LATE av. LAKsHM1KAm’HA.PPA<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUTSSYEARS _ _  ,
\nocc: BUSINESS, R\/’o.%’rALa.IK?VTor\u00ab’F1’c;::.12v.;xAD
\nDEVANAHALLITOWN
\nBANGALORE.DISTR3\u00a3\u00a7’F. _ <\/p>\n
BLDP\u00a5AI\\3A3\u00a3}\u00a7,EE\u00a3\/LR”-\u00ab ; _  ”
\ns\/0 LME’ ~13 *c\u00abr..I,2.=’.Ks\u00a7a;M1’1{A1xrrHAPPA
\nAGEDABQU1′ 29″arEA12:};.   ‘
\nocg:;_VBU~szNE=:3sV * _ ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
R\/so Txmjx OFE’I\u20ac,’E ;’-2._;5.,I3~ _
\nDEVANAHAITOWH ‘ – V… _ —\n<\/p>\n
BA:srGA’Lon_E m’sT:;e:g:’r.. <\/p>\n
D C CPIANDR\u00a7$.SHE.KR\u00a77′
\n3,1,0 LATE .MtL:>:;)u OBALAPPA<\/p>\n
,, ._;AGED ABOUT. 59 YEARS\n<\/p>\n
– ocazz; bUs1NEss’;”‘:<;o NO. 2405<\/p>\n
BHEKSYAALAKSHMI NILAYA, \u00a381'?! MAIN<\/p>\n
 " ~1.sz~2Q LA'i'QUT MAIN ROAD
\n KUvM}'aRASW.f;'MI LAYOUT an\u00bb STAGE<\/p>\n
4 "–E3ANGA'L_{)EE — *;\u00ab's
\n '*3"I+iI"\u00a3'\\}IM'.4'{\u00a3-{J KA<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS<\/p>\n
7 QCC': HOUSE HGLD WORK<\/p>\n
v n H' 5210 TALUK OFFICE Rom
\n*  BEVANAHALL1 TOWN<\/p>\n
'4 {ff<\/p>\n
BANGALORE D1S'I'E?iCT<\/p>\n
LATHA B\/O 'FHIMMAKK1\u00b0a
\nAGED ABOUT 34 YEARS<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
 A9\u00a5.5\u00a72:i.,;;A:\u00a7%1's<\/p>\n
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK
\nR\/C)' TALUK OFFICE ROAD
\nEJEVANAHALLI TOWN<\/p>\n
BANGALORE DISTRICT  _.\u00a3–:E.\u00a33_iC'%<~?:.1\u00a5:'::\u00a7,1\\:';'s " ~.. <\/p>\n
{BY SR1: '1' 24 RAJAGOPALA, ADV;;'1\u00a5'(}'1\u00a7j{;;,'f%1 &;_:23- : "   <\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U,fS 1G()7..O F._ cpc A':c;:A1e:s:i3'r
\nJUDGMENT 85 DEGREE mp 11;9.e.s; passrgo IN R._A.v..NvQ.,.V34r\/0? –. '<\/p>\n
GN THE FILE OF THE SESSiQVN.S 85 '~DISTR_\u00a7_CT , JUDGE,
\nPRESIDING OFFICER FTC – II,'\u00ab.VBF-.NG15xLC}I3E {R}  D\u00a7S'FR.,
\nBANGALORE, DISMISSINC': 'THE  AND CONFERMING THE
\nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE'. DTD V. 2}2';Q1.,C7. PASSED IN OS
\n1423f06 ON THE FILE OF"FP{EACfVI:\u00a7.\u00bb \u00ab:JU{}C:iF~,, M{'S_R.DN'}, 85 JMFVC1,
\nDEVANAHALLL   1  <\/p>\n
This Appca1\u00ab._V Conziazg g<:::<1Jf61* 'a\u00a3i'1::I.i_$_s\u00a7.0n, this day, the
\nCourt delivemd'..ths5;'fo_i]<m?it1g-;V . — <\/p>\n
%  gtirziammwl\ufb02
\n the defendants No.1 to 5 in<\/p>\n
O.S.Nc…Mf23f   has been renumbered though<\/p>\n
 H1: \u00e9\u00a7a.{$;n=}.\u00e9."Lha\u00e9i..\u00abbe\u20ac:33.\u00abf"\u00a7}\u00e9\u00e9iv on 3.9.1996. The suit was \ufb01led by<\/p>\n
 herein sacking for a declaration and<\/p>\n
  ':.~<):\u00e9ssession in respact of thc suit schedule:<\/p>\n
 '.., pmperti:$}'1. The trial Caurt by its judgment dated<\/p>\n
A ' 22..V(3}i".Q0{)? has decreed the suit; The defendants No.3 to 5<\/p>\n
 ..__ ' we 's;f'e therefore before the Lower Appellate Court in RA<\/p>\n
 '=.N"o.34\u00a5i2(}O'?. The Lower Amwrliate Court on ztrappreciation<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
'5'<\/p>\n
of the entire matter has agreed ,with the   <\/p>\n
concurred with the judgment of; the   u<\/p>\n
defendants No.1 ':10 S are therefore<\/p>\n
second appeal against the cozieurgent   " L'<\/p>\n
rendered by the Courts below.  V<\/p>\n
2. Sri C.H.;Jadha\u00a7r,..  for the
\nappellant while”  the  czmtend that
\nthe Courts  the principle
\nof iaw  and also with regard t0
\nthe \ufb01mii\ufb01fien, the have not properly considered<\/p>\n
the pmvisio\ufb01ee e\u00e9ntame\ufb02 A\ufb01zlcie 65 of the Limitation Act.<\/p>\n
 ‘~ to. the ieamed counsel for the appeliant though<\/p>\n
 {}.S.No.25{}\/19’\u00a7”8 had conciuded 33:; RA<\/p>\n
Ne;3.’?’j’ .39. 1 3.. 1991, the Courts below could not have<\/p>\n
[taken “ti:1et date as the date for cause of actioxz for \ufb01ling<\/p>\n
  preseext suit mad also Whiie considering the plea of<\/p>\n
 possession. According to the leaxned counsel, the<\/p>\n
“-\ufb01ciefendants No.1 to 5 had indicated that they were in<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
6. In the light of the rival contentions pu’:; 1:’t;)rtl:Ji M<\/p>\n
the trial Ceurt, the trial} Court \ufb02amed as’ “$131. $9 xi$s;j1;z.e\u00e9\u00bb_’ V’<\/p>\n
for its eonsideraiion inzitiaiiy and tvsfo aiid:iiiio\ufb01e21_Aia*s.ues’v<\/p>\n
also framed. insofar as the   ” L’<\/p>\n
under the sale deed dgzted   regard
\nclaiming \ufb01tle’ to the    not advert to
\nin detail, more p:=3=rticu1.:9r1j;*:..ij; eject that in the
\nearlier litigatiggzj\u00e9iv   culminated in RA
\nNo.37\/1988:     declare the said sale
\ndeed  bee}; rejected. Though it is
\nconiendeei’ fhet ‘   “eaid judgment and decree,<\/p>\n
injunction h\u00e9i\u00e9i 1\u00a7eem.v”g1’\u00e9tz:1tee1, the same is a di\ufb01’ere11t aspect<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘of  wdii\u00a7(i’i1ot assume importamre since in any<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01iejsenf suit the piaintiff have sought for<\/p>\n
posse\u00e9sien. ‘ ‘ e1;’c1s;ofar as the titie is concerned, that itself is<\/p>\n
‘.\u00a7u\ufb01e:iem ‘ tp indicate that the plainti\ufb01s based on titie were<\/p>\n
   tria} Court seeking for possession 0f the property.<\/p>\n
 tiaet background, the oniy question that arises for<\/p>\n
“c{ji1sidera\ufb01on in the narrow scope of this appeal ie with<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
‘v<\/p>\n
regard to the conicntion relating to adverse  V.<\/p>\n
in that background, whether the contgfgxgtjon _.p’1it”  .\u00a7’.h\u00e9Zi ” ”<\/p>\n
learned C011J3.S\u20acl for the appei\ufb02ant:–T jeizroix\ufb01  <\/p>\n
substan\ufb01al question. of law for cpnsi\u00e9icgfsiion _”;aHp_;’pea\u00a71 <\/p>\n
and as to whether it would mcI’it’V}4L\u00e99;d’\ufb01i1issio;:’1\u00a7’*  ‘ ”<\/p>\n
“7. On ti:1isvaspcc%:_Qff’ outset, what
\nrequires ta I3e;”‘riii-jfgjiseci iis,   relied on by the
\nlearned    iaemsai of the same
\nWcruld sndi\u00e9a\ufb01ivitj;s{:?jt;hsf’i~J\u00a7n’b1s S\ufb01smme Court as well as
\nthis   tbs  supra have oniy Ititerated<\/p>\n
the iegal  to the pzincipies mlating to<\/p>\n
 V. ‘_adV\u20acj’15’.-i\ufb02 ppisssssibii 2*.nzi\u00abkeeping in View the facts involved in<\/p>\n
tZ1Ve;V’s3jci–v\u00a7;Va*s\u20acs ‘have come to such a conclusion. No doubt,<\/p>\n
  tVJ3\u00e9\u00a7’v111a1112er 01” pleading hostiie possession and<\/p>\n
salsa Q nz;\u00b0;;”=nv gs;  be pmvttd has been stated in the said<\/p>\n
M u u ‘ V:i:e'<,:isi9ns\u00a7"ApsI"t from the said decision reizlcd by the leaxned<\/p>\n
. j_.(:<")<:':1V1 1's?\u00ab*::I for the appeiiant, a perusal of the judgment of the<\/p>\n
 V' Lower Appellate (lourt would indicate that the Lewer<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
G<\/p>\n
Ii}<\/p>\n
Appellate Court has aiso noticed the decision of  V.
\nSupreme Court with regard to m\u00a2,g;ann\u00a2r"'m  '
\ncontention with regard to the adverse::'  be<\/p>\n
pleaded and proved and alS0'(VWi_i:h  to limttattiovil  L'<\/p>\n
Act. I have referred to this aspeetef   ne\ufb01ce that
\napart from the decisionsj\u00a5e?i\u00a7:d5:{3nV–'j' 'leerned Hceunsel \ufb01ar
\nthe appellant, both the aptfcperly no\ufb01ced
\nthe legal   for adverse
\nP\ufb01ssessioxi'      '- *    V '<\/p>\n
  respect of the matter, what<\/p>\n
requires to be-. con.3it3e1A\u00a5:dV'i\u00e9uas to whether the Courts beiow<\/p>\n
 '~ ._1;ave':L_t3he3_:g;;:afi:er pztiperly' appreciated the facts evoiving in the<\/p>\n
vttgpretsent 'ea:1Se;'tc;'\ufb01t it in the appropzriate manner relating ta<\/p>\n
the.1\u00e9:a% oii  point. In this regar\u00e9, the judgments of<\/p>\n
[the  Below would indicate that both the Courts have
\n ;:1aeie"..ureferenee with regand to the right ciajmeci by the
\n in the suit an\u00e9 the defence put forth by the<\/p>\n
"tiefendants. In this zegard, specific reference has been made<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
'I<\/p>\n
9. Even with regard to ti’;1_e\u00bb..\u00bbe.o141teIit.Vi\u00a3:l>ls’  ti’; ll<\/p>\n
adverse possession, the prayer fer ;’ios:seslsioi2_. “on <\/p>\n
accepted by the Court, n0\ufb01n:{_g”*–fl1e  d.a_tel.:vl;e2Aj:’r*e_\u00a7}ee;ting ” ll<\/p>\n
adverse possession is also   event as
\napprepiiately xzoticeel   C39;li’tslL’vvvll)ielgxv even in the
\npzesent suit, the   the title of the
\nplaintiffs and   of possession
\nadverse to    not been proved as
\nzequiitfil  _  learned counsel for the
\nappella1ll~.1fei%2xied of DW. 1 to indicate that<\/p>\n
she heel stai;edV’v”t%1a’i  are the owners of the<\/p>\n
 –[SUGIAI stf\u00e9y””sei1tence in the evidence alone is not<\/p>\n
Wlsu~\ufb02’1eie1z”tv.\u00bb_i3e’}f1e1}lVanimus is required to be proved, the same<\/p>\n
shcrzhxlill heivexlreen pleaded with material particulars and<\/p>\n
XVt.herealfie1:’sVh0uId have been establislsed by leading<\/p>\n
 2…?-:1p\u00a7af’ep;ia{e evidence. Therefore, in the present facts, when<\/p>\n
 Ceurts below have pmperly appreciated the facts<\/p>\n
“–\u00ab:Vlliiii}olved and have appropriately come to a cencuxrent<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
C<\/p>\n
\u00a33<\/p>\n
\ufb01nding an\u00e9 moreso in the present facts, since   ”
\nnot pmgect any substan\u00e9ial ques\ufb01on Qf  ‘A ”<\/p>\n
in my view, both the judgments do hot  :fo\u00abz”‘?f <\/p>\n
Accoxvclixlgiy, the appeal  devoid of  stands
\ndisposed of. N0 mdcr  co:%it;s.i–_w  ” A<\/p>\n
Sd\/-E
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE) HIGH CQURT 01? KARNATAKA AT BA:~;{\u00e9:tALQr\u00e9’\u00a7: – H SATED T}\u00a7\u00a7S THE 2561 DAY'(‘3i3’–efUI?\u00a7E BEFORE Z M ma HOIWBLE MR. JL5$1’~3\u00a7:E .?\u00a7L”S__BOf5A.Ni\u00a7i;\u00a7L4’V”‘ REGULAR SECQND A?iP\u00a7;AL_ N{)A.2385Oj 2005 BETWEEN : I PADMAMMAAW\/O NAl’v\u00a5~JAi”~>PA ‘ AGED ABOUT 45 Y\u00a7\u00a7:ARs _ * […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43090","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPadmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1534,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009"},"wordCount":1534,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009","name":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-08T04:36:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/padmamma-vs-b-l-sridhar-murthy-on-25-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Padmamma vs B L Sridhar Murthy on 25 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43090"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43090\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43090"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43090"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}