{"id":43103,"date":"2011-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-18T00:54:04","modified_gmt":"2016-02-17T19:24:04","slug":"abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Ms.Justice B.M.Trivedi,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nFA\/1903\/1983\t 7\/ 7\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nFIRST\nAPPEAL No. 1903 of 1983\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCROSS\nOBJECTION No. 46 of 2010\n \n\nIn\nFIRST APPEAL No. 1903 of 1983\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nFIRST\nAPPEAL No. 1904 of 1983\n \n\nWith\n\n\n \n\nCROSS\nOBJECTION No. 47 of 2010\n \n\nIn\nFIRST APPEAL No. 1904 of 1983\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL  \nHONOURABLE\nMS.JUSTICE B.M.TRIVEDI\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nA'BAD\nMUNI. CORPORATION - Appellant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nA'BAD\nDIST. CO OP. BANK LTD - Defendant(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\nAppearance : \nMR\nJR NANAVATI for\nAppellant(s) : 1, \nMR YATIN SONI for Defendant(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nand\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMS.JUSTICE B.M.TRIVEDI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 24\/02\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
(Per
\n: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE B.M.TRIVEDI)<\/p>\n
1.\tBoth
\nthese appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated
\n03.03.1983 passed by the learned Chief Judge, Small Causes Court,
\nAhmedabad in M.V. Appeal No. 783 of 1981. When these appeals were
\nlisted on the Board for final hearing on 17.02.2011, Shri
\nJ.R.Nanavati for the appellant – Corporation was not present
\nand after hearing the learned Advocate Shri Gaurav Chudasama for the
\nrespondent – Bank, the matters were kept on 22.02.2011 for
\nexamining the same on merits. On 22.02.2011, the learned Advocate
\nShri J.R.Nanavati for the appellant appeared and stated that the
\nmatter be examined on merit. Under the circumstances, the appeals are
\nhereby finally disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tThe
\nFirst Appeal No. 1903 of 1983 has been preferred by the Appellant –
\nCorporation being aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the
\nlearned Chief Judge, Small Causes Courts, Ahmedabad, in M.V. Appeal
\nNo. 783 of 1981, which had arisen from the order dated 05.12.1980
\npassed by the Appellate Officer, whereas the First Appeal No. 1904 of
\n1983 has been filed by the Appellant – Corporation being
\naggrieved by the impugned order passed in M.V. Appeal No. 2526 of
\n1981, which had arisen from the order dated 05.08.1981 passed by the
\nAppellate Officer. In both the M.V. Appeals, the learned Chief Judge,
\nSmall Causes Court (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Lower Court’) had
\nfixed the Gross Rateable Value (G.R.V.) AT RS. 1,68,636\/- in respect
\nof the cellar, ground floor, mezzanine floor and first floor and at
\nRs. 11,988\/- in respect of the second floor of the premises belonging
\nto the Respondent – Bank, situated near the Income Tax Office,
\nAshram Road, Ahmedabad, on the Final Plot No.102-B and 103-B, for the
\nyears 1980-1981 and 1981-1982. The Respondent – Bank has also
\nfiled the Cross Objections in the said Appeals being aggrieved by the
\nimpugned order passed by the Lower Court  <\/p>\n
3.\tBefore
\ndealing with the merits of the appeals filed by the appellant –
\nCorporation and the cross objections filed by the respondent –
\nBank, it is required to be stated that at the time of admission,
\nthese appeals were directed to be heard along with First Appeal No.
\n1833 of 1983 and other companion matters, as per the order dated
\n18.01.1984. However, it appears that the said First Appeal No. 1833
\nof 1983 was disposed of by the Division Bench (Coram: B.N.Kirpal,
\nC.J. & A.N.Divecha, J.), vide oral judgment dated 14th
\nDecember, 1994 after observing as under:\n<\/p>\n
“2.\tThis Court in the case of
\nMunicipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad v. Oriental Fire &
\nGeneral Insurance Co. Ltd., A.I.R. 1994 Gujarat 167, held that a
\ntenant cannot challenge the rateable value which is fixed. In view of
\nthe said judgment, this Appeal is allowed. The order of the Small
\nCause Court is set aside. The rateable value determined by the
\nAppellant – Corporation is restored. No order as to cost.”\n<\/p>\n
4.\tSo
\nfar as the facts of the present appeals are concerned, it transpires
\nthat the respondent – Bank was the owner of the premises in
\nquestion for which the Gross Rateable Value was fixed by the
\nAppellate Officer of the Corporation and had challenged the
\nassessment before the Small Causes Court by way of presenting the
\nM.V. Appeals. The Lower Court, considering the evidence on record and
\nthe contentions raised by the learned Advocates for the parties,
\npartly allowed the said M.V. Appeals by fixing the Gross Rateable
\nValue for the premises as stated hereinabove. Being aggrieved by the
\nsaid judgment and order, the appellant – Municipal Corporation
\npreferred the above mentioned First Appeals and the respondent –
\nBank filed the cross objections as stated hereinabove. Though, these
\nappeals were ordered to be heard along with the First Appeal No. 1833
\nof 1983, as stated hereinabove, the said appeal has been disposed of
\nby this Court vide order dated 14.12.1994 only on the ground of
\nnon-maintainability, as in the said case the tenant of the premises
\nhad challenged the Gross Rateable Value fixed by the Corporation
\nbefore the Small Cause Court, whereas in the instant case, the
\nrespondent – Bank who was the owner had challenged the Rateable
\nValue fixed by the Corporation. Hence, these appeals stand on
\ndifferent footing and could not be disposed of on the lines on which
\nthe said First Appeal was disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tIt
\ncannot be gainsaid that as per the provisions contained in the
\nB.P.M.C. Act, the Municipal Corporation can impose property taxes,
\nand that the general tax at a prescribed rate is leviable on the
\nrateable value of the property. The said expression ‘rateable value’
\nwas interpreted by various judicial pronouncements, and the law in
\nthis regard was settled by the Division Bench of this Court in the
\njudgment reported in A.I.R. 1994 Gujarat 167  in the
\ncase of Municipal Corporation of the City of
\nAhmedabad v. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd.
\nThe relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced as under:\n<\/p>\n
“The burden must always rest on
\nthe assessee to establish, when he files an appeal before the Small
\nCauses Court, that the rateable value has not been properly fixed by
\nthe Commissioner. When the gross rateable value has been determined
\nby the Assessing Authority and an appeal is filed contending that the
\nconstructual rent should not be regarded as a standard rent, as it is
\nexcessive, then it is for the person, who makes this allegation to
\nprove his case. Onus of proof is on the person, who would fail, if a
\nparticular fact is not proved. The averment that the contractual rent
\ncharged by the owner is excessive is made by the appellant before the
\nSmall Causes Court.  It would, therefore, be for the appellant to
\nprove as to what should be the standard rent, which must be at a
\nfigure less than the contractual rent. In this connection, evidence
\nwill have to be led by way of cost of land and cost of construction
\nof the premises in question or the actual rent, which is being
\nreceived in the neighbourhood with regard to identical or similar
\npremises. If no evidence in this connection is led, the gross
\nrateable value,  determined by the Municipal Authorities on the basis
\nof first letting, must be regarded as the annual letting value under
\nthe B.P.M.C. Act. Evidence with regard to cost of construction and
\ncost of land can best, if not only, be available with the owner of
\nthe property. Therefore, whether it be the stage of assessment or at
\nthe stage of appeal before the Small Causes Court, evidence in this
\nregard should always be led or produced by the owner. If, on the
\nother hand, the Corporation chooses to disregard this and purports to
\nfix the rateable value on the basis of rents in the neighbourhood, or
\nby applying any other method then it is only, in such cases, that the
\nCorporation has to justify its action. When an appeal is filed,
\nchallenging the gross rateable value, it will be for the appellant to
\nshow that the rateable value fixed by the Corporation is not in
\naccordance with law.”\n<\/p>\n
6.\tNow,
\nif the ratio laid down in the above mentioned judgment is applied to
\nthe facts of the case, it appears that the Lower Court, while fixing
\nthe G.R.V. of the premises in question, had taken into consideration
\nthe comparable instances of Esic Bhavan, situated on the same plot on
\nwhich the building of the respondent – Bank was situated i.e.
\nFinal Plot No. 102-B and 103-B. The Lower Court had also considered
\nthe reasonable and expected rent of the building constructed by the
\nB.M. Institute situated in the neighbourhood of the premises of the
\nrespondent – Bank on the Ashram Road. Thus, the Lower Court
\nhaving fixed the G.R.V. Of the premises in question on the basis of
\nthe reasonable and expected rent of the premises belonging to the
\nCorporation itself and of the premises in the neighbourhood situated
\non the Ashram Road, it could not be said that the Lower Court had
\ncommitted any error while fixing the G.R.V. Of the suit premises.\n<\/p>\n
7.\tThe
\nlearned Advocate Shri J.R.Nanavati for the appellant and Gaurav
\nChudasama for the respondent have also failed to point out any error
\ncommitted by the Lower Court and to substantiate the submissions made
\nby them in the appeals and the cross objections respectively. Under
\nthe circumstance, we do not find any merits in the present appeals
\nfiled by the Appellant – Corporation and the cross objections filed
\nby the respondent Bank.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tIn
\nthat view of the matter, the First Appeal No. 1903 of 1983 and Cross
\nObjections No. 46 of 2010 filed in the said appeal and First Appeal
\nNo. 1904 of 1983 and Cross Objections No. 47 of 2010 filed in the
\nsaid appeal being dehors the merits, deserve to be dismissed
\nand are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
(JAYANT
\nPATEL, J.)<\/p>\n
(MS.\n<\/p>\n
B.M. TRIVEDI, J.)<\/p>\n
jani<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011 Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Ms.Justice B.M.Trivedi,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print FA\/1903\/1983 7\/ 7 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 1903 of 1983 With CROSS OBJECTION No. 46 of 2010 In FIRST APPEAL No. 1903 of 1983 With FIRST […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nA'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1526,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\",\"name\":\"A'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011"},"wordCount":1526,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011","name":"A'Bad vs A'Bad on 24 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-17T19:24:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abad-vs-abad-on-24-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A’Bad vs A’Bad on 24 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43103\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}