{"id":43121,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-03-21T20:53:22","modified_gmt":"2017-03-21T15:23:22","slug":"karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT 01? KARNATAKA, CIRQIA,.IliZ\u00a7V.i3'\u00a7.7\u00a7ii'-f:CIjf\n\nAT DHARWAD.\n\nDATES THIS THE 25TH DAY OF. 1\u00a7I_()V}?;}\\\u00ab\u00a55I'E\u00a7'l\u00a7iZi\u00a7;'V'i2\u00a3)iC}{3.  A '\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTI'QE K.A'SI\u00a7EEV{3v1fi}AiR\"'RA()\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JU'\u00ab\u00a7'\u00a7Titf3I\u00a7:*\u00bbIfs.S\ufb02:R5\u00a7;:\u00a7\u00a7NfVASE GOWDA\n%  1()2.\u00a7;.'?\/20%'\nBETWEEN,      \n1. KARN.A%FA;i{15i1 3;E\u00a7EEEi\u00a7AVARI\" PIKEAM LTD\nR:3PREs\u00a71\u00bbfTED% By MANAGING DIRECITOR\nNO.._1,' COI%'FEE.B\u00bbQ_AARI)_.BUE1DING\n4TH FLOOR, 1:=r<.B;1a AMBEDKAR VEEDHI\nBANGP.--.LOvRE--:O};..  \u00ab ...APPELLAN'I'.\n\n sR:I<;q;~:':*H.J.BHAT : K.'T.KIWAD ADV.)\n\nA:q:;%%%  V\n\n1.7 BR: msa BHARAMA SHEDHAL\n32\/<2 HERKUDI\nTQ cmxonz\n\n ~ ~'*..DIS\u00bbF BELGAUM\n\n    SR: BASAVANT MAHADEV SHEBBAL SINCE\n\nIJECEASED BY HIS\nLRS\n\n \u00bb " 2A. SMTSHANTABAI BASAVAN'? SHEDBAL\n\nR\/O HIRKUDI, TQ CHIKOD1, DIST EELGAUM\n\n\n\n28.\n\n2c.\n\n "  . (m%\u00b0s\n\n _ -- 41$: FRED U\/354(1) OF LA ACT AGAINST THE\nJU:;GMEs:m'~,AND AWARD DATED 25\/3\/2006 PASSED IN\nNi}. 1'1fO5 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE(S}Z))\n\nLAC\n\n ; cHIz\u00a7o1;:1;' " PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE\n   nPE'I'I'I'JV()N FOR "ENHANCED COMPENSATION.\n\n E A This Appeal is coming on for hearing this day,\n"  ._..SREET[)HAR RAD, J., delivemd the feliowingz --\n\n5{\n\nSR1 RAJU BASAVANT SHEDBAL\nR\/ O RIRKUDI, TQ CEKKODI, DIST IBE'.L(_Z'n..\n\nSR1 MALLIKARJUN BASAVART \u00bbSHE}i}BA:};'_'v L  \u00ab _ \nR\/O H1RK:Lm1, TQ (:1~;1I\/(om, DIST {BELm;L:mkAV'  <\n\nSR: BHARAMU MAHADEV s\u00e9iE\ufb0113AL   ~ * % \nR \/0 HIRKUDI, TQ C}~\u00a3H{_(_)~D_I, BEST BELGASJMVVV \n\nSR: ASHOK MAHAE)EVASH:EDE!.AL PM *\n\nR\/O HIRKUDI, T\u00a2f)"vC1HEi{C):DI',-.1}:\n\n '*'-]'_BE3LGAViJM\n\nSR: SI-IANKAR  \nR\/O HIRKUDI, '1';Q CH;KQDI*,--,_DE'ST: BELGAUM\n\nSR1 VAS3 AN;i '~ "I\u20ac?IAfI&1\u00a7EV "$14139 BAL\nR\/O I\u00bbi1R1<:L;{131, TQ c:Vm:1';,\n1313*' BE;\u00a7;GA7U'M;'~._\"--.  \n\n'1*':em% $PECi1\u00a7.L< :i;Ai:fJE):: F\u20ac31QUISYPION OFFICER,\n\nHIDKAL DAM;3K: HUKKERI.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
\u00e9 By. Sri. S HATT1 ADV. FOR R 1-R6)
\n* c:;%s%%.PA’m:;,%Govr. ADVOCATE FOR R7)<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
 f  ii   _<\/p>\n
.}’\u00a3JI)GMEN’T<\/p>\n
I.A.Ne.2 alloweci. Delay of 46  <\/p>\n
appeal condoned.\n<\/p>\n
Sri C.S.Pat;il, takes no.i:.ice for\u00e9
\nThe first respondents’  aequked for
\nthe purpose of e0nstr1ee\ufb01on’A_Vef _’\u00a7’he  awarded
\ncompensation at the  jief per acre. The<\/p>\n
Reference  . fi\u00a3e”‘iaz1ds as 1’13Vi11g NA<\/p>\n
  at the rate of iRs.11\/–,
\nRs. 12\/   under three categories. The<\/p>\n
Ka1ne_taka Nirev’ai*i We Ltd. (for short, ‘KNNL’) has filed<\/p>\n
. V.   5r:ha1ieng;i11\u00a7”ffie compensation granted as excessive<\/p>\n
  that the land has no NA potential.<\/p>\n
   award of the LAO discloses that the<\/p>\n
 the panchas Show that the value of the lanci<\/p>\n
 ._ Iie;t*1ges between Rs.25,0()O\/- and Rs.32,00{)\/- per acre.<\/p>\n
  ~T–1:1e LAO has relied upon the sales statistics ef the lanes<\/p>\n
sold in the years 1997 to 1999 which are prior t0 the<\/p>\n
A(_<\/p>\n
Wm<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\nnotification. The sales statistics disciose that the lands<\/p>\n
are soid at Rs.25,000\/– to Rs.32,0{}{}\/– perA.._a.ct”e:t:’*.:.V’*\u00a7he<\/p>\n
lands are dry lands. The value for the  <\/p>\n
dry lands of Hirekudi village isj\ufb015;ed\u00ab atdRs.3t3,ooo;\u00ab;  1 <\/p>\n
sore for the relevant year.\n<\/p>\n
3. The ciaimants,  the “‘ot1’1*e1;’.=  have<\/p>\n
produced the records”: to   laI’}HdAS  RS
\nNos.393\/3, 451\/1, 395\/_2;VS9%t'[2B,.:\u00a7.”jsI\u00a7}g__ 328\/1 and RS
\nNo.4{)9 of    …._eonverted for Non-
\nAg\ufb01ct\ufb02tuI~al   lands adjoin the lands in<\/p>\n
question” ,_’_}’he  have also produced evidence to<\/p>\n
 _ A’     is converted to NoI1–Agricu1tura}
\n  sites are formed by one Padalale, each site
\n 40′ is said for Rs.47,000\/–. The sale deed<\/p>\n
 of #101; dated 17.2.1999 is marked as ‘Ex.P.29. The
\n * rioti\ufb01cation in respect of the land in question
\n‘   ditssued in the year 2001. Survey No.309 is within the<\/p>\n
d dv\ufb02lage limits of Hirekudi village. However, on perusal of<\/p>\n
the certi\ufb01ed copy of the village mop produced discloses<\/p>\n
AK<\/p>\n
that RS No. 388 is situate immediateiy adjoining C_hjkkodi-<\/p>\n
Miraj road. The said land is nearer to oh:.t<kfe;i%:e[<\/p>\n
Hirekudi. The sale deed also recites t11at'.. }i\u20acSV   <\/p>\n
situate about 4 ions away     j'.\n<\/p>\n
adjoins Chikkodi – Miraj road.  qmsuoiuegrs<\/p>\n
situate far off from cmkko(;:ee;Marajems ‘North;<\/p>\n
West.\n<\/p>\n
4. The   :pro\u00a7i’\u00a23ee}\u00a71’_’_.reeords to show
\nthat the     i\ufb01efqixestien have been
\neonvezeted  purpose. The said lands are
\nalso sit\ufb01sge to the i\u00a7?’cst’~–of’\u00e9mkkodi -\u00bb Miraj Road, quite far<\/p>\n
away i’1″-inn  ChikkOdi — Miraj Road, and they are<\/p>\n
]a1mos:si:::a:c in the middie between Hirekudi village and<\/p>\n
 Ii\u00e9zix-“a.j Road. Considering the loea\ufb01on of as<\/p>\n
V V’ . No;’388”-Te11d”‘the lands in question, we fad that RS No.388<\/p>\n
Lhas. no comparison to the lands in question. The<\/p>\n
–‘   have aiso not produced any material to show<\/p>\n
T ” Wthat in the NA converted lands any plots have been formed<\/p>\n
and solci. The Reference Court has mainly relied upon the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
sale deed Ex.P.29 pertaining to RS No. 388 to <\/p>\n
the value. If the said document is exclud:edV,A.iis”. 4_<\/p>\n
absolutely no credible material to’ assess ivalsel ‘ j <\/p>\n
of the lands in question.\n<\/p>\n
5. There is no  A\u00e9imeni etc  shoiiv’
\nwhether the NA redo  have NA
\npotential or that t11e”$\u00a7_**E’5__’.’..tnanipulated in
\nanticipation. of  is absolutely no<\/p>\n
credible it  record for this Court to<\/p>\n
detertsiile *  proper compensation. The<\/p>\n
claimants have All]-\u00a3.\\tki.f314′. in convincing evidence to prove<\/p>\n
 tlleinsrlzet vslues\ufb02 fmly one witness is examined and<\/p>\n
  .reiis1iee__is placed on Ex.P.29, the sale deed of a<\/p>\n
H In View of the paucity of evidence, we<\/p>\n
 do riot it is just and proper to speculate in \ufb01xing<\/p>\n
‘A ‘if ‘market value of the lands in question in the interests<\/p>\n
or justice and interests of the parties. It is 3’ust and<\/p>\n
‘necessary that the order of the Reference Cicurt is to be set<\/p>\n
aside, the matter to be remanded to the Reference Court<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nfor fresh consideration and disposal in accordance with<\/p>\n
law. The parties are permitted to adduce furthe:”s’,:ei:i’dence<\/p>\n
in the matter.\n<\/p>\n
6. Keeping in View the fact that<\/p>\n
time has elapsed and that the :\u00a2m\u00a7=.\/_ <\/p>\n
compensation, we direct’_t’hst s-s._’s13.V
\nKNNL shail deposit    rate of
\nRs.1,50,000\/~ per ‘0f’:t!\u00a71’C.>>;2&VaI’d made by the
\nLAO in eachease.  fmade within four<\/p>\n
weeks.  ‘permitted to withdraw the amotmt
\ndemsited’. * 1:15  that the Reference Court shall<\/p>\n
 of t\ufb01eveevse  three months.\n<\/p>\n
A    that the Reference Court need not be<\/p>\n
 ‘~   any of the factual observations made<\/p>\n
 the leeation of the lands and the market<\/p>\n
2 \u00bb  potential. Al} the contentions are kept open.<\/p>\n
It is further clari\ufb01ed that in respect of each case if<\/p>\n
 KNNL has already deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000\/- per<\/p>\n
acre, me further deposit be made.<\/p>\n
nvb.\n<\/p>\n
Refund of Court fee is ailotved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT 01? KARNATAKA, CIRQIA,.IliZ\u00a7V.i3’\u00a7.7\u00a7ii’-f:CIjf AT DHARWAD. DATES THIS THE 25TH DAY OF. 1\u00a7I_()V}?;}\\\u00ab\u00a55I’E\u00a7’l\u00a7iZi\u00a7;’V’i2\u00a3)iC}{3. A ‘ THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTI’QE K.A’SI\u00a7EEV{3v1fi}AiR”‘RA() THE HON’BLE MR. JU’\u00ab\u00a7’\u00a7Titf3I\u00a7:*\u00bbIfs.S\ufb02:R5\u00a7;:\u00a7\u00a7NfVASE GOWDA % 1()2.\u00a7;.’?\/20%’ BETWEEN, 1. KARN.A%FA;i{15i1 3;E\u00a7EEEi\u00a7AVARI” PIKEAM LTD […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":843,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":843,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008","name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-21T15:23:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-blesh-bharama-shedhal-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Blesh Bharama Shedhal on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43121","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43121"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43121\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43121"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43121"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43121"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}