{"id":43257,"date":"2008-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-05T06:06:51","modified_gmt":"2017-11-05T00:36:51","slug":"golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGA'I}OfR_ E:A'\n\nDATE!) THIS THE sr\u00e9 DAY 0:2 NOVEMSER: :\"2Q(\u00a7S   \u00e9 \"\n\nPRESENT,w--_\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. 13.13. D:NAKA;2Ar%_; TcH1E;\u00abf1gIzJ\u00a7fs\"1fi\u00ab9\u00a7}\u00a3.T\n\nTHE HON'BLE IyiR.JUSI{IC;\u00a7;_V._\u00bbG.SABHAHf1\u00a7\nWRIT API;E1\u00a7L\"-lSjC\u00a7_,;'3;34i$}';\u00a7'..(\ufb02}{38 _\nBETWEEN:    i   \n\n1 GOLDE:'!;VALE,E'{4E{)U(31XTION TRUST\nzU{:ATI_N,;_\" :  \" '\n\nPALACE ROAD,\nBANGALORE- 1\n\nDR Mi'SU_RYANARAYAN;Px._ \nS\/0.sAMBA,.--MUm*:aY\"-- ~  \nA.{}EVI)'A?3i,YEA*RS,NQL'-3.055;'\"\" '\nIQTH CRO'SS,SWA\u00abRI'\u00e9A_ NAGAR,\nR{3BERTSONI3'ET;I\u00a7GFe22,\nKOLARV.DIS'i.'RIf3T%,.  %\n\n;  N CHQWDA REDDY\n,3 ' :3. 3\\\u00a7ARAYFsb!.A.PPA,\n_  A(}E\u00a7)?~$.'? YEARS,NO.842,\n' \" .. V 3125 c\u00a7zGss,swARNA NAGAR,\n\n\u00a7{GF=.22,'\u00a7<Q~LAR DISTRICT,\n\n- '-\u00bb'LEcT1;--R}3R IN HISTORY\n  FEES'? GRADE COLLEGE,\n\nSafe MADAN GOPAL\n\n " '*~._S\/O.LATE.CHINNAPPA PILLAI\n= ._ A353 54 YEARS,NO. 1034\/ 1,\n\n1 1TH'A'CRGSS,SWARNA NAGAR,\nKGF--22,KC}LAR DIS'FR'IC'I',\n\nSR! ASHOK KRISHNAPPA\nS] O. LATE.M.V. KRISHNAPPA,\nAGE MAJOR,\n\n\n\nGUTTAHALLI VILLAGE AND PGST,\nBANGARPET TALUK,\n\nKOLAR DISTRICI'. I2_ESP;{\u00a7Ni)f%:'if\u00ab!?i'S:  "  'V\n\n(By Sri :B.VEERAPF'A, GA, )\n\nTHIS WRIT APPEAL is-4.%._FiL1\u00e9ii:2."'U\/sJ~"?i'..\u00ab1 0,1? {rat \n\nKARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT 'PRAYINC. 'I?()_ _:Sl\u00a7',I' ASIDE\n\nTHE ORDER PASSED IN' THE w IT PETITIQN NO2296\/02\nDATED 14\/03\/2008.    --.    \n\nThis Writ Appeal  v\u00e9  'g  Hearing on\nthis day, SABHAHIT' J., gielivczied\ufb01hc fo1lo\u00a7\u00a2i\u00a7:g'}\n\n%\u00a7 \u00e9\u00a2na\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7: 9\nThis ._  ._bff" the petitioners in WP,\nNo.2296\/20\u00a2; b\u00a2Lng"';{ggf\u00a3e\u00a7}\u00e9c\u00a3 by the order dated 14.3.2003\n\nwheygiri the   Judge of this court has dismissed\n\n   declining to interfere with the order dated\n\n1 '1:8v.=1_._by Joint Director of Co\ufb02egiats, Bangalore.\n\n 2. Petition No.2296\/ 2002 was \ufb01led by the\n\nH H 'A   seeking for quashing of the artist dated\n\n -_:sfs'.'1.2Oo2 passed by the Joint Dimctor of concgate\n\n  ~E<iucatio11~respondcnt No.3 in the Writ petition wherein the:\n\n third respondent has canceilcd the or\u00e9er of suspension of<\/pre>\n
\\2~<\/p>\n
the Principa1~Sri.M.Suryana1’ayana and lecturers V<\/p>\n
Roddy in \ufb02istory and Madam Gopal in “E    <\/p>\n
pursuance of the order of the Com\ufb013is\u00absio1f1or <\/p>\n
Education, Bangalore, dateci    ._<\/p>\n
that they shall continue in tho  po\u00e9;t.as’t1j\u00e9}{  ‘boforc ” V<\/p>\n
and it is further instructpti virfchaxwgo’  shall<\/p>\n
hand over charge to Sn’.  _V<\/p>\n
3;’VIf1ViS’$3I.1:’73  that appellant No. 1 is
\na Privofo   Respondent No.4 was<\/p>\n
working ao Lf?fincip’a1 \u00e9.r,1d’x\u00a7\u00e9spondents 5 and 6 are working<\/p>\n
 \ufb02vas  in “t”ho…_II1s\ufb01mtion run by the \ufb01rst appellant.<\/p>\n
 .. .._under suspension pending enquiry. Being<\/p>\n
  ‘ order of suspension, respondents 4 to<\/p>\n
‘V 6 pfofo\ufb01\ufb01dhvoppeal before the Commissioner of Collegiate<\/p>\n
u x V’ ij\ufb01tiucgantioo and the second respondent disposed of the appeal<\/p>\n
—  \ufb01ii\ufb01lio\ufb01t proviciing an opportunity of hearing the potitrionersv<\/p>\n
T  \u00e9ipoe\ufb02ants herein on 7.11.2001 allowing the appeals \ufb01led by<\/p>\n
: respondents 4 to 6 and set aside the orders of suspension<\/p>\n
M}<\/p>\n
dated 4.10.2001 and 6.18.2001. After re1nand,_<\/p>\n
appeared before the second xespondent,,’v_”\ufb011e&\u00bbi.\/.11’tieL=iil”i  b <\/p>\n
objections, the appellants jus\ufb01\ufb01ed[:theb:oit\u00a7,e”r1  <\/p>\n
passed against respondents   6. :’botI:1\u00b0’: <\/p>\n
paras” s and on appreciation of entire \ufb01zateii\u00e9il  record,
\nthe appeals \ufb01led by L62.’ wezevvollotwed and
\norder of suspension were  were<\/p>\n
directed to   their nespective<\/p>\n
posts.  __’\u00a3.’1e said order, Writ Petition
\nNo.2296]i’2{)4’6\u00a3?.  ‘ g the pendency of writ<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01tion, the \ufb013\u20ac:t:it_io;ii.e3.*si%-agipellants reinstated respondents 4<\/p>\n
 to  ii), xespecgiite wsts and on reinstatement of the<\/p>\n
   he attained the age of superannuation –<\/p>\n
  service and \ufb01fth respondent has continued<\/p>\n
  After reinstatement of xesmnsient No.6, the<\/p>\n
  i”.f;i:titij{ine1*s~appel1ants again suspended him on 12.1.2003<\/p>\n
K   the same was the subject matter ofW.P.No.17’153\/2006.<\/p>\n
\\._i<\/p>\n
4. It was contended by the learned Counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for the appellants that the Management of the apgeHe1,tt~.is<\/p>\n
not an authority as de\ufb01ned under the   _<\/p>\n
Act, 1983 (for short ‘the Act’), ther\ufb01fore, the   ”  <\/p>\n
respondents 4 to 6 under Section 1730  ‘b\u00a212m: \u00a31;.;: <\/p>\n
second respondent was not “and   L.\n<\/p>\n
order is without jurisdiction. ‘I’Ir\u00e9VV.:learr1edV”Si.::txgie’:Jddge after
\nhearing the counsel’   the  Hdes and<\/p>\n
scm\ufb01nieing . ‘C3.l__Zi– record he-id that the order
\npassed iii s;L\ufb01P.N\u00a2e.4:36e6:5e3)2001 dated 13\/12\/2001 has<\/p>\n
becoggg\u00bb \ufb01nal.’  {E116 dvapiaellants have accepted the order<\/p>\n
.     ground of maintainabiiity of appeal<\/p>\n
   of the Act and also question of<\/p>\n
juriedic\ufb01ondf the second respondent was not raised before<\/p>\n
  The order of suspeneion was passed on<\/p>\n
  T”‘r%;;.’1o.::z0o1 and 6.10.2091, both the parties have accepted the<\/p>\n
 ‘Herder passed in W.P.Nos.42686\u00ab688\/ 2001 participated in<\/p>\n
 the proceedings before the second respondent and<\/p>\n
respondents 4 and 6 were reinstated as per the order and<\/p>\n
\\._2’\u00bb<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
fourth respondent retired from service aftsr  <\/p>\n
Fifth respondent continued in sexvigg a11d_–i’i”i\u00a7::  ~ V’ ‘A<\/p>\n
mspondent who has been ncinstat\u00e9\u00e9 ha~s .Be’\u00e9z,1. .’pl a’c<4\u00a7.s5;ed.”-t11A.\u00e9’..Writ petition. Being aggrieved by<\/p>\n
‘% k”v%a1;e%%vL%;iis:c::ssa1 of A’c’}\u00a71\u00a3:” ‘vswrr:r’it petition dated 14.3.2008, writ<\/p>\n
 \/4  igsrcferred this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
 WE have hcani the iearned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
H u    and the learned Government Advocate for the<\/p>\n
.’  ii\u00a2?:V5′;’;i)(ii1<it:13.ts.~<\/p>\n
6. The learned counsel appeaxing for the appellants<\/p>\n
submitted that the learned Single Judge was not justi\ufb01ed in
\nKr”\n<\/p>\n
eon\ufb01rraitxg the order passed by the third respozi\ufb01ieiit\u00bb  .<\/p>\n
Annexure-C to the Writ petition dated 18.    ‘* <\/p>\n
petition ought to have been alloweeci   <\/p>\n
order passed by the Joint Dizeetm” of Cev1_1\u00e9g.iate: V<\/p>\n
?. On the other hand, 1ea4*eied”\u20ac\u00abevemji1ent..vi-Ekdvocate<\/p>\n
argued in support of the  learned <\/p>\n
Ju\u00e9ge.\n<\/p>\n
8. We .1:’;E;\u00a7re ve.ca:e\ufb0111} eonsidera\ufb01son to the<\/p>\n
centention ef’  for the parties and<\/p>\n
scrutinise\u00e9 the  <\/p>\n
..  Ii is elea1*–Vfr9g1_tit1e perusal of the material on record<\/p>\n
  erdeI’\u00abpf.v:s7t1epension passed against respondents 4 to 6<\/p>\n
 6.10.2901 has been set asiric, the same<\/p>\n
V . was”\u00e9&cce’\u00a7t.:eti”.:t)y the appe\ufb02.-ants and zespondents 4 to 6 were<\/p>\n
  Respondent No.4 has retired’ \ufb01mn service.<\/p>\n
  Respo\ufb01dent No.5 after reinstatement is continuing ix: service<\/p>\n
VT  ”  Respondent; No.6 who had also been reinsmted has been<\/p>\n
\\JJ\u00bb<\/p>\n
suspended by order dated 12.11.2003 and the saxgxe is<\/p>\n
subject matter in W.P.No.17153\/2006. The <\/p>\n
Judge has scrutinised the material on record  .<\/p>\n
held that the order impugned in the jag\ufb01t pekiiio\ufb01iisi  ” ‘V <\/p>\n
and does not Cali for interfemnce   11:1.dt- <\/p>\n
reason to interfere with the .\u00bb0r(\u00a7er  ieafn\u00e9\u00e9 <\/p>\n
Single Judge as the same is   acbotxiai\u00e9ce  law.
\nAccoxdingly, We hold   inHt1iA:is appeal<\/p>\n
and pass the  __ — ‘
\n‘\u00ab   ‘f’hc:  “d i\u00e9tiiisscd.\n<\/p>\n
Snd\/.\n<\/p>\n
Chief Iustjce<\/p>\n
Sd\/..;\n<\/p>\n
I”d93<\/p>\n
Index: Yes] No<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA AT BANGA’I}OfR_ E:A’ DATE!) THIS THE sr\u00e9 DAY 0:2 NOVEMSER: :”2Q(\u00a7S \u00e9 ” PRESENT,w–_ THE I-ION’BLE MR. 13.13. D:NAKA;2Ar%_; TcH1E;\u00abf1gIzJ\u00a7fs”1fi\u00ab9\u00a7}\u00a3.T THE HON’BLE IyiR.JUSI{IC;\u00a7;_V._\u00bbG.SABHAHf1\u00a7 WRIT API;E1\u00a7L”-lSjC\u00a7_,;’3;34i$}’;\u00a7’..(\ufb02}{38 _ BETWEEN: i 1 GOLDE:’!;VALE,E'{4E{)U(31XTION […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGolden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":803,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008"},"wordCount":803,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008","name":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-05T00:36:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/golden-valley-education-trust-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Golden Valley Education Trust vs State Of Karnataka on 3 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43257"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43257\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}