{"id":43289,"date":"2009-03-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-10-20T08:12:26","modified_gmt":"2014-10-20T02:42:26","slug":"the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 30.3.2009\n\nCoram\n\nThe Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.SUDHAKAR\n\nCivil Miscellaneous Appeal No.723 of 2009\nand\nM.P.No.1 of 2009 \n\n\n \nThe Managing Director,\nTamil Nadu State Transport \nCorporation Ltd.,\nKumbakonam.                                          ... Appellant\/Respondent \n \n\t\t\t\t\t\tvs.\n\nVaithiyanathan alias \nVaithiyanathasamy.                                  ... Respondent\/Petitioner\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t          \n \n\n\t Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the  award  and decree dated 8.5.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.45 of 2006  on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1), Chidambaram. \n\n\n\t\tFor appellant        :  Mrs.B.Vijayalakshmi \n\t\t \t\t\n----- \n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation is on appeal challenging the award dated  8.5.2008 passed in M.C.O.P.No.45 of 2006  on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1), Chidambaram.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2.  It is a case of injury.    The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The accident in this case happened on 30.10.2001 at 11.30 a.m.   The injured claimant Vaithiyanathan alias Vaithiyanathasamy,     was proceeding on a cycle.   The appellant transport corporation bus coming from behind driven by the driver in a rash and negligent manner hit the cyclist.   In that accident, the said Vaithiyanathan alias Vaithiyanathasamy  suffered grievous injuries.  He was admitted at Chidambaram Government Hospital.  Thereafter, for further treatment at Annamalai Hospital.  It is stated that the claimant was in hospital for more than a year.   He filed a claim for compensation in a sum of Rs.2,00,000\/- for the injury suffered in the accident stating that he is an agricultural coolie and was earning a sum of Rs.100\/- to Rs.150\/- per day at the time of accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3.    In support of the claim, the injured claimant  was   examined   as P.W.1.  Dr.Balamurugavel  was examined as P.W.2.  Exs.A-1 to A-6 were marked, the details of which  are as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-1 is the  photocopy of FIR,  <\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-2 is the certified copy of Motor Vehicle Inspector&#8217;s Inspection<br \/>\n          Report,  <\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-3 is the discharge summary,<\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-4 is the treatment certificate, <\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-5 is the medical bill for Rs.100\/- and<\/p>\n<p>Ex.A-6 is the disability certificate.\n<\/p>\n<p>Through the doctor P.W.2,  X-Ray, M.O.1 was also marked on behalf of the claimant.  No oral or documentary evidence was let in on behalf of the appellant transport corporation, the respondent before the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute the finding of the Tribunal with regard to the rash and negligent driving  on the part of the appellant transport corporation bus and therefore, such finding stands confirmed.  The only  contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is on the quantum of compensation, particularly the multiplier method adopted by the Tribunal in a case of injury.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5.  The Tribunal in this case fixed the age of the injured claimant as 65 years.  Considering the claimant&#8217;s occupation as an agricultural coolie, the Tribunal fixed the income of the injured claimant at Rs.1,500\/- per month.  Based on the age, the Tribunal adopted 5 multiplier and for the disability assessed at 20% under Ex.A-6   granted a sum of Rs.18,000\/- (Rs.1,500\/- x 12 x 5 x 20% = Rs.18,000\/-) as pecuniary loss to the injured claimant.  Further, the Tribunal granted a sum of Rs.5,000\/- for injuries   and a sum of Rs.18,000\/- towards loss of income for one year.  In all the Tribunal granted a sum of Rs.41,000\/- with interest at 7.5%.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t 6.  In appeal, the  learned counsel for the appellant pleaded that since the fracture had healed and there is no total permanent disability, the Tribunal erred in adopting  multiplier method to determined the compensation.  Therefore, the compensation has to be reduced.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t7.  On going through the award of the Tribunal, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the quantum of compensation on the above said contention for the following reasons:-\n<\/p>\n<p>(i)   The accident in this case happened on 30.10.2001.  The injured claimant is an agricultural coolie who has to make his living by physical strength.\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii)  The injured claimant suffered various injuries including fracture of the backbone, viz., L2.  The disability assessed under Ex.A-6 is 20%.  The claimant will be entitled to Rs.20,000\/- for the disability assessed at 20%.   He is also entitled to extra nourishment expenses, transport and attender charges which were omitted by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii)  In such view of the matter no  good ground has been made out for reduction of the  quantum of compensation even if it is accepted that the multiplier method will not apply to the facts of the present case.  Therefore, the sum of Rs.18,000\/- granted towards pecuniary loss  does not require any further reduction.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iv)  Considering all the above aspects, the total compensation granted in a sum of Rs.41,000\/- is reasonable and does not require any further reduction as also the interest granted at 7.5% as the accident in this case happened in the year 2001 and the award is of the year 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t8.  Finding no merit, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed at the admission stage.  Counsel for the appellant seeks for eight weeks&#8217; time to deposit the award amount and  is granted and on such deposit, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the same.   Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Index     :   No                                                 30.3.2009\n\nInternet :  Yes  \n\nts\n\n\n\nTo\n\nThe Additional District and Sessions Judge, \nFast Track Court No.1, \n(The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal),\nChidambaram.  \n\n \n\n \n    \n    \n\n \n\nR.SUDHAKAR,J.\n\nts\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                                            Judgment in     \nC.M.A.No.723 of 2009\n    30.3.2009        \n                                                                          \n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.3.2009 Coram The Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice R.SUDHAKAR Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.723 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Kumbakonam. &#8230; Appellant\/Respondent vs. Vaithiyanathan alias Vaithiyanathasamy. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\",\"name\":\"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009","name":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-20T02:42:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-vaithiyanathan-alias-on-30-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Managing Director vs Vaithiyanathan Alias on 30 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43289"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43289\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}