{"id":43857,"date":"2011-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-23T10:44:45","modified_gmt":"2017-02-23T05:14:45","slug":"mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011<\/div>\n
                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001640\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Bharti\n           H.No.320,\u00a0Hastlal\u00a0Village\n           Uttam\u00a0Nagar\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0059\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education\n           ACT\u00a0Branch\n           Old\u00a0Secretariat\n           Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0054\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Marcel\u00a0Ekka,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0ADE(ACT)\n                                     Dr.K.S.Yadav,\u00a0DDE\u00a0West\u00a0A\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner          :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001640\n\n\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.23.3.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education,\u00a0GNCTD\u00a0<\/p>\n
       seeking\u00a0the\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0progress\u00a0made\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.30.8.10\u00a0with\u00a0effect\u00a0from\u00a01.9.10.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Marcel\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Ekka,\u00a0PIO(Act)\u00a0\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a020.4.11\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0to\u00a0RD\u00a0West\u00a0<\/p>\n
       along\u00a0with\u00a0their\u00a0comments.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.4.11\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Kaushal,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Authority\u00a0 replied\u00a0 on \u00a0 28.4.11\u00a0 directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0 (Act)\u00a0to\u00a0ask\u00a0 DDE\u00a0 West\u00a0 A\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
       regarding\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.30.8.10\u00a0with\u00a0Annexure\u00a01\u00a0to\u00a044\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0days.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0reply,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.22.6.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0Appellant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
       representation \u00a0 dt.30.8.10 \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 same \u00a0 along \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 annexures \u00a0 has \u00a0 as \u00a0 reported \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       PIO(Act)\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0lost.\u00a0 \u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO'(Act)\u00a0s\u00a0reply\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0representation\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0RD\u00a0West\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0communication\u00a0<\/p>\n
       pertained\u00a0to\u00a0another\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.6.10.10\u00a0 \u00a0lodged\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0not\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0representation\u00a0dated\u00a0<\/p>\n
       30.8.10.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0(Act)\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
       of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0page\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0dispatch\u00a0register\u00a0indicating\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0along\u00a0<\/p>\n
       with\u00a0the\u00a0annexures\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RD\u00a0West\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0page\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0entry\u00a0register\u00a0<\/p>\n
       of\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0\u00a0RD\u00a0West\u00a0indicating\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0<\/p>\n
       RD\u00a0West.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0such\u00a0a\u00a0proof\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0(Act)\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0admitting\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0
\n          annexures\u00a0 has\u00a0 been\u00a0 lost\u00a0 \u00a0 . \u00a0 The\u00a0information\/affidavit\u00a0 \u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\/Appellant\u00a0 by\u00a0<\/p>\n
         25.9.11.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
                                                                                              (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Bharti
\n         H.No.320,\u00a0Hastlal\u00a0Village
\n         Uttam\u00a0Nagar
\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0059<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education
\n         ACT\u00a0Branch
\n         Old\u00a0Secretariat
\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0054<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education
\n         O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Additional\u00a0Director\u00a0of\u00a0Education
\n         Old\u00a0Secretariat
\n         Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0054<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC
\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission’s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0
\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0
\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001640 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a024,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a024,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Rajeev\u00a0Bharti H.No.320,\u00a0Hastlal\u00a0Village Uttam\u00a0Nagar New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0059 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Respondents Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education ACT\u00a0Branch Old\u00a0Secretariat Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0054 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Marcel\u00a0Ekka,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0ADE(ACT) Dr.K.S.Yadav,\u00a0DDE\u00a0West\u00a0A Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001640 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.23.3.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Education,\u00a0GNCTD\u00a0 seeking\u00a0the\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0progress\u00a0made\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.30.8.10\u00a0with\u00a0effect\u00a0from\u00a01.9.10.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Marcel\u00a0 Ekka,\u00a0PIO(Act)\u00a0\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a020.4.11\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0to\u00a0RD\u00a0West\u00a0 along\u00a0with\u00a0their\u00a0comments.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.4.11\u00a0with\u00a0 the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Kaushal,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":473,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011"},"wordCount":473,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011","name":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-23T05:14:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajeev-bharti-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-24-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajeev Bharti vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 24 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43857\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}