{"id":43940,"date":"2009-04-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-04T02:23:40","modified_gmt":"2018-04-03T20:53:40","slug":"sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
This WA. is \ufb01led under Section 4 of the \nHigh Court Act, 1961, prayirzg ':9 set aside the {;:ft1sr\"da{s{1\n\n19.8.2008 passed by the learned Single. J  \n\nW.P.N<3.1Z we\/2008.\n\nThis WA coming up for Pr\u00a2:iiii1i1:a.r_\u00a7f.' \n\nCourt this day, SABHAHFI' J., deli'e{ere:;\u00a7st;I%;1e'fQ1}o\u20acx:iAr1g;'-ss..__A :,j\n\nJUD\u00a7}h_\u00a7ENT- Z\nThis appeal is filed   W.P.N0.\n3 1106\/2008 being VA  order dated\n19.8.2008, wherem  has declined\nto interfere    and reserved an\nopp<):'tL13\u00a3\u00a7s't#x';\u00bb%'Vs\u00a3s; Qztproach the Civil Court of\n\na compet\ufb01nt ss'juI*is<i'ir3'\u00a3i,\u00a2si"3 'ts workout his renmdy 1'31\n\naccorcljgamzs with  azjsi accordingly the writ petition has\n\n  bless;-eje\ufb01zlgd} " \u00ab V\n\n  2.  _f:*i1e\u00e9q\u00a7;5g~:1iax:: filed W.?.N'0.I11(}6\/2088 sseking for\n\n the order passed by the 21% respondent,<\/pre>\n
   Engineer, Mangalore City Corporatien, dated<\/p>\n
. K  and for & direction to the respondents to restcvrs<\/p>\n
\\,_\/9<\/p>\n
the clesed drainage system form-:~:ti’ -mg the  5;; ‘<\/p>\n
reinsml\ufb01ng 69 Rec Hume Pipes (S_p_1\u00a7_%;’A’pip\u00e9s}_A.Qf.<\/p>\n
size of 3% feet breadth andV8–!f\u00a7””feet lV.e\u00a3?\u00ab.g1;;’1T<_5':\u00e93M<;'V\u00a71:* Wt:(\u00a7' \u00a7:0veI:' <\/p>\n
the ogen drain of 285 ..feet,\u00e9.A"i?ii\u00a7_\u00a2}\u00a7V ""p\u00a7ss<\u00a7S'"i:;i;I'<;z,1gh the
\nscheduie prop\u00e9i\ufb01' and   Rs. 10 iakhs
\nsuffered by 1:13;.   handed act of
\nthe z*esponc}e3fit'};4;_;'~-.    petition that the
\nP\u20ac*1iti0\u00a51\u00a7\u00b0*1'\/ ;3'1\u00ab;'~"t5_"\u00e9'ii't',::<=:re<:i into an ageement
\nfor   bearing Sy..I\\\u00a7o.6\u00a7\/3<\/p>\n
measugfing 48 ~Vc\u00a21:ts'v~.sifu.\u00e91t\u00e9d in Kadri village of Martgalore<\/p>\n
  zhasV p2'1i\u00a3i" tile entire: sale consideration in<\/p>\n
Ihyaur' '  Asz\u00e9ildors and the vendors have executed<\/p>\n
' V'   p0ws?er4:'&:fatt{\u00a7f:\u00a71\u00e9;\u00a7; in favour of the petitioner 03:1 31.8.2GO5.<\/p>\n
 fI'iaereait\u00a3:r, 3~ the petitianer formed a layout. in the said<\/p>\n
  after obtaining necessary pennission imm thtit<\/p>\n
  \u00e9qggij\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb02t authorities. It is avexrad that there is a drain<\/p>\n
 \ufb01\ufb01aintai\ufb02ed by the City Corporation, Mangaiere, which<\/p>\n
passes in 33;. No.65\/8 and the approximate: length and<\/p>\n
K.)<\/p>\n
breadth of the drain is about 286 feet <\/p>\n
respectively. Because of the flow of con\u00a3a11 fi;1at?\u00a7d ?.3_.v;ite:i  <\/p>\n
and fiithy crontents and staglaticffx ' sawag\u00e9 <\/p>\n
poixzts and the said drain is_a_ Iivi13gA_;\u00a7}aoe fat'. <\/p>\n
and are likely to cause: dangefdL\ufb01V;S:%d.isea\u00e9es;A_": 'i'7}%1e p\u20act\u00a7tioneI*
\nformed a layout.    \u00e9aroperties
\npurchased by     a closed
\ndrainage systeafii    pipes. Keeping
\nthe   approachad the
\n     Mangalora, seeking<\/p>\n
perI11issi(\u00a7i;._f:{; length spun pipe line with a<\/p>\n
Width pf 7. fe\u00e9i: 'a:jci"'he'V'pr:caposed to install two RCO spun<\/p>\n
 each pipe is having a width of 3% feet<\/p>\n
  feei. As per the progosal, 69 RC6}<\/p>\n
 _pipes""–.w<i:;*\u00e9 -z\ufb01quireci to cover 285 feet drain ans} also<\/p>\n
 \ufb01ll mud for abet}: 5 feet height on the Hume<\/p>\n
'pips!  {(2 put 6 inch bouiders on $116 mud and to form a<\/p>\n
V[ ifoacsl ts ingess and egress from the layout. The p\u20actitiO\ufb02(31"<\/p>\n
K)<\/p>\n
action at th\ufb01 instan<;e of political clams and passed the<\/p>\n
order dated 13.6.2008 asking the petitioner to I'\u20ac_3I1,(V)'i?'{\u00a7\u00a7~1'._I1\u20ac<\/p>\n
RCO Huxne pipes, which causetd obstr13ction_.\u00a72?\u00a7\u00a7.4'fi*\u00e9\u00a7\u00ab;–: <\/p>\n
of dyainage water and restore Vt\u00bb.1}<%;_   I3\u20aci:{3.g '<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said order, the fii\u00e9\u00e9l <\/p>\n
petitien f{.)}f' the aforesaid re1ie'3\u00a7'."~-<\/p>\n
3. Learned Single  ;J11dg\u00e9;’c5,””_’VA  the
\ncontentions of the cc:uI1s\u00a7-.3;  pet:i*\u00a3i0n<~:r, by
\norder ciated  hc:1c?.\u00a3: allegations made
\nagainst  1".he=  the reaim of fact fnlciizag,<\/p>\n
which can 1\u00a7\u00a7e._\u00a7'a1'z*i{\u00a7\u20ac*:::i'4V\u20ac;z1; \u00e9f\ufb01zr a full \ufb02edged trial and catmot<\/p>\n
 be cc}11i?e:3;ie::1%t1}7 'a\u00e93'\u00abL1.\u00a2;ii\u00a3:ated upon in 3 W\ufb01t proceedings by<\/p>\n
 '–:iir{:rt:tix}giv._j:\u00a71ra{~\u00a7\u00e9.i1:'ti<3s to \ufb01le a\ufb01idavits and the fact as to<\/p>\n
   wh\u00e9tiidr ';\u00a7i\u00e9;'ti\ufb01oner cammitted brsach of taimins and<\/p>\n
 '<:()nciitio;r.1;3=;of the permission to lay hume pipes to form a<\/p>\n
  Ci0e':\u00a7\u00e9d"~Wat6r zirain; Whether there was breach of terms of<\/p>\n
  and sa;}51e{h\u20acr the petitioner has suffered any<\/p>\n
KJ<\/p>\n
cizmzage and is entitled for damages carmot in<\/p>\n
proceedings under Articles 226 of the   <\/p>\n
India. 'I'heref0re, the Iealned   <\/p>\n
the disputsd questions of fact    <\/p>\n
competent Civil Court and   the Writ
\npatition by order dates}  ag\u00a7;r ?ie;'ed by the
\nsaid order dismigsing  19.8.2008,
\nthe writ peti\ufb01o\u00a71\u00e9;\u20ac;:'E:i'a$   Vapgg\u00e9eal.<\/p>\n
4. We  vth\u20acj’.V1fiQ\u00bb\ufb01A1’i3.\u00e9#1’~V\u00a2<iiunse1 app\u00e9aring for the
\nappeIlaI:\u00a3t_  ::C\u00a7f.#1\u00a21.I1S\u20ac\u00a7l appeagltizag for the<\/p>\n
respcmdent\u00e9;–.. _V % –\n<\/p>\n
   C(l;1iZ{1S\u20acI appealring for the<\/p>\n
 herein; submitt\ufb01d that the action<\/p>\n
2  takexr.by…_”t}:\u00e9::”‘ respondents by order dated 13.6.2008 is<\/p>\n
W 4.4″iT\u00a3V1:\u00a3:ga.1__ arid: the petitioner has not commitied breach of<\/p>\n
Q\ufb01ndiudns and has suffered damage and the learned<\/p>\n
VT Sirxgle Judge ought to have aliowed the Writ pefjtierz.<\/p>\n
‘V3’<\/p>\n
6. We have given carefui .r1_’ ‘  3:213:<\/p>\n
contentions urged by the learned Coulzsehl\ufb02  fa{r__ ‘ <\/p>\n
tha appellant and scrutinized the  \ufb011\u00a7\u00e9.t\u20ac:1’is.I’o:1i   _ <\/p>\n
2?. The material on recorci’\u00a7i2L{>;1}d i’:}t=:ar\u00a7y that the” ‘<\/p>\n
averments made in    to the
\nquestions as 1:0 :x.?he:1″;I*i”e:;  -tii:e__V  has committed
\nbreach afterms     uiidertaken
\nto compiy    huxne pipes had
\ncaused   A’ :\u20ac1:\u00bb;\ufb02\\x2.s::’.  drainage water and
\nWhether\ufb02ue  Iszy\ufb01f\u00e9red any damaga in View sf<\/p>\n
the action   i3ya ‘1;Eie:’..’Lresp0ndents are flh\ufb01 disputed<\/p>\n
_._quest;i\u00e9::1s_?Ac;:I.’Vfact”a2:zri___the Same cannot be gong into a wtrit<\/p>\n
 ‘f;;:1’c);(ie3dir1g:-3.;’\u00abv_ T’ft1e:’ef0r$, the: iearned Single Judg\ufb01 has<\/p>\n
1*igI’it1.\u00a7;’V%i1eiCI;TtV}1e reliefs sought far by the patitiormr can<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘Ex: \u00a7”El.i”1i6;:i\u00ab:_OIV1i}-‘ after detaii investigation to the qttestions<\/p>\n
   f’a.bt:?. by the Civii Cnurt. No gmtmd is made out for<\/p>\n
 .___”\u00a7;\u00a7;1t\u00e9;:’ference under Articie 226 of tile Constitution af lndia.<\/p>\n
\\r9~<\/p>\n
Acccmtiingly we haici that the order passed by the E\u00e9\u00e9s\ufb01ed<\/p>\n
Single Judge is justifiad and does not <\/p>\n
ermr or \ufb01iegaiity as to C2111 fer interf\u00e9rence. ,_ii’:._ti2i:$ .jI:?4r3–\u00ab , <\/p>\n
court appeal. Accorciirxgiy, we ixoii\ufb01i
\ndevoid ofmerit. and pass the f{;J1\u00a7>Wi1\u00e9”i’g;’_ ‘ ‘. A . V
\no:e13%1\u00a7’}1\u00a7.V?V  %
\nThe writ appeal ._ :4 ._   ~ . % _<\/p>\n
A  &   sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
 \"\"\"     C11i5*f.Tustice\n\n %%%%%  .Tudg3\n\nii:d::V*:x~:  \"\ufb02u  . V _:~~\n\n  \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit This WA. is \ufb01led under Section 4 of the High Court Act, 1961, prayirzg ‘:9 set aside the {;:ft1sr”da{s{1 19.8.2008 passed by the learned Single. J W.P.N<3.1Z we\/2008. This WA coming up for Pr\u00a2:iiii1i1:a.r_\u00a7f.' Court this day, SABHAHFI' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":959,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009"},"wordCount":959,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009","name":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T20:53:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-prakash-pinto-vs-the-commissioner-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Prakash Pinto vs The Commissioner on 6 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43940\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}