{"id":44854,"date":"2009-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-11T12:30:39","modified_gmt":"2018-09-11T07:00:39","slug":"the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
THE I-iON'BLE MR.JUST1CE v1f\u00bb:9HAx\"3HAxTANAe\u00ab{>U1\u00a7AR,  \u00bb ''\n\nWP NGKBE \u00bb'i35529{}S\n\nIN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA\ncmctm BENCH AT Di-IARWAE) _\nDATED THIS THE 1111\u00bb: ms? 05* AUGUST;----3\u00a7()9~ ,[.: .\n\nBEFORE I\n\n \n\nwan' PETITION No.31\u00a51%3\u00a3g[g008 ('@3349-:S.1v; } H \n\nBetween:\n\n3.\n\nTHE LIQUE DATQR\nMARATM. C'O--OPERA'I'lVE\n\u00a74I.$aRA'i'HA GALL-1v  \n\u00a7\u00ab:uBL1--20.   I\n\n'ia.\" V  __ \n\nKER. 33' \u00a7<A.L2Em,AHr.i_E'D_ S*;41;::_';_:;m \n\nAG-ED ABQLTT 54 i2*\u00a7;AR:3,\u00e9 '- '\n\n{f}\u20ac)'.,C:AS'S'I' R\u00a7;<::r$'I";2A\u00a7'e   _\n\n<:;P.C:3'--{':*2\u00bb:3_'.T*{\n\u00a7\u00a7Qi3i\u00a5Z'>A\"T<i}R'E.iARe\u00a7,THA.*~C{;-'OPERATEVEZ mmsz LTEE\nHUBEJ} :';"_=8\u00a3')0Z30." ' \n\nmtzgrag. s::,0PERA*::*:vE BANK LIMlTE$\n\n '~':\u00bb\u00a2a,RATHa Ganm\ufb02 %%%%% .. .\n HUESLI-$33..'\n\n\" ?;1'_E!E?*'~,_E':{,, 1N;::2~:A.;2G\u00a3; GENERAL zvzabzaaaa\n $\"\u00a7<:c::.b:C:\u00bb_m1%431:$3\u00e9\u00a72\u00a3}\u20ac}8\n\n1%.}\n\n2. BHIMARAO\nS\/C} JYC)'i'i\ufb01t'5t. SHINDE\n\u00a3\u00a7.GE'.54 YEARS,\nC3CC:GOV'i'. SERVICE\nRIO OPP. T9 KC\u00bb PARK,\nDHARWAD.\n\n3. THE DESTRECT CONSUMER DISFUTES RE;9:2Es5$ALvt\u00e9:31\u00e9\u00a3;MV' \nVEDYAGERE 1 ~ \u00ab * = ' V\n\nDHARWAED.     \n\nmy Sri.Prnful1a smug, Adv for R2, \n121, 3 \u00ab:3\n\nThis petition is fll\ufb01iiilildtii'---~9:rfiC1ES%A 226  227 of the\nConstitution of India prayirig to fstri_1{\u00e9' d_c~.w'n thc sub-sect.i0I1 (2)\nand (3) of Sc(:.27n of \"i.;'\u20ac1er~- C.;:::;.si11Iic3L1f .,F'1=::_stect:ion Act as\nunconstitutional and void and :=_:t<:.  ' ' ' --  \n\n"I'his__p\u00a7ti\ufb019 n 'fa:  hearing, this day,\nthe Courf\u00e9 madc3..t21\u00a2 f0;'\u00a7ic}W_i11g\u00e9' \n\n1.<\/pre>\n
 Pgti\ufb01o\ufb01\u00e9rs ba=\u00a7.re: _ for striking dawn sub scctions (2)
\n   iii\ufb01cficruitxi ‘2?…\u00ab0f the Consumer Pmtectieu Act as<\/p>\n
 –;}.’I::v:;t\u00a2::$ji.;$”E;it2_;1Vitz:mzalE”‘a=e11ci void and 3330 hava sought for quashiug<\/p>\n
th\u00e9’ zifr\u00e9stv  issued agaiust ihezm data\u00e9 3G.10.2OQ8 in<\/p>\n
 4 ‘,gxec\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7gn”‘r;gs\u00a7 1’*\u00abia.498{2G\ufb02’?.<\/p>\n
   . “f*}’1c3 records rsveai that mspczndent No.2 hemrixz has<\/p>\n
 .__ “E:1\u00e9:\u00a7\u00a7:+$ited certain sums of maney in petitionmk\ufb01ank, Ever:<\/p>\n
 V.aft,er mamrity, the amounis with interest were not Itpai\u00e9 ta<\/p>\n
respendent $20.3 hertzink Thus, respondcni $40.2 had \ufb01les}<\/p>\n
1′ E
\nx’-\/\\<\/p>\n
EV? 3\\f<}31436i '2(}\u20ac38<\/p>\n
U3<\/p>\n
Qamplaint before: District Ccmsumer Disputes Redxf\u00e9\u00e9ai'  _<\/p>\n
Dharwa\u00e9i, in complaint No.399;:200?.w jrhe sai:i"cvc\u00a7ii1p:1\u00e95i1t was ~ 'V <\/p>\n
allewed and petitioners were diIf\u00e9'Qv"[:t(;1_…,tA.r;'i  "a  gef<\/p>\n
Rs.3,89,984\/– with intctrtzst a:\u00bbT'z;% p.a,_i:i1i  <\/p>\n
from compensation and costs.  %\u00a7zidV"(}i\u00a5}':VEf:rv':}1e1: s\u00a7\u00a7 attained
\n\ufb01nality. As the pe\ufb01u\u00e9gigxs    thg \u00e9\ufb01xount in
\npursuance to thgorder  -'i:1.}v1v\u00a7:'AA*\u00bb.:'_{g':'<)\u00a7\ufb01";'sumer Forum,
\nrespcmcient Ne_;'2"'j:;jTf3\u00a7\u00a7:d  yu\/s 27 of the
\nConsumcr \ufb01at,   \u20ac1;%e"s\u00e9:id Execution Petition,
\narrest   petitioners, Themafter,
\nthis   'Q  h<\/p>\n
3. isms c:<:~;1:it'-:::."~.;;1;\u00e9" case of M\/S.SHANTINIE{ETA1'~\u00a7<\/p>\n
I-T '"\u00a7~;QU\u00a73{N<:;~.Pmumagfrsp\u00e9 vs. BRI'G.{RE'I"D) J.N.DEVAIAH in<\/p>\n
 "\u00ab?{  and czoxmectzd matters disposs\ufb01 0f on<\/p>\n
 upheid the vaiidity 0f sub sections {2} and {3}<\/p>\n
 Sec\ufb01\ufb01zd 2'? of ih\ufb01 Consumer ?10iecti0n Act, 1986.<\/p>\n
'\u20ac:\u00a2~.t;2_s\u00a7\u00e9;;_ue11\u00a3iy, this first \u00a7:"a}e*er mastic in {$516 writ pstitian (1063<\/p>\n
K  21923 smvim:-. in View ef the aferxmaid erder. This court<\/p>\n
 rsspectiveiy agrecg with the jusigment rendarcd in<\/p>\n
w.mqg.ma; 2698,<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
Km\ufb01<\/p>\n
WE’ :\\\u00e9’\u20ac:.31~435:’2(}{}S<\/p>\n
4. In the aforementione\u00e9 judgment, it is also rule:;i,;t}:_:1’a1;\u00bb_i\u00a3i1e<\/p>\n
pmvisisns of Code: of Crizninal Procedure should’.’:5\u00a7\u00a7”\u00a2\u00a2:1;–gj:e::;i_f .<\/p>\n
with while issuing arr\ufb01st war1’aJ:1?:._HM SiIlCE.””fI1-Ei::”‘\u00a3)IV'(‘2′(:\u20ac:ti1].z’T_t:’_ <\/p>\n
catmtempiated under the Code of    <\/p>\n
followed in those cases, the msg\u00e9m\ufb01ve f\u00a33l_’|i111.S s\u00a3\u00bb.\u00e9;t*:;~’:’VV&dVi;fectg\u00a7:ci to u a<\/p>\n
follow the pIUCC{}.L11″\u20ac prescribed  the;  of }C1imi1:1a}<\/p>\n
Procedure whiie issuing \ufb011!\u00a3*3. E”1IT\u20acj,S’:t <\/p>\n
I3. Lcarnsd CQU.%TKS\ufb01I   relying upcm the
\nsaid portion gaf ihg ;\u00a5$1r._’r1-_er’  fur \ufb01zmit\ufb01ng the matter to the
\nConsum\u00e9z’ ‘\u00a37or:.1\u00a3}:\u00a3’V’ii\u00a7–.f\u00a73.e’ pF()Cf3d1.1l”l\u00b03 under the Code of<\/p>\n
Srimilial PItc\u00a2c\u00a7:;:\u00e9}’   S11bII}.iSSiOI1 canmet be accepted<\/p>\n
 inas31=..\u00a7;c}1*.as iI2 :’;},ff;is matter, the proceeiure prescribed lllldftl’<\/p>\n
   .\u00a7:1\u00e9:11jnaI Proceaiure is followed The ordershest<\/p>\n
  notice W33 issued in ‘tha Execution Pe\ufb01\ufb01on<\/p>\n
V V’ _ :9 t\u00a7i\u00e9—-\u00a7ud_gme\u00a7it debtorsg Q12, 2238,2008 judgm\ufb01nt debtcxr N::>.1<\/p>\n
 I L’ ea\ufb01tef\u00e9\u00e9 agpearamce through his advacate namely<\/p>\n
  \u00a7};R;%~.?E3 adI*e. Ha has \ufb01l\ufb01d the meme: alang with one document<\/p>\n
  01:1; that \ufb02ay’ The matter was a\ufb01ljomned to 85.09.2008 far<\/p>\n
 fflfih\ufb01l’ hearing. O11 (}S.09:Q(}(}8, no payment was made: by the<\/p>\n
judgmant debt\ufb02rs and arrest Warrant was issuaci against<\/p>\n
W’<\/p>\n
W’? N\u20acs.3143\u20acS:’2()(}8<\/p>\n
ju\ufb01gment debtcszs. Even a\ufb01er four adjouI*mments\u00a7;:\u00ab..fh\u00a7:V_’ _<\/p>\n
warrants were not served on the judgnlpnt dsbtii-;*$;:<.'I'h%\u00a71'cfor\u00a7\u00a74 <\/p>\n
the matter was adjcnlrned from    <\/p>\n
writ petition is filed.\n<\/p>\n
6. From thr: above,   c1\u00a2a1″‘*%1;1e  debtors
\nwens: given adequate u “~h\u00a2a;rd before the
\nExecuting Cou1.i,.     said that the
\npmce\u00e9um    of  contained in
\nthe Codgvof   arrest Warrant was<\/p>\n
nct fen-iwed. ‘secom gmund also fails.\n<\/p>\n
73 _}~F\u00a5;:>x\u00a7z\u20ac:vLE1*,  to the fact that the Bank is<\/p>\n
 V’   b\u00a2:A.}iq1:\u00a3idai\u20ac:’\u20ac;-;\ufb01”‘4’T;Vf\u00a5#f1{’31’i$. ‘(v;\u00a7\u00a7:’1f5..T:i:r10rs opp\ufb01rtunity of bitiiilg hetaxri. Accordingly,<\/p>\n
 \ufb01.hE fc$\ufb019\u00a3;?i;1g erd\ufb01r is made:\n<\/p>\n
”  ; ~..The wrii: petition is dispgse\u00e9 eff. Petitianers ghali be<\/p>\n
  one mare: epptsrtuzxity of being heave} befs:-re the<\/p>\n
u hh\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9ecu\ufb01ng Court The pefiiioners $1133} apgaar before the 3″‘<\/p>\n
mspon\u00e9eut–I~?’0mm on 14.09.2009 at 1 1 am. No fmsh noticas<\/p>\n
\\V\u00ab*\\<\/p>\n
W? NQ3143652008<\/p>\n
(’71<\/p>\n
need be issueei to the petitiancrs.  4’ .\n<\/p>\n
proceedings sh-all {aka place in accordagqcgj witi1’Vla\\\u00bb’%:  <\/p>\n
BC ceercive steps Shall be taken again\u00e9: the’     ‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar THE I-iON’BLE MR.JUST1CE v1f\u00bb:9HAx”3HAxTANAe\u00ab{>U1\u00a7AR, \u00bb ” WP NGKBE \u00bb’i35529{}S IN THE HIGH comm’ or KARNATAKA cmctm BENCH AT Di-IARWAE) _ DATED THIS THE 1111\u00bb: ms? 05* AUGUST;—-3\u00a7()9~ ,[.: . BEFORE I wan’ PETITION No.31\u00a51%3\u00a3g[g008 (‘@3349-:S.1v; } H Between: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":726,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\",\"name\":\"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009"},"wordCount":726,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009","name":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-11T07:00:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-liquidator-vs-the-union-of-india-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Liquidator vs The Union Of India on 11 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}