{"id":45130,"date":"2011-07-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-17T21:06:01","modified_gmt":"2016-01-17T15:36:01","slug":"mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                  at\n                                                         New\u00a0Delhi\n\n              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001018\n                                                                                           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0        \u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\nHeard\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0Conferencing\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n\n                    Shri\u00a0S\u00a0S\u00a0Vohra\n                    4572,\u00a0Bldg\u00a0No.\u00a0129\n                    New\u00a0Tilak\u00a0Nagar\n                    Chembur\n                    Mumbai\u00a0-\u00a04000\u00a0089.\n\n                    Applicant\u00a0\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0conferencing\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n                    Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting\n                    Pay\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Office\u00a0(IRLA)\n                    AGCR\u00a0Building,\u00a0\u00a0I.P.Estate\n                    New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n                   Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Arun\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Mittal,\u00a0PAO\n                                              Shri\u00a0\u00a0R\u00a0C\u00a0Jain,\u00a0Dy\u00a0CA\n                                              Mrs\u00a0Veena\u00a0Mehta,\u00a0AAO\n           Information\u00a0Commissioner           :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                             In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                                    at\n                                                           New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                                                                \u00a0\n                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/01018\n\n\n\n                                                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>        1.   The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a026.10.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Sr.Accounts\u00a0\u00a0Officer,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0four\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             court\u00a0cases\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0in\u00a0various\u00a0courts\u00a0against\u00a0PAO\u00a0(IRLA)\u00a0vide\u00a0OA\u00a0no.\u00a0426\u00a0of\u00a02001,\u00a0OA\u00a0no.\u00a0268\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             2006\u00a0and\u00a0W.P.\u00a05166\u00a0of\u00a02009.\u00a0He\u00a0also,\u00a0including\u00a0\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0when\u00a0Bank\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0right\u00a0claimant\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 vide \u00a0 PAO\/IRLA\/PEN\/I&amp;B\/99\u00ad2000\/36\u00ad37 \u00a0 has \u00a0 actually \u00a0 been \u00a0 issued \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             posted.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0 \u00a07.12.2010\u00a0providing\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0first\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             appeal\u00a0on\u00a08.1.11\u00a0seeking\u00a0further\u00a0clarification\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             vide\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a014.2.11\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0re\u00a0examine\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0and\u00a0verify\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             provide\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0Still\u00a0not\u00a0received\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        2.   During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0sought\u00a0\u00a0further\u00a0clarification\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0delay\u00a0caused\u00a0\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             points\u00a02\u00a0and\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application.\u00a0He\u00a0questioned\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>             could \u00a0 treat \u00a0 a \u00a0 period \u00a0 of \u00a0 4 \u00a0 days \u00a0 as\u00a0 a\u00a0delay\u00a0 on\u00a0the\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rightful\u00a0claimant\u00a0though\u00a0this\u00a0 is \u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\n            permissible\u00a0 as\u00a0per\u00a0 establishment\u00a0procedures\u00a0and\u00a0rules\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Home\u00a0Affairs\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           sought\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a05,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0rules\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officer\u00a0had\u00a0released\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           amount\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0non\u00a0claimant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0why\u00a0\u00a0contradictory\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0alleged\u00a0delay\u00a0of\u00a0four\u00a0days\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rightful\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           claimant\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.    The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           with\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0first\u00a0and\u00a0second\u00a0appeals,\u00a0\u00a0substantiated\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           copies\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0relevant\u00a0documents.\u00a0\u00a0Information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a016th\u00a0August\u00a02011.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0showcause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\/her\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           delay\u00a0in\u00a0providing\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0The\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a016\u00a0August,\u00a02011.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.    The\u00a0\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                 \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                         Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>1.         Shri\u00a0S\u00a0S\u00a0Vohra<br \/>\n           4572,\u00a0Bldg\u00a0No.\u00a0129<br \/>\n           New\u00a0Tilak\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n           Chembur<br \/>\n           Mumbai\u00a0&#8211;\u00a04000\u00a0089.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.         The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n           Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting<br \/>\n           Pay\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Office\u00a0(IRLA)<br \/>\n           AGCR\u00a0Building,\u00a0\u00a0I.P.Estate<br \/>\n           New\u00a0Delhi.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.             The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n               Railway\u00a0Rrecruitment\u00a0Board<br \/>\n               Divisional\u00a0office\u00a0Compound<br \/>\n               Mumbai\u00a0Central<br \/>\n               Mumbai\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0400\u00a0008.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.             Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001018 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011 Heard\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0Conferencing Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0S\u00a0S\u00a0Vohra 4572,\u00a0Bldg\u00a0No.\u00a0129 New\u00a0Tilak\u00a0Nagar Chembur Mumbai\u00a0&#8211;\u00a04000\u00a0089. Applicant\u00a0\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0conferencing Respondent(s) Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting Pay\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Office\u00a0(IRLA) AGCR\u00a0Building,\u00a0\u00a0I.P.Estate New\u00a0Delhi. Represented\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Arun\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Mittal,\u00a0PAO Shri\u00a0\u00a0R\u00a0C\u00a0Jain,\u00a0Dy\u00a0CA Mrs\u00a0Veena\u00a0Mehta,\u00a0AAO Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/01018 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a026.10.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Sr.Accounts\u00a0\u00a0Officer,\u00a0 M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Broadcasting,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0four\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":518,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011"},"wordCount":518,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011","name":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T15:36:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-s-vohra-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.S S Vohra vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 11 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45130\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}