{"id":45495,"date":"2008-11-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-13T06:34:47","modified_gmt":"2015-09-13T01:04:47","slug":"ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Pradeep Nandrajog<\/div>\n
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n+                        RFA 428\/2008\n\n\n      MR.RAVI CHAND                  ..... Appellant\n           Through: Mr.R.P.Sharma, Adv. and\n                    Mr.Pankaj Raj, Adv.\n\n                              versus\n\n      MR.PRAMOD KUMAR AGGARWAL            ...... Respondent\n               Through: None.\n\n\n\n                              DATE OF DECISION:\n%                                17.11.2008\n\nCoram:\n*   Hon'ble Mr.Justice Pradeep Nandrajog\n    Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.R. Midha\n\n\n1.    Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed\n      to see the judgment?\n\n2.    To be referred to the Reporter or not?\n\n3.    Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?\n\n\nPRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n
1.             On 5th November 2008 the Trial Court record was<\/p>\n
requisitioned through special messenger.           The same is<\/p>\n
available and has been considered in the light of the<\/p>\n
submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant.<\/p>\n
2.             The respondent filed a suit for recovery of<\/p>\n
Rs.4,35,000\/- alleging that on six different dates being<\/p>\n
19.9.2003, 20.9.2003, 22.9.2003, 27.9.2003, 4.10.2003 and<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                         Page 1 of 8<\/span>
\n 7.10.2003 he had advanced Rs.50,000\/- on each date to the<\/p>\n
appellant by way of loan for which proper receipts were<\/p>\n
executed by the appellant and that the loan was to carry<\/p>\n
interest @15% per annum. Alleging that in spite of notice<\/p>\n
being served no payment was made to return the loan, suit<\/p>\n
was filed to claim the principal sum of Rs.3 lakhs and<\/p>\n
interest thereon till the date when suit was filed i.e.<\/p>\n
13.9.2006.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.             The defence of the appellant was that he had<\/p>\n
received Rs.3 lakhs by way of loan from his nephew Balram<\/p>\n
who while advancing the loan obtained his signatures on six<\/p>\n
receipts which were blank.               Appellant stated that he<\/p>\n
returned the loan to Balram in the year 2004 but did not<\/p>\n
take back the receipts because of being close relatives.<\/p>\n
4.             In   a   nutshell   the   appellant   denied    having<\/p>\n
executed any receipts in favour of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n
5.             The six receipts have been proved by the plaintiff<\/p>\n
as PW-1\/1 to PW-1\/6. The plaintiff proved the partition deed<\/p>\n
as Ex.PW-1\/7 which he claimed was handed over to him by<\/p>\n
the appellant as security when loan was advanced. Under<\/p>\n
the partition deed certain immovable properties stand<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                           Page 2 of 8<\/span>
\n assigned to the appellant.      The respondent also proved as<\/p>\n
Ex.PW-1\/8 the legal notice sent to the appellant under<\/p>\n
registered post vide postal receipt Ex.PW-1\/9 and in proof of<\/p>\n
the notice being served upon the appellant proved the<\/p>\n
acknowledgment card Ex.PW-1\/10.          Suit has been decreed<\/p>\n
with interest @9% per annum from date of suit till<\/p>\n
realization.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.             The contention of the appellant that the receipts<\/p>\n
Ex.PW-1\/1 to Ex.PW-1\/6 do not record the name of the<\/p>\n
person to whom the receipts have been executed and hence<\/p>\n
a conclusion should be drawn that the receipts were never<\/p>\n
issued to the plaintiff has been repelled by the learned Trial<\/p>\n
Judge on account of the fact that the appellant took<\/p>\n
inconsistent stands while deposing as his witness. He stated<\/p>\n
that he had signed the receipts blank, which deposition we<\/p>\n
note is in harmony with his defence pleaded in the written<\/p>\n
statement.        Simultaneously   he   denied   his     signatures<\/p>\n
thereon. The learned Trial Judge has held that the appellant<\/p>\n
is obviously not speaking the truth. Learned Trial Judge has<\/p>\n
held that the appellant ought to have examined his nephew<\/p>\n
Balram and by not doing so has weakened his defence. But,<\/p>\n
what has been held as fatal to the defence of the appellant is<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                           Page 3 of 8<\/span>
\n the non-explanation by the appellant as to how the original<\/p>\n
partition deed, Ex.PW-1\/7, under which an immovable<\/p>\n
property stood assigned to the appellant reached the hands<\/p>\n
of the plaintiff.       The original document being in the<\/p>\n
possession of the plaintiff has been held by the learned Trial<\/p>\n
Judge to be good evidence of a loan transaction between the<\/p>\n
parties with the document being handed over to the plaintiff<\/p>\n
as a security. Admittedly, the appellant never refuted the<\/p>\n
legal notice Ex.PW-1\/8 (in spite of being held to be served<\/p>\n
with the same) where from the conclusion drawn is that the<\/p>\n
appellant did not state, what he did in the written statement,<\/p>\n
at the first opportunity.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.             Learned counsel for the appellant has re-agitated<\/p>\n
the plea that the six receipts are not executed in favour of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.             We are surprised at the plea urged for the reason<\/p>\n
each receipt records as under:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      “Received by Ravi Chand son of Late Shri Suraj Bhan
\n      from Pramod Kumar Aggarwal son of Shri Mahavir
\n      Prasad Aggarwal cash 50,000 (Rs.Fifty Thousand
\n      only).”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                        Page 4 of 8<\/span><\/p>\n
 9.             The argument urged runs in the teeth of the<\/p>\n
contents of the receipts Ex.PW-1\/1 to Ex.PW-1\/6.<\/p>\n
10.            We note that the question of the receipts being<\/p>\n
signed blank stands negated from the receipts themselves<\/p>\n
inasmuch as the appellant has signed the receipts across the<\/p>\n
revenue stamps affixed at the bottom of the receipts and<\/p>\n
has also signed the receipts at the place the amount has<\/p>\n
been filled up. This appears to be for the reason the receipts<\/p>\n
are as per printed proforma and the beneficiary of the<\/p>\n
receipt i.e. the plaintiff took care to obtain the signatures of<\/p>\n
the appellant at the place where the sum stands recorded.<\/p>\n
11.            A second contention is urged that the partition<\/p>\n
deed, Ex.PW-1\/7 was handed over by Balram to the<\/p>\n
appellant.      In respect of this plea we note that in his<\/p>\n
testimony the plaintiff has categorically deposed that the<\/p>\n
said document was handed over to him by the defendant<\/p>\n
when he took the loan. Learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
has not been able to show that this assertion of the plaintiff<\/p>\n
was refuted by cross-examining the plaintiff.              Indeed, the<\/p>\n
testimony       of   the   plaintiff   on   this   point     has     gone<\/p>\n
unchallenged.\n<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                               Page 5 of 8<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 12.            Learned counsel for the appellant next urges that<\/p>\n
the legal notice Ex.PW-1\/8 was never received by him and<\/p>\n
points out the testimony of the appellant to the effect that<\/p>\n
the A.D. card Ex.PW-1\/10 does not bear his signatures.<\/p>\n
13.            Learned counsel for the appellant does not<\/p>\n
dispute that the address at which the notice Ex.PW-1\/8 has<\/p>\n
been issued is correct.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
14.            Postal receipt Ex.PW-1\/9 shows that the notice<\/p>\n
dated 30.8.2006, Ex.PW-1\/8, was posted at the correct<\/p>\n
postal address of the appellant.        A.D. card, Ex.PW-1\/10,<\/p>\n
shows that the postal authorities returned the same to the<\/p>\n
person who had issued the notice. At the place where the<\/p>\n
recipient i.e. the noticee has to pen his signatures on the<\/p>\n
A.D. card we find some initials.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
15.            Ex.PW-1\/9 and Ex.PW-1\/10 are good evidence of<\/p>\n
the legal notice being served upon the appellant. Thus, non-<\/p>\n
reply thereto is a circumstance against the appellant.<\/p>\n
16.            The final argument of learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant is that the decree has been drawn for an excessive<\/p>\n
cost evidenced by the fact that while filling up the costs,<\/p>\n
towards stamp paper on which the plaint was drawn,<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                       Page 6 of 8<\/span>
\n Rs.18,465.00 have been awarded.             Counsel urges that the<\/p>\n
suit amount was Rs.4,35,000\/- as per which, counsel urges<\/p>\n
that     the   court   fee    payable     comes    to   approximately<\/p>\n
Rs.5,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
17.            As noted above, the plaintiff sued on six different<\/p>\n
loans advanced on six different dates and since the<\/p>\n
defendant was the same person and subject matter being<\/p>\n
same, in one suit six loan transactions were founded as the<\/p>\n
action. The plaintiff correctly valued the suit for purposes of<\/p>\n
court fee by recording that court fee payable would be as<\/p>\n
under:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      Date        Principal    Interest    Total        C.Fee paid<\/p>\n
1. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      19.9.2003<\/p>\n
2. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      20.9.2003<\/p>\n
3. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      22.9.2003<\/p>\n
4. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      27.9.2003<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                             Page 7 of 8<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 5. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      4.10.2003<\/p>\n
6. Receipt dt: Rs.50,000\/- Rs.22,500\/- Rs.72,500\/- Rs.3076\/-<\/p>\n
      7.10.2003<\/p>\n
18.            No other contention has been urged.                With<\/p>\n
reference to the record of the learned Trial Judge we find<\/p>\n
that each and every contention is worthless. We dismiss the<\/p>\n
appeal in limine and hence no costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                   PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.\n<\/p>\n
                                   J.R. MIDHA, J.\n<\/p>\n
November 17, 2008
\nDharmender<\/p>\n
RFA 428\/2008                                        Page 8 of 8<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 Author: Pradeep Nandrajog * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 428\/2008 MR.RAVI CHAND ….. Appellant Through: Mr.R.P.Sharma, Adv. and Mr.Pankaj Raj, Adv. versus MR.PRAMOD KUMAR AGGARWAL …… Respondent Through: None. DATE OF DECISION: % 17.11.2008 Coram: * […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRavi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1267,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008"},"wordCount":1267,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008","name":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-13T01:04:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ravi-chand-vs-pramod-kumar-aggarwal-on-17-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ravi Chand vs Pramod Kumar Aggarwal on 17 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45495"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45495\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45495"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45495"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}