{"id":45522,"date":"2011-08-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-18T23:29:51","modified_gmt":"2017-02-18T17:59:51","slug":"mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                     File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001638\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Mahatma\u00a0Mahto\n           R\/o\u00a066,\u00a0Palika\u00a0Gram\n           NDMC\u00a0Flats\n           Sarojini\u00a0Nagar\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0023\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council\n           Law\u00a0Department\n           Palika\u00a0Kendra\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0M.M.Khan,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Law\u00a0Officer\n                                    Shri\u00a0Dharam\u00a0Pal,\u00a0AA\u00a0&\u00a0L.O\n\n\n\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                      File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001638\n\n\n\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.Nil\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO(Personnel),\u00a0NDMC\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
       against\u00a0eight\u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0following:<\/p>\n
       i)        List\u00a0 of \u00a0 cases\u00a0 in \u00a0 which\u00a0 appeal\u00a0 filed\u00a0 by\u00a0NDMC\u00a0with\u00a0 the\u00a0 prior\u00a0approval\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 competent \u00a0<\/p>\n
       authority\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0time\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0filling\u00a0appeal.<\/p>\n
       ii)       List\u00a0of\u00a0cases\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0appeal\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0NDMC\u00a0without\u00a0approval\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authority \u00a0<\/p>\n
       along\u00a0with\u00a0details\u00a0of\u00a0time\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0filling\u00a0appeal.<\/p>\n
       Shri\u00a0M.M.Khan,\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Law\u00a0Department\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a023.3.11\u00a0providing\u00a0some\u00a0inormation.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0<\/p>\n
       replied \u00a0 on\u00a0 13.4.11 \u00a0 advising \u00a0 the \u00a0Applicant\u00a0to\u00a0approach\u00a0the\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0for\u00a0 information\u00a0<\/p>\n
       against\u00a0point\u00a07.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.21.4.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a07\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0dispute\u00a0between\u00a0both\u00a0Law\u00a0and\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Departments.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0<\/p>\n
       complete\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0even\u00a0after\u00a0elapse\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0considerable\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0time.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Dharam\u00a0Pal,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.5.11\u00a0explaining\u00a0the\u00a0role\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0two\u00a0Departments\u00a0(Law\u00a0<\/p>\n
       and\u00a0Personnel).\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.17.6.11\u00a0<\/p>\n
       before\u00a0CIC\u00a0raising\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0issues:\n<\/p>\n
       i)        NDMC\u00a0has\u00a0designated\u00a0subordinate\u00a0staff\u00a0of\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\/Deputy\u00a0Law\u00a0Officer\u00a0and\u00a0Section\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Officer\u00a0Level\u00a0as\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Directors\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
       ii)       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0has\u00a0neither\u00a0provided\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0opportunity\u00a0of\u00a0personal\u00a0hearing,\u00a0nor\u00a0<\/p>\n
       has \u00a0 directed \u00a0 the \u00a0 concerned \u00a0 PIO\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 Personnel\u00a0 department\u00a0 to \u00a0 provide\u00a0 the\u00a0 information\u00a0 sought\u00a0<\/p>\n
       against\u00a0points\u00a05\u00a0to\u00a08.\n<\/p>\n
       iii)      No \u00a0 date \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 mentioned \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 letters \u00a0 of \u00a0 Law \u00a0 Department \u00a0 as \u00a0 to \u00a0 when \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n
       application\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0transferred\u00a0by\u00a0them\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Department.<\/p>\n
Decision\n<\/p>\n
 2.       During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 he \u00a0 had \u00a0 filed \u00a0 the\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 application \u00a0 only\u00a0 with \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0from\u00a0them\u00a0except\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a07\u00a0<\/p>\n
         which\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.31.5.11.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0when\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0gone\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Cell\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
         submit\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CIC,\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Cell\u00a0would\u00a0<\/p>\n
         receive\u00a0only\u00a0RTI\u00a0applications\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0appeals\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0handed\u00a0over\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officer\u00a0directly.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Law\u00a0Department\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n
         received \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Application \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Cell \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 was \u00a0 transferred \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0by\u00a0them\u00a0on\u00a010.3.11\u00a0for\u00a0providing\u00a0information\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0them.<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a05\u00a0<\/p>\n
         and\u00a06\u00a0are\u00a0yet\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0(as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0Law\u00a0Department’s\u00a0submission)\u00a0<\/p>\n
         and\u00a0accordingly\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO(Personnel)\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a025.9.11.<\/p>\n
4.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Chairperson,\u00a0NDMC\u00a0to\u00a0issue\u00a0directions\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Cell\u00a0to\u00a0receive\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0second\u00a0appeals\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellants\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officers\u00a0<\/p>\n
         get\u00a0sufficient\u00a0time\u00a0to\u00a0respond\u00a0to\u00a0them.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.       The\u00a0undersigned\u00a0 \u00a0also\u00a0recommends\u00a0u\/s\u00a025(5)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0 \u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Chairperson,\u00a0NDMC\u00a0ensure\u00a0<\/p>\n
         that\u00a0only\u00a0those\u00a0officers\u00a0who\u00a0 \u00a0are\u00a0either\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0rank\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0Under\u00a0Secretary\u00a0 \u00a0or\u00a0above\u00a0this\u00a0rank\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n
         designated\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0and\u00a0PIOs.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0new\u00a0CPIOs\/PIOs\u00a0 \u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
         intimated\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a030.9.11\u00a0.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0PIOs\u00a0of\u00a0Law\u00a0Department\u00a0and\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0<\/p>\n
         as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalties\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0them\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0providing\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n
         for\u00a0providing\u00a0incomplete\u00a0information,\u00a0seemingly\u00a0with\u00a0intentions\u00a0that\u00a0are\u00a0malafide.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0They\u00a0are\u00a0directed\u00a0<\/p>\n
         to\u00a0submit\u00a0their\u00a0\u00a0written\u00a0responses\u00a0separately\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a030.9.11.<\/p>\n
7.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                             (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0
\n (G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.      Shri\u00a0Mahatma\u00a0Mahto
\n        R\/o\u00a066,\u00a0Palika\u00a0Gram
\n        NDMC\u00a0Flats
\n        Sarojini\u00a0Nagar
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0023<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council
\n        Law\u00a0Department
\n        Palika\u00a0Kendra
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.      The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council
\n        Law\u00a0Department
\n        Palika\u00a0Kendra
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.      The\u00a0Chairperson
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council
\n        Palika\u00a0Kendra
\n        New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
5.      The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council
\n        Personnel\u00a0Department
\n        Palika\u00a0Kendra
\n        New\u00a0Delhi\n<\/p>\n
 6.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n
Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission’s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0
\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0
\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001638 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Mahatma\u00a0Mahto R\/o\u00a066,\u00a0Palika\u00a0Gram NDMC\u00a0Flats Sarojini\u00a0Nagar New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0023 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Respondents New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0Municipal\u00a0Council Law\u00a0Department Palika\u00a0Kendra New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0M.M.Khan,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Asst.\u00a0Law\u00a0Officer Shri\u00a0Dharam\u00a0Pal,\u00a0AA\u00a0&\u00a0L.O Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001638 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.Nil\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO(Personnel),\u00a0NDMC\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0 against\u00a0eight\u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0following: i) List\u00a0 of \u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":776,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011"},"wordCount":776,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011","name":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-18T17:59:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-mahatma-mahto-vs-government-of-nct-of-delhi-on-23-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Mahatma Mahto vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}