{"id":45540,"date":"2008-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-03-01T17:32:31","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T12:02:31","slug":"mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 2118 of 2008()\n\n\n1. MATHAI, AGED 49 YEARS, S\/O.EAPEN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.EAPEN MATHAI\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :25\/07\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                               R.BASANT, J\n                        ------------------------------------\n                      Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008\n                       -------------------------------------\n                 Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008\n\n                                    ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
      Petitioner has come before this Court with this petition under<\/p>\n
Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of proceedings initiated against<\/p>\n
him (and two co-accused) in C.C.No.278 of 1991 of Chief Judicial<\/p>\n
Magistrate Court, Ernakulam.             The petitioner along with a co-<\/p>\n
accused faced allegations in that Calendar Case on the basis of a<\/p>\n
final report filed by the police alleging offences punishable under<\/p>\n
Section 120 (B), 465, 466, 468, 471, 109 and 420 r\/w 34 I.P.C.<\/p>\n
      2.    This case have a had chequered history. The crux of<\/p>\n
the allegations is that the accused persons had conspired<\/p>\n
together to bring into existence a forged B.Com degree certificate<\/p>\n
for the petitioner herein.          Making use of such forged B.Com<\/p>\n
certificate, the petitioner had allegedly secured admission for the<\/p>\n
L.LB course and later obtained the L.LB degree and had enrolled<\/p>\n
himself as a lawyer. He was practicing as a lawyer on the basis of<\/p>\n
such enrollment. No allegations are raised in respect of the L.LB<\/p>\n
degree or subsequent enrollment, but the charge is that he<\/p>\n
secured admission in the L.LB course with a forged B.Com degree<\/p>\n
certificate.\n<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008         2<\/span><\/p>\n
      3.   Cognizance was taken by the learned C.J.M, Ernakulam<\/p>\n
and C.C.No.278 of 1991 was registered.\n<\/p>\n
      4.   The learned C.J.M, by order dated 10.04.92, discharged<\/p>\n
the petitioner holding that the allegations against him are all<\/p>\n
groundless. At that time though the 3rd accused had expired, the<\/p>\n
2nd accused was also facing allegations along with the petitioner.<\/p>\n
Now the 2nd accused is also no more, it is submitted.<\/p>\n
      5.   By the detailed order dated 10.04.92, the petitioner<\/p>\n
was discharged under Section 239 Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
      6.   The State filed a revision petition against the said<\/p>\n
order of discharge.    Suo motu revision proceedings was also<\/p>\n
initiated by the learned Sessions Judge. By common order dated<\/p>\n
20.03.93 in Crl.R.P.Nos.50 of 1992 and 58 of 1992, the learned<\/p>\n
IInd additional Sessions Judge set aside the order of discharge and<\/p>\n
directed the learned C.J.M to “take back C.C.No.278 of 1991 to file<\/p>\n
and dispose of the same afresh in accordance with law<\/p>\n
untrammeled by any observations contained in this order”.<\/p>\n
      7.   That order of the learned Sessions Judge was<\/p>\n
challenged before this Court. A learned Judge of this Court as per<\/p>\n
order dated 20.06.1991 in Crl.R.P.No.246 of 1993 dismissed the<\/p>\n
said challenge and upheld the order of the learned Sessions<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008         3<\/span><\/p>\n
Judge. This Court also directed the learned C.J.M “to proceed with<\/p>\n
C.C.No.278 of 1991 and dispose of the same in accordance with<\/p>\n
law untrammeled by any observations contained in the<\/p>\n
judgment”.\n<\/p>\n
      8.   That order of the learned Single Judge was challenged<\/p>\n
before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court, by order dated<\/p>\n
22.01.2004 in Crl.Appeal No.215 of 1998, dismissed the said<\/p>\n
appeal.\n<\/p>\n
      9.   Thereafter the matter came before the learned C.J.M<\/p>\n
and at that stage, the Public Prosecutor filed an application for<\/p>\n
withdrawal of the case under Section 321 Cr.P.C. The learned<\/p>\n
C.J.M, by order dt.30.05.2008 in Crl.M.P.No.63 of 2006, refused to<\/p>\n
grant leave to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the<\/p>\n
prosecution. Thereafter the learned C.J.M had posted the case to<\/p>\n
24.06.08 for hearing on the question of charge and further steps.<\/p>\n
Charges have not been framed so far. The matter stands posted<\/p>\n
for framing charge.\n<\/p>\n
      10.  It is at this stage that the petitioner has come before<\/p>\n
this Court with this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The order<\/p>\n
passed by the learned Magistrate refusing to grant leave for<\/p>\n
withdrawal is significantly not challenged at all.     I am of the<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008         4<\/span><\/p>\n
opinion that in the sequence of events referred above, it is for the<\/p>\n
petitioner now to appear before the learned C.J.M and advance<\/p>\n
arguments, if any, to show that charges are not liable to be<\/p>\n
framed. Instead of doing that, the petitioner has unnecessarily<\/p>\n
come to this Court with this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to<\/p>\n
quash the proceedings. The learned Sessions Judge had already<\/p>\n
held that the allegations are not groundless and that the<\/p>\n
discharge on that ground is not justified.      That order of the<\/p>\n
learned Sessions Judge has been upheld by this Court and the<\/p>\n
Supreme Court. It is too late in the day for the petitioner now to<\/p>\n
contend that on merits, the prosecution against the petitioner is<\/p>\n
liable to be quashed invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n
      11.  At the Bar in the course of submissions, the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been inordinate<\/p>\n
delay in the disposal of the case and that in turn results in denial<\/p>\n
of the right to life of the petitioner under Article 21 of the<\/p>\n
Constitution of India. It is submitted that speedy trial is an axiom<\/p>\n
of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution and<\/p>\n
inasmuch as the same has been denied to the petitioner, the<\/p>\n
proceedings are liable to be quashed. Significantly such a<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008        5<\/span><\/p>\n
contention is not seen raised at all in the petition filed under<\/p>\n
Section 482 Cr.P.C.     Respondent\/State has been denied an<\/p>\n
opportunity to raise the contention that there has been no denial<\/p>\n
of the fundamental right to speedy trial in the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of this case. I do note that though the learned<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge had passed the order as early as on 20.03.93, it<\/p>\n
was the successive challenges raised before this Court and the<\/p>\n
Supreme Court by the petitioner that led to the delay in the case<\/p>\n
making further progress. In any view of the matter, I am not<\/p>\n
persuaded to agree that powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C can or<\/p>\n
ought to be invoked in favour of the petitioner now. It is for the<\/p>\n
petitioner to appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate<\/p>\n
and raise his contention, if he has any such contention, to claim<\/p>\n
discharge afresh.\n<\/p>\n
      12.  I need only mention that the learned Magistrate must<\/p>\n
dispose of the case in accordance with law as expeditiously as<\/p>\n
possible.\n<\/p>\n
      13.  With the above observations, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                           (R.BASANT, JUDGE)
\nrtr\/-\n<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C. No.2118 of 2008   6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 2118 of 2008() 1. MATHAI, AGED 49 YEARS, S\/O.EAPEN, … Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.V.EAPEN MATHAI For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon’ble MR. Justice R.BASANT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1040,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008"},"wordCount":1040,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008","name":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-01T12:02:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mathai vs State Of Kerala on 25 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}