{"id":45583,"date":"2010-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010"},"modified":"2018-05-25T06:16:38","modified_gmt":"2018-05-25T00:46:38","slug":"prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010<\/div>\n
Bench: A.P. Bhangale<\/div>\n
                                                                 1\n\n\n                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                                                 \n                                    BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.\n\n                                      SECOND APPEAL NO.  322 \/1998\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                    \n    Prabhakar   Dadaji  Darne\n    Aged about  53 years\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                   \n    occu: cultivator R\/o Takli (Darne)\n    Tah. & Dist. Wadha).               ...               ...APPELLANT\n\n\n                      v e r s u s\n\n\n\n\n                                                                    \n    Sharad  s\/o Janrao Darne\n    Aged about  48 years \n                                        \n    occu: Cultivator\n                                       \n    R\/o Takli (Darne)\n    Tah. & Dist.  Wardha)                                  ...               ...RESPONDENT\n\n\n    ...........................................................................................................................\n       \n\n\n                      Mr. G.G. Modak, Advocate  for   appellant\n    \n\n\n\n                      Mr V.G. Wankhede Adv.for Respondent.\n\n    ...........................................................................................................................\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                           CORAM:   A.P.BHANGALE, J.\n                                                           DATED :   27th   July,2010\n\n     JUDGMENT :   \n<\/pre>\n
                      This     appeal   is   directed     against   the   judgment     and   order <\/p>\n
    dated   22.4.1998     passed   in   Regular   Civil   Appeal   No.129\/1995   by <\/p>\n
    learned   2nd  Additional District Judge,   Wardha,     who confirmed the <\/p>\n
    judgment   and order passed by the trial Court,  except to the extent of <\/p>\n
                                                                                    ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>
\n                                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n
    awarding   compensatory   cost   to   the   original   defendant.       The   order <\/p>\n
    granting   compensatory costs was  set aside.   In the trial Court, learned <\/p>\n
    Civil   Judge,   Jr.Dn.,   Wardha   had   dismissed   the   Regular   Civil   Suit <\/p>\n
    No.143\/ 1993    awarding compensatory cost of Rs. 500\/-payable   to the <\/p>\n
    defendants.\n<\/p>\n
    2.           Facts  briefly are :\n<\/p>\n
                 The plaintiff had instituted the suit for possession based on <\/p>\n
    title   to   the   suit   property   i.e.   Plot   No.27       admeasuring   40′   x   20′ <\/p>\n
    situated  at Takli  Tal.  & Dist. Wardha.   The suit plot  was owned by <\/p>\n
    father of the plaintiff and bequeathed   in his favour   under Will dated <\/p>\n
    26.3.1981. The defendant who is not concerned with the plot started <\/p>\n
    storing \/keeping firewood   in the suit plot, which the plaintiff objected.\n<\/p>\n
    On 5.5.1993,  the  defendant dug  a pit  with a view to construct  a shed.\n<\/p>\n
    The   plaintiff complained to the Gram Panchayat, Takli,   which issued <\/p>\n
    notice     dated   27.2.1993   to   the   defendant   to   remove   the   tinshed.   On <\/p>\n
    7.5.1993   an exparte  injunction    was     granted  against the defendant <\/p>\n
    but the defendnt has forcibly  dispossessed the palintiff of the portion 40′ <\/p>\n
    x 20′  out of the suit plot.\n<\/p>\n
    3.           The defendant had resisted the suit by denial of contentions <\/p>\n
    in the plaint  and claimed that  defendant  owns plot admeasuring  40′ <\/p>\n
    NS x  20′  W.   since his forefathers  and alleged    that the plaintiff  in <\/p>\n
                                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>
\n                                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n
    connivance   with     Sarpanch     is   trying   to   grab     the   property   of   the <\/p>\n
    defendant.\n<\/p>\n
    4.             The   trial   Court   disbelieved   the     case   of   the   plaintiff     and <\/p>\n
    found that  the plaintiff had failed to prove that he acquired title to the <\/p>\n
    suit plot under Will deed dated 26.3.1981,  purportedly   executed   by <\/p>\n
    his father in his favour.  The trial Court found that the suit is false and <\/p>\n
    vexatious and awarded compensatory cost  of Rs. 500\/-    payable to the <\/p>\n
    defendant.   The   first   appellate   Court,   however,   felt   that   compensatory <\/p>\n
    cost  ought not to have been awarded in the facts and circumstances of <\/p>\n
    the case, while confirming  rest of the judgment and order passed by the <\/p>\n
    trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
    5.             The   appeal   was   admitted   on   8.9.21998       on   following <\/p>\n
    substantial question of  law :-\n<\/p>\n
                    “Whether the Courts below were right in holding that <\/p>\n
                    the plaintiff     has not proved the Will on the ground <\/p>\n
                    that   the   attesting   witness   has   said   that   the   testator <\/p>\n
                    did   not   sign   the   Will   in   their   presence     when   the <\/p>\n
                    deposition of the   attesting witness clearly shows that <\/p>\n
                    he has   categorically   made a statement that the Will <\/p>\n
                    was signed by the testator  in his presence and he  has <\/p>\n
                    specifically denied  a suggestion that it  was not signed <\/p>\n
                                                                  ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>
\n                                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
                   in his presence?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    6.            I have heard submissions   advanced on behalf of  the parties.\n<\/p>\n
    7.            The plaintiff had claimed that the suit plot was allotted to his <\/p>\n
    father by an order of Tahsildar   in 1954-55 for rehabilitation of flood-\n<\/p>\n
    affected persons and his father had on 26.3.1981   bequeathed it in his <\/p>\n
    favour.       The   only         attesting       witness   examined   by   the   plaintiff, <\/p>\n
    however, admitted that he does not know the contents of the document <\/p>\n
    Exh. 41;    as also does not know name of the scribe. There was no any <\/p>\n
    evidence about ownership  of the father of the plaintiff so as to bequeath <\/p>\n
    the suit plot. The  plaintiff had miserably  failed to prove his title  to the <\/p>\n
    suit plot.\n<\/p>\n
    8.            Learned   Advocate   for   respondent   made   reference   to   the <\/p>\n
    ruling in  Niranjan   Umeshchandra Joshi   vs.   Mrudula     Jyoti Rao  <\/p>\n
    and   others<\/a>   :(2006   )   13   SCC   433,        to   argue     that     if   there     are <\/p>\n
    suspicious     circumstances   surrounding     execution       of   Will   and <\/p>\n
    genuineness of the Will it has to be considered  as null and void.   In the <\/p>\n
    ruling cited it appears that   the probate   was   refused   for the alleged <\/p>\n
    Will   as     there     were   several   suspicious   circumstances   surrounding <\/p>\n
    execution of   Will. The testator  was in Hospital   in ICU    and  within <\/p>\n
    24 hours   of his admission in ICU   a power-of-attorney       and Will in <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>
\n                                                5<\/span><\/p>\n
    favour of   his second son was drafted, which bequeathed entire legacy <\/p>\n
    of the deceased absolutely  in favour of  propounder of the Will. The Will <\/p>\n
    along with two schedules drafted  meticulously   although testator  had <\/p>\n
    no documents  with  him  in  the  small cubicle  of  hospital. The    Doctor <\/p>\n
    attending the patient was not examined,  who could have  stated about <\/p>\n
    state of mind of the  testator at the time of  execution of the Will. The <\/p>\n
    manner   in   which   death   certificate   was   granted     was   also   suspicious.\n<\/p>\n
    Under these circumstances, the Apex Court had  refused to interfere with <\/p>\n
    the order of the High Court refusing probate  for the Will.\n<\/p>\n
    9.           In order to prove a Will,  it  was necessary  for the plaintiff to <\/p>\n
    prove first   that his father   owned the suit plot   and was competent to <\/p>\n
    bequeath     the same and furthermore in view of Section 63       of the <\/p>\n
    Indian Succession Act, at least, one attesting witness must be examined <\/p>\n
    to   prove   who   depose   about   having     seen   the   testator       present   and <\/p>\n
    signing   the Will.   The witness examined   in the present case did not <\/p>\n
    know about the scribe   as well as   contents   of the document. Second <\/p>\n
    attesting   witness was not examined. For these reasons,   it cannot   be <\/p>\n
    said that conclusion of   the courts below were either     erroneous   or <\/p>\n
    contrary to law.   The findings    and conclusion of facts  were concurrent <\/p>\n
    to   order   dismissal   of   suit     and     were   based   on   evidence.   Hence   no <\/p>\n
    infirmity whatsoever  can be found.   The   substantial  question of law <\/p>\n
                                                              ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>
\n                                         6<\/span><\/p>\n
    stated has to be answered accordingly against the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
    10.        In the result, the Appeal being sans merit, deserve dismissal, <\/p>\n
    which I direct.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                    JUDGE<\/p>\n
    sahare<\/p>\n
                                                    ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:12:28 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 Bench: A.P. Bhangale 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO. 322 \/1998 Prabhakar Dadaji Darne Aged about 53 years occu: cultivator R\/o Takli (Darne) Tah. & Dist. Wadha). … …APPELLANT v e r s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPrabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":942,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010"},"wordCount":942,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010","name":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-25T00:46:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prabhakar-dadaji-darne-vs-unknown-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prabhakar Dadaji Darne vs Unknown on 27 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}