{"id":45849,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-22T08:24:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-22T02:54:00","slug":"state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; Malimath<\/div>\n<pre>-31m\n\nIN THE men comm' or-' KARNATAKA AT   \n\nDATED THIS THE mm DAYQF MARCi\u00a5i;~ $'f2\u20acO\u00a7aAV { j  A ~ \n\n------------------~--~-------------\"' R E S E \"\"      \nTHE HON'BLE MR.JU'S:H.(_3EV 5\nTHE HON'BLE \n\n \n\n \n\ncmmm Azp\u00e9mz  m7\n\nState (if   .\nPSI Raichur   ' . .\nRaichur; L % A   % *   \n\n f; (BY SRI~.suBHAvANIs1NGH, s.1=-.9.)\n\nS\/o\"=SVri'.Kondi Yellappa,\n about 29 years,\n\n A'  Agriculture,\n\" 'R.\/o Merchad\n\n \n\n Talukz Raichur.\n\nk A  A \"  Sri.Raju,\n\nS\/o Sri.YeIlappa,- -\n\n  25 years,\n\nOne: Agriculture,\n\nR\/0 Merchad, Taluk: Raichur.\n\n\n\n3. S1-i.Yellmpa,\n\nS\/o Sri.Gouruma,\n\nAged about 61 years,  &gt;\nOoc: Agriculture,  \nR\/o Merchad,\n\nTalukz Ra\ufb01chur.\n\n4. Sri.Choud:_1 @  _\nS\/o    \"\nAged about 24 yegfm, \nR\/o Merchad,  '\n'!'a1uk:Ra\u00e9echu_r.  . '\n\n5.  %  *L;     l  \n\nS\/o     \nAged amt as  \nR\/o\u00abYeldaap1.uf',V.  \nTaluk: ._ _ \" .\n\n \u00e9_ \n . we \n l'  51 years,\n'  'R\/o_ M\u00e9er\u00e9lxad,\nTali.tk:' \"Raichur.\n\" _ 3 . . . . RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p> iBf1sm.p.pRAsANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1<br \/>\n T0 R6.) &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>i*\ufb01#-\n<\/p>\n<p>This Criminal appeal is \ufb01led under Saction 3&#8217;78<br \/>\n(1) 85 (3) Cr.P.C. praying to grmt have to \ufb01le an<br \/>\nappeal against the judmant dated 16.10.2006 in<br \/>\nS.C.No.69\/2006 on the file of the Add}. Sessions<\/p>\n<p>-3&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge and Prwiding O\ufb01cer, F.T.C&#8211;III, Raielmr,<br \/>\naequitting the zmpondenmwaecneed Nos. 1, 3,5<\/p>\n<p>6 for the offence punishable under  &#8221;<br \/>\n148, 307 read with Section 149 IPC<br \/>\nN032 and 4 punishable under v_&#8217;i43,jj143,&#8217;*\u00ab ._ <\/p>\n<p>324, 307 read with Section    &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>This appeal eommg&#8217; on fo1;;&#8217;~a&lt;im,    <\/p>\n<p>SABI-IA!-11&#039;!&#039; J., delivered the    _<\/p>\n<p>This appeal by  _ against the<br \/>\nFast Track&quot;    i~.\ufb01WVS.C.No.69\/2006<br \/>\ndated 1, 3, 5 and 6,<br \/>\n(respehdeete  convicted of having<\/p>\n<p>eomae &quot;the Vee\ufb01eneeh punishable under Seaman&#039;<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;..  -on 34  and . I of<\/p>\n<p>  accused for the said o\ufb01enee, accused<\/p>\n<p> S .V 2, V3,  6 are rele\ufb01 under Section 4 of the<\/p>\n<p>H K  &#039;\ufb02;\u00bbS.,F&#039;rel;gatVien of O\ufb01endean Actand on they urinating&#039; into<\/p>\n<p>   with one surety to appear before the Court<\/p>\n<p>S&#039;  to receive the sentence whenever called upon<\/p>\n<p>during the period of next one year and that they<br \/>\n&quot;\\3&quot;\\\/3<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>shall remain under the supervision of <\/p>\n<p>O\ufb01eer, Raichur during that period.<\/p>\n<p>2. We have heard the  4&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<pre>Prosecutor and the    *\n\nthe r\u00b0sP\u00b0nd\u00b0nt3'  .. ..  ;\n\n3. The    \nherein), stood   of hawfmg\n    under Sections\n143, 143,    149 IPC and an the\n<\/pre>\n<p>accused 1  reepondenm, pleaded not<br \/>\ngumy aha  tried.\n<\/p>\n<p>   prose     &#8220;cation, examm&#8217; ed Pws. 1 to 11<\/p>\n<p>X m.P.1 to R8 and Mae. 1 to 5.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;The trial Court, after eonaidenng&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p> of the learned Public Prosecutor and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   counsel appearirg for theeocused by a<\/p>\n<p>u mjtxdgxnent apprec:atang&#8217; &#8216; dock?-1\/xgaents produced before<\/p>\n<p>-5&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>it, by its judgment dated 16.10.2006 held4\ufb02:&#8221;thle\u00a3%:-l&#8211;.i:l&#8217;i%1&#8217;lj\\ <\/p>\n<p>prosecution has failed to prev._eW1:l_1e   &#8221; &#8216;V <\/p>\n<p>ageing&#8217; t the accused of the    <\/p>\n<p>Sections 143, 148, 307   A  ipc e t<\/p>\n<p>and held that accused  and stand  of<br \/>\nhaving&#8217; committed   2&#8242;  Section<br \/>\n324 read with  adttdrcfet L  d<\/p>\n<p>   made available the<br \/>\n  11 adduced by the<\/p>\n<p>prosecutlen  Court. It is clear from the<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;  peadimljod uthdltwdund certi\ufb01cate issued by PW-10<\/p>\n<p>  in respect of P&#8217;Ws.l, 3, 2 md 5<\/p>\n<p>I    per Exa.P.3 to R6 respectively, has<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8221;  the injuries sustained by PWIJ and 3<\/p>\n<p>   wlere&#8221;lsimple in nature. The evidence of P&#8217;We.1, 3, 2<\/p>\n<p>ll  5 establish that accused 1, 3, 5 and 6<\/p>\n<p>(respondents herein) assaulted mad caused simple<\/p>\n<p>injuries to the witnesaea FWa.&#8217; &#8216;1;&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;3,-M2   <\/p>\n<p>However, the material does not show that any of the<br \/>\nw<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-15-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>injured had sustained any gievous  <\/p>\n<p>there ww an intention to cause the     <\/p>\n<p>the o\ufb01enee was  <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ix: &#8216;!&#8217; &#8220;_\\ <\/p>\n<p>circumstances, that,  <\/p>\n<p>of the murder and  feet, .  by<br \/>\nP&#8217;Ws.1, 3, 2 and 5  the em<br \/>\nCourt, on  P&#8217;Ws.I, 3,<br \/>\n2 and 5 me.  committed<br \/>\n  Section 324 read with<\/p>\n<p>  ed to the fact that<\/p>\n<p> V.    between the two groups and<\/p>\n<p>   to patios of both the groups md<\/p>\n<p> L th.;&#8221;e.egn,:g.;3reee;ustasned by PWe.1,3, 2 and 5 wme<\/p>\n<p> .V, :emtple &#8221; in neture, the trial Court, ineteed of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V &#8211;&#8216;   the reepondenm 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; we\ufb01&#8217;e_11&lt;:_e  under Section 324 IPC, hm<\/p>\n<p>released them under Section 4 ofthe Probation of<\/p>\n<p>Oifendere Act with a. direction to execute bond for<br \/>\n\\\u00a7:\\_,J..5<\/p>\n<p>..-7-\n<\/p>\n<p>one year to receive the sentence if theme is <\/p>\n<p>violation of the bond and that they A&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>directed to remain under the ..    ., <\/p>\n<p>Probation Officer, Raichur,  <\/p>\n<p>order was passed on  of <\/p>\n<p>\\&#8217;.\\g$. Q, \u00ab<\/p>\n<p>one year 1g exqaired 9:1   has<br \/>\nbeen no viola\ufb01oh of       &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    we, on re-\n<\/p>\n<p>  PWa.1, 3, 2, 5 and<\/p>\n<p>mo, ma shag: : _ .\u00a2.)f&#8221;the trial Court that the<\/p>\n<p>pmaecutix\u00e9LnV%%   prove that the accused<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~   o\ufb01onoe punishable under<\/p>\n<p> 43, 143, 307 read with Section 149 IPC is<\/p>\n<p>   imposed upon accused 1, 3,<\/p>\n<p> gnd 5&#8217; (respondents herein) is also justi\ufb01ed md<\/p>\n<p>   Elbe:-;&#8217;Anot call for interfenence in this tipped .<\/p>\n<p>8. On re-appreciation, we \ufb01nd_%t___hat_,the \ufb01nding<\/p>\n<p> of the ma: Court acquittingaccuaed 2 and 4 is also<\/p>\n<p>.. 3 ..\n<\/p>\n<p>justified as the evidence of PWs,1, 3, 2 and 5 &#8216;\ufb01nes<br \/>\nnot disclose any overt-act on their part. <\/p>\n<p>We hold that the judment of    A<br \/>\nagainst accused 1, 3, 5 and 6 ifa\u00e9isa   <\/p>\n<p>Aeoordmsl&#8217; y. the a1PPeal_  % = %  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 Author: V.G.Sabhahit &amp; Malimath -31m IN THE men comm&#8217; or-&#8216; KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE mm DAYQF MARCi\u00a5i;~ $&#8217;f2\u20acO\u00a7aAV { j A ~ &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;~&#8211;~&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&#8220;&#8216; R E S E &#8220;&#8221; THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JU&#8217;S:H.(_3EV 5 THE HON&#8217;BLE cmmm Azp\u00e9mz m7 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":658,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":658,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008","name":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur ... vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-22T02:54:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-psi-raichur-vs-sri-gopal-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka By Psi Raichur &#8230; vs Sri Gopal on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}