{"id":46170,"date":"2009-04-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-24T10:56:01","modified_gmt":"2016-06-24T05:26:01","slug":"general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED:15.04.2009\n\nCORAM\n\nTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN\n\nC. R. P. (NPD) No.493 of 2009\nand\nM.P.No.1  of 2009\nGeneral Manager\nSouthern Railway\nChennai-600 003\t\t\t\t\t\t.. Petitioner \n\n\t\t\tVs.\n\n1. D.K.Bakthan\n2. S.Devadoss\n3. P.L.Kandasamy\t\t\t\t\t  .... Respondents\n\n\tCivil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the order dated 31.10.2008  made E.A.No.4448 of 2006 in E.P.No.1593 of 2005 in O.S.No.6016 of 2001 on the file of IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.\n\n\tFor Petitioner           :  :Mr.R.Theagarajan,Senior Counsel,\n\t\t\t\t\t  For Mr.V.G.Suresh Kumar, Advocate\n\tFor respondents        : : No appearance.\n\t\t\t\t  O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tHeard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2. This Civil revision petition  has been directed  against the order passed  in E.A.No.4448 of 2006 in E.P.No.1593 of 2005 in O.S.No.6016 of 2001 on the file of IX Assistant Judge,City Civil Court, Chennai.  The revision petitioner is the third respondent\/third party in E.A.No.4448 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. The learned Senior Counsel would state that the third party General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai is neither a party to the suit in O.S.No.6016 of 2001 nor  a party in E.P.No.1593 of 2005,only in E.A.No.4448 of 2006, the decree holder\/first respondent had arrayed as third party\/General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai as respondent and in E.A.No.4448 of 2006 in E.P.No.1593 of 2005 in O.S.No.6016 of 2001, an exparte order against R3\/third party General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai was passed by the execution Court on 27.9.2006. Against which the third party-General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai had preferred C.R.P(NPD) No.538 of 2007 in which this Court has allowed the said Civil revision petition setting aside the exparte order passed in E.A.4448 of 2006 in O.S.No.1593 of 2005 against the third party\/General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai  directing the Execution Court to give an opportunity to the third party-General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai\/third respondent in E.A.No.4448 of 2006 to file his counter and then to decide the E.A. on merits. Even thereafter, the learned Execution Court had allowed E.A.No.4448 of 2006 against the third party with an observation that only the Chief Security Commissioner, R.P.F. Southern Railway has filed the counter and the third party\/third respondent\/General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai has not filed the counter.  Further it is pertinent to note that even the counter filed by the Chief Security Commissioner, RPF Railway was not taken into consideration by the learned IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai while disposing of the E.A.No.4448 of 2006 on 31.10.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. The grievance of the learned Senior counsel is that even as per the G.O.E(G) 82 LL2\/2(B) dated 4.5.1992, the Government of India has authorised about 87 personnels of the Railways to file counter on behalf of the Union of India and Railways and that the Chief  Security Commissioner came under Sl.No.20(Page 1 of the typed set of papers). So the finding of the Execution Court\/IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai that the Chief Security Commissioner RPF Southern Railway is not  competent to file counter on behalf of the General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai\/third party cannot be sustainable. Further E.P. against the third respondent in E.P.No.1593 of 2005\/General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai who is neither a party to the suit nor in Execution petition is maintainable or not? was also not considered by the  Execution Court.\n<\/p>\n<pre>under such circumstances, the order passed in E.A.No.4448 of 2006 in E.P.No.1593 of 2005 in O.S.No.6016 of 2001 on the file IX \t\t\t\t\t\tA.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN,J\nAssistant Judge, City Civil Court,Chennai warrants interference from this Court.\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t5. In fine, this civil revision petition is allowed and the order passed in E.A.No.4448 of 2006 in E.P.No.1593 of 2005 in O.S.No.6016 of 2001  on the file of IX Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned execution Court with a direction to consider afresh within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2009 is closed.  At this juncture, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would state that the service of R1 to R3 has not been effected sofar. But, we are not disposing of E.A.No.4448 of 2006,since this Court has exercised power under Article 227 of Constitution of India, it is no bar to remand the same for fresh consideration by the Court below, on the basis of the material defects pointed out by the Senior counsel on the face of the record.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t15.4.2009<br \/>\nIndex:Yes<br \/>\nInternet:Yes<br \/>\nsg<br \/>\nTo Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tC.R.P(NPD)No.493\/2009<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P(NPD)Nos.783 &amp;784\/2009<\/p>\n<p>A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN,J<\/p>\n<p>\tIn fine, this civil revision petitions are allowed and the order passed by the first appellate Judge in C.M.A.No. 13 of 2008 in I.A.No.1137 of 2007 in O.S.No.908 of 2007 and C.M.A.No.11 of 2008 in I.A.No.1138 of 2007 in O.S.No.908 of 2007 respectively on the file of Additional District Munsif No.1, Salem is set aside only in respect of the direction regarding the removal of the plaint from the file of the learned trial Judge. The learned trial Court  is directed to restore O.S.No.908 of 2007 on its file, after restoration, the defendants are entitled to file a petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the plaint.  On such filing of the petition, the learned trial Judge is directed to consider the petition filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC filed by the defendants  and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of two months thereafter.No costs.  Consequently, connected MPs are \tclosed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t03.04.2009sg<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.NPD.Nos.783 &amp;784 of 2009<br \/>\nM.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN, J<br \/>\n\tThis matter came up today under the caption &#8220;For Being Mentioned&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2.Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. No representation for the respondents. The grievance of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is that this Court while disposing of CRP.NPD.No.783 and 784 of 2009 has given a liberty to the defendants to file the petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC and has further directed the trial Court to dispose of the petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC to be filed by the defendants on merits within a period of two months.  But incase, the petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC is dismissed, then the trial Court should have been directed to dispose of O.S.No.908 of 2007 also within two months.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3.Under such circumstances, the learned trial Judge is directed to dispose of O.S.No.908 of 2007 also, incase if the petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC to be filed by the defendants is dismissed, within two months thereafter.  The learned counsel for the revision petitioner  further  submits  that  so far the defendants have not filed<br \/>\nA.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>any petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.  Under such circumstances, the defendants are directed to file the petition under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC within ten days from today, failing which, the learned trial Judge shall proceed with the suit and dispose of the same within two months thereafter.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.04.2009<br \/>\nssv<br \/>\nNOTE :- Issue Today.\n<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.NPD.Nos.783 &amp;784 of 2009<br \/>\nand<br \/>\nM.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15.04.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN C. R. P. (NPD) No.493 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 General Manager Southern Railway Chennai-600 003 .. Petitioner Vs. 1. D.K.Bakthan 2. S.Devadoss 3. P.L.Kandasamy &#8230;. Respondents [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1118,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\",\"name\":\"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009"},"wordCount":1118,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009","name":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-24T05:26:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/general-manager-vs-d-k-bakthan-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"General Manager vs D.K.Bakthan on 15 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46170\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}