{"id":46185,"date":"2008-10-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-03T16:20:49","modified_gmt":"2016-11-03T10:50:49","slug":"e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nOP.No. 211 of 2000(A)\n\n\n\n1. E.A.BABU\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJESH THOMAS\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :21\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                             S. Siri Jagan, J.\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                    O.P. Nos. 211 &amp; 3339 of 2000\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                 Dated this, the 21st   October, 2008.\n\n                            J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      These two original petitions are filed by rival      Government<\/p>\n<p>employees of the Motor Vehicles Department, seeking seniority over<\/p>\n<p>one another. The petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 started service as a<\/p>\n<p>L.D. Clerk. Later on, he was appointed by transfer as Assistant Motor<\/p>\n<p>Vehicle Inspector on 23-1-1982 provisionally.      As per the Special<\/p>\n<p>Rules applicable, the post of AMVI has to be filled up from among<\/p>\n<p>transferees and direct recruits in the ratio of 1 : 4. The petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>provisional appointment on 23-1-1982 was regularised and he was<\/p>\n<p>declared to have completed his probation in the cadre of          AMVI<\/p>\n<p>satisfactorily with effect from 11-2-1984.      The 4th respondent in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No. 3339\/2000, who is the petitioner in O.P.No. 112\/2000, was<\/p>\n<p>advised for direct recruitment on 21-3-1983 and he joined service on<\/p>\n<p>30-5-1983. By Ext. P. 2 seniority list of AMVIs, the petitioner was at<\/p>\n<p>serial no. 19 and the 4th respondent at serial no. 20.     Pursuant to<\/p>\n<p>objections raised by the 4th respondent, the 3rd respondent issued<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P4 order provisionally holding that since the date of regularisation<\/p>\n<p>of the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 was         11-2-1984 and    the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in the other original petition joined duty on 30-5-1983, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000 was senior in the cadre of AMVIs.<\/p>\n<p>Although the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 filed Exts.P5 and P 6<\/p>\n<p>objections in the matter, by Ext.P7 order, the 3rd respondent declared<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000 is senior to the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No. 3339\/2000. However, in the select lists prepared for the<\/p>\n<p>posts of Motor Vehicle Inspector and Joint R.T.O,      the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>O.P. No. 3339\/2000 was shown ahead of the petitioner in the other<\/p>\n<p>original petition. In O.P.No. 211\/2000, the 4th respondent in the other<\/p>\n<p>original petition seeks to implement the seniority as confirmed in Ext.<\/p>\n<p>P7 for the purpose of further promotion. Pursuant to interim orders<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">O.P.No. 211 &amp; 3339\/2000              -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>passed in that original petition, the date of promotion was assigned to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000 ahead of the petitioner in the other<\/p>\n<p>original petition subject to the result of these original petitions.<\/p>\n<p>      2. The contention of the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner&#8217;s provisional appointment on 23-1-1982 was regularised<\/p>\n<p>and his probation was satisfactorily declared with effect from 11-2-<\/p>\n<p>1984. Therefore, his first appointment to the post of AMVI for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of Rule 27(a) of K.S and S.S.R is 23-1-1982 and not 11-2-<\/p>\n<p>1984. When, admittedly, the petitioner in the other original petition<\/p>\n<p>entered service only as per advice dated 21-3-1983, he can only be<\/p>\n<p>assigned seniority below the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000, is the<\/p>\n<p>contention raised. On the other hand, the petitioner in the other<\/p>\n<p>original petition would contend that in so far as the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No. 3339\/2000 was regularised in service only with effect from<\/p>\n<p>11-2-1984, he is liable to be ranked junior to the petitioner in O.P. No.<\/p>\n<p>211\/2000 for all purposes of promotion and seniority.<\/p>\n<p>      3. I have considered the rival contentions in detail.<\/p>\n<p>      4. Ext. P1 in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 reads thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>            &#8220;Shri. S. Prabhakaran Thampi was provisionally appointed<br \/>\n      as Asst. Motor Vehicle Inspector by transfer from among<br \/>\n      ministerial staff vide Order No.A3\/1027\/TC\/82 dt. 23.1.82.      He<br \/>\n      joined duty on 25.1.82 F.N. The period of probation in the cadre of<br \/>\n      AMVI is 2 years on duty within a continuous period of three years.<\/p>\n<p>            2)   The provisional appointment of Shri. S. Prabhakaran<br \/>\n      Thampi as Asst. Motor Vehicles Inspector is regularised and he is<br \/>\n      declared to have completed is probation in the cadre of Asst. Motor<br \/>\n      Vehicle Inspector satisfactorily with effect from 11.2.1984.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>From a reading of the same, what one understands is that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s provisional appointment dated 23-1-1982 has been<\/p>\n<p>regularised and his probation in the cadre of AMVI has been declared<\/p>\n<p>with effect from 11-2-1984. Going by the same, the date of order of<\/p>\n<p>the first appointment of the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">O.P.No. 211 &amp; 3339\/2000             -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>purpose of Rule 27(a) of K.S and S.S.R is 23-1-1982 and cannot be<\/p>\n<p>11-2-1984. Further, Rule 18(a) deals with date of commencement of<\/p>\n<p>first appointment temporarily, which reads thus:<\/p>\n<p>            &#8220;18. (a)      Date of commencement of probation of<br \/>\n      persons first appointed temporarily:- If a person, having been<br \/>\n      appointed temporarily under sub-rule (a) or sub-rule (c) of rule 9 to<br \/>\n      a post borne on the cadre of any service, class or category<br \/>\n      otherwise than in accordance with the rules governed appointment<br \/>\n      thereto, is subsequently appointed to the service, class or category<br \/>\n      in accordance with the rules, he shall commence his probation<br \/>\n      from the date of such subsequent appointment or from such earlier<br \/>\n      date as the appointing authority may determine, without prejudice<br \/>\n      to seniority of others.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>There is no case for the respondents in O.P.No.3339\/2000 that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has been assigned date of commencement of probation<\/p>\n<p>other than 23-1-1982 as contemplated in Rule 18(a). On the other<\/p>\n<p>hand, his probation was declared with effect from 11-2-1984.<\/p>\n<p>Further, once a provisional appointment is ordered to be regularised<\/p>\n<p>without specifying any date, the regularisation would relate back to<\/p>\n<p>the date of provisional appointment, which in the case of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is 23-1-1982. That would mean that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner&#8217;s first appointment for the purpose of seniority is 23-1-<\/p>\n<p>1982. In that view, the petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is senior to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000.           Therefore, the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is entitled to be considered as senior to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000 for all subsequent promotions.<\/p>\n<p>      Accordingly, Exts.P4 and P7 are quashed and it is declared that<\/p>\n<p>in the cadre of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector, the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is senior to the petitioner in O.P.No. 211\/2000.<\/p>\n<p>The date of subsequent promotions of the petitioners shall be revised<\/p>\n<p>accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 has retired in 2004 and the<\/p>\n<p>other petitioner has retired in 2007. As such, what requires to be done<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">O.P.No. 211 &amp; 3339\/2000          -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>now is reassignment of date of subsequent promotions and payment of<\/p>\n<p>arrears of salary on that basis. Accordingly, I direct respondents 2<\/p>\n<p>and 3 to pass orders in accordance with the above directions as<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Arrears, if any, due to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in O.P.No. 3339\/2000 shall be disbursed within one month<\/p>\n<p>from the date of passing orders as above.         O.P.No. 3339\/2000 is<\/p>\n<p>allowed as above and O.P.No. 211\/2000 is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                         S. Siri Jagan, Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>Tds\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">O.P.No. 211 &amp; 3339\/2000      -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                    S. Siri Jagan, J.<\/p>\n<pre>\n                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                             O.P. Nos. 211 &amp; 3339 of 2000\n                         =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n\n\n\n\n                                    J U D G M E N T\n\n\n                                21st    October, 2008.\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OP.No. 211 of 2000(A) 1. E.A.BABU &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH THOMAS For Respondent :SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.) The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN Dated :21\/10\/2008 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1151,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\",\"name\":\"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008"},"wordCount":1151,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008","name":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T10:50:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-a-babu-vs-state-of-kerala-on-21-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"E.A.Babu vs State Of Kerala on 21 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}