{"id":46271,"date":"2010-04-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-14T17:56:42","modified_gmt":"2015-05-14T12:26:42","slug":"ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010<\/div>\n
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n\n                               W.P.(C) NO. 2327 OF 2003\n                                         with\n                               W.P.(C) NO. 2328 OF 2003\n\n  M\/S. Narbheram Leasing Company Pvt. Limited ... ...           Petitioner[In both Cases]\n                                  -versus-\n    State of Jharkhand and others                     ... ... Respondents[in both cases].\n\n\n\n     CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESHWAR SAHAY.\n\nFor the Petitioner        : Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Advocate.\nFor the Respondents       : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate.\nFor the State             : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, J.C. to Sr. S.C.-II\n\n\n\n8\/19.04.2010<\/pre>\n
.     Heard the parties.\n<\/p>\n
                  In view of the fact that the facts and points involved in both the writ<\/p>\n
          petitions are same and similar and as such, both the cases have been heard<\/p>\n
          together and are being disposed of by this common Order.<\/p>\n
                  The facts in short are the petitioner of both the writ petitions, is the<\/p>\n
          landlord and the private respondents i.e. Vijay Mehta and Dhiren Mehta, are<\/p>\n
          his tenant with respect to two tenanted premises i.e. shop no. 2 and shop no.<\/p>\n
          3, situated in the commercial building namely – Narbheram Building, Sakchi<\/p>\n
          Boulevard Road (Bistupur Main Road), Bistupur, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum.<\/p>\n
                  The petitioner filed applications for fixing fair rent of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
          two shops praying under Section 5 of the B.B.C. Act before the S.D.O.<\/p>\n
          contending that the tenanted premises is located in the busy market area and<\/p>\n
          business centre of Bistupur, Jamshedpur and the same is being used by the<\/p>\n
          tenants for commercial purposes whereas, the rent paid by them was too low.<\/p>\n
          As a matter of fact, the rent for such accommodation prevalent in that area is<\/p>\n
          being paid @ about Rs.28\/- per Sq. Ft.. Accordingly, prayer was made to fix the<\/p>\n
          fair rent of the two shops premises @Rs.28\/- per Sq. Ft. per month.<\/p>\n
                   The S.D.M. – cum – House Rent Controller registered those two<\/p>\n
          petitions filed by the petitioner under Section 5 of B.B.C. Act as H.R.C. Cases.<\/p>\n
          The tenants were noticed and thereafter, he directed the Special Officer,<\/p>\n
          Jugsalai Municipality, Jamshedpur to make a spot enquiry and report about the
\n statements made by the petitioner. The Special Officer submitted his enquiry<\/p>\n
report dated 06.07.2002, contained in Annexure-2 to the writ petition. He<\/p>\n
reported in his report that for similar accommodation, the prevailing rent in<\/p>\n
the area was @Rs.28\/- per Sq. Ft.. However, it was also mentioned in the<\/p>\n
report that since in one case, namely H.R.C. Case No. 72 of 1998, the fare rent<\/p>\n
has been fixed at Rs.12 per Sq. Ft. and, therefore, he recommended that the<\/p>\n
fair rent of the premises can be fixed in between Rs.14 – 18 per Sq. Ft.. The<\/p>\n
S.D.M., on consideration of the report, submitted by the Special Officer of<\/p>\n
Jugsalai Municipality, Jamshedpur, by the impugned order dated 18.07.2002,<\/p>\n
contained in Annexure-3, fixed the fair rent of the premises in question of<\/p>\n
both the shops @Rs.15\/- per Sq. Ft.\n<\/p>\n
            The respondents-tenants, being aggrieved by the order passed by the<\/p>\n
Rent Controller, preferred appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, East<\/p>\n
Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, which were registered as H.R.C. Appeals. The Deputy<\/p>\n
Commissioner, by the impugned Order dated 22.10.2002, contained in<\/p>\n
Annexure-4 to the writ petitions, after hearing the parties, set aside the order<\/p>\n
passed by the S.D.M. And remanded the matter back to him by holding as<\/p>\n
follows:-\n<\/p>\n
  (i)     M\/s. Narbheram Leasing Company Pvt. Limited was allotted the<\/p>\n
          premises by TISCO for running a motor garage and a sum of Rs.180\/-<\/p>\n
          per month was being paid by way of rent to TISCO.\n<\/p>\n
  (ii)    M\/s. Narbheram Leasing Company Pvt. Limited, by violating the terms<\/p>\n
          and conditions of the lease, are realising excess rent after constructing<\/p>\n
          shop in the premises.\n<\/p>\n
  (iii)   Fixing the fair rent of the premises in question by comparing the rent<\/p>\n
          of Yes Kamal Complex, was not justified since Yes Kamal Complex was<\/p>\n
          a newly constructed building and it was having all sorts of facilities.<\/p>\n
            On the basis of the above findings, the Deputy Commissioner,<\/p>\n
directed the Sub Divisional Officer to consider and pass order in the case<\/p>\n
afresh. He also directed the Deputy Collector, Tata Lease to make enquiry and<\/p>\n
take action as to whether the petitioner was violating the terms of the lease<\/p>\n
with the TISCO.\n<\/p>\n
          The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order passed by the appellate<\/p>\n
authority i.e. Deputy Commissioner, preferred a revision before the<\/p>\n
Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division. The Revisional Court, by the<\/p>\n
impugned Order dated 25.02.2003, as contained in Annexure-5, dismissed<\/p>\n
both the revision applications by affirming the Order passed by the Deputy<\/p>\n
Commissioner i.e. the appellate authority.\n<\/p>\n
         Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
submitted that the impugned Orders passed by the appellate authority i.e. the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner, are beyond the purview, scope and jurisdiction of the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner. He had no jurisdiction or authority to direct to take<\/p>\n
action against the petitioner for the alleged violation of the terms and<\/p>\n
conditions of the lease with TISCO. The Deputy Commissioner had no<\/p>\n
jurisdiction also to direct the Deputy Collector, Tata Lease to make enquiry if<\/p>\n
the terms of the lease was being violated by the petitioner. He further<\/p>\n
submitted that the orders of the Sub Divisional Officer, which were based on<\/p>\n
the basis of the enquiry report submitted by the Special Officer, Jugsalai<\/p>\n
Municipality, were perfectly legal and valid wherein, it was held that the rent<\/p>\n
of the commercial premises similarly situated were in between Rs.5 – 28 per<\/p>\n
Sq. Ft. but since in a similar case, the fair rent was fixed at Rs.12\/- and,<\/p>\n
therefore, he fixed the fair rent at Rs.15\/- per Sq. Ft.<\/p>\n
         On the other hand, Mr. Ananda Sen, learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
the respondents, submitted that so far the first portion of the order of the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner fixing rent @Rs.15\/- per Sq. Ft. is concerned, the same is<\/p>\n
not at all justified since even according to the report of the Special Officer,<\/p>\n
the rent prevalent in the area was in between Rs.5 – 28 per Sq. Ft. and the<\/p>\n
Special Officer has wrongly compared the shops situated in the building<\/p>\n
namely Yash Kamal Complex which is a newly constructed complex with all<\/p>\n
amenities and, therefore, the rent of the shops situated in the Yash Kamal<\/p>\n
Complex were naturally higher since the building was a new one and all sorts<\/p>\n
of facilities was there and, therefore, the Deputy Commissioner has rightly<\/p>\n
remanded the matter back to the S.D.O. to pass a fresh order in accordance<\/p>\n
with law.\n<\/p>\n
          So far the second part of the Order of the Deputy Commissioner is<\/p>\n
concerned, whereby the Deputy Commissioner directed to make enquiry and<\/p>\n
to take action against the petitioner for alleged violation of the terms of lease,<\/p>\n
Mr. Ananda Sen submitted that he cannot support that part of the order since<\/p>\n
it was beyond the scope of Section 5 of BBC Act and jurisdiction of the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n
         In view of the submissions made by the parties, the only point which<\/p>\n
has to be considered in the present writ petitions are as to whether the fair<\/p>\n
rents fixed by the S.D.O. – cum – House Rent controller, on the basis of the<\/p>\n
enquiry report submitted by the Special Officer, was legal and valid and<\/p>\n
whether the appellate authority was justified in setting aside the orders of the<\/p>\n
House Rent Controller and remanding the matter back for fresh consideration.<\/p>\n
         From perusal of the Annexure-2, i.e. Enquiry Report submitted by the<\/p>\n
Special Officer, it appears that he made the spot enquiry by visiting the<\/p>\n
building where the shops in question are situated and also the Commercial<\/p>\n
Yash Kamal Building situated in the Bistupur area and on enquiry and local<\/p>\n
inspection made in presence of both the parties, he found that the rent of the<\/p>\n
shops situated in that area was ranging in between Rs.6 – 28 per Sq. Ft.<\/p>\n
         On considering of the facts mentioned in the report, the Special<\/p>\n
Officer recommended for fixation of rent in between Rs.14 – 18 per Sq. Ft..<\/p>\n
From the order of the Deputy Commissioner, it appears that he found fixation<\/p>\n
of rent to be not justified because that Yash Kamal Complex was a newly<\/p>\n
constructed building whereas, the building in which the shops in question was<\/p>\n
old one and, therefore, he come to the conclusion that the rent of the two<\/p>\n
buildings cannot be compared in fixing fair rent of the shops situated in the<\/p>\n
old building. He also held that Yash Kamal building is a new building and all<\/p>\n
sorts of facilities are available in the said building.<\/p>\n
         In order to find out the correctness of the findings of the Deputy<\/p>\n
Commissioner, I have gone through the enquiry report submitted by the<\/p>\n
Special Officer, which has been annexed in the writ petition as well as the<\/p>\n
other documents annexed with the writ petition and I find that there was<\/p>\n
nothing on the record before the Deputy Commissioner to arrive at such a<\/p>\n
conclusion. Such finding of the Deputy Commissioner is certainly not based on
\n       the materials on record. He could not have decided the appeal on the basis of<\/p>\n
      his own personal knowledge.\n<\/p>\n
              I further find from the order of the Sub Divisional Officer i.e. the<\/p>\n
      Rent Controller that he, on consideration of several factors, has fixed the fair<\/p>\n
      rent at Rs.15\/- per Sq. Ft. , which, in my view, cannot be said to be illegal or<\/p>\n
      invalid or unjustified for any reason.\n<\/p>\n
             For the reasons stated above, both the writ petitions are allowed.<\/p>\n
      The Orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner dated 22.10.2002 in H.R.C.<\/p>\n
      Appeal No. 25 of 2001 – 02 and H.R.C. Appeal No. 24\/2002 – 03 as well as the<\/p>\n
      Orders dated 25.02.2003 passed by the Commissioner South Chhotanagpur<\/p>\n
      Division in H.R.C. Revision No. 167\/2002 and 167A\/2002 are hereby set aside<\/p>\n
      and the order of the Sub Divisional Officer dated 18.07.2002 as contained in<\/p>\n
      Annexure-3, is hereby affirmed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                   (Amareshwar Sahay, J.)
\nRC\/\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) NO. 2327 OF 2003 with W.P.(C) NO. 2328 OF 2003 M\/S. Narbheram Leasing Company Pvt. Limited … … Petitioner[In both Cases] -versus- State of Jharkhand and others … … Respondents[in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1607,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010"},"wordCount":1607,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010","name":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-14T12:26:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-narbheram-leasing-co-plt-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-19-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.Narbheram Leasing Co.(P)Lt vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 19 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}