{"id":47184,"date":"2010-03-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-16T11:07:34","modified_gmt":"2018-08-16T05:37:34","slug":"siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 598 of 2004()\n\n\n1. SIBY MANI, S\/O.MANI, THEKKEKARAKADUPPIL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.C.THOMAS S\/O.CHACKO, KONNAKKAL HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.R.REGU S\/O.P.K.RAGHAVAN,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :15\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                    -------------------------------\n                  C.R.P.NO.598 OF 2004 ()\n                  -----------------------------------\n          Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
      The revision is directed against the order passed by the<\/p>\n
learned Sub Judge Kattappana in E.A.No.82 of 2003 in<\/p>\n
E.P.No.63 of 2000 in O.S.No.91 of 1997. Revision petitioner is<\/p>\n
the decree holder. The decree which is being executed is one<\/p>\n
passed in a suit for money. Before passing of the decree there<\/p>\n
was an interim attachment over an item of immovable<\/p>\n
property belonging to the defendant\/judgment debtor. That<\/p>\n
attachment, it is submitted, had been made absolute by the<\/p>\n
trial court before passing of the decree. In execution of the<\/p>\n
decree, when the decree holder proceeded for sale of that<\/p>\n
property and in fact at the stage after settling proclamation<\/p>\n
and publication and the property brought for sale, a third<\/p>\n
party moved an application claiming title over the property<\/p>\n
under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The<\/p>\n
decree holder had resisted that application in which disputing<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                      2<\/span><\/p>\n
the claim raised by that third party, inter alia, it was<\/p>\n
contended that if at all there was a transfer, that transfer is a<\/p>\n
fraudulent transfer hit by Section 53 of the Transfer of<\/p>\n
Property Act as it had been effected by the transferee<\/p>\n
(defendant) to defeat his creditors. The learned Sub Judge,<\/p>\n
after considering the materials placed over the claim petition<\/p>\n
(E.A.No.21 of 2002) allowed the claim and lifted the<\/p>\n
attachment. While disposing of that claim petition in its order,<\/p>\n
the learned Sub Judge reserved the right of the decree holder<\/p>\n
to canvass his case that the transfer in favour of the claimant<\/p>\n
was vitiated as a fraudulent transfer under Section 53 of the<\/p>\n
Transfer of Properties Act in proper proceedings. Pursuant to<\/p>\n
that order, the decree holder moved an application E.A.No.82<\/p>\n
of 2003 seeking a declaration that the property over which the<\/p>\n
attachment subsisted, but, which had been lifted allowing the<\/p>\n
claim, was a fraudulent transfer covered by Section 53 of the<\/p>\n
Transfer of Property Act. In that application, the judgment<\/p>\n
debtor and also the claimant were made as the respondents.<\/p>\n
The 2nd respondent, the claimant, alone resisted that<\/p>\n
application filing objections in which among other contentions<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                     3<\/span><\/p>\n
the maintainability of the petition in the execution court was<\/p>\n
also challenged. The learned Sub Judge after considering the<\/p>\n
materials placed and hearing both sides dismissed the<\/p>\n
application of the decree holder, and that order is challenged<\/p>\n
in the revision.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     2.   I heard the counsel on both sides.      The learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the decree holder relying on a number of judicial<\/p>\n
pronouncements rendered by this Court and also that of the<\/p>\n
apex court contended that the petition filed before the<\/p>\n
execution court seeking a declaration that a transfer effected<\/p>\n
by the judgment debtor is vitiated as a fraudulent transfer<\/p>\n
under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act is perfectly<\/p>\n
maintainable. To my query, the learned counsel for the decree<\/p>\n
holder submitted that such an application is maintainable<\/p>\n
under Order XXI Rule 58 (2) of the CPC. I cannot agree.<\/p>\n
Order XXI Rule 58 reads thus:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
          58.    Adjudication of claims to, or
\n          objections to attachment of, property:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          (1) Where any claim is preferred to, or any<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
          objection is made to the attachment or, any
\n          property attached in execution of a decree
\n          on the ground that such property is not
\n          liable to such attachment, the Court shall
\n          proceed to adjudicate upon the claim or
\n          objection in accordance with the provisions
\n          herein contained:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                Provided that     no   such   claim  or
\n          objection shall be entertained-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                (a)   where, before the claim is
\n          preferred or objection is made the property
\n          attached has already been sold; or<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                (b)  where the Court considers that
\n          the claim or objection was designedly or
\n          unnecessarily delayed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          (2)    All questions (including questions
\n          relating to right, title or interest in the
\n          property attached) arising between the
\n          parties   to    a   proceeding     or   their
\n          representatives under this rule and relevant
\n          to the adjudication of the claim or objection,
\n          shall be determined by the Court dealing
\n          with the claim or objection and not by a
\n          separate suit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 (sub rules (3) to (5) are omitted
\n                 as not relevant)<\/p>\n
According to the counsel, the application moved by the decree<\/p>\n
holder is entertainable under sub rule (2) of Rule 58 of Order<\/p>\n
XXI of the CPC. True, that all questions relating to right, title<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                      5<\/span><\/p>\n
or interest in the property attached as between the decree<\/p>\n
holder\/judgment debtor and also the claimant have to be<\/p>\n
decided when a claim petition is moved under Order XXI Rule<\/p>\n
58 of the CPC by a third party over a property which had been<\/p>\n
attached as if it belonged to the judgment debtor for<\/p>\n
satisfaction of the decree.       In fact, it is a triumvirate<\/p>\n
proceeding wherein the claimant, who have set up the claim<\/p>\n
over the attached property, the decree holder and judgment<\/p>\n
debtor are all necessary parties.       As between them the<\/p>\n
decision entered in that proceedings is conclusive and final<\/p>\n
and it is open to a challenge only in the manner provided by<\/p>\n
the Code. The order passed under Order XXI Rule 58 of the<\/p>\n
CPC is deemed to be a decree from which an appeal is<\/p>\n
provided.   Admittedly, in the claim petition moved by the<\/p>\n
claimant, an adjudication was made by the court as<\/p>\n
contemplated by the Rule and a decision had been entered<\/p>\n
upholding the right, title and interest of the claimant over the<\/p>\n
property, with the result the attachment was lifted.        The<\/p>\n
disposal of the claim petition by the order of the court which is<\/p>\n
deemed to be a decree remains unchallenged by the decree<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                      6<\/span><\/p>\n
holder. The arguments canvassed by the learned counsel that<\/p>\n
after the disposal of such petition in view of the observations<\/p>\n
made by the execution court that his right to challenge the<\/p>\n
transfer effected in favour of the claimant was vitiated by<\/p>\n
fraud as under Section 53 of the Transfer of Properties Act<\/p>\n
can be considered and adjudicated upon under sub rule (2) of<\/p>\n
Rule 58 of Order XXI of the CPC is meritless since that rule is<\/p>\n
applicable only in adjudication of a claim petition. Order XXI<\/p>\n
of the CPC does not confer any right on a decree holder nay to<\/p>\n
any other person to call upon the execution court to determine<\/p>\n
the proprietary title of the judgment debtor over any property<\/p>\n
belonging to him whether it is vitiated as a fraudulent transfer<\/p>\n
or otherwise. If at all the decree holder has any such case, it<\/p>\n
is for him to challenge it by way of a separate suit as provided<\/p>\n
by law. Whether such a suit is entertainable in respect of a<\/p>\n
property under attachment, after a decision is entered in a<\/p>\n
proceeding under Order XXI Rule 58 of the CPC, which I have<\/p>\n
already pointed out is a triumvirate proceeding, wherein the<\/p>\n
judgment debtor is also a party, is a different question to be<\/p>\n
considered, over which I am not expressing any opinion in the<\/p>\n
CRP.598\/04                     7<\/span><\/p>\n
present case.   The dismissal of the petition moved by the<\/p>\n
decree holder by the court below, in the above circumstances,<\/p>\n
does not suffer from any infirmity, leave alone jurisdictional<\/p>\n
infirmity, and hence the revision is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                           S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                        JUDGE<\/p>\n
prp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 598 of 2004() 1. SIBY MANI, S\/O.MANI, THEKKEKARAKADUPPIL, … Petitioner Vs 1. P.C.THOMAS S\/O.CHACKO, KONNAKKAL HOUSE, … Respondent 2. P.R.REGU S\/O.P.K.RAGHAVAN, For Petitioner :SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE (SR.) For Respondent :SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR The Hon’ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN Dated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSiby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1190,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010"},"wordCount":1190,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010","name":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-16T05:37:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siby-mani-vs-p-c-thomas-on-15-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Siby Mani vs P.C.Thomas on 15 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47184\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}