{"id":47422,"date":"2008-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-28T16:46:58","modified_gmt":"2018-02-28T11:16:58","slug":"the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>_- M  &#8211;~&#8230;..m&#8230;&#8230;. -nnw\ufb02 uvulu ur nmmamlm -rum\u00bb: scum&#8221; as KARNATAKA men COURT OF KAMMAKA MGM coun<\/p>\n<p>E&#8217;? &#8220;mm mari $903&#8242;: 0? Kammrmm, BANGAL\u00a7\u00a71RE:VV: V   &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3Z3&amp;&#8217;E&#8221;E\u00a7} Ti-ES Tm: 22% my my mmaaa         <\/p>\n<p>SEEM T     X<br \/>\nTm Hsi}I=?&#8217;3\u00a7.\u00abE mmmcm I~3;1a,1i.a;&lt;&#039;.::4:s.1:\u00bb1z\u00a7Qsz-I mg     <\/p>\n<p>BE EP\u00a5:~ \u00bb<br \/>\n31$ amszmaz, cgmmm\ufb01 .;     V<br \/>\nI\u20ac3R&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;fi,, MVARAGEM;  &amp;  L<br \/>\nE\u00a5\ufb01V.&amp;H2%GERE,_ %%%%<br \/>\nK$R&#8217;FI: aamwmammg  _<br \/>\nK.\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7za.\u00e9a,    %<br \/>\nBazmsma\ufb01 27,; % %   <\/p>\n<p> A      PETTTIONER<\/p>\n<p>{av am:  ,3<br \/>\nARE:-~ V A A<\/p>\n<p>1 smfsmaamm<br \/>\nsgawmm <\/p>\n<p>_ I3A\u00a5a$rm*E.%E:J \u00a3.m:3tIT,<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a7\u00a7&#8217;!URAL<\/p>\n<p>2 A ..La;%-.*v.;%$&lt;g%s*::j%g:;1\u00a7:*:* \u00a3\ufb011\\@m8I\u20ac*I~i&#039;ER,<br \/>\nCEzf}\u00a7\u00e9T&#039;R\ufb01LLH\u00a7G AIIIT-I\u20ac&#039;3RITY,<br \/>\nma\ufb01a smwmasw,<\/p>\n<p>Q\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01- \ufb01.<\/p>\n<p>ow&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>-urrnw\ufb01 ?__..,&#8221;. nnuuunannm ruuri uuum Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH \u20acC3i.3R3&#8242; OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQURF OF \u00a7\u20acAWM&amp;T\ufb01zKA Hi6-H (SOUR<\/p>\n<p>3 :31s:m&#8217;1Y CQ2k\ufb02!dZISSOHiER mam  V ifj&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>AH\u00a7%U\ufb01EAUHKm\ufb02Z<\/p>\n<p>Emma swsmm .ac:.T,<br \/>\nRE_\ufb01\u00a7G\u00a7AL~I,<\/p>\n<p> BEAV\ufb01H;\n<\/p>\n<p>ammmmwa RQAD, BmwcmLo1e\u00a3:., A  <\/p>\n<p>   F5%smNaEri Ts<\/p>\n<p>gs&#8217;; gm: 3 3 mxsrm, 1=&#8217;\u00a3;:e7\u00bba:;<br \/>\nms @929, Is  if\ufb02nm\u00e9  226 &amp; 227<br \/>\nmy \ufb01rm :2   To mass<\/p>\n<p>m \ufb01R1\u00a7ER?&#8217;=,DT.  mx-a, ETC.<\/p>\n<p> Ar$z:.V\u00a7z&#8217;p1t:\u00ae&#8217; um&#8217; ;syhaarmg&#8217; nah<br \/>\n izhg  th\u00e9v f$Zim\\vviz1g;.<\/p>\n<p>GEDER<\/p>\n<p>V A &#8216;  \u20ac?f%i_\u00a7Ls\u00a7&lt;&#039;:;\u00a3t pewican, the pa\ufb01&#039;&amp;::2zm* has prayed \u00a3232.&quot; a<br \/>\n ai mziomx: as quash the arder dam<br \/>\n waged by tm 3rd. reapmnclent app-mint:<br \/>\n ms pay the yatuity amum: to t&#039;ne \ufb01at<\/p>\n<p>WA,<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;_&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;  -M-mu  ..,&#8230;.mm.m nnun MUUMKI W mmmmm mm comm or amnmmm mm mam 05 mmnmm mm-E cow<\/p>\n<p>zmpammai &#8216;G32&#8242; E31511&#8242; 1% Hm&#8217; z:om1\u00e9er&#8217; a\ufb01nn 36    H<\/p>\n<p>acr\ufb01umremtlamdbyhim.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. \ufb01rm \ufb01rst raspmndmx   <\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01\ufb01aner ca:-pamzam Z   on\n<\/p>\n<p>31.:a.2r2\u00a3;3. at am mm at fegpondexxt,<br \/>\nthe pefminner mm   and<br \/>\notlmr re%*ame21t&#8221;   the \ufb01rs&#8217;:<br \/>\nrespax\ufb01ant   &#8221;  rmpondent<br \/>\nCnn\ufb01n\ufb02\ufb01g  in paymant at&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>yaaxity &#8216;V   Autfmrity wide ocrder<br \/>\n  H  &#8220;&#8221; fixe pe\ufb01tmxusm ta pay 8. sum of<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01  53:: gratuity ammznt.\n<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7i::rA1[&#8216;::im*, the appellataa authorigr clirwmd<br \/>\n&#8216; Zta pay the di\ufb01mmnce in gmmity amcnxxat<br \/>\n af 3% ysars uaf aearvkze rwxdewd by tbs \ufb01at<\/p>\n<p> V  , V _  V&#8217; gm, \u00a7-Iencze \ufb02aw&#8217; writ peti\ufb01nn by the Corporahon.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02ux\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> vw &#8212;\u00bbmA-A _.\\w: &#8230;-&#8230;&#8230;.m.\u00bb-\u00abW-. mun \u00ab..e..mm ur EKAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT C)? KARNATAKA HIGH COUR? mm \u00a7mnNA?m&lt;A men com:<\/p>\n<p>3.; I\ufb01r\u00e9 \ufb02  an both the   <\/p>\n<p>}&#8217;\u00a7*&amp;t&#8221;l.1s&amp;\u20aci\u00a7ke&amp;$i1&#8217;$\u00a5VI&#8217;i3:p&amp;p6r8.<\/p>\n<p>4.. It ia 11-36.: in dispute   <\/p>\n<p>the \ufb01rat r\ufb01pex\ufb01ent an<br \/>\nmm it ?m we in dispute   the<br \/>\na$r\u00a7vmes mm   and he<br \/>\nmwetl an    on\n<\/p>\n<p>3.a.1a2.ga:::=;.3.   amount,<br \/>\nthe pmianm=a\u00abt\u00a7au\u00a2  ~pe\u00ab:-ind tram 9610.196?<br \/>\nix: n1ns.1\u00a7?;   he has not worked for<\/p>\n<p>   dtzm &#8216; that pans&#8217; (1..\n<\/p>\n<p>  _ 5.. A It :53  poaitzmn (sf law that the burden&#8217;: of<\/p>\n<p>thgt\ufb01\u00e9wvrhad \ufb01r mam than 266 days in a yaar<br \/>\n :13 an tbs frat rwpmndma In the \ufb01tant:<br \/>\n   gmt xmpnndgm dgpwed b%ra the Contrnlhng&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01rm&#8217;: has was appc1n;ted&#8217; rm E\u00a75.1CL196&#8242;? as daily&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wagm\ufb01  ha warlm mars than 24%} days in aa yw: upto<\/p>\n<p>IV<\/p>\n<p>(j&#8217;\\f\\4<\/p>\n<p>197;, mm; the amt mpandm has disc1wW &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p> human as!&#8217; pmmng&#8221; that has wr:rr},:s:\ufb01*\ufb01:rf_   V<\/p>\n<p>2443 days\u00bb in a gym baa-rm \\\\<\/p>\n<p>pe.tia%tme3,&#8221;s Wm are the cm;3ky$rVar\u00a7&#8221;&#8216;i1 pa s,s:&#8217;\u00a7isi\u00a7i1  <\/p>\n<p> t riacmnmztm   to<\/p>\n<p>39%    gm   me<br \/>\n\ufb02aacuwnm     1961<br \/>\nm 19?: m}a:i:zg&#8217;  :&#8217;s:?~at mpomimt.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u00a7%ere was    to produce<br \/>\nan \u00e9mcxzzaw\ufb01zs   Shoe The<br \/>\nhave mi gmdmaa af ewu:3.enx:e&#8217; available<\/p>\n<p>  \u20ac&#8217;\ufb01?i:&#8217;~&amp;&amp;w&#8221;%&#8217;s\u00a2  &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; H  emce has ta be drawn awn&#8217; t<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;  E13&#8217;-rt the appe\ufb02ante autlzwrity<\/p>\n<p> riglitizz mmdga tlaat. thsc am-im rendered by the<\/p>\n<p>uunnnumammm FMWJFI MWMRI In?!&#8221; WKKWMEHKR HIWH         <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  &#8216;W 1&#8217;. \ufb01mm 55.1&amp;.,195&#8242;? 1:: 01.05.1971 is has he<\/p>\n<p>  far the- pllrmtz: at calculatmg me<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I Vwiwl\ufb02lwu &#8216;V10?!<\/p>\n<p>  V  &#8216; V _  43%&#8217; gatixiign cam Emptxgned ardar page-ad by the<\/p>\n<p>was<\/p>\n<p> autwritgr is in aawrdanae with law and I \ufb01nd<\/p>\n<p>-v-I-n-I vau-\n<\/p>\n<p>rm ju\ufb01t\ufb01ahls grzaum ts intarfem with t.&#8217;r1\u00a2 mm.<\/p>\n<p>,-\\,3&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>C)<br \/>\n\ufb01  \/3 1&amp;5 pa\ufb01tian in lamb}: raajwhaci with&#8221; n&lt;;i&#039;ij&#039;nr}     \u00ab<br \/>\n$3 t\ufb01  . .\n<\/p>\n<pre>  55\/.    %\nIudge~--   \ndil*\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>.3300 mm&#8221;: $_.z<\/p>\n<p>_\u00bb 1515.5:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 Author: H N Das _- M &#8211;~&#8230;..m&#8230;&#8230;. -nnw\ufb02 uvulu ur nmmamlm -rum\u00bb: scum&#8221; as KARNATAKA men COURT OF KAMMAKA MGM coun E&#8217;? &#8220;mm mari $903&#8242;: 0? Kammrmm, BANGAL\u00a7\u00a71RE:VV: V &#8221; 3Z3&amp;&#8217;E&#8221;E\u00a7} Ti-ES Tm: 22% my my mmaaa SEEM T X Tm [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":715,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\",\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008"},"wordCount":715,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008","name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-28T11:16:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-p-kailasam-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri P Kailasam on 22 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47422\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}