{"id":47425,"date":"2005-04-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-04-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005"},"modified":"2014-12-09T23:29:26","modified_gmt":"2014-12-09T17:59:26","slug":"the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","title":{"rendered":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS           \n\nDated: 26\/04\/2005 \n\nCoram \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. MARKANDEY KATJU, THE CHIEF JUSTICE            \nand \nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA         \n\nWrit Appeal No. 828 of 2005\n\n\nThe Tuticorin\nThermal Power Station \nIndustrial Co-operative Society Ltd.,\nTuticorin-628 004.                              ...  Appellant\n\n-Vs-\n\n1. The Deputy Regional \n Director,\n   Sub-Regional Office, E.S.I.Corporation,\n   1-B, Old Post Office Street,\n   Thallakulam, Madurai-1.\n\n2. The Joint Regional Director,\n   E.S.I.Corporation,\n   1-B, Old Post Office Street,\n   Thallakulam, Madurai-1.\n\n3. The Regional Director,\n   E.S.I.Corporation, Chennai-600 034.\n\n4. Insurance Inspector Revenue Recovery,\n    Sub-Regional Office,\n   E.S.I.Corporation,\n   1-B, Old Post Office Street,\n   Thallakulam, Madurai-1.         ...  Respondents\n\n        Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters  Patent  against  the\norder passed in W.P.No.15433 of 1997 dated 17.12.2004. \n\n!For appellant :  Mr.R.Balasubramanian\n\n^For Respondent :  ---\n\n:JUDGMENT   \n<\/pre>\n<p>(Judgment of the Court was delivered by<br \/>\nThe Hon&#8217;ble Chief Justice.)<\/p>\n<p>                This  writ appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment<br \/>\nof the learned single Judge dated 17.12.2004.  Heard the learned  counsel  for<br \/>\nthe appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>                2.   The  appellant  filed  the  writ petition challenging the<br \/>\ndemand notice issued under section 45(B) of the Employees State Insurance Act.<br \/>\nIn our opinion, the petitioner\/appellant has a  clear  alternative  remedy  of<br \/>\nfiling  an  application  under section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act<br \/>\nbefore the Employees State Insurance Court.  We cannot approve  this  kind  of<br \/>\npractice  of  directly  filing  writ  petition  in  this  Court  when  a clear<br \/>\nalternative remedy is available.  We have repeatedly held in <a href=\"\/doc\/1555058\/\">Indian  Additives<br \/>\nLimited v.  Indian Additives Employees Union,<\/a> 2005 Writ L.R.  22 and in <a href=\"\/doc\/683725\/\">Madura<br \/>\nSugars Staff Union  &amp;  others  v.  Madura Sugar Mills,<\/a> 2005 Writ L.R.  25 that<br \/>\nwhen alternative remedy is available ordinarily that must be availed of.  That<br \/>\nis the settled legal principle that has been repeatedly held by the Supreme<\/p>\n<p>Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/321104\/\">Premier Automobiles Limited v.  Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke,<\/a> 197 6 I SCC<br \/>\n496, <a href=\"\/doc\/1696077\/\">The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v.  Krishna Kant, AIR<\/a> 1995<br \/>\nSC 1715,  <a href=\"\/doc\/1885496\/\">Whirlpool  Corpoation  v.  Registrar of Trade Marks,<\/a> 1998 (8) SCC 1,<br \/>\nand <a href=\"\/doc\/1452602\/\">U.P.State Bridge Corporation Ltd.  &amp;  others  v.    U.P.Rajya  Setu  Nigam<br \/>\nS.Karamchari Sangh,<\/a> (2004) 4 SCC 268.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3.  Hence we dismiss the writ appeal and also the writ petition on the<br \/>\nground  of alternative remedy before the Employees State Insurance Court under<br \/>\nSection 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.  If the appellant files an application under Section 75 of the  Act<br \/>\nwithin one month from today, the same will be entertained by the E.  S.I Court<br \/>\nwithout   raising  any  objection  as  to  limitation  and  shall  be  decided<br \/>\nexpeditiously thereafter in accordance with  law  after  hearing  the  parties<br \/>\nconcerned  without  being  influenced  by  the  judgment of the learned single<br \/>\nJudge.  Consequently, WAMP No.1570 of 2005 is also dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Index:Yes<br \/>\nInternet:Yes<\/p>\n<p>ns\/pv<\/p>\n<p>Copy to:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.  The Deputy Regional Director<br \/>\nSub-Regional Office, E.S.I.  Corporation,<br \/>\n1-B, Old Post Office Street,<br \/>\nThallakulam, Madurai-1<\/p>\n<p>2.  The Joint Regional Director,<br \/>\nE.S.I.  Corporation,<br \/>\n1-B, Old Post Office Street,<br \/>\nThallakulam, Madurai-1.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.  The Regional Director,<br \/>\nE.S.I.  Corporation, Chennai &#8211; 600 034.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  Insurance Inspector Revenue Recovery,<br \/>\nSub-Regional Office,<br \/>\nE.S.I.  Corporation,<br \/>\n1-B, Old Post Office Street,<br \/>\nThallakulam, Madurai-1.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 26\/04\/2005 Coram THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. MARKANDEY KATJU, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE F.M.IBRAHIM KALIFULLA Writ Appeal No. 828 of 2005 The Tuticorin Thermal Power Station Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd., Tuticorin-628 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005\",\"datePublished\":\"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\"},\"wordCount\":395,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\",\"name\":\"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005","datePublished":"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005"},"wordCount":395,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005","name":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-09T17:59:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-tuticorin-vs-the-deputy-regional-on-26-april-2005#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Tuticorin vs The Deputy Regional on 26 April, 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47425\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}