{"id":48013,"date":"2009-02-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-26T07:38:21","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T02:08:21","slug":"jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n             AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                    CWP No.16605 of 1999\n                                 Date of decision: 11.2.2009\n\nJai Bhagwan Sharma and others\n                                                   -----Petitioners\n                              Vs.\n\n\nState of Haryana and others\n                                                   --Respondents\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL\n          HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN\n\nPresent: Mr. RK Malik, Sr.Advocate with\n         Mr.Vikas Malik and Mandeep                      Kaushik,\n         Advocates.\n\n         Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG.Haryana for the\n         State.\n\n\n\nAdarsh Kumar Goel,J.\n<\/pre>\n
1.        This petition has been filed for a direction to give<\/p>\n
appointment letters to the petitioners on the basis of their<\/p>\n
selection on 22.5.1999 to the posts of Patwaris.\n<\/p>\n
2.        Case of the petitioners is that on 7.9.1997, an<\/p>\n
advertisement was issued for filling up 1055 posts of Patwaris
\n CWP No.16605 of 1999                                       2<\/span><\/p>\n
by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission. Written test was<\/p>\n
held on 29.11.1998, which was followed by interview between<\/p>\n
8.4.1999 to 20.4.1999. Result was announced on 22.5.1999.<\/p>\n
1055 candidates were selected. 288 candidates have joined as<\/p>\n
petitioners in this petition. It is stated that there are other<\/p>\n
petitions also by some of the candidates. After selection, the<\/p>\n
petitioners were not given appointments. The petitioners<\/p>\n
served a legal notice dated 18.10.1999 but no reply was<\/p>\n
received. The present petition was filed in this Court in<\/p>\n
November 1999.\n<\/p>\n
3.          Contention raised in the petition is that the<\/p>\n
petitioners having been duly selected, have acquired a right to<\/p>\n
appointment.\n<\/p>\n
4.          In the written statement filed by the State, the<\/p>\n
petition has been opposed by submitting that no right of<\/p>\n
appointment accrues merely on selection. Due to increased<\/p>\n
expenditure liability on account of pay revision and other<\/p>\n
factors, there was rise in fiscal deficit of the State and the<\/p>\n
Government had taken a decision not to offer appointments to<\/p>\n
selected candidates.\n<\/p>\n
 CWP No.16605 of 1999                                           3<\/span><\/p>\n
5.          In a further affidavit filed on 23.8.2001, it is stated<\/p>\n
that 1248 posts of Patwaris were advertised earlier and there<\/p>\n
was stay against appointments beyond 1248 advertised posts.\n<\/p>\n
6.          When a bunch of petitions came up for hearing<\/p>\n
earlier on August 2, 2005, the same were dismissed. Earlier,<\/p>\n
vide order dated 23.5.2000, the present writ petition was<\/p>\n
allowed on the ground of reasonable expectation of selected<\/p>\n
candidates to get appointment and a direction was issued to<\/p>\n
depute the petitioners for training in batches. However, on<\/p>\n
appeal, the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its judgment dated<\/p>\n
9.2.2001 in Civil Appeal No.1197 of 2001 (State of Haryana<\/p>\n
and others v. Jai Bhagwan Sharma and others<\/a>), set aside<\/p>\n
the order of this Court and remanded the matter for a fresh<\/p>\n
decision. Thereafter, the writ petitiosn were dismissed on<\/p>\n
2.8.2005. It was, however, made clear that candidates who had<\/p>\n
appeared, will be entitled to appear in fresh selection subject to<\/p>\n
eligibility and the Government will relax the condition of<\/p>\n
eligibility with regard to age. Against the said judgment, the<\/p>\n
petitioners approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court and their<\/p>\n
appeal was heard with the appeal of candidates selected on<\/p>\n
earlier occasion, which selections were quashed. The Hon’ble
\n CWP No.16605 of 1999                                           4<\/span><\/p>\n
Supreme Court set aside judgment of the High Court and<\/p>\n
remanded the matter without any discussion on the case of the<\/p>\n
present petitioners. The matter of other set of candidates<\/p>\n
selected in selections held in the year 1992 has been disposed<\/p>\n
of by a separate judgment today in CWP No.11526 of 1994<\/p>\n
(Rajpal Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others<\/a>).\n<\/p>\n
7.          We have heard learned counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n
8.          Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that<\/p>\n
the petitioners having been duly selected, were entitled to be<\/p>\n
appointed. Reliance has been placed on judgment dated<\/p>\n
7.2.2007 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Punajb<\/p>\n
and others v. Harcharan Singh and others, Civil Appeal<\/p>\n
No.3521 of 2006, judgment of this Court dated 31.1.2007 in<\/p>\n
Davender Kumar and others v. State and others, CWP<\/p>\n
No.16376 of 1999, wherein direction for appointment of<\/p>\n
Panchayat Secretaries was issued and judgment of Allahabad<\/p>\n
High Court in State of UP and another v. Rakesh Kumar,<\/p>\n
2004(1) SCT 34.\n<\/p>\n
9.          Learned counsel for the State submitted that the<\/p>\n
State had financial difficulty in appointing the petitioners but it<\/p>\n
has no objection to eligibility of the selected candidates being
\n CWP No.16605 of 1999                                           5<\/span><\/p>\n
relaxed with regard to the age in the fresh selections as and<\/p>\n
when held.\n<\/p>\n
10.          The question whether mere selection confers a right<\/p>\n
to be appointed, is well settled. Mere selection does not confer<\/p>\n
any right of appointment. Reference may be made to the law<\/p>\n
laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of UP v.<\/p>\n
Rajkumar Sharma,<\/a> (2006) 3 SCC 330, wherein it was<\/p>\n
observed:-\n<\/p>\n
                       “14. Selectees cannot claim the appointment
\n                as a matter of right. Mere inclusion of candidate’s
\n                name in the list does not confer any right to be
\n                selected, even if some of the vacancies remained
\n                unfilled and the candidates concerned cannot claim
\n                that they have been given a hostile discrimination.
\n                (See Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India AIR<\/a> 1991
\n                SC 1612; Asha Kaul v. State of J&K (1993) 2 SCC
\n                573; Union of India v. S.S. Uppal AIR<\/a> 1996 SC
\n                2340; Hanuman Prasad v. Union of India<\/a> (1996)10
\n                SCC 742; Bihar Public Service Commission v.
\n                State of Bihar (1997) 3 SCC 198: AIR 1997 SC
\n                2280; Syndicate Bank v. Shankar Paul AIR<\/a> 1997
\n                SC 3091, Vice-Chancellor, University of Allahabad
\n                v. Dr. Anand Prakash Mishra<\/a> (1997) 10 SCC 264;
\n                Punjab SEB v. Seema 1999 SCC (L&S) 629; All
\n                India SC & ST Employees’ Assn. v. A. Arthur Jeen
\n                AIR<\/a> 2001 SC 1851; Vinodan T. v. University of
\n CWP No.16605 of<\/span><\/a> 1999                                         6<\/p>\n
                Calicut (2002) 4 SCC 726; S. Renuka v. State of
\n                A.P. AIR<\/a> 2002 SC 1523 and Batiarani Gramiya
\n                Bank v. Pallab Kumar AIR<\/a> 2003 SC 4248.)”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
11.         No doubt, no public authority can act arbitrarily and<\/p>\n
every decision has to be fair and reasonable, Mere change of<\/p>\n
Government may not by itself be a valid ground to with-hold<\/p>\n
appointments of selected candidates, who may have been<\/p>\n
lawfully selected.\n<\/p>\n
12.         The question is whether a mandamus ban be issued<\/p>\n
at this stage for appointing the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n
13.         We are of the view that having regard to long time<\/p>\n
which has elapsed since the selection of the petitioners i.e.<\/p>\n
about 10 years and the settled law that the petitioners do not<\/p>\n
have any indefeasible right to appointment merely on the basis<\/p>\n
of selection, no case is made out for issuance of mandamus for<\/p>\n
appointment of the petitioners. The judgments relied upon<\/p>\n
being on individual facts are distinguishable. However, the<\/p>\n
petitioners having been once selected and having regard to the<\/p>\n
stand taken by the learned counsel for the State, we direct that<\/p>\n
the petitioners be given relaxation in eligibility as and when<\/p>\n
fresh selections for the said posts are made.
\n CWP No.16605 of 1999                                        7<\/span><\/p>\n
14.         The petition is disposed of.<\/p>\n
\n                                       (Adarsh Kumar Goel)\n                                                Judge\n\n\nFebruary 11, 2009                      (Jitendra Chauhan)\n'gs'                                             Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16605 of 1999 Date of decision: 11.2.2009 Jai Bhagwan Sharma and others —–Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others –Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1019,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009"},"wordCount":1019,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009","name":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-26T02:08:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jai-bhagwan-sharma-and-others-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-11-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jai Bhagwan Sharma And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}