{"id":48120,"date":"2009-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-06-15T01:22:48","modified_gmt":"2017-06-14T19:52:48","slug":"sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>               Central Information Commission\n                                                             CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/000691\n\n                                                           Dated 13h November, 2009\n\n\nName of the Applicant                  :   SH. R G SINGH\n\n\nName of the Public Authority           :   DEPARTMENT OF POST\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Complainant in the instant case had filed representations against his non<br \/>\n      promotion in HSG -II (BCR) against the CPMG UP Circle, Lucknow memo No.<br \/>\n      STA\/570-RR\/2002-I dated 24.11.03. A similar petition was subsequently filed<br \/>\n      before the DG Posts, New Delhi on 24.07.04 against the non lifting of the Efficiency<br \/>\n      Bar [EB] at the stage of Rs. 1800\/- to Rs. 1850\/-. It was the case of the<br \/>\n      Complainant that the case of EB deserved to be reconsidered. However having<br \/>\n      received no decision on his petition\/s, the Complainant filed two RTI Applications<br \/>\n      dated 19.12.06 with the CPIO, Dy. Directorate General (Personnel), Ministry of<br \/>\n      Communication &amp; IT, New Delhi seeking information about the Original Petition<br \/>\n      dated 24.07.04 regarding lifting of the Efficiency Bar. The Complainant also sought<br \/>\n      copy of decision arrived at by the DG Post in the representation dated 2.4.05,<br \/>\n      against decision of the CPMG UP Circle, Lucknow under letter No. STA\/570-<br \/>\n      RR\/2002-I dated 24.11.03 vide the second RTI application.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The CPIO forwarded the application to the office of the Directorate of Postal<br \/>\n      Services, CPMG vide letter dated 08.01.07 to examine the applications and reply to<br \/>\n      the Applicant in view of provisions of the RTI act 2005. However when despite<br \/>\n      sufficient passage of time, no information was received by the Applicant, he once<br \/>\n      again filed an application on 30.06.08 before the CPIO, Dy. Directorate General<br \/>\n      (Personnel), Ministry of Communication &amp; IT, New Delhi intimating him of the non<br \/>\n      receipt of any information. Being aggrieved at non receipt of any response nor<br \/>\n      information, the Complainant approached the Central Information Commission by<br \/>\n      filing the instant Complaint dated 11.07.09 reiterating his RTI request and give a<br \/>\n      factual narration of the case.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Commission passed an order dated 29.09.09 directing the CPIO to provide<br \/>\n      information as sought by the Complainant by 30th October 2009 and also issued a<br \/>\n      Show Cause notice upon the CPIO for non supply of information within stipulated<br \/>\n      period of time as provided in the RTI Act 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner scheduled the<br \/>\n      hearing on 13th November, 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    Sh. G P Bajpai, Asst. Superintendent Post was present for the Public Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    The Applicant was heard through Audio Conference during the hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>7.    The Commission is in receipt of a communication dated 10.11.09 from the O\/o<br \/>\n      CPMG, UP Circle, Lucknow stating that information to the RTI query was received in<br \/>\n      Postal Directorate and received at the O\/o CPMG, UP Circle, Lucknow on 08.01.07<br \/>\n      upon being forwarded therefrom. Due to non             satisfactory   service   of   the<br \/>\n      Complainant, financial benefit under BCR scheme was not granted to him upto<br \/>\n      2000 and this position duly communicated by a reasoned speaking order dated<br \/>\n      24.11.2003. Decision on the lifting of the EB was duly conveyed vide letter dated<br \/>\n      08.07.04. It was stated in the said submission of the Respondent that the<br \/>\n      information as sought by the Appellant were provided to him even by the ADPS,<br \/>\n      Kanpur vide letter dated 07.05.2007. It was further clarified by the Respondent<br \/>\n      that his representation had been forwarded\/transferred under Section 6 (3) of the<br \/>\n      RTI Act 2005 by Circle Office, Lucknow to Regional Office, Kanpur for further action<br \/>\n      from where it reached the O\/o SPOs Kanpur, Muffassil Division on 30.05.05, since<br \/>\n      he is the custodian of information. Meanwhile vide a communication dated 23.09.08<br \/>\n      the Respondent from the Kanpur Office had sought certain clarificatory information<br \/>\n      from the Complainant whereas no information was received from the Complainant.<br \/>\n      However the Complainant, heard through audio conference, contended that the<br \/>\n      Respondent&#8217;s submissions were incorrect and that information as sought by him<br \/>\n      had not been received till date.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.    The Commission observes that it is an admitted fact that the RTI application has<br \/>\n      been lying with the SPOs, Muffassil Division, Kanpur since 30.05.2005 and no<br \/>\n      communication nor information has been received therefrom ever since. Hence, the<br \/>\n      Commission directs the SPOs, Muffassil Division, Kanpur to show cause as to why a<br \/>\n      penalty of Rs.250\/- per day should not be imposed on him for not providing the<br \/>\n      information within the stipulated period of 1 month as given in the RTI Act, 2005. It<br \/>\n      is also observed that no explanation has been offered by the Respondent Public<br \/>\n      Authority to the Show Cause notice. Accordingly a penalty of Rs. 25,000\/- is being<br \/>\n      directed to be recovered from the salary of the CPIO, O\/o CPMG, UP Circle,<br \/>\n      Lucknow in five equal installments for violation of the provisions of the RTI Act<br \/>\n      2005 and non furnishing of response to the RTI application way beyond the<br \/>\n      stipulated period as provided in the RTI Act 2005. The penalty should be paid by<br \/>\n        way of a Demand Draft drawn in favour of &#8220;PAO, CAT&#8221; payable at New Delhi and<br \/>\n       send the same to Sh. G. Subramanian, Assistant Registrar, Central Information<br \/>\n       Commission. The first installment should reach by 15th Dec, 2009 and the final<br \/>\n       installment by 15th April 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.     The case is accordingly disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                    (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                            Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G. Subramanian)<br \/>\nAssistant Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.     Mr. R G Singh<br \/>\n       P A H S G II, BCR<br \/>\n       56, Gandhi Nagar<br \/>\n       Unnao<\/p>\n<p>2.     Mr. P K Misra<br \/>\n       The SPOs,<br \/>\n       Muffassil Division,<br \/>\n       Kanpur<\/p>\n<p>3.     The CPIO<br \/>\n       O\/o CPMG, UP Circle,<br \/>\n       Lucknow<\/p>\n<p>4.     Officer in charge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.     Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/C\/2009\/000691 Dated 13h November, 2009 Name of the Applicant : SH. R G SINGH Name of the Public Authority : DEPARTMENT OF POST Background 1. The Complainant in the instant case had filed representations against his non [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":862,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009"},"wordCount":862,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009","name":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-14T19:52:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sh-r-g-singh-vs-department-of-post-on-13-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sh. R G Singh vs Department Of Post on 13 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}