{"id":48542,"date":"2010-03-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010"},"modified":"2015-08-15T01:42:29","modified_gmt":"2015-08-14T20:12:29","slug":"james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 37296 of 2008(M)\n\n\n1. JAMES.N.CHACKO, NALLEPARAMBIL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BRANCH MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK LTD., OYOOR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.BABU (VETTAKALAYIL)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.JOHN MATHEW (RETD.JUDGE)\nSHRI S.VENKATASUBRAMONIA IYER(SR. ADVOCATE)\n\n Dated :03\/03\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.JOHN MATHEW\n                          (RETD. JUDGE)\n                                AND\n                          SRI.P.G.THAMPI\n                         (SENIOR ADVOCATE)\n          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    W.P.(C) NO.37296 OF 2008\n          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n              DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2010\n\n\n                           A W A R D\n\n\n\n\n     Learned counsel for the petitioner Adv. Mr.Biju stated that\n\nthe matter has been settled and the payment have been effected\n\nand execution proceedings are also closed and that the Writ\n\nPetition has become infructuous, Writ Petition closed.\n\n\n\n\n                                            K.JOHN MATHEW\n                                            (RETD. JUDGE)\n\n\n\n\n                                              P.G.THAMPI\n                                           (SENIOR ADVOCATE)\n\n\n\n\nss\/.\n\n\n? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\n+WP(C).No. 30846 of 2009(A)\n\n\n#1. P.M.SHARAF MUHAMMED,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n$1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS) &\n\n3. M.M.THOMAS, CHIEF TRANSPORT\n\n!                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF\n\n^                For Respondent  :SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA\n\n*Coram\n The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n% Dated :25\/02\/2010\n\n: O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n<\/p>\n
        —————————————————————–
\n          W.P.(C) Nos.30846\/09, 37306\/09, 115\/2010
\n                               & 5716\/2010\n<\/p>\n
        —————————————————————-
\n           Dated this the 25th day of February, 2010<\/p>\n
                             J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n
     In 2003, KSRTC regulations were amended providing that 15%<\/p>\n
of the posts in the category of Assistant Transport Officer and<\/p>\n
Administrative Officer will be filled up from among the qualified<\/p>\n
employees of the KSRTC. That regulation was under challenge<\/p>\n
before this court in WP(c).No.12159\/06 and connected cases. The<\/p>\n
writ petitions were disposed of by judgment dated 7th August, 2009<\/p>\n
holding that the appointments which were made in the meanwhile<\/p>\n
were irregular for want of consultation with PSC as required in terms<\/p>\n
of the provisions contained in the Kerala Public Service Commission<\/p>\n
(Additional Functions as respects the KSRTC) Act 1970 and the Rules<\/p>\n
framed there under. The petitioners              in WP(c).Nos.30846\/2009,<\/p>\n
37306\/2009 and 115\/2010 are persons who are appointed in the<\/p>\n
meanwhile to the post of Assistant Transport Officer. In the<\/p>\n
judgment referred to above, after having found that the<\/p>\n
appointments are invalid for want of consultation this court issued<\/p>\n
the following directions.\n<\/p>\n
WPC.Nos. 30846\/09& conn.\n<\/p>\n
                                    :2 :<\/span><\/p>\n
                        \"Taking    all  the   aforesaid           into\n                        consideration,    it  is   orderedfactors\n                                                             that  the\n                        Corporation     will  immediately    take   up\n<\/pre>\n
                        necessary follow up action to commence and
\n                        complete the consultation process with the
\n                        PSC. The State Government will also do the
\n                        needful and the PSC will ensure that such
\n                        proceedings are not held up having regard to
\n                        the fact that the regulations were conceived
\n                        some time in 2003. As of now, those who have
\n                        been given the benefit of the 2003 Regulations
\n                        would continue to enjoy the same provisionally
\n                        in terms of the orders of appointment issued
\n                        by the Managing Director in their cases and
\n                        any selection process could also be completed
\n                        as regards the 15% internal recruitment
\n                        candidates and even appointment orders and
\n                        any incumbent joining duty in any such posts,
\n                        would be provisional and subject to review by
\n                        the Managing Director on the basis of the final
\n                        outcome of the consultation process. These
\n                        writ petitions are ordered accordingly.”<\/p>\n
     2. Accordingly, the KSRTC took up the matter with the PSC<\/p>\n
and the PSC has issued letter dated 16.12.2009, which is produced<\/p>\n
as Ext.P9 in WP(c).No.5716\/2010.\n<\/p>\n
     3. In so far as WP(c)Nos.30846\/2010,37306\/2010 and<\/p>\n
115\/2020 filed by the appointees are concerned, what they claim is<\/p>\n
that since their appointment they are continuing in service, earned<\/p>\n
promotions but however are now being overlooked in the matter of<\/p>\n
WPC.Nos. 30846\/09& conn.\n<\/p>\n
                                  :3 :<\/span><\/p>\n
promotion to the post of Chief Transport Officer. On the other hand<\/p>\n
in WP(c).No.5716\/2010 filed by the Transport Democratic Front and<\/p>\n
another, what they contend is that now that in pursuance to the<\/p>\n
judgment of this court, the matter was taken up with the PSC and<\/p>\n
since the PSC has clarified its position by its letter dated 16.12.2009<\/p>\n
referred to above, the appointments are to be invalidated.<\/p>\n
      4. In the judgment in WP(c).No.12159\/2006 and connected<\/p>\n
cases referred to above, this court directed the KSRTC to initiate<\/p>\n
consultation with the PSC in view of the provisions contained in<\/p>\n
Section 3 of the Act referred to above. It is in response to that the<\/p>\n
PSC has issued the letter dated 16.12.2009. Now that the matter is<\/p>\n
pending before the KSRTC,       it is for the KSRTC to consider the<\/p>\n
response of the PSC and take a decision in the matter. Obviously, if<\/p>\n
there is a conflict between the KSRTC and PSC, it is also open to the<\/p>\n
KSRTC to take up the matter with the Government and seek<\/p>\n
appropriate orders.\n<\/p>\n
      5. Therefore, at this stage what is required to be done is that<\/p>\n
the KSRTC should finally decide on this matter duly taking into<\/p>\n
account the views expressed by the PSC in its letter dated<\/p>\n
WPC.Nos. 30846\/09& conn.\n<\/p>\n
                                 :4 :<\/span><\/p>\n
16.12.2009. This the KSRTC shall do as expeditiously as possible<\/p>\n
and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a<\/p>\n
copy of the judgment. Depending upon the final decision so taken,<\/p>\n
and if the decision is in favour of the appointees, their claim for<\/p>\n
promotion will also be considered by the KSRTC.<\/p>\n
     Writ petitions are disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                       (ANTONY DOMINIC)
\n                                             JUDGE
\nvi\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 37296 of 2008(M) 1. JAMES.N.CHACKO, NALLEPARAMBIL, … Petitioner Vs 1. BRANCH MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK LTD., OYOOR … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.BABU (VETTAKALAYIL) For Respondent :SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) The Hon’ble MR. Justice K.JOHN MATHEW (RETD.JUDGE) SHRI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJames.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":684,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\",\"name\":\"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010"},"wordCount":684,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010","name":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-14T20:12:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/james-n-chacko-vs-branch-manager-on-3-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"James.N.Chacko vs Branch Manager on 3 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}