{"id":48659,"date":"2007-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007"},"modified":"2015-11-18T11:04:10","modified_gmt":"2015-11-18T05:34:10","slug":"jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","title":{"rendered":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 9881 of 2007(B)\n\n\n1. JAYAKUMAR, ATTENDER, MURUNTHAL\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES\n\n3. MURUNTHAL SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD.NO.\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.R.SREEHARI\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :29\/03\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                          S. SIRI JAGAN,  J.\n\n           =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n\n                   W.P(C) No.  9881 of  2007\n\n           =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n\n               Dated this, the  29th   March, 2007.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      The   petitioner   and   additional   4th  respondent   are<\/p>\n
employees   of   the   3rd  respondent-   Bank.     Both   of   them<\/p>\n
applied   to   the   Bank   for   sending   them   to   undergo   the<\/p>\n
course of  Junior Diploma in Co-operation (in short ‘J.D.C.’)<\/p>\n
which is of ten months’ duration without benefit of salary<\/p>\n
for   the   period   of   course.     By   Ext.P2   resolution,   the   bank<\/p>\n
decided to send the petitioner for the course.  Although, in<\/p>\n
Ext.P2   resolution,   the   application   by   the   4th  respondent<\/p>\n
was  also  mentioned,   the  bank  did  not   take   any  decision<\/p>\n
either  way  in  respect  of  his   application.    Accordingly,  the<\/p>\n
bank   counter   signed   Ext.P3   application   filed   by   the<\/p>\n
petitioner.     The   same   was   forwarded   to   the   first   and<\/p>\n
second   respondents   for   certificates   to   be   signed   in   the<\/p>\n
form   itself   as   certificate   Nos.II   and   III.     However,   the<\/p>\n
respondents   1   and   2   refused   to   issue   certificates   as<\/p>\n
requested   by   the   petitioner.     It   is,   under   the   above<\/p>\n
circumstances,   the   petitioner   has   approached   this   Court<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No.9881 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
seeking the following reliefs:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                        ” i)   issue   a   writ   of   mandamus<\/p>\n
            or   other   appropriate   writ,   order   or<\/p>\n
            direction,   directing   the   respondents   1<\/p>\n
            and   2   to   issue   certificates   2   and   3   in<\/p>\n
            Ext.P3   application   form   forthwith   if   the<\/p>\n
            particular   furnished   by   the   petitioner   is<\/p>\n
            correct.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                          ii)     grant  such  other   relief  as<\/p>\n
            this   Hon’ble   Court   may   deem   fit   and<\/p>\n
            proper in the circumstances of the case.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      2.  The learned Government Pleader, on the strength<\/p>\n
of the counter affidavit stated to have  been filed by him,<\/p>\n
which does not find a place in the case records, but a copy<\/p>\n
of which has been made available across the bar, submits<\/p>\n
that   the   petitioner   is   not   a   regular   employee   of   the   3rd<\/p>\n
respondent-bank   and   therefore   he   is   not   entitled   to   be<\/p>\n
sent   for   JDC   course.     The   reason   is   that   the   bank<\/p>\n
appointed   the   petitioner   as   an   Attender   by   category<\/p>\n
change from that of Salesman, to which he was appointed<\/p>\n
and that appointment alone was approved.   The category<\/p>\n
change granted  by  the  3rd  respondent-  Bank was  refused<\/p>\n
to   be   approved   by   the   Joint   Registrar.     In   the   above<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No.9881 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n
circumstances,   the   petitioner   has   filed   W.P.(C)   No.27916<\/p>\n
of 2006 in which there is an order of stay.  The reasoning<\/p>\n
of the Govt. Pleader is that now petitioner is appointed as<\/p>\n
an Attender for which there is no approval.  Therefore, the<\/p>\n
petitioner cannot  be considered  as a regular employee of<\/p>\n
the   bank   is   the   submission   made   by   the   Government<\/p>\n
Pleader.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      3.        The   additional   4th  respondent   has   also   filed   a<\/p>\n
counter   affidavit   and   strongly   opposes   the   claim   of   the<\/p>\n
petitioner.  He submits that it was pursuant to a complaint<\/p>\n
filed   by   him   that     respondents   1   and   2   have   refused   to<\/p>\n
issue the required certificates to the petitioner.   He would<\/p>\n
submit    that   he had also   applied  for  sending  him   for   the<\/p>\n
course   which   is   evident   from     Ext.P2   resolution   and   as<\/p>\n
such  there   was  no   reason  for   refusing  permission   to   him<\/p>\n
for   going   for   the   course.     He,   therefore,   submits   that<\/p>\n
without sending him also for the course the petitioner shall<\/p>\n
not be allowed to attend the course.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      4.       I have heard the learned counsel on both sides<\/p>\n
in detail.\n<\/p>\n
\nW.P.(C) No.9881 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
      5.   Along  with  the reply  affidavit,  the petitioner has<\/p>\n
produced   Ext.P5   order   by   which   the   petitioner   was<\/p>\n
appointed as Salesman in the society.   That appointment<\/p>\n
was approved by the  Joint  Registrar, by Ext.P6  order,  by<\/p>\n
which   order   itself   the   appointment   of   the   additional   4th<\/p>\n
respondent     has   also   been   approved.     By   Ext.P7   order,<\/p>\n
the third respondent declared probation of   the petitioner<\/p>\n
as   well   as   the   additional   4th  respondent   in   the   posts   of<\/p>\n
Salesman and   Peon, respectively.  Ext.P8 is the seniority<\/p>\n
list   of   employees   of   the   3rd  respondent   society   in   which<\/p>\n
the   petitioner   appears   at   serial   number   9   and   the   4th<\/p>\n
respondent   at serial number 10. Exts. P5 and P8 are not<\/p>\n
disputed   by   anybody   before   me.   In   fact   in   Ext.P8,   the<\/p>\n
additional   4th  respondent   has   also   signed   accepting   the<\/p>\n
seniority   position   in   the   list.     Now   with   regard   to   the<\/p>\n
dispute   as   to   whether   the   petitioner   is   entitled   to<\/p>\n
category   change   or   not     as   an   Attender   is   pending<\/p>\n
consideration   before   this   Court   in   another   Writ   Petition.<\/p>\n
Even   assuming   that     the   category   change   cannot   be<\/p>\n
approved,   the   only   consequence   would   be   that   the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No.9881 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                      5<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioner   would   have   to   go   back     to   the     post   of<\/p>\n
salesman.   Of course, the additional 4th respondent would<\/p>\n
contend   that   the   post   of   salesman   is   no   longer  available<\/p>\n
in the  bank  on account   of  change of  category of   bank  in<\/p>\n
support   of   which   there   is   no   material   before   me.     I   am<\/p>\n
also not inclined to consider the same in this Writ Petition<\/p>\n
since nobody has a case that Ext.P6 has been cancelled or<\/p>\n
that the petitioner’s appointment to the post as Salesman<\/p>\n
has been cancelled.   Therefore it cannot be disputed that<\/p>\n
either   as   Salesman   or   as   Attender,   the   petitioner   is   a<\/p>\n
regular employee of the 3rd  respondent-bank.   As such he<\/p>\n
cannot be denied an opportunity to attend the JDC course<\/p>\n
on   the   ground   now   mentioned   in   the   counter   affidavit   of<\/p>\n
respondents 1 and 2.   Whatever that be, for the purpose<\/p>\n
of sending of JDC   course it is totally  irrelevant   whether<\/p>\n
the  petitioner is a salesman or attender.<\/p>\n
       6.     The   additional   4th  respondent   would   contend<\/p>\n
that   when   both   himself   and   petitioner   had     applied,     it<\/p>\n
was   not   just     to   allow   the   petitioner   alone   to   attend   the<\/p>\n
course.     I   am   of   the   opinion   that   this   is   a   matter   which<\/p>\n
W.P.(C) No.9881 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                     6<\/span><\/p>\n
the   additional   4th  respondent   would     have   taken   up   with<\/p>\n
the   bank   and   the   Joint   Registrar   in   appropriate<\/p>\n
proceedings.     For   that   reason,   I   do   not   think   that   the<\/p>\n
respondents   1   and   2   can   refuse   to   give   certificates   for<\/p>\n
which   the   petitioner   has   applied   for   and   the   3rd<\/p>\n
respondent bank has recommended.   Accordingly, I direct<\/p>\n
respondents   1   and   2   to   issue   necessary   certificates<\/p>\n
namely,   Certificate   Nos.2   and   3   in   Ext.P3.     This   shall   be<\/p>\n
done immediately on production of a certified copy of this<\/p>\n
judgment     so   that   the   petitioner   can   apply   for   the   post<\/p>\n
tomorrow itself, which is stated to be the last date for such<\/p>\n
application.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      The Writ Petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
      Issue certified  copy of this Judgment today itself.<\/p>\n
                                                       Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                              S. Siri Jagan,  Judge<\/p>\n
jp<\/p>\n
                    \/\/\/TRUE COPY\/\/\/<\/p>\n
                                  P.A. TO JUDGE.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 9881 of 2007(B) 1. JAYAKUMAR, ATTENDER, MURUNTHAL … Petitioner Vs 1. ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES … Respondent 2. THE ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES 3. MURUNTHAL SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD.NO. For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN For Respondent :SRI.R.SREEHARI The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1052,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\",\"name\":\"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007","datePublished":"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007"},"wordCount":1052,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007","name":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of ... on 29 March, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-18T05:34:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayakumar-vs-asst-registrar-of-on-29-march-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jayakumar vs Asst.Registrar Of … on 29 March, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}