{"id":48752,"date":"2009-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-05T18:59:17","modified_gmt":"2016-04-05T13:29:17","slug":"saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<pre> A1\u00a2V'i'Mai'n; Bviapujinagar,\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 24\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.3usT1cE..3AwA{:r\"i\u00e9;AHi:_:si'\"=   \n\nCRL.R.P. No.14\u00e9r8\/zioos\nBETWEEN: 2 0 0'\n\nSaifuila Sharief, \u00a5VIajor,_. \n\nNO.i778, VI Main, IX 'C\ufb013.SS, \n\nRPC Layout, Bangaiore'--\"4t0.~. '-- __  ,\n\nWorking at Indian Instit_ute._of.'_ \n\nBusiness Manag:ement'as\"'V.:V \" :_ . \n\nAnaiyist Prog2_rarnjm'er,  =i   A ' \nBannerghatta\"Rda.d';; \" I y_ ..   .\n\nBangalore; _   r  y'   ...Petitioner\n\n(By   Advwo\ufb02ctate)\n\nS.Anavndkurnar, ' Mtajodr-.\nNo;~'.Z?..\/3_,'11\"' Cro~ss_,\n\n' ,BanVgat_o're'f ...Respondent\n\n*{.By~'sr.i 'i3I.'s:.i}i:a'dimani, Advocate)\n\n..'Ti:iis Cr|.R.P. is filed under Section 397 r\/w. 401\n\n2 nCr';4E?.C. praying to set--aside the judgment and order of\n\n 'r.V'Conx\/cition in C.C.No.34106\/2000 dated 10.12.2002 on the\n 'file of the XVI Addi.C.M.M., Bangalore and in\n_.rCri.A.No.10\/2003 dated 22.7.2005 on the file of the P.O.\n\nFTC--VII, Bangalore City.\n\nThis petition coming on for hearing this day, the\nCourt made the foilowing;\n\n'T'! \n .\/'\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>This petition is by the convicted accused <\/p>\n<p>impugned judgment dated 22.7.2005 in <\/p>\n<p>on the file of iudge, Fast TrackerC,oLi__rt'{_&#8217;Sa&#8217;ngg.a&#8217;Ioregii*<\/p>\n<p>confirming the judgment in__C.C}&#8217;i*io&#8217;.&#8217;3410\u00a7\u00a7\/2.000&#8242; <\/p>\n<p>10.12.2002 convicting the petiVfi\u00bbo:ner_forioffence punishable<br \/>\nunder Section 138  Instruments Act<br \/>\n(hereinafter for short theg_&#8217;V:i3\\ct&#8217;9):&#8217;;__VV<br \/>\n2 . H e.a&#8221;rd&#8217;<br \/>\n   the respondent initiated<br \/>\nprosecu&#8217;t&#8217;io_n&#8217; of the Apfet\u00bbiti&#8217;o:ri&#8217;er&#8221;&#8216;for offence under Section 138<\/p>\n<p>of the rggxctuonathe&#8217; gr-ouznd that in relation to debt\/legal<\/p>\n<p>. 9&#8242;&#8221;*Iiabii!ity&#8221;-&#8220;i&#8217;n asum of&#8221;&#8216;ii&#8217;s.14,10,000\/&#8211;, he issued cheques for<\/p>\n<p>9%&#8217;h.sgsi9,oo,ooo\/- and 3,5o,ooo\/~ which were<\/p>\n<p>diAsh._0novured~~;A9 Then the parties entered into Memorandum<\/p>\n<p>ofVggMu.tu.a:| Understanding (hereinafter for short referred to<\/p>\n<p>  dated 15.7.1999. In terms of M00, the accused<\/p>\n<p> &#8230;.i.ssued cheques covering Rs.14,10,000\/&#8211; out of which one<\/p>\n<p>cheque dated 15.1.1999 and the other cheque dated<\/p>\n<p>1.8.1999 were presented to the Bank, but were<\/p>\n<p>.-3\/\\:&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured for want of funds. On dishonour of the<\/p>\n<p>cheques, statutory notice issued was aiso not <\/p>\n<p>The accused denied liability and was put <\/p>\n<p>trial, the complainant examined hirnself and&#8217;p&#8221;rod\u00bbuced_A.thrreV 99&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>impugned cheque, bank endorse1meint,*~&#8217;Viega|_&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>acknowiedgrnent. He also produced copy ofythe dated <\/p>\n<p>15.7.1999. Placing reliance on.&#8212;-th,ev&#8211;MO_l}, &#8216;elaiirnsi that the<br \/>\naccused had issued   for Rs.50,000\/&#8211;,<br \/>\nwhich was one_:of__   to discharge<br \/>\nthe Iiability.&#8221;9l&#8221;&#8216;h_\u00a73&#8242;::~a.c;cused,_i_s&#8211;e_rio&#8217;us.lyguestioned prosecution<br \/>\non the.&#8211;ground&#8217; ;th,a.t  has initiated other<br \/>\nprosecution.  \u00a7&#8217;trial Judge negated all the<\/p>\n<p>defence   Aggrieved by it, he was in<\/p>\n<p> criV_rn&#8217;i,nallA&#8217;aopeal&#8217;,&#8221;~w,h_l_ch was also rejected. Against both the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; j,u&#8217;dgm-e_n&#8217;ts&#8217;,\u00ab.he is En revision.<\/p>\n<p> T_hi&#8217;.sllrevision came up for final hearing along with<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R&#8230;Pv&#8230;!&#8217;lo.1497\/2005 in which the cheques for<\/p>\n<p>x\u00e9&#8217;~..VRs..9l,0O,0OO\/~ and Rs.3,S0,000\/~ was an issue for<\/p>\n<p> V. &#8230;consideration. By a detailed order, the said revision has<\/p>\n<p>been allowed, wherein it ls held that En terms of the MOU<\/p>\n<p>No.15.7.1999, the liability cast on the accused under the<\/p>\n<p> ._ &#8220;&#8216;3 \/r<br \/>\n,&lt;\\_&#039;;_1,&quot;~,,.\u20ac,;,.\n<\/p>\n<p>cheque was postponed in terms of the agreement and<\/p>\n<p>hence there was no cause of action and he-&#8216;nce&lt;\u00ab.._t!je<\/p>\n<p>prosecution of the petitioner for an offence un;der_f<\/p>\n<p>138 of the Act has been set-aside._,  <\/p>\n<p>5. In the instant case, the\u00e9&#8217;&#8211;proceedgi,n&#8221;gs.V&#8221;r\u00e9late&#8221;to&#8217;z<\/p>\n<p>cheque of Rs.50,000\/&#8211;, al|eged&#8217;c&#8217;t:ol&#8217;havebeen -hissuedw\ufb02by the V<\/p>\n<p>accused in terms   1999. This<br \/>\ncheque, in the said  to .pe&#8217;ef.I&#8217;V_su&#8217;bstitution to the<br \/>\nearlier cheque4is:su&#8217;ed.Ii-.Th%e presented the<br \/>\nsaid  The contention of<br \/>\naccused enforceable after 2 years<br \/>\ncannotxfbe&#8217;acc&#8217;e\u00bbpt&#8217;e.dA~.lb&#8217;e@&#8217;u&#8217;s&#8217;e the cheque bears the date<\/p>\n<p>1.8.3999. Traerefo&#8217;re flthevscheque would be enforceable as<\/p>\n<p> on&#8217;i&#8221;th\u00e9-.&#8221;&#8216;\u00a2\u00a7at&#8217;e__it bears.&#8217; The terms of the MOU aiso indicate<\/p>\n<p> th.atV&amp;icheq%.ueVs.c~in&#8221;question had been issued to be presented<\/p>\n<p>on&#8217;-theV__date=mentioned, within a period of 1 year.<\/p>\n<p>if   The other contention is that the cheque has been<\/p>\n<p>tampered. The date has been tampered and the amount<\/p>\n<p>i also. I am unable to accept this ground for the reason that<\/p>\n<p>for every alteration, there is signature of the accused. The<\/p>\n<p>L\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>U<\/p>\n<p>to impose fine equai, double the amount covered tinder<br \/>\nthe cheque. I decline to interfere with the <\/p>\n<p>sentence. Therefore the petition faiis.<\/p>\n<p>8. Accordingly, the petition    <\/p>\n<p>However the orderVipa&#8221;3.sed thy the, Eiourt\ufb02&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>imposing another surn_.of Rs:S.,.o0L0\/&#8217;:.._\u00bbto he&#8221;&#8216;credit;ed to the<br \/>\nState is set&#8211;aside.  it 2<\/p>\n<p>On recove:r*,r__of  shail be paid<br \/>\nto the  permissibie under<br \/>\n it  i<\/p>\n<p>So}-\n<\/p>\n<p>HEDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim A1\u00a2V&#8217;i&#8217;Mai&#8217;n; Bviapujinagar, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF NOVEMBER BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.3usT1cE..3AwA{:r&#8221;i\u00e9;AHi:_:si'&#8221;= CRL.R.P. No.14\u00e9r8\/zioos BETWEEN: 2 0 0&#8217; Saifuila Sharief, \u00a5VIajor,_. NO.i778, VI Main, IX &#8216;C\ufb013.SS, RPC Layout, Bangaiore&#8217;&#8211;&#8220;4t0.~. &#8216;&#8211; __ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48752","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":641,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009"},"wordCount":641,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009","name":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-05T13:29:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/saifulla-sharief-vs-s-anandkumar-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Saifulla Sharief vs S Anandkumar on 24 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48752","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48752"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48752\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48752"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}