{"id":48841,"date":"2010-07-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-08-25T11:32:17","modified_gmt":"2017-08-25T06:02:17","slug":"mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010<\/div>\n
                             Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                                 CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000151\n                                                                                                    Dated\u00a0July\u00a022,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                    :    Shri\u00a0\u00a0Florence\u00a0Edward\u00a0Fernandes\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                             :    Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n
1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a08.9.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
        seeking\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0Provident\u00a0Fund.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0GPF\u00a0statement\u00a0<\/p>\n
        for\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02007\u00ad2008\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Pay\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Officer\u00a0(DGW).\u00a0However,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.4515\/\u00ad\u00a0<\/p>\n
        was\u00a0not\u00a0included.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a06\u00a0points\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        cheque\u00a0dated\u00a024.10.07\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0after\u00a02\u00a0months\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0cheque.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
        receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a011.11.09\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n
        been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0till\u00a0date.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0<\/p>\n
        before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 on \u00a0 15.12.09. \u00a0 The \u00a0 AA \u00a0 replied \u00a0 (not \u00a0 on \u00a0 record) \u00a0 as \u00a0 per \u00a0 the \u00a0 Complainant,\u00a0<\/p>\n
        sometime\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0January,\u00a02010,\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0vide\u00a0<\/p>\n
        letter\u00a0dated\u00a03.1.08.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0July\u00a022,\u00a0<\/p>\n
        2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.      Shri\u00a0Mohar\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO,\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Raj\u00a0Kishore,\u00a0Nodal\u00a0Officer\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
5.      During\u00a0 the\u00a0 hearing\u00a0 the\u00a0 Complainant\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a017.3.10\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Respondent\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0<\/p>\n
        with\u00a0the\u00a0AA’s\u00a0reply\u00a0since\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0furnished\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0information\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0
\n          an\u00a0earlier\u00a0RTI\u00a0application.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Complainant\u00a0contented\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0is\u00a0actually\u00a0<\/p>\n
         based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0earlier\u00a0application\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0furnishing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         same\u00a0information\u00a0again\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0makes\u00a0no\u00a0sense.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         cheque\u00a0for\u00a0Rs.4515\/\u00ad,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0had\u00a0\u00a0been\u00a0issued\u00a0but\u00a0not\u00a0presented\u00a0since\u00a0it\u00a0had\u00a0probably\u00a0been\u00a0lost\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
         transit.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0the\u00a0RBI\u00a0was\u00a0contacted\u00a0for\u00a0obtaining\u00a0a\u00a0non\u00adencashment\u00a0certificate\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0said\u00a0amount\u00a0<\/p>\n
         which\u00a0was\u00a0only\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0on\u00a019.3.2010.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0several\u00a0efforts\u00a0<\/p>\n
         had\u00a0been\u00a0made\u00a0earlier\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0get\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0RBI\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RBI\u00a0finally\u00a0had\u00a0informed\u00a0them\u00a0<\/p>\n
         that\u00a0a\u00a0cheque\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0and\u00a0sent\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0March\u00a02010.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
         received.\u00a0It\u00a0has\u00a0therefore\u00a0been\u00a0decided\u00a0a\u00a0cheque\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0issued\u00a0now\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0basis\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         letter\u00a0dated\u00a019.3.10\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0RBI\u00a0\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0an\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a04515\/\u00ad\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0debited\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0<\/p>\n
         account.\u00a0This\u00a0action\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
         kept\u00a0informed.\u00a0 \u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0this\u00a0amount,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0 \u00a0may\u00a0 \u00a0inform\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Complainant\u00a0within\u00a0one\u00a0month\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0amount\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0interest\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
         paid.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.       The\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0providing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         information\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0mandatory\u00a0period.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0notice\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Commission\u00a0by\u00a015.8.10.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.       The\u00a0complaint\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                            \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Florence\u00a0Edward\u00a0Fernandes
\n         A\u00ad202,\u00a0Sanghamitra\u00a0Aptt
\n         Plot\u00a0No.20,\u00a0Sector\u00ad4,\u00a0Dwarka
\n         New\u00a0Delhi
\n                                               \u00a0\n<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0PIO
\n         Northern\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0office
\n      State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road
\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
3.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n\u00a0    Northern\u00a0Railway
\n     Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0office
\n     State\u00a0Entry\u00a0Road
\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n
5.   Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000151 Dated\u00a0July\u00a022,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0\u00a0Florence\u00a0Edward\u00a0Fernandes Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a08.9.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 seeking\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0Provident\u00a0Fund.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0GPF\u00a0statement\u00a0 for\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02007\u00ad2008\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Pay\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Officer\u00a0(DGW).\u00a0However,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.4515\/\u00ad\u00a0 was\u00a0not\u00a0included.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a06\u00a0points\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0 cheque\u00a0dated\u00a024.10.07\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0after\u00a02\u00a0months\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0cheque.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0 receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a011.11.09\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0 been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0till\u00a0date.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 on \u00a0 15.12.09. \u00a0 The \u00a0 AA \u00a0 replied \u00a0 (not \u00a0 on \u00a0 record) \u00a0 as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":584,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010"},"wordCount":584,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010","name":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-25T06:02:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-floeence-edward-fernandes-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Floeence Edward Fernandes vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}