{"id":49380,"date":"2009-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009"},"modified":"2014-06-22T18:21:23","modified_gmt":"2014-06-22T12:51:23","slug":"state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1267 of 2009()\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION,\n3. THE PRINCIPAL,GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE,\n4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DR.AYYAMKULAM JAMES LOUIS,AYYAMKULAM\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. DR.C.H.ASHALATHA,MALIYEKKAL THEKKAKKARA\n\n3. DR.SONU.R.,\"VYKHARI\",A.P.C.ROAD,\n\n4. DR.MANUMOHAN.K.,KAMALA NIVAS,\n\n5. DR.FELIX NELSON,JEHOVAH JIRESH,\n\n6. DR.ARUN.S.,\"SUJA\",31,265 A,WAYANAD,\n\n7. DR.ROSHNI GANGAN,M10,S2,\"GANGES\",\n\n                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :18\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                      K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\n                                        &\n                          C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n                   ---------------------------------------------\n                          W.A. NO. 1267 OF 2009\n                   ---------------------------------------------\n                   Dated this the 19th day of June, 2009\n\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Balakrishnan Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       The point that arises for decision in this case is whether provisional<\/p>\n
hands appointed in the pre revised scale of pay are entitled to get higher<\/p>\n
scale of pay upon revision of the pay for regular hands, with retrospective<\/p>\n
effect. The brief facts of the case are the following:<\/p>\n
       2.  The respondents herein who were the writ petitioners were<\/p>\n
appointed by Ext.P1 order as Lecturers in various subjects in the<\/p>\n
Kozhikode Medical College by its Principal. The said order provided that<\/p>\n
the candidates are appointed on contract basis as Lecturers in the scale of<\/p>\n
pay of Rs.2,200-4,000\/- plus other allowances admissible in the<\/p>\n
department, for a period of one year from the date of their joining duty and<\/p>\n
that their services will be terminated as and when candidates advised by<\/p>\n
the Kerala Public Service Commission or Employment Exchange join<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
duty. Later, the salary of Lecturers were revised by the Government as<\/p>\n
per Ext.P2 order dated 16.6.2000 with retrospective effect from 1.1.1996.<\/p>\n
On a clarification sought as to whether the writ petitioners and other<\/p>\n
similarly placed persons were entitled to the revised salary payable under<\/p>\n
Ext.P2, the Government clarified that the existing Lecturers who were<\/p>\n
appointed on contract basis may be terminated and reappointed on contract<\/p>\n
basis with effect from 16.6.2000 so that they can draw the revised salary.<\/p>\n
The writ petitioners and others moved the Government by filing Ext.P5<\/p>\n
representation claiming revised pay. The Government, by Ext.P6 order,<\/p>\n
issued further clarification regarding payment of salary to doctors who<\/p>\n
were appointed on contract basis. Feeling aggrieved by the omission of<\/p>\n
the Government to pay salary at the revised rate, the Writ Petition was<\/p>\n
filed seeking appropriate reliefs. The respondents in the Writ Petition who<\/p>\n
are the appellants herein resisted the prayers in the Writ Petition by filing a<\/p>\n
counter affidavit. But, the learned Single Judge, after hearing both sides,<\/p>\n
allowed the Writ Petition. Hence, this appeal by the official respondents.<\/p>\n
       3.  The learned Government Pleader, referring to the terms of<\/p>\n
Ext.P2, especially the one regarding deposit of arrears in the Provident<\/p>\n
Fund account of the incumbents, submitted that it is meant to apply for<\/p>\n
regular hands only.   Once a person is appointed on contract basis, he is<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009                     3<\/span><\/p>\n
entitled to get salary only at the rates provided in the appointment order.<\/p>\n
Relying on the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in State of Kerala<\/p>\n
v. Philomina<\/a> (2008(1) K.L.T. 666(F.B.)), it is submitted that unless there<\/p>\n
are express provisions in the orders regarding grant of financial benefits,<\/p>\n
the courts should not order payment of additional emoluments which will<\/p>\n
cause great financial commitment to the State.<\/p>\n
       4. On a query made by this Court, the learned Government Pleader<\/p>\n
submitted that the respondents were appointed under Rule 9A of Part II of<\/p>\n
the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 (hereinafter<\/p>\n
referred to as “the Rules”).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       5. The opening paragraph of Ext.P1 appointment order reads as<\/p>\n
follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                    “The following candidates are appointed
\n             on contract basis as Lecturers on Rs.2200 – 4000
\n             plus   other   allowances     admissible   in   the
\n             department noted against their names for a period
\n             of one year from the date of their joining duty on
\n             the specific condition that, their services will be
\n             terminated as and when candidates advised by
\n             Kerala Public Service Commission\/Employment
\n             Exchange join duty.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
Going by the above appointment order, we are of the view that the<\/p>\n
appointment has been made under Rule 9(a)(i) of the Rules. It can never<\/p>\n
be treated as an appointment under Rule 9A of the Rules which reads as<\/p>\n
follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                  “9A. Appointment by agreements.– (1)
\n            When in the opinion of the State Government
\n            special provisions inconsistent with any of these
\n            rules or of any other rules made under the proviso
\n            to Article 309 of the Constitution of India or
\n            continued by Article 313 of that Constitution
\n            (hereinafter referred to in this rule as the said
\n            rules) are required in respect of conditions of
\n            service, pay and allowances, pension, discipline
\n            and conduct with reference to any particular post,
\n            or any of them, it shall be open to the State
\n            Government to make an appointment to such post
\n            otherwise than in accordance with these rules or
\n            the said rules and to provide by agreement with
\n            the person so appointed for any of the matters in
\n            respect of which      in the opinion of the State
\n            Government special provisions are required to be
\n            made and to the extent to which such provisions
\n            are made in the agreement, nothing in these rules
\n            or the said rules shall apply to any person so
\n            appointed in respect of any matter for which
\n            provision is made in the agreement.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                  Provided that in every agreement made in
\n            exercise of the power conferred by this rule it
\n            shall further be provided that in respect of any
\n            matter in respect of which no provision has been
\n            made in the agreement the provisions of these
\n            rules or of the said rules shall apply.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                  (2) A person appointed under sub-rule (1)<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009                     5<\/span><\/p>\n
              shall not be regarded as a member of the service
\n              in which the post to which he is appointed       is
\n              included and shall not be entitled by reason only
\n              of such appointment to any preferential claim to
\n              any other     appointment in that or any other
\n              service.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
A reading of the above rule shows that the appointment of the respondents<\/p>\n
can never be under the said rule. Rule 9(a)(i) of the Rules reads as<\/p>\n
follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                   “9.Temporary appointments.–(a) (i) Where
\n              it is necessary in the public interest, owing to an
\n              emergency which has arisen to fill immediately a
\n              vacancy in a post borne on the cadre of a service,
\n              class or category and there would be undue delay
\n              in making such appointment in accordance with
\n              these rules and the Special Rules, the appointing
\n              authority may appoint a person, otherwise than in
\n              accordance with the said rules, temporarily.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
In fact, the present appointment is made otherwise than in accordance with<\/p>\n
Rules, as contemplated under Rule 9(a)(i) of the Rules. Therefore, by<\/p>\n
virtue of Rule 9(a)(v), the incumbents are entitled to get the minimum pay<\/p>\n
in the scale of pay applicable to regular incumbents in that post. Rule 9(a)<\/p>\n
(v) reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                     “There shall be paid to a person appointed
\n              under clause (i) or clause (ii) the minimum pay in<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009                     6<\/span><\/p>\n
             the time-scale of pay applicable to such service,
\n             class or category.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
In this case, the respondents were paid the minimum salary in the scale of<\/p>\n
pay of Rs.2,200 – 4000\/- plus other allowances, as it was the scale of pay<\/p>\n
applicable to regular hands at the relevant time. Since the pay was revised<\/p>\n
with retrospective effect, by operation of the above statutory rule, the<\/p>\n
respondents are entitled to get salary in the revised pay scale at its<\/p>\n
minimum. In view of the above legal position, we find nothing wrong<\/p>\n
with the direction of the learned Single Judge.<\/p>\n
      The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. The appellants are given<\/p>\n
one month’s time from today to implement the direction issued by the<\/p>\n
learned Single Judge.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                     (K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR)
\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                      (C.T. RAVIKUMAR)
\n                                              JUDGE<\/p>\n
sp\/<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009    7<\/span><\/p>\n
                         K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
\n                                    &
\n                         C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n<\/p>\n
                         W.A. NO. 1267\/2009<\/p>\n
                         JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
                         19th June, 2009<\/p>\n
W.A. NO. 1267\/2009    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1267 of 2009() 1. STATE OF KERALA, … Petitioner 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 3. THE PRINCIPAL,GOVT.MEDICAL COLLEGE, 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, Vs 1. DR.AYYAMKULAM JAMES LOUIS,AYYAMKULAM … Respondent 2. DR.C.H.ASHALATHA,MALIYEKKAL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1239,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\",\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009"},"wordCount":1239,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009","name":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-22T12:51:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-dr-ayyamkulam-james-louis-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Kerala vs Dr.Ayyamkulam James Louis on 18 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49380\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}